BriXS – MariX WG 8,9 LASA December 13, 2017.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Tom Powers Practical Aspects of SRF Cavity Testing and Operations SRF Workshop 2011 Tutorial Session.
Advertisements

RF Unit Test Facility at NML & CM1 Test Plan Bob Kephart Fermilab IWLC-10 October 20, 2010.
Thomas Roser RHIC Open Planning Meeting December 3-4, 2003 RHIC II machine plans Electron cooling at RHIC Luminosity upgrade parameters.
LEP3 RF System: gradient and power considerations Andy Butterworth BE/RF Thanks to R. Calaga, E. Ciapala.
Large-capacity Helium refrigeration : from state-of-the-art towards FCC reference solutions Francois Millet – March 2015.
ILCTA_NML Progress at Fermilab Jerry Leibfritz September 10, 2007.
SRF Results and Requirements Internal MLC Review Matthias Liepe1.
Accelerators for ADS March 2014 CERN Approach for a reliable cryogenic system T. Junquera (ACS) *Work supported by the EU, FP7 MAX contract number.
July LEReC Review July 2014 Low Energy RHIC electron Cooling Roberto Than CRYOGENICS SYSTEM.
The ESS Cryogenics System J. G. Weisend II, P. Arnold, J Fydrych, W. Hees, J. Jurns, A. Lundmark, X. T. Su, X.L. Wang June 2015.
July LEReC Review July 2014 Low Energy RHIC electron Cooling Sergey Belomestnykh SRF and RF systems.
MCTF 8/17/06 A. Bross MTA Activities and Plans MCTF August 17, 2006 A. Bross.
SRF Requirements and Challenges for ERL-Based Light Sources Ali Nassiri Advanced Photon Source Argonne National Laboratory 2 nd Argonne – Fermilab Collaboration.
Aug 23, 2006 Half Current Option: Impact on Linac Cost Chris Adolphsen With input from Mike Neubauer, Chris Nantista and Tom Peterson.
1Matthias LiepeAugust 2, 2007 Future Options Matthias Liepe.
Cold versus Warm, parameters impacting LC reliability and efficiency contribution to the discussion on risk factors Giorgio Bellettini, Seul ITRP meeting,
Project X RD&D Plan Cryogenics Arkadiy Klebaner AAC Meeting February 3, 2009.
An Overview of the ILC Cryogenic System Tom Peterson, Fermilab LCFOA at SLAC 1 May 2006.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Page 1 SPL Cryogenic and vacuum sectorisations 9-10 November, 2009 Joe Preble Workshop on cryogenic and.
Performance analysis of cryogenic system and cryomodules for the complete superconducting linear accelerator at IUAC, New Delhi. T S Datta ( On behalf.
BEAMLINE HOM ABSORBER O. Nezhevenko, S. Nagaitsev, N. Solyak, V. Yakovlev Fermi National Laboratory December 11, 2007 Wake Fest 07 - ILC wakefield workshop.
5 K Shield Study of STF Cryomodule (up-dated) Norihito Ohuchi KEK 2008/4/21-251FNAL-SCRF-Meeting.
1 st stage Possible extension XFEL Cryo System Project X Collaboration Meeting, FNAL September 8-9, 2010 Bernd Petersen DESY MKS (XFEL WP10 & WP13)
26 April, 2016 LCLS II Cryomodules and Cryoplant, Joe Preble LCLS-II Overview JLAB Organization for LCLS-II JLAB responsibilities & Schedule and Status.
ALBA RF Systems Francis Perez.
HISTORY OF SNS DESIGN AND TECHNOLOGY CHOICES PROJECT X WORKSHOP NOVEMBER 12-13, 2007 R. KUSTOM.
Matthias Liepe. Matthias Liepe – High loaded Q cavity operation at CU – TTC Topical Meeting on CW-SRF
Project X Workshop - Cryogenics1 Project X CRYOGENICS Arkadiy Klebaner.
Integration and Cold Testing of the CW ERL Cryomodule at Daresbury Shrikant Pattalwar ASTeC, STFC, Daresbury Laboratory (UK) On behalf of ERL Cryomodule.
Spoke section of the ESS linac: - the Spoke cryomodules - the cryogenic distribution system P. DUTHIL (CNRS-IN2P3 IPN Orsay / Division Accélérateurs) on.
ILCTA_NML Progress at Fermilab Jerry Leibfritz August 16, 2007.
Cavity/CM Considerations for CW Operation Cryogenic loads and cryogen distribution End Group cooling: HOM antenna redesign HOM loads and suppression requirement.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Page 1 FNAL September 11, 2009 Design Considerations for CW SRF Linacs Claus H. Rode 12 GeV Project Manager.
Shuichi NoguchiTTC Meeting at Milano, Injector Cryomodule for cERL at KEK Cavity 2 Prototypes were tested. Input Coupler 2 Couplers were tested.
FCC Infrastructure & Operation Update on the cryogenics study Laurent Tavian CERN, TE-CRG 28 October 2015.
TDR Cryogenics Parameters Tom Peterson 28 September 2011.
LCLS-II Technical Requirements
Status of BESSY II and bERLinPro
Dana Arenius LCLS-II 4.5K Cold Box Director’s Review November 16, 2016
Process Simulation for the LCLS-II Cryogenic Systems
WP5 Elliptical cavities
FRIB Cryogenic Support
TTC Topical Workshop - CW SRF, Cornell 12th – 14th June 2013
WG3 Summary High current and CW accelerators
Dana M. Arenius Jefferson Laboratory Cryogenics Dept Head
SC Quadrupole Magnets in ILC Cryomodules
CEPC Cryogenic System Jianqin Zhang, Shaopeng Li
Joint Accelerator Research JGU & HZB
High Gradient Cavities: Cost and Operational Considerations
ESS RF Development at Uppsala University
Commissioning and First Cooldown of XFEL Linac
Notkestrasse 85, Hamburg, Germany
Measurements, ideas, curiosities
High Q Cavity Operation in the Cornell Horizontal Test Cryomodule
Accelerator Layout and Parameters
CW Operation of XFEL Modules
Review of the European XFEL Linac System
Operation experience of cryogenic system and cryomodules for the superconducting linear accelerator at IUAC, New Delhi. T S Datta ( On behalf of Cryogenics.
MIT Compact X-ray Source
XFEL Project (accelerator) Overview and recent developments
Cost Optimization Models for SRF Linacs
KEK injector cryomodule
ERL Main-Linac Cryomodule
SCRF for cw operating XFEL
Analysis of Multi-Turn ERLs for X-ray Sources
Electron Source Configuration
IHEP ILC Cavity Status Jiyuan Zhai (IHEP)
ILC Cryogenics -- Technical Design Report Planning
Cryomodules Challenges for PERLE
ERL Director’s Review Main Linac
Presentation transcript:

