High precision measurement of the beam energy at VEPP-4M collider by Yury Tikhonov KEDR&VEPP-4M collaboration Budker INP, Novosibirsk Outlook Introduction.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Flipping proton and deuteron spins in storage rings L.I. Malysheva.
Advertisements

DEELS workshop, ESRF, 12.– 13. May 2014 Friederike Ewald Difficulties to measure the absolute electron beam energy using spin depolarisation at the ESRF.
Fast and Precise Beam Energy Measurement at the International Linear Collider Michele Viti.
GSI – 13 March – 2004 ELISe collaboration Photonuclear Reactions at Storage Rings V. Nedorezov Institute for Nuclear Research RAS, Moscow,
1 The project of Super-ct-factory with Crab Waist in Novosibirsk E.Levichev Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Novosibirsk Tau-08 Satellite Meeting,
The charmonium mass spectrum
1 Electron Beam Polarimetry for EIC/eRHIC W. Lorenzon (Michigan) Introduction Polarimetry at HERA Lessons learned from HERA Polarimetry at EIC.
Alain Blondel NUFACT03 Why do we believe that the neutrino fluxes can be determined to at a Neutrino Factory? source: M. Apollonio et al, OSCILLATION.
DESY PRC May 10, Beyond the One Photon Approximation in Lepton Scattering: A Definitive Experiment at DESY for J. Arrington (Argonne) D. Hasell,
Glasgow, October 25, 2007 Results on e+e- annihilation from CMD2 and SND G.V.Fedotovich and S.I.Eidelman Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics Novosibirsk.
K. Moffeit 6 Jan 2005 WORKSHOP Machine-Detector Interface at the International Linear Collider SLAC January 6-8, 2005 Polarimetry at the ILC Design issues.
M. Woods (SLAC) Beam Diagnostics for test facilities of i)  ii) polarized e+ source January 9 –11, 2002.
CMD-2 and SND results on the  and  International Workshop «e+e- Collisions from  to  » February 27 – March 2, 2006, BINP, Novosibirsk, Russia.
March 2011Particle and Nuclear Physics,1 Experimental tools accelerators particle interactions with matter detectors.
Beijing, Feb 3 rd, 2007 LEPOL 1 Low Energy Positron Polarimetry for the ILC Sabine Riemann (DESY) On behalf of the LEPOL Collaboration.
Crossed Channel Compton Scattering Michael Düren and George Serbanut, II. Phys. Institut, - some remarks on cross sections and background processes  
Polarimetry at the LC Source Which type of polarimetry, at which energies for LC ? Sabine Riemann (DESY), LEPOL Group International Workshop on Linear.
Radius To use a Compton polarimeter, the possible range of the backscattered photons’ energy should be calculated. Applying the laws of conservation of.
1 Measurement of tensor analyzing powers in deuteron photodisintegration Dmitri Toporkov Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics Novosibirsk, Russia SPIN2004,
Energy calibration at LHC J. Wenninger. Motivation In general there is not much interest for accurate knowledge of the momentum in hadron machines. 
1 Options for low energy spin manipulation Ken Moffeit, SLAC 2009 Linear Collider Workshop of the Americas 29 September to 3 October 2009 K. Moffeit, D.
Plans for Polarized Beams at VEPP-2000 and U-70 Yu.Shatunov BINP, Novosibirsk P S IN 2006.
and Accelerator Physics
The tensor analysing power component T 21 of the exclusive π - - meson photoproduction on deuteron in the resonance region. V.N.Stibunov 1, L.M. Barkov.
1 Overview of Polarimetry Outline of Talk Polarized Physics Machine-Detector Interface Issues Upstream Polarimeter Downstream Polarimeter Ken Moffeit,
Energy determination at BEPC-II  Satellite Meeting «On the Need for a super-tau-charm factory» September 26 – 27, 2008, BINP, Novosibirsk, Russia M.N.
Polarisation monitoring Sabine Riemann, Andreas Schälicke, Andriy Ushakov (DESY) Positron Source Group Meeting, October, 2009 University of Durham.
