Characteristics of ASTER GDEM Version 2

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Trend for Precision Soil Testing % Zone or Grid Samples Tested compared to Total Samples.
Advertisements

Trend for Precision Soil Testing % Zone or Grid Samples Tested compared to Total Samples.
AGVISE Laboratories %Zone or Grid Samples – Northwood laboratory
Fill in missing numbers or operations
STATISTICS Linear Statistical Models
36th COSPAR Scientific Assembly 2006 Beijing July 20, 2006 Hypothesis-Test-Based Landcover Change Detection Using Multitemporal Satellite Images S. P.
Surface Water and Ocean Topography (SWOT) Satellite Mission
VIIRS Data Evaluation Over Thailand and Japan February 13, 2012 Chair, Chris Elvidge NOAA-NGDC 1.
1 September North Lee Street, Suite 400 · Alexandria, Virginia · · FAX Public Opinion on Coverage for the Uninsured.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Agency Report, WGISS #22 September 15, 2006 Lyndon R. Oleson U.S. Geological Survey Center for Earth.
Development of Global Map for GEOSS Societal Benefit Areas US-09-03a UIC 13 th Meeting, Washington November, 2009 Yoshikazu FUKUSHIMA Secretariat.
Integrated GMES Project on Landcover and Vegetation geoland Grid based Spatial Disaggregation of Population Data Klaus Steinnocher – ARC systems research.
JMA Takayuki MATSUMURA (Forecast Department, JMA) C Asia Air Survey co., ltd New Forecast Technologies for Disaster Prevention and Mitigation 1.
Add Governors Discretionary (1G) Grants Chapter 6.
CALENDAR.
2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt 2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt 2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt 2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt 2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt ShapesPatterns Counting Number.
Environmental Remote Sensing GEOG 2021
Decimals 10ths and 100ths.
£1 Million £500,000 £250,000 £125,000 £64,000 £32,000 £16,000 £8,000 £4,000 £2,000 £1,000 £500 £300 £200 £100 Welcome.
IGARSS 2011, Vancouver, Canada
1 00/XXXX © Crown copyright Carol Roadnight, Peter Clark Met Office, JCMM Halliwell Representing convection in convective scale NWP models : An idealised.
1 OFDM Synchronization Speaker:. Wireless Access Tech. Lab. CCU Wireless Access Tech. Lab. 2 Outline OFDM System Description Synchronization What is Synchronization?
The basics for simulations
Jim Thompson, Eric Anderson, & Rob Austin NC State University, Department of Soil Science Jim Thompson, Eric Anderson, & Rob Austin NC State University,
CrIMSS EDR Performance Assessment and Tuning Alex Foo, Xialin Ma and Degui Gu Sept 11, 2012.
Filling and Wrapping Review Sheet
1 Prediction of electrical energy by photovoltaic devices in urban situations By. R.C. Ott July 2011.
Basis and Price Formation. Basis Basis is the difference between a cash price at a specific location and the price of a particular futures contract. The.
Area under curves Consider the curve y = f(x) for x  [a, b] The actual area under the curve is units 2 The approximate area is the sum of areas.
When you see… Find the zeros You think….
Before Between After.
Enhancement of Satellite-based Precipitation Estimates using the Information from the Proposed Advanced Baseline Imager (ABI) Part II: Drizzle Detection.
Bottoms Up Factoring. Start with the X-box 3-9 Product Sum
1 Dr. Scott Schaefer Least Squares Curves, Rational Representations, Splines and Continuity.
LANDSAT Program Update Tim Newman Coordinator, USGS Land Remote Sensing Program National Geospatial Advisory Committee December 3, 2014.
ASTER Operation Scenario and Status Y. Yamaguchi (Nagoya Univ., Japan) M. Fujita, T. Tachikawa, M. Kato, H. Tsu ( ERSDAC, Japan), M.J. Abrams, L. Maldonado.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey SRTM Level-2, ASTER GDEM Quality comparison Wm Matthew Cushing 18 February 2011, Sao Paulo Brazil.
Characteristics, uses, and sources Introduction to DEMs.
Naresh N Spatial Modelling Group RMS India Pvt. Ltd., Noida February 8, 2012 Damage loss estimation of the 2011 Japan tsunami: A case study Co-authors.
High-Resolution Maps of Outlet Glacier Surface Elevation Change from Combined Laser Altimeter and Digital Elevation Model Data (ID # ) Joanna Fredenslund.
G. Bryan Bailey, U.S. Geological Survey, USA Michael Abrams, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, USA Hiroji Tsu, ERSDAC, Japan Hiroyuki Fujisada, SILC, Japan Dean.
Digital Elevation Models GLY 560: GIS and Remote Sensing for Earth Scientists Class Home Page:
SDCG-5 ESA/ESRIN, Frascati, Italy February 24-26, 2014 SDCG-5 Session 4 Element 3 (R&D support) Intro Gene Fosnight.
SRTM 30-m Wm Matthew Cushing (USGS) 16 May 2013
GTOPO30 Global 30-arc-second (1-km) elevation model - “Best available” global DEM - Initial release: March Widely used for climate modeling, land.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Geometric Assessment of Remote Sensed Data Oct Presented By: Michael Choate, SAIC U.S.
ASSESSMENT OF ALBEDO CHANGES AND THEIR DRIVING FACTORS OVER THE QINGHAI-TIBETAN PLATEAU B. Zhang, L. Lei, Hao Zhang, L. Zhang and Z. Zen WE4.T Geology.
SWOT Near Nadir Ka-band SAR Interferometry: SWOT Airborne Experiment Xiaoqing Wu, JPL, California Institute of Technology, USA Scott Hensley, JPL, California.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Mega-File Data Cube (MFDC) Concept and Preparation Jun Xiong, Prasad, Pardha Nov 21th, 2013, Flagstaff.
USGS DIGITAL TERRAIN MODELS AND MOSAICS FOR LMMP M. R. Rosiek, E. M. Lee, E. T. Howington-Kraus, R. L. Fergason, L. A. Weller, D. M. Galuszka, B. L. Redding,
ASTER Advanced Spaceborne Emission and Reflection Radiometer.
Generation of a Digital Elevation Model using high resolution satellite images By Mr. Yottanut Paluang FoS: RS&GIS.
Evapotranspiration Estimates over Canada based on Observed, GR2 and NARR forcings Korolevich, V., Fernandes, R., Wang, S., Simic, A., Gong, F. Natural.
Terrain Data at the LP DAAC
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Afghanistan Natural Resource Assessment and Reconstruction Project Geospatial Infrastructure Development:
Volcano observations with ASTER and ASTER image database for volcanoes Urai, Minoru Geological Survey of Japan, AIST.
0 0 Robert Wolfe NASA GSFC, Greenbelt, MD GSFC Hydrospheric and Biospheric Sciences Laboratory, Terrestrial Information System Branch (614.5) Carbon Cycle.
Spatially Complete Global Spectral Surface Albedos: Value-Added Datasets Derived From Terra MODIS Land Products Eric G. Moody 1,2, Michael D. King 1, Steven.
Alaska DEM Workshop JULY 22, Agenda Sensors Terrain Models Accuracy Grid Spacing Deliverables Archive (DEMs, Stereo coverage) Product.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Afghanistan Natural Resource Assessment and Reconstruction Project Geospatial Infrastructure Development:
Global Forest Change 2000 – 2012 Classification of Landsat from two different years
Retrieval of Land Surface Temperature from Remote Sensing Thermal Images Dr. Khalil Valizadeh Kamran University of Tabriz, Iran.
The Low Frequency Array (LOFAR)
Definition In scientific literature there is no universal agreement about the usage of the terms: digital elevation model (DEM) digital terrain model (DTM)
S. Skakun1,2, J.-C. Roger1,2, E. Vermote2, C. Justice1, J. Masek3
Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer
Environmental data Landscape genomics
Satellite Sensors – Historical Perspectives
Digital Elevation Models (DEM) / DTM
Information Session: October 12, 2011 – 2:30 – 4:00 in Rm
Presentation transcript:

Characteristics of ASTER GDEM Version 2 IGARRS 2011, Vancouver, Canada Session: TH2.T05.3 ASTER (Thursday, July 28, 10:20 - 12:00) Characteristics of ASTER GDEM Version 2 Tetsushi Tachikawa1, Masami Hato1, Manabu Kaku2, Akira Iwasaki3 1 Earth Remote Sensing Data Analysis Center (ERSDAC), 2 Mitsubishi Material Techno Corp., 3 University of Tokyo

METI/Japan and NASA/USA in conjunction ASTER GDEM Project METI/Japan and NASA/USA in conjunction with ERSDAC and LPDAAC   ASTER GDEM Data source ASTER Release 2009 (ver.1) Data collection 2000-2008(ver.1) Posting 1 arc-second (30 m) Coverage 83 degrees north - 83 degrees south Missing data Areas under constant cloud cover (filled by other DEMs)

Status of GDEM Version 2 Now Validated by Version 1 Release Year 2009 2010 2011 Month 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Now Validated by USGS NGA NASA/JPL NASA/GSFC University of Tokyo ERSDAC Version 1 Release Trial Process Trial Version Version 2 Production by SILC Beta Version Validation New Data Version 2 Release ASTER New Observation

ASTER Stereo Observation ASTER nadir- and backward-looking telescopes (Band3, NIR band) allow acquisition of stereo image pairs Automated processing Terra/ASTER 55 sec. Image correlation matching between Band 3N and Band 3B Band3N Nadir Band3B Backward Determination of geolocation at the corresponding point for Band 3N and Band 3B Elevation Calculation of elevation

