LHCb Velo: commissioning, performance and High flux tests.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LHCb Alignment 12 th April 2007 S. Viret Coseners Forum « LHC Startup » 1. Introduction 2. The alignment challenge 3. Conclusions.
Advertisements

H1 SILICON DETECTORS PRESENT STATUS By Wolfgang Lange, DESY Zeuthen.
Collection Of Plots for A Testbeam Paper. List of Possible Plots R/Phi resolution, charge sharing, noise etc. Noise performance and few Landau distributions.
ATLAS SCT Endcap Detector Modules Lutz Feld University of Freiburg for the ATLAS SCT Collaboration Vertex m.
(non-)Destructive high-rate tests on silicon strip modules Emulating LHC beam incidents using the PS booster and measuring the effect on a LHCb Velo silicon.
May 14, 2015Pavel Řezníček, IPNP Charles University, Prague1 Tests of ATLAS strip detector modules: beam, source, G4 simulations.
1 The LHCb Vertex detector 15/9/2003 Physics –Goals –Properties and consequences LHCb –Overview of the detector Vertex –Specifications –Silicon stations.
The Transverse detector is made of an array of 256 scintillating fibers coupled to Avalanche PhotoDiodes (APD). The small size of the fibers (5X5mm) results.
The ATLAS Pixel Detector - Running Experience – Markus Keil – University of Geneva on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration Vertex 2009 Putten, Netherlands,
1 Performance of the LHCb VELO Outline LHCb Detector and its performance in Run I LHCb Detector and its performance in Run I LHCb VELO LHCb VELO VELO performance.
Martin van Beuzekom, STD6 14 th September Outline: Introduction to LHCb and VErtex LOcator (VELO) Status of VELO Beamtests Upgrades Summary LHCb.
The LHCb VErtex LOcator Olaf Behrendt on behalf of the VELO group Novosibirsk,
Chris Parkes First results from the LHCb Vertex Locator Act 1: LHCb Intro. Act 2: Velo Design Act 3: Initial Performance for LHCb VELO groupVienna Conference.
Installation and operation of the LHCb Silicon Tracker detector Daniel Esperante (Universidade de Santiago de Compostela) on behalf of the Silicon Tracker.
LHCb VErtex LOcator & Displaced Vertex Trigger
Swadhin Taneja Stony Brook University On behalf of Vertex detector team at PHENIX Collaboration 112/2/2015S. Taneja -- DNP Conference, Santa Fe Nov 1-6.
8/18/2004E. Monnier - CPPM - ICHEP04 - Beijing1 Atlas liquid argon calorimeter status E. Monnier on behalf of the Atlas liquid argon calorimeter group.
Apollo Go, NCU Taiwan BES III Luminosity Monitor Apollo Go National Central University, Taiwan September 16, 2002.
26 June 2006Imaging2006, Stockholm, Niels Tuning 1/18 Tracking with the LHCb Spectrometer Detector Performance and Track Reconstruction Niels Tuning (Outer.
Progress on the beam tracking instrumentation Position measurement device Tests performed and their resolution Decision on electronics Summary.
- Performance Studies & Production of the LHCb Silicon Tracker Stefan Koestner (University Zurich) on behalf of the Silicon Tracker Collaboration IT -
LHCb Vertex Detector and Beetle Chip
ScECAL Beam FNAL Short summary & Introduction to analysis S. Uozumi Nov ScECAL meeting.
CHIPP meeting Appenberg, 24 Aug 2009 Preparation for LHC beam, Jeroen van Tilburg 1/15 Jeroen van Tilburg (Universität Zürich) LHCb: Preparation for LHC.
The Detector Performance Study for the Barrel Section of the ATLAS Semiconductor Tracker (SCT) with Cosmic Rays Yoshikazu Nagai (Univ. of Tsukuba) For.
1. Efficient trigger for many B decay topologies Muon System CALORIMETERS PRS + ECAL+ HCAL RICH1 VERTEX LOCATOR Efficient PID Good decay time resolution.
The LHCb Vertex Locator Lars Eklund LHCb VELO Group of the LHCb Collaboration CERN (Geneva), EPFL (Lausanne), NIKHEF (Amsterdam), University of Glasgow,
26/May/2008Calor LHCb Preshower(PS) and Scintillating pad detector (SPD): commissioning, calibration, and monitoring Eduardo Picatoste Universitat.
Test Beam Results on the ATLAS Electromagnetic Calorimeters Lucia Di Ciaccio – LAPP Annecy (on behalf of the ATLAS LAr Group) OUTLINE Description of the.
A novel approach to detector calibration parameter determination and detector monitoring Eduardo Rodrigues On behalf of the LHCb VELO Group CHEP 2010,
A New Inner-Layer Silicon Micro- Strip Detector for D0 Alice Bean for the D0 Collaboration University of Kansas CIPANP Puerto Rico.
3 May 2003, LHC2003 Symposium, FermiLab Tracking Performance in LHCb, Jeroen van Tilburg 1 Tracking performance in LHCb Tracking Performance Jeroen van.
Commissioning the LHCb VErtex LOcator (VELO) Mark Tobin University of Liverpool On behalf of the LHCb VELO group July 28, 2008Vertex 2008: 17th International.
Performance of the LHCb Vertex Locator Thomas Latham (on behalf of the LHCb VELO group) 11/06/20111TIPP Chicago.
1 Methods of PSD energy calibration. 2 Dependence of energy resolution on many factors Constant term is essential only for energy measurement of single.
Aras Papadelis. NIKHEF 1 Aras Papadelis B-physics meeting 15/ Results from the Nov2004 VELO test beam (and what followed…)
Use of Silicon Detectors for Proton Diagnostics Tomasz Cybulski
Atlas SemiConductor Tracker final integration and commissioning Andrée Robichaud-Véronneau Université de Genève on behalf of the Atlas SCT collaboration.
12 th LECC, Valencia Sep 2006Aldo F. Saavedra 1 The Vertex Detector of LHCb - VeLo Aldo F. Saavedra Glasgow University On behalf of the VeLo group.
First collisions in LHC
Developing Radiation Hard Silicon for the Vertex Locator
Tracking detectors/2 F.Riggi.
IOP HEPP Conference Upgrading the CMS Tracker for SLHC Mark Pesaresi Imperial College, London.
Results achieved so far to improve the RPC rate capability
The Silicon Drift Detector of the ALICE Experiment
Silicon Pixel Detector for the PHENIX experiment at the BNL RHIC
Simulated vertex precision
Preparation of LHCb for data taking
Panagiotis Kokkas Univ. of Ioannina
CMS Preshower: Startup procedures: Reconstruction & calibration
Roberto Chierici - CERN
CMS ECAL Calibration and Test Beam Results
5% The CMS all silicon tracker simulation
The LHC collider in Geneva
ScECAL+AHCAL+TCMT Combined Beam FNAL
The Pixel Hybrid Photon Detectors of the LHCb RICH
UNIZH and EPFL at LHCb.
ATLAS Silicon Tracker commissioning
VELO Software Status Some highlights of recent work
LHCb HCAL: performance and calibration
Vertex Detector Overview Prototypes R&D Plans Summary.
Niels Tuning (Outer Tracker Group LHCb)
The LHCb vertex detector
Operational Experience with the ATLAS Pixel Detector at the LHC
Peter Kodyš, Zdeněk Doležal, Jan Brož,
The LHCb Level 1 trigger LHC Symposium, October 27, 2001
Setup for testing LHCb Inner Tracker Modules
The LHCb VErtex LOcator
The LHCb Front-end Electronics System Status and Future Development
First results from the LHCb Vertex Locator
Presentation transcript:

