Introduction James W. & Frances G. McGlothlin Medical Education Center

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ASHA National Office Building 2011 AE Senior Thesis Ryan Dalrymple 5 th year Structural Option BAE/MAE Advisor: Dr. Thomas Boothby Photo Courtesy of Boggs.
Advertisements

Carl Hubben – Structural Option Ae senior thesis Office Building-G EASTERN UNITED STATES.
Jeremiah Ergas AE 482 – 5 th Year Senior Thesis Structural Option April 15 th, 2008 Faculty Consultant: Dr. Ali Memari Northside Piers – Brooklyn, NY Structural.
A Medical Office Building For The Primary Health Network Daniel Goff I Structural Option Dr. Thomas Boothby l Faculty Advisor Sharon, Pennsylvania Source:
Milton S. Hershey Medical Center Biomedical Research Building Joshua Zolko, Structural Option.
Penn State Hershey Medical Center Children’s Hospital Hershey, Pennsylvania Matthew Vandersall Structural Option AE Senior Thesis Dr. Richard Behr.
The University Sciences Building Northeast, USA Final Presentation Chris Dunlay Structural Option Dr. Boothby.
Crocker West Building State College, Pa Eric M. FosterStructural OptionSpring 2009.
Daniel Bellay Lancaster County Bible Church Structural Option Lancaster County Bible Church.
Hershey Academic Support Center Structural Option Shawn Jones Building Analysis of the Hershey Academic Support Center Hershey, PA Shawn Jones Structural.
Courtesy of Holbert Apple Associates Georgia Avenue Building Introduction Statistics Gravity System Lateral System Problem Statement & Solution.
Samuel M. P. Jannotti Structural April 14, 2008 American Eagle Outfitters Quantum III: South Side Works.
LOCKWOOD PLACE BALTIMORE, MARYLAND Monica Steckroth- Structural Option.
360 State Street New Haven  CT  Structural | Sabrina Duk | T. Boothby.
Kirk Stauffer BAE / MAE - Structural Option Senior Thesis Project Life Sciences Building The Pennsylvania State University University Park Campus.
AE SENIOR THESIS APRIL 14 th, 2014 CHRIS DUARTE – STRUCTURAL Dr. THOMAS BOOTHBY ORCHARD PLAZA.
Michael Wiegmann BAE Structural Option Senior Thesis April 15,2008.
Rockville Metro Plaza II Rockville Pike John Vais | Structural Option PSU AE Senior Thesis 2014 Faculty Advisor – Dr. Hanagan Rockville, Maryland
Kenneth G. Langone Athletic and Recreation Center Kyle Oberdorf Structural Option Thesis April 2007.
Senior Thesis Structural Option Ryan Friis Spring Morgan St. Chicago, IL 111 Morgan St. Chicago, IL Ryan Friis Structural Option.
Introduction Connected to existing Benton Hall via skywalk Size: 103,154 SF above grade on 4 levels 82,661 SF below grade parking on 3 levels Cost: $23,651,159.
Nick Szakelyhidi Structural Option Office Building Washington, DC Nick Szakelyhidi Structural Option.
First Baptist Church of Doylestown Senior Thesis Structural Emphasis James Chester Preliminary Phase II Design.
TYPICAL member spot checks & alternate systems design study
AMERICAN EAGLE OUTFITTERS Quantum II Corporate Headquarters Michael Sandretto Spring – 2007 Structural Option.
Southeast View of IRMC West View of IRMC. Presentation Outline Introduction Existing Structure Thesis Goals Structural Depth Lighting Breadth Conclusion.
BRYAN DARRIN SENIOR THESIS PRESENTATION MILLENNIUM HALL DREXEL CAMPUS PHILADELPHIA, PA.
Structural System Redesign Existing Conditions Proposal Gravity Design Lateral Design Cost Comparison Schedule Impact Conclusions.
Duquesne University Forbes Expansion
SEAN BEVILLE STRUCTURAL OPTION ADVISOR: PROF. BOOTHBY APRIL 13, 2009 TEMECULA MEDICAL CENTER “STRUCTURAL SYSTEM OPTIMIZATION” THE DEPARTMENT OF ARCHITECTURAL.
1.  S.T.E.P.S.: Science, Technology, Environment, and Policy Building  Education, laboratory, and research  Owner: Lehigh University  Location: Bethlehem,
Helios Plaza Houston, TX Advisor - Dr. Hanagan Kevin Zinsmeister Structural Option.
