Date of download: 1/7/2018 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Correlations of Bubble Diameter and Frequency for Air–Water System Based on Orifice Diameter and Flow Rate J. Fluids Eng. 2016;138(11):114501-114501-7. doi:10.1115/1.4033749 Figure Legend: Schematic diagram of the experimental setup: A—control valve, B—digital mass flow meter, C—light source, D—single orifice setup, E—glass tank, and F—high-speed camera
Date of download: 1/7/2018 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Correlations of Bubble Diameter and Frequency for Air–Water System Based on Orifice Diameter and Flow Rate J. Fluids Eng. 2016;138(11):114501-114501-7. doi:10.1115/1.4033749 Figure Legend: Measured and predicted values comparison for bubble size
Date of download: 1/7/2018 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Correlations of Bubble Diameter and Frequency for Air–Water System Based on Orifice Diameter and Flow Rate J. Fluids Eng. 2016;138(11):114501-114501-7. doi:10.1115/1.4033749 Figure Legend: Measured and predicted values comparison for bubble frequency
Date of download: 1/7/2018 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Correlations of Bubble Diameter and Frequency for Air–Water System Based on Orifice Diameter and Flow Rate J. Fluids Eng. 2016;138(11):114501-114501-7. doi:10.1115/1.4033749 Figure Legend: Captured images of bubble formation for 0.30 mm orifice under a flow rate of (a) 0.050 SLPM, (b) 0.100 SLPM, and (c) 0.15 SLPM
Date of download: 1/7/2018 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Correlations of Bubble Diameter and Frequency for Air–Water System Based on Orifice Diameter and Flow Rate J. Fluids Eng. 2016;138(11):114501-114501-7. doi:10.1115/1.4033749 Figure Legend: Captured images of bubble formation at a flow rate of qm = 0.050 SLPM for an orifice size of (a) 0.20 mm, (b) 0.41 mm, and (c) 0.61 mm
Date of download: 1/7/2018 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Correlations of Bubble Diameter and Frequency for Air–Water System Based on Orifice Diameter and Flow Rate J. Fluids Eng. 2016;138(11):114501-114501-7. doi:10.1115/1.4033749 Figure Legend: Comparison between Eq. (10) with reported literature at a flow rate of (a) 0.050 SLPM, (b) 0.1 SLPM, and (c) 0.15 SLPM and different orifice sizes