LHCb Velo: commissioning, performance and High flux tests. K. Akiba On behalf of the Velo group

LHCb VErtex LOcator Muon HCAL ECAL RICH2 Tracker Magnet TT RICH1 VELO Outer/Inner Tracker Silicon sensors BEAM BEAM Kazu Akiba RD09 Firenze 30.9.2009 2

Velo – A Closer Look Cooling manifold 21 +2 modules 2 retractable detector halves: 21 stations per half with an R and Ф sensor Bi-phase CO2 cooling system Injection 6 cm x y Cooling manifold Stable beams 21 +2 modules Kazu Akiba RD09 Firenze 30.9.2009

Even Closer Electronics Cooling: Thermal highway to remove 18W (ΔT=20C) CO2 evaporator Mechanical Support -sensor R-side circuit -side circuit R-sensor Thermal Pyrolythic Graphite Kazu Akiba RD09 Firenze 30.9.2009

after 3-4 years [~8 fb-1]: Replacement under construction Sensors 300 μm n-in-n strip sensors (Micron Semiconductor) Double metal layer for signal routing R measuring sensors: Pitch=40-102μm Non uniform type inversion (2fb-1) 512 strips Radius (cm) 512 strips 1385 outer strips 683 inner strips Depletion Voltage 512 strips 512 strips Radius (cm) Ф measuring sensors: Pitch=36-97μm VELO closest detector to LHC! expected radiation dose: 1.3 · 1014neq/cm2/year at r = 0.8 cm 5 · 1012neq/cm2/year at r = 4.2 cm after 3-4 years [~8 fb-1]: Replacement under construction Kazu Akiba RD09 Firenze 30.9.2009

Can we make it work? Yes! – Detector in its very final commissioning stage. Short description of the Controls and DAQ system Some calibration plots. Results from LHC injection tests. Kazu Akiba RD09 Firenze 30.9.2009

Service electronics (84) Temperature monitoring Board (6) DAQ/ECS Shielding wall VELO Half (x2) LV CAEN HV ISEG Throughput Rate: 1 MHz lOlOl ADC TELL1 (84) ADC ADC ADC Service electronics (84) LV delays Timing & trigger system 60m analogue cables GBE FPGAs ECS 25m Control Board (14) ECS Temperature monitoring Board (6) delays Optical receiver Kazu Akiba RD09 Firenze 30.9.2009

Working State Test Pulse Noise Measuered with Noise: Noise = offset + slope* Capacitance. Test Pulse Noise Kazu Akiba RD09 Firenze 30.9.2009