The Towers at the City College of New York Robin Scaramastro - Structural Option - Advisor: Dr. Memari Senior Thesis Final Presentation – Spring 2007.
URS – ARENA DISTRICT OFFICE BUILDING DAVID LEE STRUCTURAL OPTION.
Dan Donecker BAE/MAE – Structural Option Senior Thesis Project 35 West 21 st Street New York, New York.
Howard County General Hospital Patient Tower Addition Columbia, MD Kelly M. Dooley Penn State Architectural Engineering Structural Option.
Ryan Pletz Structural Dr. Hanagan The Pennsylvania State University Department of Architectural Engineering Senior Thesis April 14, 2008.
Welcome to Daniel Painter’s Architectural Engineering Senior Thesis Presentation of Two Freedom Square April 16, 2003 Pennsylvania State University.
Senior Thesis 2006 The Pennsylvania State University
Rensselaer, NY Meral Kanik Structural Option Advisor: A.M. Memari April 14, 2008.
Jonathan Goodroad Structural Option 2005 Thesis Penn State AE Delaware State University Administration and Student Services Building.
T IMOTHY H P ARK – S TRUCTURAL O PTION. Building Summary Current Systems Proposal Description Gravity Lateral Other Structural Factors Breadth Options.
Brad Oliver – Structural Option Advisor – Professor Memari.
Oklahoma University Children’s Medical Office Building Oklahoma City, Oklahoma AE Senior Thesis Final Report April 14, 2014 Jonathan Ebersole Structural.
Jon Hill – Structural OptionSpring 2005 Senior Thesis Structural Analysis and Redesign of Lynde and Harry Bradley School of Technology & Trade Milwaukee,
Justin Purcell Structural Option Advisor: Dr. Hanagan.
151 First Side William J. Buchko introduction overview proposal structural depth acoustics breadth cm breadth conclusions 151 First Side Pittsburgh, PA.
Park Potomac Office Building “E” Kyle Wagner l Structural Option AE Senior Thesis l Spring 2010 Faculty Consultant l Prof. Kevin Parfitt.
Eastern USA University Academic Center Alexander AltemoseIStructural Option.
SteelStacks Performing Arts Center Sarah Bednarcik | Structural BAE/MAE Faculty Advisors: Dr. Linda Hanagan & Dr. Ali Memari Spring Thesis 2013Bethlehem,
James C. Renick School of Education PSU AE Senior Thesis 2006 Mick Leso - Structural North Carolina A&T State University - Greensboro.
Michael A. Troxell Structural Option Senior Thesis 2006 The College of Business Administration Northern Arizona University Flagstaff, Arizona.
Biobehavioral Health Building The Pennsylvania State University Daniel Bodde Structural Option Advisor – Heather Sustersic.
THE NORTHBROOK CORPORATE CENTER Redesign of the Lateral Load Resisting System.
William W. Wilkins Professional Building Columbus, Ohio Michelle Benoit Senior Thesis Presentation Spring 2007 Structural Option.
Albany Medical Center Patient Pavilion Albany, Ny Thomas J. Kleinosky – Structural Senior Thesis 2012 | Advisor: Dr. Hanagan.
Coppin State University Physical Education Complex Baltimore, MD Todd Drager Faculty Consultant: Lepage Coppin State University Physical Education Complex.
Hunter Woron Spring 2012 Structural Professor Parfitt.
CBD Chemical Production Building Virginia, USA Christina DiPaolo │ Structural Option.
R. Bryan Peiffer– Structural Option AE Senior Thesis 2011 Three PNC Plaza, Pittsburgh Pa.
Mountain State Blue Cross Blue Shield Headquarters
Pearl Condominiums Philadelphia, PA
Advisor: Professor M. Kevin Parfitt
Acterna Headquarters John M Sekel, EIT Germantown, Maryland
Ryan Johnson - Structural Option
Structural Technical Report #4: Lateral System Analysis Study
TOWERS CRESCENT BUILDING B Mike Synnott Structural.
Rutgers University Law School Building Addition and Renovation Nathan E. Reynolds Advisor: M. Kevin Parfitt Structural Option The Pennsylvania State.
North Shore at Canton The Pennsylvania State University
Mitre III Building McLean VA Debra Schroeder Structural Option.
Presentation transcript:

