A Registry of Efficacy & Effectiveness Studies Supported under grant IES R305U150001 to the Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness Jessaca.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
From the eyes of an Administrator A general overview of e-CFunds Administrative Site, including navigation and exploring the features of this powerful.
Advertisements

Scaling-Up Early Childhood Intervention Literacy Learning Practices Maurice McInerney, Ph.D. American Institutes for Research Presentation prepared for.
Copyright © Healthcare Quality Quest, Proposed standards for a national clinical audit — How we got involved and what we have learned.
Archived Information U.S. Department of Education Student Achievement and School Accountability Conference Breakout Session: Scientifically Based Research.
Irish Health Research Kate Kelly, February 11 th, 2011.
Implementation Research: Using Science to Guide Implementation of Evidence-Based Practices Brian S. Mittman, PhD Director, VA Center for Implementation.
Roger D. Goddard, Ph.D. March 21, Purposes Overview of Major Research Grants Programs Administered by IES; Particular Focus on the Education Research.
Registration in political science reflections and proposals Macartan Humphreys.
Using Statistics Effectively in Statistics Education Research Sterling C. Hilton Brigham Young University.
Key Findings Networks achieve success by: - Increasing buy-in and reducing cost of failure - Deliberately including new points of activation (e.g. students,
International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research updated June 2010
National Science Foundation: Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (TUES)
A service of the U.S. National Institutes of Health Module 1: Clinical Trials and Requirements for Registration and Results Reporting.
NATIONAL CLINICAL TRIAL (NCT) NUMBER Clinical Trials Management Office December 17, 2014.
Bibliometrics: coming ready or not CAUL, September 2005 Cathrine Harboe-Ree.
Global Ministerial Forum on Research for Health Bamako Mali, November 2008 Objectives, themes and processes Susan Jupp Head, External Relations Global.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES National Institutes of Health U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES FITBIR: A Platform for International.
Session I: Unit 2 Types of Reviews September 26, 2007 NCDDR training course for NIDRR grantees: Developing Evidence-Based Products Using the Systematic.
How funders’ perspectives have helped to shape the field: The work of The True Colours Trust in the UK and sub-Saharan Africa Paediatric Palliative Care.
Maria E. Fernandez, Ph.D. Associate Professor Health Promotion and Behavioral Sciences University of Texas, School of Public Health.
November 15, Regional Educational Laboratory - Southwest The Effects of Teacher Professional Development on Student Achievement: Finding from a Systematic.
Identifying and Implementing Evidence-Based Substance Abuse Services Charles G. Curie, M.S.W., A.C.S.W. Administrator, Substance Abuse & Mental Health.
ClinicalTrials.gov Results Reporting, Unique Evidence, and the Role of Medical Librarians SCR CONNECTions March 19, 2014.
Guidelines for Clinical Trial Registration.. Background. In 2005 the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) announced that in order.
Ies.ed.gov Connecting Research, Policy and Practice Kristen Rhoads, Ph.D. National Center for Special Education Research Presentation to Single-Case Intervention.
Dr. Karen E. Downing Education Librarian University of Michigan Dr. Camila Alire Dean Emeritus University of New Mexico Janice Welburn, M.L.S. Dean of.
Developing an evaluation of professional development Webinar #2: Going deeper into planning the design 1.
From the initial page of the Cochrane Library, we have clicked on the Cochrane Reviews: By Topic hyperlink. This has displayed the Topics for Cochrane.
Curriculum Leaders Institute. Next Steps CEU’s Complete and turn in Mentor Log 30 hours/ 3 credits Due March 20, 2012 Signed by both mentor and mentee.
National 4-H Common Measures Suzanne Le Menestrel, Ph.D. National Institute of Food and Agriculture, USDA Jill Walahoski, Ph.D. University of Nebraska-Lincoln.
Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2002 An Introduction to Human Services: Policy and Practice Evaluation §This multimedia product and its contents are protected.
June 25, Regional Educational Laboratory - Southwest Review of Evidence on the Effects of Teacher Professional Development on Student Achievement:
Strategic Framework on Health Systems Research: A multi-dimensional approach Risk behaviorsNon-communicable diseases Harmful organismsInfectious / Communicable.
Quality Management in Early Childhood Intervention
Introducing orcid What, why and how
Agenda Vision Overview of Plain Language Summary
Elke Dawson Manager – Open Research
Current and Upcoming RDA Recommendations Dr. ir. Herman Stehouwer
Are Evidence-Based Practice Websites Trustworthy and Accessible?
Role of The Physical Therapist in Critical Inquiry
Research using Registries
WHY? - Found initiative while case statement preparation
Module 1: Introducing Development Evaluation
MUHC Innovation Model.
Student Experience in the Classroom & Beyond
NSF INCLUDES – DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT LAUNCH PILOTS
Clinical Study Results Publication
Effective evidence-based occupational therapy
Theory of Change template
“Next Generation of Connected Health”
Open Science at the Royal Society Dr Stuart Taylor Publishing Director
Realizing the Promise of Learning Networks: Getting to Real Results
Project Name: Country:
Systematic Approaches to Literature Reviewing
QUALITY DEVELOPMENT IN COLOMBIA AND LATIN AMERICAN
Evidence Based Curriculum & Instruction
Translation into Practice
Role of The Physical Therapist in Critical Inquiry
2018 OSEP Project Directors’ Conference
Sabine Wollscheid, Senior Researcher, Dr. phil.
How to apply successfully to the NIHR HTA Board?
Masoud Solaymani-Dodaran Iran University of Medical Sciences
NEPF a semester away… Focus: All Students 21st Century Ready
SHOULD AMERICAN STUDENTS
Professor Deborah Baker
Theory of Change template
Curriculum Coordinator: Patrick LaPierre February 1, 2016
Multidisciplinary projects as a cross-cultural enterprise
Randomized Controlled Trial’s in a self-improving health system
Journal Editor Perspectives
Presentation transcript:

A Registry of Efficacy & Effectiveness Studies Supported under grant IES R305U150001 to the Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness Jessaca Spybrook, Western Michigan University jessaca.spybrook@wmich.edu Rebecca Maynard, University of Pennsylvania rmaynard@upenn.edu March 2, 2017

Talking Points Why a registry for education studies? The Registry of Efficacy and Effectiveness Studies (REES) What’s next?

1. Why a registry for education studies?

A sampling of existing registries Medicine – National Institutes of Health Clinicaltrials.gov Economics & other Social Sciences – American Economic Association (AEA) RCT Registry Governance, Politics, and Institutions – Evidence in Governance and Politics (EGAP) International Development – The Registry for International Development Impact Evaluations (RIDIE)

Commonalties & differences Common goals Information sharing Transparency Accountability Disciplinary distinctions Norms Languages Standards Existing infrastructures Vision and goals for a registry Registration requirements

A Registry specific to education studies Build on lessons from other disciplines Create a reliable source for identifying all causal inference studies in education Build on & articulate with existing infrastructures in education (i.e., WWC, common evidence guidelines & grant guidelines) Language familiar to education researchers Norms and standards used for efficacy & effectiveness studies

2. A Registry of Efficacy & Effectiveness Studies (REES)

Registry of Efficacy & Effectiveness Studies (REES) Repository of information on causal inference studies Efficacy & effectiveness studies RCTs & QEDs Planning phase, in-process & completed studies Chronicle changes & add products Project leadership Study plans Sample & data Reports Low burden for evaluators Easy to navigate Quick to complete Structured response codes (when possible)

What is in REES? 8 Sections – Basic information & analysis plan General Study Information Description of Study Research Questions Study Design Sample Characteristics Outcomes Analysis Plans Additional Materials (e.g., instruments, reports, data & code)

REES Output Uses Content Unique registration ID PDF of registration & changes Searchable & exportable database By intervention type, grades, design type, etc. Uses Quick identification of completed & in-process studies Facilitate replication, research synthesis

3. What’s Next?

Status of REES Completing development Pilot registrations New studies In-process studies Completed studies (imported from existing review platforms) Refine REES based on pilot Launch REES late 2017

Promoting REES Permanent ID/Badge Collaborate with: Funders Professional Associations Journals Clearinghouses

To volunteer to pilot REES: REES Website www.sree.org/pages/registry.php To volunteer to pilot REES: contact@sreereg.org Additional Questions: Jessaca.spybrook@wmich.edu

Clinical Trials.gov

AEA RCT Registry

EGAP

RIDIE