BriXS – MariX WG 8,9 LASA December 13, 2017

Reference machines Three families of SC cavities could be foreseen BriXS cavities: zero beam-loading, high-current, heavily damped HOMs, Energy Recovery LERF (JLAB), in operation at 10 mA cERL (KEK), in operation at 1 mA, not yet at nominal current of 100 mA CBeta (Cornell), multi-pass ERL demonstrator, linac module tested, DR released BERLinPro (HZB), under costruction, CDR released MariX cavities Moderate beam loading, moderate current, possibly standard TESLA cavity (RF geometry) LCLS-II Booster module (not considered) If a booster module is required: Less cells, high-power, full beam-loading cERL (KEK), CBeta (Cornell) Bottom-lines TESLA/European-XFEL is mostly the reference

BRIXs linacs

CBETA, Cornell Linac Module: 6 7-cells cavities, custom cavity RF shape Design Limit beam current of 100 mA (one pass) Limit down to 40 mA for 4-passes Beam test, no ERL, low current CW, 16 MV/m gradient, up to 75 MeV 5 kW forward RF power for each cavity Commercial Solid State Amplifier, Qext 6e7 Nominal Q0 at 2e10 at 1.8 K HOM absorbers rings: Up 400 W each <12 W @ 40 mA, single cavity test Cooled at 80 K by 20 bar gHe

CBETA, Cornell 80 K heat load finally goes to LN2 one gHe/LN2 heat-exchanger for the CM 13600 m3/h subcooling pumping system 4 systems in parallel, 3400 m3/h Roots backed by 850 m3/h rotary Margin required by Q0 that is not met (not doped cavities) One of a kind module

c-ERL, KEK Linac Module: 2 9-cells cavities, TESLA shape (cells) f80 HOM damper HOM damper Linac Module: 2 9-cells cavities, TESLA shape (cells) Limit beam current of 100 mA ERL beam test done up to 1 mA CW, 15 MV/m gradient, 20 to 30 MeV Actually limited to 8 MV/m by FE Q0 > 1e10 at 2.0 K 3 Ferrite HOM absorbers per module up to 160 W dissipated power each Isolated from the cavity Cooled directly by liquid nitrogen

c-ERL, KEK Separate LN2 feed-throughs and circuitry required for HOM absorbers Poor Eacc and Q0 compared to non HOM-damped TESLA cavities One of a kind

BRIXs - comments CBETA Cornell: 2 more cavities required for 100 MeV 6 to 8 cavities string, from 10 to 13 m length Not a dramatic change but yet not the very same object … cERL KEK: For A 100 MeV final energy… linac could be assembled by 3/4 existing 2-cavity modules to stay on the safest side Much higher thermal loads Redesign vacuum vessel with 6/8 cavities in a string Once more, not critical but… Ongoing activity at KEK