Introduction James W. & Frances G. McGlothlin Medical Education Center Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine (VCU SOM) Richmond, VA Marissa Delozier {Structural Option} Faculty Consultant: Hanagan

VCU SOM Building Statistics 220, 000 GSF 13 stories above ground Project Overview Proposal Gravity System Redesign Vibration Control Lateral System Moment Frame Layout RAM Model Cost & Schedule Analysis Architectural Impacts Conclusions 220, 000 GSF 13 stories above ground Multipurpose (Admin, Classrooms, Labs) $159 million October 2009 to March 2013 Designed for LEED Silver Certification

VCU SOM Primary Project Team Project Overview Proposal Gravity System Redesign Vibration Control Lateral System Moment Frame Layout RAM Model Cost & Schedule Analysis Architectural Impacts Conclusions Owner – Virginia Commonwealth University CM – Gilbane Building Company Architect + Engineers – Ballinger Exterior Architect – Pei Cobb Freed & Partners Civil Engineer – Draper Aden Associates Geotechnical Engineers – Geotech, Inc.

Existing Gravity System VCU SOM Existing Gravity System Project Overview Proposal Gravity System Redesign Vibration Control Lateral System Moment Frame Layout RAM Model Cost & Schedule Analysis Architectural Impacts Conclusions Drilled piers + caisson-grade beam system N

Existing Gravity System VCU SOM Existing Gravity System Project Overview Proposal Gravity System Redesign Vibration Control Lateral System Moment Frame Layout RAM Model Cost & Schedule Analysis Architectural Impacts Conclusions Drilled piers + caisson-grade beam system Composite Steel Flooring 3” 20 gauge decking 3 ½” LW concrete topping Wide Flange Steel Beams + Girders Typical Bay Sizes 30’ x 20’ 30’ x 40’ N

Existing Lateral System VCU SOM Existing Lateral System Project Overview Proposal Gravity System Redesign Vibration Control Lateral System Moment Frame Layout RAM Model Cost & Schedule Analysis Architectural Impacts Conclusions Concentrically braced frames + moment connections 7 total, majority in one direction Both wide flange + HSS N

VCU SOM Opportunities Increase efficiency of structural system Project Overview Proposal Gravity System Redesign Vibration Control Lateral System Moment Frame Layout RAM Model Cost & Schedule Analysis Architectural Impacts Conclusions Increase efficiency of structural system Save both time + money In line with VCU SOM reinvented curriculum, create open environments

Opportunities Proposal VCU SOM Opportunities Proposal Project Overview Proposal Gravity System Redesign Vibration Control Lateral System Moment Frame Layout RAM Model Cost & Schedule Analysis Architectural Impacts Conclusions Increase efficiency of structural system Save both time + money In line with VCU SOM reinvented curriculum, create open environments Design alternate structural system Non-composite deck + K-series joists + girders Heavier emphasis on use of moment frames Evaluate cost + schedule of redesign Structural Costs vs. Total Project Costs Investigate impacts on Architecture Can a more open concept be achieved? Can improvements be made?

VCU SOM Gravity System Possible Bay Configurations Project Overview Proposal Gravity System Redesign Vibration Control Lateral System Moment Frame Layout RAM Model Cost & Schedule Analysis Architectural Impacts Conclusions Possible Bay Configurations 30’ x 20’ – Joists traveling in 30’ direction 30’ x 40’ – Joists traveling in 30’ direction 30’ x 20’ – Joists traveling in 20’ direction 30’ x 40’ – Joists traveling in 40’ direction 40’ 30’

Gravity System Hand Calculations VCU SOM Gravity System Hand Calculations Project Overview Proposal Gravity System Redesign Vibration Control Lateral System Moment Frame Layout RAM Model Cost & Schedule Analysis Architectural Impacts Conclusions Possible Bay Configurations 30’ x 20’ – Joists traveling in 30’ direction 30’ x 40’ – Joists traveling in 30’ direction 30’ x 20’ – Joists traveling in 20’ direction 30’ x 40’ – Joists traveling in 40’ direction Layout Decking Joists Girders I 1.0C24 22K10 W18x35 II 1.0C24 22K10 W24x146 III 0.6C24 14K4 W24x68 IV 0.6C24 26K12 W24x76

