1. AE SENIOR THESIS APRIL 14 th, 2014 CHRIS DUARTE – STRUCTURAL Dr. THOMAS BOOTHBY ORCHARD PLAZA

2. INTRODUCTION GRAVITY LATERAL REDESIGN DAYLIGHTING CONCLUSION PITTSBURGH STATE COLLEGE PHILADELPHIA

3. SOUTHWEST PENNSYLVANIA URBAN ENVIRONMENT ADJACENT PARKING GARAGE PITTSBURGH STATE COLLEGE PHILADELPHIA INTRODUCTION GRAVITY LATERAL REDESIGN DAYLIGHTING CONCLUSION

4. PITTSBURGH STATE COLLEGE PHILADELPHIA PROPERTY DEVELOPER INTRODUCTION GRAVITY LATERAL REDESIGN DAYLIGHTING CONCLUSION SOUTHWEST PENNSYLVANIA URBAN ENVIRONMENT ADJACENT PARKING GARAGE

5. PITTSBURGH STATE COLLEGE PHILADELPHIA PROPERTY DEVELOPER ARCHITEC T INTRODUCTION GRAVITY LATERAL REDESIGN DAYLIGHTING CONCLUSION SOUTHWEST PENNSYLVANIA URBAN ENVIRONMENT ADJACENT PARKING GARAGE

6. PITTSBURGH STATE COLLEGE PHILADELPHIA PROPERTY DEVELOPER ARCHITEC T STRUCTURAL ENGINEER INTRODUCTION GRAVITY LATERAL REDESIGN DAYLIGHTING CONCLUSION SOUTHWEST PENNSYLVANIA URBAN ENVIRONMENT ADJACENT PARKING GARAGE

7. PITTSBURGH STATE COLLEGE PHILADELPHIA PROPERTY DEVELOPER ARCHITEC T STRUCTURAL ENGINEER CIVIL ENGINEER INTRODUCTION GRAVITY LATERAL REDESIGN DAYLIGHTING CONCLUSION SOUTHWEST PENNSYLVANIA URBAN ENVIRONMENT ADJACENT PARKING GARAGE

8. PITTSBURGH STATE COLLEGE PHILADELPHIA PROPERTY DEVELOPER ARCHITEC T STRUCTURAL ENGINEER CIVIL ENGINEER MEP ENGINEER INTRODUCTION GRAVITY LATERAL REDESIGN DAYLIGHTING CONCLUSION SOUTHWEST PENNSYLVANIA URBAN ENVIRONMENT ADJACENT PARKING GARAGE

9. OCCUPANCY – OFFICE LEVELS - 6 SIZE – 144,000 S.F. COST - $18.5 MILLION COMPLETED – DECEMBER 2006 INTRODUCTION GRAVITY LATERAL REDESIGN DAYLIGHTING CONCLUSION

10. LIMESTONE BASE OCCUPANCY – OFFICE LEVELS - 6 SIZE – 144,000 S.F. COST - $18.5 MILLION COMPLETED – DECEMBER 2006 INTRODUCTION GRAVITY LATERAL REDESIGN DAYLIGHTING CONCLUSION

11. LIMESTONE BASE OCCUPANCY – OFFICE LEVELS - 6 SIZE – 144,000 S.F. COST - $18.5 MILLION COMPLETED – DECEMBER 2006 GLAZING & CURTAIN WALL INTRODUCTION GRAVITY LATERAL REDESIGN DAYLIGHTING CONCLUSION

12. LIMESTONE BASE OCCUPANCY – OFFICE LEVELS - 6 SIZE – 144,000 S.F. COST - $18.5 MILLION COMPLETED – DECEMBER 2006 BRICK VENEER GLAZING & CURTAIN WALL INTRODUCTION GRAVITY LATERAL REDESIGN DAYLIGHTING CONCLUSION

13. LIMESTONE BASE OCCUPANCY – OFFICE LEVELS - 6 SIZE – 144,000 S.F. COST - $18.5 MILLION COMPLETED – DECEMBER 2006 BRICK VENEER GLAZING & CURTAIN WALL METAL PANELING INTRODUCTION GRAVITY LATERAL REDESIGN DAYLIGHTING CONCLUSION