LHC shots on TED No Cosmics for the Velo Results from last run: mm No Cosmics for the Velo Results from last run: 6-7th of June. Main objectives: Timing Online monitoring Tracking Alignment Determination of the detector position TI8 LHC mm Transfer line External beam Dump. 340m before LHCb, along beam 2 Aquired around 10k Tracks. Kazu Akiba RD09 Firenze 30.9.2009

Time Shape Fit Timing Event by event pulse shape fit (25 ns spaced steps) The procedure to tune the timing was tested with data acquired on the TED. Can set the time with precision better than 2 ns with ~100 cluster/sensor/step Time (ns) Clusters ADC Counts Average fit, with fine steps (6.5 ns) Time (ns) Can set the time with precision better than 2 ns with ~100 cluster/sensor/step Kazu Akiba RD09 Firenze 30.9.2009

Pulse Shape Time after peak (ns) Pre-spill % Spillover S/N loss 2.0 2.0 24.5 1 4.0 21.8 1.6 2 6.2 19.2 1.5 3 9.2 16.8 2.2 4 13.0 14.6 4.4 5 17.5 12.5 6.4 6 22.9 10.5 8.7 Amplitude Peak (ns) Constant (offset) Spillover = ADC @ Peak +25ns / ADC@peak. Pre-spill = ADC @ Peak - 25ns / ADC@peak. 4 ns Spillover @ +4 ns Fractional charge Kazu Akiba RD09 Firenze 30.9.2009 Fraction of the charge Strip Length (mm)

TED’s Signal Use clusters on tracks and corrected for path-lengths Phi: 34.4 R: 32.8 Signal to Noise: Phi: 20 R: 18 ADC counts ADC counts Kazu Akiba RD09 Firenze 30.9.2009

Resolution Expected resolution vs track angle LHCb tracks TED tracks Preliminary TED tracks Expected resolution vs track angle LHCb tracks Kazu Akiba RD09 Firenze 30.9.2009

Pseudoefficiency by interpolation Exp. Rec. Very Preliminary R sensors 97.2 %  sensors 97.5 % Limited search window: 5 of resolution + Tolerance of 100 m (5 mrad) Mult. Scatter. Higher Efficiency expected for Collision data. Kazu Akiba RD09 Firenze 30.9.2009 14

First evaluation of 2 halves distance Preliminary Resolver x distance 2 mm Distance measured with 255 tracks: 2.163 mm ±0.08 The halves were moved by 450 m. Distance measured with 852 tracks: 2.611 ± 0.09 Preliminary Relative distance between the halves measured: 445 Kazu Akiba RD09 Firenze 30.9.2009

Some Tracks Kazu Akiba RD09 Firenze 30.9.2009

Should we be afraid of LHC? The Velo sits very close to the beam Beam incidents are not to be excluded: incomplete or unsynchronized kicker fire wrong magnet settings in transfer line LHCb wrong magnet settings in the LHC Take a Velo Module to a quasi LHC incident scenario: Velo High Particle Rate Test A.K.A. Zap Test. Kazu Akiba RD09 Firenze 30.9.2009

PS Booster Proton beam with 1.4 GeV energy Intensity: 2x109 – 9x1012 p Beam spot: a few mm Bunch length: ~200 ns Resto 2 Main bldg Compare with LHC Pilot bunch @ injection: 2x109 protons (450 GeV) 300 µm beam spot 0.4 ns bunch length Full luminosity L=1034 4x1013 protons/cm2/bunch 288 bunches Kazu Akiba RD09 Firenze 30.9.2009

The victim Mounted in the beam line LHCb/Velo spare from production Cooled to +1 ˚C (LV on) Florescent screen to view the beam Insert/retract from beam line Remote control and read-out LHCb/Velo spare from production Kazu Akiba RD09 Firenze 30.9.2009

Beam images Combined R-Φ sensor Beam line camera on front-end data scintillating screen Kazu Akiba RD09 Firenze 30.9.2009

Measurements No measurable damage up to Intensity steps: 2x109, 2x1010, 2x1011, 2x1012 , 9x1012 Each step: LV/HV off, LV on/HV off, LV on/HV 150 V , LV on/HV 300V Each beam ‘shot’ follows the same pattern A set of standard measurements I/V of both sensors Noise & pedestal data Test pulse data. Insert the module, acquire during the shot 14 consecutive triggers of front-end data: 350 ns. Repeat the same set of measurements Shots on two sensor positions Shots on five front-end chips (only LV on/off matters) No measurable damage up to 9x1012 @ 300V bias on the sensor 2x1011 (LV on) on the FE chips Kazu Akiba RD09 Firenze 30.9.2009

Survival Proofs Test pulse response @ ‘booster’: in-situ after a few shots at 2x109 ‘lab’: lab measurement after the full program Gain difference due to different analogue drivers/receivers Bad channels identical to production QA Kazu Akiba RD09 Firenze 30.9.2009

Thermal image: No hot-spots Kazu Akiba RD09 Firenze 30.9.2009

Summary The Velo detector is ready for data taking with the LHC. At least one module tested against (and survived) a “beam like incident” particle rates. Kazu Akiba RD09 Firenze 30.9.2009