Walking Evaluation < 0.5 % g Floor Stiffness < 9 Hz VCU SOM Gravity System Project Overview Proposal Gravity System Redesign Vibration Control Lateral System Moment Frame Layout RAM Model Cost & Schedule Analysis Architectural Impacts Conclusions Layout Bay Size Walking Evaluation < 0.5 % g Floor Stiffness < 9 Hz Final Evaluation I 30’x20’ 0.47 % g 5.47 Hz Pass II 30’x40’ 0.28 % g 3.54 Hz III 0.38 % g 4.77 Hz 40’ IV 30’x40’ 0.58 % g 3.93 Hz Fail 30’

Gravity System – Final Redesign VCU SOM Gravity System – Final Redesign Project Overview Proposal Gravity System Redesign Vibration Control Lateral System Moment Frame Layout RAM Model Cost & Schedule Analysis Architectural Impacts Conclusions Layout Bay Size Decking Joists Girders I 30’x20’ 1.0C24 22K10 W18x40 Layout Bay Size Decking Joists Girders II 30’x40’ 1.0C24 22K10 W30x124

VCU SOM Lateral System Existing Lateral System – Braced Frames Project Overview Proposal Gravity System Redesign Vibration Control Lateral System Moment Frame Layout RAM Model Cost & Schedule Analysis Architectural Impacts Conclusions Existing Lateral System – Braced Frames Proposed Lateral System – Moment Braced N

Center of Mass + Center of Rigidity VCU SOM RAM Model Project Overview Proposal Gravity System Redesign Vibration Control Lateral System Moment Frame Layout RAM Model Cost & Schedule Analysis Architectural Impacts Conclusions Center of Mass + Center of Rigidity Center of Mass (88, 43.5) Center of Rigidity (91, 39)

RAM Model Maximum Drifts VCU SOM RAM Model Maximum Drifts Project Overview Proposal Gravity System Redesign Vibration Control Lateral System Moment Frame Layout RAM Model Cost & Schedule Analysis Architectural Impacts Conclusions Center of Mass + Center of Rigidity Drift Checks Wind Loadings – Case 1 Controls Seismic Loadings Loading Drift Allowable Drift Wind – Case 1 0.42 0.44 Wind – Case 2 0.32 Wind – Case 3 Wind – Case 4 0.25 Seismic 0.62 2.9

Proposed Lateral System VCU SOM Frame Participation Proposed Lateral System Project Overview Proposal Gravity System Redesign Vibration Control Lateral System Moment Frame Layout RAM Model Cost & Schedule Analysis Architectural Impacts Conclusions Frame # 1 2 3 4 5 6 Avg. Load 20% 32% 5% 18% 6 5 4 3 2 1

Proposed Lateral System VCU SOM Frame Participation Proposed Lateral System Project Overview Proposal Gravity System Redesign Vibration Control Lateral System Moment Frame Layout RAM Model Cost & Schedule Analysis Architectural Impacts Conclusions Frame # 1 2 3 4 5 6 Avg. Load 20% 32% 5% 18% 6 5 4 3 Frame # 7 8 9 10 Avg. Load 5% 54% 15% 26% 7 8 9 10 2 1

Cost & Schedule Analysis VCU SOM Project Overview Proposal Gravity System Redesign Vibration Control Lateral System Moment Frame Layout RAM Model Cost & Schedule Analysis Architectural Impacts Conclusions Cost & Schedule Analysis {Breadth 1}

Cost & Schedule Analysis VCU SOM Cost & Schedule Analysis {Breadth 1} Project Overview Proposal Gravity System Redesign Vibration Control Lateral System Moment Frame Layout RAM Model Cost & Schedule Analysis Architectural Impacts Conclusions Original System Concrete $ 1.16 Conc. Placing $ 0.25 Conc. Finishing $ 0.14 Shear Studs $ 0.16 Beams $ 4.20 Girders $ 11.72 Decking $ 2.80 Fireproofing $ 0.81 Total ($/SF) $ 21.23 Redesigned System Concrete $ 1.25 Conc. Placing $ 0.18 Conc. Finishing $ 0.67 K-Series Joists $ 3.41 Girders $ 8.17 Decking $ 2.22 Fireproofing $ 1.70 Total ($/SF) $ 17.61 Structural System Costs Total Project Costs Curtain Wall Changes Additional Fireproofing Schedule Comparison