14. TYPICAL BAYS CONSIDERED - 35’ x 42’ 28’ x 35’ - N INTRODUCTION GRAVITY LATERAL REDESIGN DAYLIGHTING CONCLUSION

15. TYPICAL BAYS CONSIDERED - 35’ x 42’ 28’ x 35’ - N INTRODUCTION GRAVITY LATERAL REDESIGN DAYLIGHTING CONCLUSION

16. TYPICAL BAYS CONSIDERED - 35’ x 42’ 28’ x 35’ - DECKING REGIONS - N-S E- W- NN INTRODUCTION GRAVITY LATERAL REDESIGN DAYLIGHTING CONCLUSION

17. EXISTING ECCENTRIC FRAMES - FULL HEIGHT FRAMES - GROUND LEVEL FRAMES N INTRODUCTION GRAVITY LATERAL REDESIGN DAYLIGHTING CONCLUSION

18. EXISTING ECCENTRIC FRAMES - FULL HEIGHT FRAMES - GROUND LEVEL FRAMES N

19. INTRODUCTION GRAVITY LATERAL REDESIGN DAYLIGHTING CONCLUSION PROPOSA L

20. INTRODUCTION GRAVITY LATERAL REDESIGN DAYLIGHTING CONCLUSION PROPOSA L OPEN-WEB STEEL JOIST FLOOR SYSTEM

21. INTRODUCTION GRAVITY LATERAL REDESIGN DAYLIGHTING CONCLUSION PROPOSA L OPEN-WEB STEEL JOIST FLOOR SYSTEM HVAC INTEGRATION

22. INTRODUCTION GRAVITY LATERAL REDESIGN DAYLIGHTING CONCLUSION PROPOSA L OPEN-WEB STEEL JOIST FLOOR SYSTEM HVAC INTEGRATION CONCENTRIC LATERAL FRAMING

23. INTRODUCTION GRAVITY LATERAL REDESIGN DAYLIGHTING CONCLUSION PROPOSA L OPEN-WEB STEEL JOIST FLOOR SYSTEM HVAC INTEGRATION CONCENTRIC LATERAL FRAMING ARCHITECTURAL IMPACT

24. INTRODUCTION GRAVITY LATERAL REDESIGN DAYLIGHTING CONCLUSION OPEN-WEB STEEL JOIST FLOOR SYSTEM NON-COMPOSITE SYSTEM 2” DECK WITH 4.5” SLAB 28” DEPTH RESTRICTION 42’ SPAN 80psf DEAD LOAD 100psf LIVE LOAD N

25. INTRODUCTION GRAVITY LATERAL REDESIGN DAYLIGHTING CONCLUSION OPEN-WEB STEEL JOIST FLOOR SYSTEM NON-COMPOSITE SYSTEM 2” DECK WITH 4.5” SLAB 28” DEPTH RESTRICTION 42’ SPAN 80psf DEAD LOAD 100psf LIVE LOAD N

26. INTRODUCTION GRAVITY LATERAL REDESIGN DAYLIGHTING CONCLUSION VIBRATION CONCERNS 2” DECK WITH 4.5” SLAB 28LH11JOISTS w/ 42’ SPAN W30x108 GIRDER w/ 35’ SPAN 80psf DEAD LOAD 100psf LIVE LOAD N

27. INTRODUCTION GRAVITY LATERAL REDESIGN DAYLIGHTING CONCLUSION N

28. N N ECCENTRIC FRAMING CONCENTRIC FRAMING N

29. INTRODUCTION GRAVITY LATERAL REDESIGN DAYLIGHTING CONCLUSION HVAC INTEGRATION 18” X 30” SUPPLY DUCT 8” AUXILARY DUCTS 36” - CONCRETE SLAB - ACOUSTIC TILE CEILING - HVAC DUCTS - FLOOR STRUCTURE