LHe Cryo plant – BRIXs Parameter LCLS-II-type concept cERL-like CBETA-like Cavity temperature K 2.0 1.8 Q0 1e10 2E+10 Accelerating E field MV/m 12.5 15.4 Power, cavity W 16.6 17.2 10.1 # modules 2 8 # cavities 16 Energy, Total GeV 0.200 Cryo power, total: only cavities, no HOM heat-load kW 0.266 0.276 0.161 Cryo power, total: cavities, distribution, feed-boxes, end caps 0.326 0.436 0.221 Cryo power, with margins: +30% static, +10% dynamic (LCLS-II) 0.366 0.490 0.248 Cryo power, plant: rated capacity at cavity temperature 0.4 (+50 l/h LHe*) 0.5 (+50 l/h LHe*) 0.25 (+50 l/h LHe*) AC plug power, 4.5 K refrigerator MW 0.7 0.85 AC plug power, 1.8 K or 2.0 K refrigerator 0.1 0.15 AC plug power, water cooling AC plug power, Total: sum of above 0.9 1.1 * Liquefaction required by concurrent activities (single cavity VTs, magnet cold tests etc.)

LHe Cryo plant – BRIXs - Actual machines Cold compressors: Used above 300 W cryogenic power Typically 3,2-3,6 W@4,5K/W@1,8K FNAL CryoModule Test Facility: 500 W @ 2,0 K or 250 W @ 1,8 K 460 l/h liquefier mode 3-stage cold compressor Largest off-the-shelf unit: LINDE L/LR280 280 l/h, theoretically up to 900 W @ 4,5 K One in magnet test-stand at INFN-Salerno (200 W @ 4.5 K)

Considerations on AC plug power requirements - BRIXs Only CRYO and RF! Liquid Nitrogen plant not investigated (LHe refrigerator pre-cooling and up to 7 kW @ 80 K for HOMs) RF amplifier 16 single cavity RF SSA, 5 kW forward and 12.5 kW plug power each 0.2 MW for the two linac modules Overall Source Power – MW Linacs cryo 0.8 Linacs RF 0.2 Booster RF (2 x) Gun (2 x) 0.3 Total: sum of above 2.1 Cooling Total, with margin: to the user 2.5 Installed: electrical grid substation, considering high inductive loads 8

MARIX linac

LCLS-II, SLAC CW, 16 MV/m, 9 cells, 1.3 GHz TESLA cells, minor modifications for CW Larger pipes, dual inlets, etc. 3.8 kW forward RF power each cavity Commercial SSA, Qext 4.1e7 Q0 at 2.7e10 at 2.0 K (doped cavity) Linac Module has 8 cavities Design beam current of 100 mA upgrade foreseen to 300 mA Module string includes SC quad magnet BPM 1 HOM beam-pipe absorber Dual cryogenic feed-box

LCLS-II, SLAC 35 CMs, 280 1.3 GHz cavities 1 3.9 GHz module 2 bunch compression chicanes Linac foot-print Using the first part of original LCLS tunnel at SLAC Cutting LCLS-II at 2.4 GeV, 19 CMs: Total length approximately 500 m Without undulators, photon beam lines, user’s facility etc.

LHe Cryo plant – MARIX 1.3 GHz SC linac Parameter LCLS-II MARIX – low risk MARIX – medium risk Cavity temperature K 2.0 Q0 2.7e10 2e10 Accelerating E field MV/m 16 20 Power, cavity W 10.1 13.6 15.8 # modules 35 19* # cavities 280 152 Energy, Total GeV 4.5 2.4 3.0 Cryo power, total: only cavities kW 2.83 2.07 2.40 Cryo power, total: cavities, distribution, feed-boxes, end caps 3.64 2.64 2.97 Cryo power, with margins: +30% static, +10% dynamic (LCLS-II) 4.09 3.33 Cryo power, plant: rated capacity at cavity temperature 2 x 4 (JLAB CHL2) 1 x 4 (JLAB CHL2) AC plug power, cryogenic plant MW 9 AC plug power, water cooling 1 0.5 AC plug power, Total: sum of above 10 5 * Assuming 15 m each unit, the cryomodule string itself extends for 285 m

Considerations on AC plug power requirements - MARIX Few changes from LCLS-II MARIX 1.3 GHz SC linac Parameter Unit LCLS-II MARIX Loaded Q 4.1e7 3.25e7 Peak detuning Hz 10 30 Number of cavities 280 152 Forward RF power, with margins: cavity kW 3.7 6.0 Installed RF power: cavity 3.8 6.2 Total, AC plug power: linac, 40 % SSA efficiency MW 2.7 2.4 Source Power – MW Linac cryo 5 Linac RF 3 Electronics 2 Total: sum of above 10 Cooling 1 Total, with margin: to the user 14 Installed: electrical grid substation, considering high inductive loads 45