Cost & Schedule Analysis VCU SOM Cost & Schedule Analysis {Breadth 1} Project Overview Proposal Gravity System Redesign Vibration Control Lateral System Moment Frame Layout RAM Model Cost & Schedule Analysis Architectural Impacts Conclusions System Floor-to-Floor Ceiling Ht Total Height Original 14’ – 8” 11’ – 0” 196’ – 0” Structural System Costs Total Project Costs Curtain Wall Changes Additional Fireproofing Schedule Comparison Redesign Option 1 14’ – 8” 10’ – 6” 196’ – 0” Redesign Option 2 15’ – 2” 11’ – 0” 202’ – 6” Option 1 – Same Floor-to-Floor Height (vs Original) Option 2 – Same Ceiling Height (vs Original)

Cost & Schedule Analysis VCU SOM Cost & Schedule Analysis {Breadth 1} Project Overview Proposal Gravity System Redesign Vibration Control Lateral System Moment Frame Layout RAM Model Cost & Schedule Analysis Architectural Impacts Conclusions System Original Decking Meets 2 HR Steel Spray Ceiling Non-Rated Sprinkler Yes Price Increase – Redesign – A Meets 2 HR Spray Non-Rated Yes $ 0.92/SF Redesign – B Meets 2 HR Factory Applied+Spray Rated No $ 1.20/SF Structural System Costs Total Project Costs Curtain Wall Changes Additional Fireproofing Schedule Comparison

Cost & Schedule Analysis VCU SOM Cost & Schedule Analysis {Breadth 1} Project Overview Proposal Gravity System Redesign Vibration Control Lateral System Moment Frame Layout RAM Model Cost & Schedule Analysis Architectural Impacts Conclusions Task Original Duration Redesign Duration Steel Erecting + Detailing 122 days 114 days Deck Pour/ Fireproofing 89 days 93 days Structural System Costs Total Project Costs Curtain Wall Changes Additional Fireproofing Schedule Comparison

Architectural Impacts VCU SOM Project Overview Proposal Gravity System Redesign Vibration Control Lateral System Moment Frame Layout RAM Model Cost & Schedule Analysis Architectural Impacts Conclusions Architectural Impacts {Breadth 2}

Architectural Impacts VCU SOM Architectural Impacts {Breadth 2} Project Overview Proposal Gravity System Redesign Vibration Control Lateral System Moment Frame Layout RAM Model Cost & Schedule Analysis Architectural Impacts Conclusions Creating an Open Environment Fireproofing Redesign Occupancies Additional Fire Barriers Removal of Sprinklers

Architectural Impacts Additional Fireproofing VCU SOM Architectural Impacts {Breadth 2} Project Overview Proposal Gravity System Redesign Vibration Control Lateral System Moment Frame Layout RAM Model Cost & Schedule Analysis Architectural Impacts Conclusions Floor Main Occupancies 1 – 3 A & B 4 B 5 – 8 9 10 11 12 Additional Fireproofing – 65 LF 300 LF 25 LF 150 LF 55 LF Sprinklers Removed – 120 90 150 100 Creating an Open Environment Fireproofing Redesign Occupancies Additional Fire Barriers Removal of Sprinklers

VCU SOM Conclusions Designed viable alternate structural system Project Overview Proposal Gravity System Redesign Vibration Control Lateral System Moment Frame Layout RAM Model Cost & Schedule Analysis Architectural Impacts Conclusions Designed viable alternate structural system Non-composite deck + K-series joists + girders Controlled lateral deflections Decreased eccentricity Increase efficiency of structural system Save both time + money In line with VCU SOM reinvented curriculum, create open environments Reduced project costs + schedule Impacted Architecture Positively Eliminated bracing Increased Fireproofing Options

VCU SOM Acknowledgements Gilbane Building Company {MARO} Project Overview Proposal Gravity System Redesign Vibration Control Lateral System Moment Frame Layout RAM Model Cost & Schedule Analysis Architectural Impacts Conclusions Gilbane Building Company {MARO} Nick Ivey Virginia Commonwealth University Entire PSU AE Faculty Professor Linda Hanagan Professor M. Kevin Parfitt Family & Friends

VCU SOM Comments Project Overview Proposal Gravity System Redesign Vibration Control Lateral System Moment Frame Layout RAM Model Cost & Schedule Analysis Architectural Impacts Conclusions