30. INTRODUCTION GRAVITY LATERAL REDESIGN DAYLIGHTING CONCLUSION HVAC INTEGRATION 18” X 30” SUPPLY DUCT 8” AUXILARY DUCTS 36” 31” - CONCRETE SLAB - ACOUSTIC TILE CEILING - HVAC DUCTS - FLOOR STRUCTURE

31. INTRODUCTION GRAVITY LATERAL REDESIGN DAYLIGHTING CONCLUSION FRAME COMPARISON MAXIMUM WIND SPEED 90mph CONTROLLING LOAD CASE WIND N-S TOTAL BASE SHEAR 496 kips

32. INTRODUCTION GRAVITY LATERAL REDESIGN DAYLIGHTING CONCLUSION FRAME COMPARISON MAXIMUM WIND SPEED 90mph CONTROLLING LOAD CASE WIND N-S TOTAL BASE SHEAR 496 kips N CENTER OF RIGIDITY

33. INTRODUCTION GRAVITY LATERAL REDESIGN DAYLIGHTING CONCLUSION FRAME COMPARISON MAXIMUM WIND SPEED 90mph CONTROLLING LOAD CASE WIND N-S TOTAL BASE SHEAR 496 kips N CENTER OF RIGIDITY - LINE 1 FRAME ANALYZED

34. INTRODUCTION GRAVITY LATERAL REDESIGN DAYLIGHTING CONCLUSION FRAME COMPARISON MAXIMUM WIND SPEED 90mph CONTROLLING LOAD CASE WIND N-S TOTAL BASE SHEAR 496 kips DRIFT AT ROOF – 3.28” N CENTER OF RIGIDITY - LINE 1 FRAME ANALYZED DISPLACEMENTS AMPLIFIED BY A FACTOR OF 50

35. INTRODUCTION GRAVITY LATERAL REDESIGN DAYLIGHTING CONCLUSION FRAME COMPARISON MAXIMUM WIND SPEED 90mph CONTROLLING LOAD CASE WIND N-S TOTAL BASE SHEAR 496 kips DRIFT AT ROOF – 3.28” DRIFT AT ROOF – 1.52” N CENTER OF RIGIDITY - LINE 1 FRAME ANALYZED DISPLACEMENTS AMPLIFIED BY A FACTOR OF 50

36. INTRODUCTION GRAVITY LATERAL REDESIGN DAYLIGHTING CONCLUSION ARCHITECHURAL IMPACT N ECCENTRIC BAYS - 11 ECCENTRIC FRAMING

37. INTRODUCTION GRAVITY LATERAL REDESIGN DAYLIGHTING CONCLUSION ARCHITECHURAL IMPACT N N ECCENTRIC BAYS - 11 CONCENTRIC BAYS - 5 ECCENTRIC FRAMING CONCENTRIC FRAMING

38. INTRODUCTION GRAVITY LATERAL REDESIGN DAYLIGHTING CONCLUSION ARCHITECHURA L IMPACT N CONCENTRIC FRAMING

39. INTRODUCTION GRAVITY LATERAL REDESIGN DAYLIGHTING CONCLUSION ARCHITECHURA L IMPACT N

40. INTRODUCTION GRAVITY LATERAL REDESIGN DAYLIGHTING CONCLUSION ARCHITECHURA L IMPACT N

41. INTRODUCTION GRAVITY LATERAL REDESIGN DAYLIGHTING CONCLUSION STRUCTURA L REVIEW

42. OPEN-WEB STEEL JOIST FLOOR SYSTEM 28LH11 JOIST W30X108 GIRDER C=1/2” SATISFIES VIBRATION CONCERNS INTRODUCTION GRAVITY LATERAL REDESIGN DAYLIGHTING CONCLUSION

43. STRUCTURA L REVIEW OPEN-WEB STEEL JOIST FLOOR SYSTEM 28LH11 JOIST W30X108 GIRDER C=1/2” SATISFIES VIBRATION CONCERNS HVAC INTEGRATION CEILING RAISE POTENTIAL OF 5” INTRODUCTION GRAVITY LATERAL REDESIGN DAYLIGHTING CONCLUSION

