Introduction to Logic Lecture 5b More Fallacies

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Argumentation.
Advertisements

Critical Thinking: Chapter 7
Unit 1A Recognizing Fallacies. LOGIC Logic is the study of the methods and principles of reasoning.
1 Philosophy and Arguments. 2Outline 1 – Arguments: valid vs sound 2. Conditionals 3. Common Forms of Bad Arguments.
Understanding Logical Fallacies
More Bad Reasoning and Bad Rhetoric Violence to both People and Logic.
More Bad Reasoning and Bad Rhetoric Violence to both People and Logic.
Capstone Seminar Mr. Dana Linton. Logical fallacies are common errors of reasoning. If an argument commits a logical fallacy, then the reasons that it.
 Read the following argument. Examine it closely. Do you think it is logically sound? Why?  [T]he acceptance of abortion does not end with the killing.
Counterarguments Direct Ways of Refuting an Argument 1.Show that at least of the premises is false. 2.Show that an argument is not valid or strong 3.Show.
Arguments Minds and Machines. Arguments When people think of an argument, they usually think of a fight between two people (‘they’re having an argument’).
AP English Language and Composition
Critical Inquiry Part Two.
Recognizing Fallacies.  Logic ◦ The study of the methods and principles of reasoning  Premises ◦ Facts or assumptions  Fallacy ◦ A deceptive argument-
Logical Fallacies1 This line of "reasoning" is fallacious because pity does not serve as evidence for a claim Just to get a scholarship does not justify.
More Bad Reasoning and Bad Rhetoric Violence to both People and Logic.
Chapter 6 Relevance fallacies! What you need to know…
FALLACIES COMMON AND RECURRENT ERRORS IN REASONING
Critical Thinking. Critical thinkers use reasons to back up their claims. What is a claim? ◦ A claim is a statement that is either true or false. It must.
INFORMAL FALLACIES The aim of this tutorial is to help you learn to recognize and resist fallacious arguments.
Logic Fallacies Debate Class Production Spain Park High School
Logical Fallacies Guided Notes
Chapter Two: Good Reasoning Review Applying Ethics: A Text with Readings (10 th ed.) Julie C. Van Camp, Jeffrey Olen, Vincent Barry Cengage Learning/Wadsworth.
Definition Review Diversion and Distortion Tactics
Standard: Delineate and evaluate the argument and specific claims in a text… identify false statements and fallacious reasoning.
Fallacies The quickest ways to lose arguments. Introduction to Logic O Argument: The assertion of a conclusion based on logical premises O Premise: Proposition.
Errors in Reasoning. Fallacies A Fallacy is “any error in reasoning that makes an argument fail to establish its conclusion.” There are two kinds of fallacies.
Argumentum Ad Hominem Attacking the person’s character or personal traits rather than the argument at hand Rejecting a claim based on the person defending.
Critical Thinking Lecture 5b More Fallacies
Reasoning & Problem Solving Lecture 5b More Fallacies By David Kelsey.
Logical Fallacies A logical fallacy is an element of an argument that is flawed If spotted one can essentially render an entire line of reasoning invalid.
LOGICAL FALLACIES. Post Hoc, Ergo Propter Hoc “After this, therefore because of this.”
Ad Hominem (Personal Attack) An attempt to discredit the argument by discrediting the character of the person advancing it.
Logical Fallacies. Slippery Slope The argument that some event must inevitably follow from another without any rational claim. If we allow A to happen.
Logical Fallacies Overview Logical fallacies are instances of “broken reasoning.” Fallacies avoid the actual argument. We want to avoid fallacies, be.
Understanding Fallacy
Logical Fallacies © Copyright 1995 Michael C. Labossiere (author of Fallacy Tutorial Pro 3.0) reprinted with permission as a Nizkor Feature on the Nizkor.
Relevance Premises are relevant to the conclusion when the truth of the premises provide some evidence that the conclusion is true Premises are irrelevant.
Or: how to win the internets
Topic: Logical Fallacies Objective: I will identify various logical fallacies EQ: What are the most common logical fallacies and where do they appear?
How to win friends and influence people by being a jerk.
Propaganda and Logical Fallacies
4 The Art of Critical Reading Reading Critically Mather ▪ McCarthy
Logical Fallacies Unit 2.
Errors in Reasoning.
Chapter 6 Relevance (Red Herring) Fallacies
Critical Thinking Lecture 5b Fallacies in Reasoning (2)
Logical fallacies.
More on Argument.
Logical Fallacies.
C/Maj Nicholas Schroder
Logical Fallacy Notes Comp. & Rhet. ENG 1010.
Fallacies Implicit or explicit arguments that: Ignore logic and reason
Errors in Reasoning.
Logical Fallacies List
Fallacies of Relevance
Informal Logical Fallacies
Dialectic.
Looking for false logic in someone’s argument
Logical Fallacy Study Guide
More on Argument.
Fallacious Reasoning a.k.a. Fallacy.
Fallacies of Reasoning
Fallacies.
Logical Fallacies.
Philosophy 1100 Title: Critical Reasoning Instructor: Paul Dickey
Logical fallacies.
Concise Guide to Critical Thinking
Logical Fallacies English III.
1. Could I receive an A for this class
Presentation transcript:

Introduction to Logic Lecture 5b More Fallacies By David Kelsey

Ad Hominem To commit this fallacy is to think that some consideration about a person refutes the claims that he or she makes. Confusing the person and the claim:

Ad Hominem again A personal attack ad hominem: claiming that because someone has certain negative features it follows that a claim she makes is false. Examples Inconsistency ad hominem: to hold that what someone says is false because it is inconsistent with something else she has said or done. Examples

Circumstantial & Positive ad hominem Circumstantial ad hominem: holding that because a person’s circumstances are a certain way it follows that some claim she makes is false. Priest example Positive ad hominem: holding that the claim a person makes follows from some positive consideration about the person.

Poisoning the Well To poison the well an in advance ad hominem. For example,

Genetic Fallacy When one tries to refute a claim based on its origin or history she has committed the genetic fallacy. Belief in God’s existence Genetic fallacy vs. Circumstantial ad Hominem

Straw Man Straw man fallacy: trying to refute a claim or argument by distorting it or oversimplifying it or misrepresenting it in such a way that it can be easily refuted. Reconfiguring a claim Knocking down a straw man is easy business but knocking down a good argument is not.

False Dilemma False dilemma limits considerations to a choice between only two alternatives although other reasonable alternatives are available. The form of a false dilemma: Using a false dilemma for the purpose of deception Example:

Perfectionist fallacy Rejecting a policy or claim because it isn’t perfect. A kind of false dilemma Example:

Line Drawing Fallacy The Line-Drawing fallacy insisting that a conceptual line must be drawn at a particular point when drawing such a line isn’t necessary. Examples: Rich Bald Excessive force Line drawing and Vagueness

Slippery Slope Slippery Slope: Claiming that if we let some thing X occur it follows that something else Y will occur, yet there is no reason to think that if X occurs so must Y. Causation and slippery slope arguments Example: Hand gun laws

Misplacing the Burden of Proof Misplacing the burden of proof on the wrong side of an issue. The 2 sides of an issue Example: Should we go to war with Iraq?

The burden of proof To say the burden of proof rests on a claim: This just means that if one is to hold this position, then she must support it with argumentation. Temporal Priority Example:

Where does the burden lie? Placing the burden Plausibility: Affirmative:

The burden of proof #3 Special Circumstances: Under special circumstances the burden of proof is placed on a particular side of an issue. The court:

Appeal to ignorance Appeal to ignorance claiming that we should believe that some claim is true because no one has proved it false. A type of burden of proof fallacy Example:

Begging the Question One begs the question when one of the premises of her argument assumes the truth of the conclusion. Examples: Abortion An argument for God’s existence Circular reasoning