Possible Applications of Wave-Beam Interaction for Energy Measurement and Obtaining of Polarization at FCCee Evgeni Levichev, Sergei Nikitin BINP, Novosibirsk.
Polarimetry Report Sabine Riemann on behalf of the DESY/HUB group January 24, 2008 EUROTeV Annual Meeting, Frascati.
16 June, 2015 В.И. Тельнов 1 Two-photon experiments with detector MD1 at VEPP-4 Valery Telnov Budker INP and Novosibirsk St. Univ. PHOTON 2015, June 16,
1 New Results on  (3770) and D Mesons Production and Decays From BES Gang RONG (for BES Collaboration) Presented by Yi-Fang Wang Charm07 Cornell University,
Measurements with Polarized Hadrons T.-A. Shibata Tokyo Institute of Technology Aug 15, 2003 Lepton-Photon 2003.
FLAIR meeting, GSI March Positron Ring for Antihydrogen Production A.Sidorin for LEPTA collaboration JINR, Dubna.
Beijing, Sept 2nd 2004 Rachele Di Salvo Beam asymmetry in meson photoproduction on deuteron targets at GRAAL MENU2004 Meson-Nucleon Physics and the Structure.
Fast or slow positron spin flipping Sabine Riemann (DESY) November 17, 2008 ILC08, University of Illinois - Chicago.
Review of τ -mass measurements at e + e - - colliders Yury Tikhonov (Budker INP) Contents  Introduction  Current status of τ-mass measurements and μτ.
Jan. 18, 2008 Hall C Meeting L. Yuan/Hampton U.. Outline HKS experimental goals HKS experimental setup Issues on spectrometer system calibration Calibration.
Study of e+e- annihilation at low energies Vladimir Druzhinin Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics (Novosibirsk, Russia) SND - BaBar Lepton-Photon, August,
An electron/positron energy monitor based on synchrotron radiation. I.Meshkov, T. Mamedov, E. Syresin, An electron/positron energy monitor based on synchrotron.
Calibration of energies at the photon collider Valery Telnov Budker INP, Novosibirsk TILC09, Tsukuba April 18, 2009.
First results from CMD-3 detector at VEPP-2000 collider Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, SB RAS, Novosibirsk, Russia September 2011 E.Solodov (for.
First results from SND at VEPP-2000 S. Serednyakov On behalf of SND group VIII International Workshop on e + e - Collisions from Phi to Psi, PHIPSI11,
JINR, Dubna 5-9 December, 2011 Current status of luminosity measurements with the CMD-3 detector at VEPP-2000 G.V.Fedotovich BINP, Novosibirsk.
High Precision Energy Calibration with Resonant Depolarization at VEPP-4M Collider S.A. Nikitin BINP, Novosibirsk 3 July 2014, Valencia, Spain.
BINP tau charm plans and other projects in Turkey/China A. Bogomyagkov BINP SB RAS, Novosibirsk.
Fedotovich G.V. On behalf of CMD-3 collaboration Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics Novosibirsk State University phipsi15, USTC, Hefei, China 23 – 26.
Mashines&Detectors at Budker INP PhoPSi workshop, Beijing
Polarization of final electrons/positrons during multiple Compton
Electroweak Physics Towards the CDR
Electroweak physics at CEPC
Electroweak Physics Towards the CDR
Electron Polarization effects in Compton X/γ-ray Sources
P. Chevtsov for the ELIC Design Team
A.P. Potylitsyn, I.S. Tropin Tomsk Polytechnic University,
Measurement of J/ψ→ηCγ at KEDR
Baseline of Super-c-tau in Novosibirsk
Cross section of the process
Energy calibration issues for FCC-ee I. Koop, BINP, Novosibirsk
FCCee energy calibration using reference low energy storage ring
FCCee energy calibration using reference low energy storage ring
Accelerating and injecting polarized beams into FCC-ee I
Status of the VEPP-2000 Collider Project at Novosibirsk
At a Future Linear Collider
Electroweak bosons  .
The project of t-charm factory with crab waist in Novosibirsk
ILC Baseline Design: Physics with Polarized Positrons
Status and results of Novosibirsk accelerator complex
CEPC Z-pole polarization
Yu.N. Filatov, A.M. Kondratenko, M.A. Kondratenko
Based on material presented at various meetings
Presentation transcript:

High precision measurement of the beam energy at VEPP-4M collider by Yury Tikhonov KEDR&VEPP-4M collaboration Budker INP, Novosibirsk Outlook Introduction Resonance depolarization technique Compton backscattering Applications Conclusion 11 Pisa meeting on advanced detectors, La Biodola, Isola Elba, Italy, May 24-30

Introduction The energy in a storage ring is determined by the integral of the transverse magnetic field (H) and the orbit length (L): E~L*∫Hdl The precision of this method is limited to dE/E~10ˉ³ and it is not sufficient for particle physics (particle mass and total cross section measurements, spectroscopy etc) A few method was invented for the absolute energy measurement in a storage ring: -resonance depolarization method, dE/E~10ˉ⁷ (Budker INP, 1975) -dependence of the SR intensity on beam energy, dE/E~10ˉ⁵ (Budker INP, 1978) -Compton backscattering, dE/E~10ˉ⁴ (BESSY, 1997)

Resonance depolarization method Electrons and positrons in a storage ring become polarized due to Sokolov-Ternov effect (1964): probability of SR with spin flip depends on spin direction to magnetic field p ~ R/ The spin precession frequency depends on the beam energy:

Resonance depolarization method BEAM ENERGY SPREAD AND SPIN SPECTRA at VEPP-4M In homogeneous magnetic field a width of the spin spectra is ~10ˉ⁹ ! In real storage ring it is ~10ˉ⁷ due to betatron oscillations and nonlinearity of magnetic field and noise in magnet system

Resonance depolarization method The spin precession frequency can be measured by resonance depolarization by external electromagnetic field So, methods for polarization measurements are needed. A few method have been invented and developed: -intra-beam scattering (Touschek effect) -angle asymmetry of the backscattered polarized laser photons on a beam -angle asymmetry of the backscattered polarized SR photons on a beam -spin dependence of SR intensity (Budker INP, SLAC, DESY, Cornel. CERN……) The resonance depolarization method has been used in many experiments for high precision measurements of particle masses and total cross section measurements (VEPP-2M, VEPP-4, VEPP-4M, DORIS-2, CESR, LEP….): Kˉ ,K°,K⁺, ,,,J/, (nS),(nS),  precision 10ˉ⁴ ÷ 10ˉ⁵ ( Recent development at VEPP-4M: precision 10ˉ⁶ !

Resonance depolarization at VEPP-4M Touschek effect: Intra-beam cross-section depends on polarization. Scattered particles hit the scintillation counters

Resonance depolarization at VEPP-4M 200 kHz per 2 mA in a bunch =(fpol-funpol)/fpol f =IBS counting rate

Energy measurement at VEPP-4M by RD with an accuracy of 5 Energy measurement at VEPP-4M by RD with an accuracy of 5*10-7 using the IBS polarimeter 1-funpol/ fpol

e- e+ Scan speed=55 eV/sec Ep - Ee =(1.32±0.14) keV Comparison of the depolarization frequencies of electrons and positrons VEPP-4M (electron-positron energy gap measurement) Scan speed=55 eV/sec e- e+ Ep - Ee =(1.32±0.14) keV

Partial depolarization of the beam at VEPP-4M (spin gymnastic…)

The example of the long-term beam energy behaviour measured by RD The example of the long-term beam energy behaviour measured by RD. Error bars show the mean deviation from the fit

Compton backscattering VEPP-4M, 2006-09, 900-2000 MeV

Compton backscattering at VEPP-4M The precision of energy measurement is 30-50 KeV ( 1keV for RD!) BUT! No polarized beams needed Energy measurements during experiments (in case of any jumps RD used) Energy spread can be measured with precision of 5% A few isotopes used for detector calibration and stability check The final calibration by resonance depolarization

Resonance depolarization and Compton backscattering at VEPP-4M The VEPP-4M beam energy is know with precision better 20 keV at any time and it is sufficient for all applications

High precision measurement of the beam energy at VEPP-4M: applications The motivations for development of high precision measurements of beam energy: Improvement of the mass measurement of J/ and  - families and D-mesons (important for spectroscopy) Improvement of the -lepton mass measurement (test of lepton universality) Precision measurement of the e+e- hadrons cross section in the region 2E=1.8-4.0 Gev (important for g-2,  and s determination) High precision test of CPT theorem by comparison of spin precession frequencies of electrons and positrons The motivations for development of high precision measurements of beam energy: Improvement of the mass measurement of J/ and  - families and D-mesons (important for spectroscopy) Improvement of the -lepton mass measurement (test of lepton universality) Precision measurement of the e+e- hadrons cross section in the region 2E=1.8-4.0 Gev (important for g-2,  and s determination) High precision test of CPT theorem by comparison of spin precession frequencies of electrons and positrons

KEDR detector at VEPP-4M In operation since 2002

High precision mass measurement with KEDR detector at VEPP-4M An example of J/ mass measurement

High precision mass measurement with KEDR detector at VEPP-4M MJ/ψ= 3096.917 ± 0.010 ± 0.007 MeV Mψ’ = 3686.117 ± 0.012 ± 0.015 MeV Mψ’’= 3773.5 ± 0.9 ± 0.6 MeV The precision was improved 3-6 times compare to PDG value

High precision mass measurement with KEDR detector at VEPP-4M -lepton mass measurement ee→ττ τ-lepton mass Best results now: precision is 1.5 better then PDG value

High precision test of CPT Spin precession frequency  is equal to: So, comparison of the precession frequency of electron and positron is sensitive to m , e and g-2 ! Now the differences of the electron and positron mass, charge and g-2 are below 6*10ˉ , 8*10ˉ and 4*10ˉ respectively Our preliminary study shows that we can compare precession frequency for electrons and positron with precision of 10ˉ⁹

Conclusion The new development of the methods for high precision measurement of beams energy allows to realize a wide physics program with KEDR at VEPP-4M: Improvement of the mass measurement of J/ and  - families and D-mesons Improvement of the -lepton mass measurement Precision measurement of the e+e- hadrons cross section in the region 2E=1.8-4.0 Gev High precision test of CPT theorem by comparison of spin precession frequencies of electrons and positrons