44. STRUCTURA L REVIEW INTRODUCTION GRAVITY LATERAL REDESIGN DAYLIGHTING CONCLUSION

45. STRUCTURA L REVIEW CONCENTRIC FRAMING ELIMINATION OF 6 FRAMING BAYS 24 BRACING MEMBERS & 42 WELDED CONNECTIONS INTRODUCTION GRAVITY LATERAL REDESIGN DAYLIGHTING CONCLUSION

46. STRUCTURA L REVIEW CONCENTRIC FRAMING ELIMINATION OF 6 FRAMING BAYS 24 BRACING MEMBERS & 42 WELDED CONNECTIONS ARCHITECTURAL IMPACT CURTAIN WALLS USED IN FRAMING BAYS INTRODUCTION GRAVITY LATERAL REDESIGN DAYLIGHTING CONCLUSION

47. BREADTH STUDIES INTRODUCTION GRAVITY LATERAL REDESIGN DAYLIGHTING CONCLUSION

48. BREADTH STUDIES INTRODUCTION GRAVITY LATERAL REDESIGN DAYLIGHTING CONCLUSION DAYLIGHTING BUILDING MODELED TO VISUALIZE SHADOWS JANUARY & JUNE 9AM – 12PM – 4PM

49. BREADTH STUDIES INTRODUCTION GRAVITY LATERAL REDESIGN DAYLIGHTING CONCLUSION DAYLIGHTING BUILDING MODELED TO VISUALIZE SHADOWS JANUARY & JUNE 9AM – 12PM – 4PM GREEN ROOF MOST APPROPRIATE SYSTEM RESEARCHED LOADING IMPLICATIONS FALL PROTECTION

50. INTRODUCTION GRAVITY LATERAL REDESIGN DAYLIGHTING CONCLUSION JANUARY – 9AM

51. INTRODUCTION GRAVITY LATERAL REDESIGN DAYLIGHTING CONCLUSION JANUARY – 9AM JANUARY – 12PM

52. INTRODUCTION GRAVITY LATERAL REDESIGN DAYLIGHTING CONCLUSION JANUARY – 9AM JANUARY – 12PM JANUARY – 4PM

53. INTRODUCTION GRAVITY LATERAL REDESIGN DAYLIGHTING CONCLUSION JANUARY – 9AM JANUARY – 12PM JANUARY – 4PM

54. INTRODUCTION GRAVITY LATERAL REDESIGN DAYLIGHTING CONCLUSION JUNE– 9AM

55. INTRODUCTION GRAVITY LATERAL REDESIGN DAYLIGHTING CONCLUSION JUNE– 9AM JUNE – 12PM

56. INTRODUCTION GRAVITY LATERAL REDESIGN DAYLIGHTING CONCLUSION JUNE– 9AM JUNE – 12PM JUNE – 4PM

57. INTRODUCTION GRAVITY LATERAL REDESIGN DAYLIGHTING CONCLUSION JUNE– 9AM JUNE – 12PM JUNE – 4PM

58. DAYLIGHTING CONCLUSION S INTRODUCTION GRAVITY LATERAL REDESIGN DAYLIGHTING CONCLUSION JANUARY LOW SOUTHERN LIGHT BEST MITIGATED WITH OPERABLE INTERIOR SHADES MORNING AND EVENING SUNLIGHT PARTIALLY SHADED USING VERTICAL FINS http://www.angarch.com/products/brise-soleil_01_archive.html

59. DAYLIGHTING CONCLUSION S INTRODUCTION GRAVITY LATERAL REDESIGN DAYLIGHTING CONCLUSION JUNE HIGH ANGLE AFTERNOON LIGHT BEST MITIGATED WITH HORIZONTAL CANTILEVER SHADES MORNING AND EVENING SUNLIGHT BEST MITIGATED WITH INTERIOR OPERABLE SHADES http://levolux.blogspot.com/2012_02

61. ACKNOWLEDGEMEN TS MILLCRAFT INV. A.E. DEPT. FACULTY FAMILY, FRIENDS, CLASSMATES

62. ACKNOWLEDGEMEN TS MILLCRAFT INV. A.E. DEPT. FACULTY FAMILY, FRIENDS, CLASSMATES QUESTIONS ?