ASTER GDEM Production ASTER GDEM ASTER Coverage Global Coverage All ASTER stereo observation (60km*60km*1.2 million scenes) Produce scene DEM ASTER Coverage Calculate elevations by stacking ASTER GDEM Global Coverage Elevation (m) Number of stack (#)

Updates in GDEM Version2 New algorithm Finer horizontal resolution The elevation is calculated by image matching of ASTER stereo pair. The kernel size for image correlation matching is changed to 5 by 5 pixel from 9 by 9 pixel. Offset adjustment Every calculated scene DEM has elevation offset of -5m. This offset (-5m) is adjusted. Water body detection GDEM version 1 could detect lakes larger than about 12km2. This improves to 1km2 in version 2. New observed data GDEM version 2 incorporates new ASTER data observed after September 2008. The voids and artifacts caused by lack of ASTER data will be improved.

Estimate Horizontal and Elevation Error GSI 10m-grid DEM covers all the land of Japan GSI (The Geospatial Information Authority of Japan) N36E137 N36E138 N35E137 N35E138 553701 553702 553801 553802 543703 543704 543803 543804 543701 543702 543801 543802 533703 533704 533803 533804 533701 533702 533801 533802 523703 523704 523803 523804

Method to Estimate Horizontal Error 13 grid square = 169 grids ASTER GDEM 169 grids of elevation error (m) 0.4 arc-second 0.4 arc-second SD of elevation errors (m) Move 13 grid square and repeat 2 dimensional mapping Calculate the lowest location   -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 +1 +2 +3 +4 +5 +6 7.46 7.36 7.31 7.29 7.37 7.60 7.76 7.95 8.17 8.42 8.69 7.35 7.26 7.21 7.20 7.23 7.39 7.53 7.70 7.90 8.13 8.38 8.66 7.19 7.18 7.28 7.71 7.91 8.15 8.40 8.68 7.34 7.22 7.33 7.45 7.59 7.77 7.98 8.22 8.48 8.75 7.43 7.32 7.57 7.72 8.11 8.35 8.60 8.88 7.58 7.52 7.49 7.50 7.55 7.63 7.75 8.08 8.29 8.53 8.78 9.06 7.79 7.74 7.73 7.78 7.87 7.99 8.14 8.32 8.76 9.01 9.28 8.06 8.01 8.07 8.27 8.80 9.03 9.54 8.36 8.34 8.92 9.12 9.34 9.59 9.85 8.71 8.85 8.97 9.11 9.48 9.69 9.93 10.1 9.10 9.07 9.16 9.25 9.37 9.51 9.67 9.86 10.0 10.3 10.5 9.49 9.50 9.53 9.68 9.79 10.2 10.4 10.7 10.9 9.95 9.94 9.98 11.1 11.3 EW NS SD GSI 10m-grid DEM

Horizontal Error N-S Geolocation Error (arc-second) 1.0 arc-second E-W Geolocation Error (arc-second)

Standard Deviation of Elevation Error SD of Elevation Error (m) Average of Version 1 Average of Version 2

Offset Estimation Offset is estimated in ‘Rice Farm’ and ‘Farm’ as open area. “Subdivision Land Use Data of Digital National Land Information” produced by the GSI Japan. Land Use Rice Farm Farm Forest Bare Urban Others

Offset Estimation Offset is estimated as -0.7 m. Frequency   Mean Peak SD RMSE Rice Farm -1.32 -0.74 5.91 6.06 Farm -1.09 -1.23 8.50 8.57 Forest +8.68 +7.98 13.26 15.85 Offset is estimated as -0.7 m. Frequency Elevation Error (m)

Horizontal Resolution Version 1 Version 2 Version 1

Method to Estimate Resolution GDEM Version 2 Version 1 4000 m Resolution:1arc-sec Resolution:2arc-sec Resolution:3arc-sec Resolution:4arc-sec Reference DEM (Degraded 10m DEM) 4000 m Elevation Error -50 +50 m m Standard Dev. 14.489 13.022 13.122 13.993

Horizontal Resolution (arc second) of Reference DEM Estimated Resolution Standard Deviation of Elevation Error (m) 3.8 (114m) 2.4 (72m) Horizontal Resolution (arc second) of Reference DEM

Error Estimation of Version 2 Horizontal Error 0.82 arc-sec. to west 0.47 arc-sec. to south 0.11 arc-sec. to west 0.20 arc-sec. to north Elevation Error offset -6m -0.7m SD 14.8m 12.6m Horizontal Resolution 3.8 arc-sec. (114m*) 2.4 arc-sec. (72m*) *1 arc-second corresponds to 30m

Improvement of Voids in Northern Area Version 2 Version 1

Improvement of Voids in Northern Area Version 2 Version 1

Improvement of Artifacts Version 1 S31E023 1200x1200 arc-second filled 01234567890123456789012 1000 2000 Elevation (m) Stacking Number

Improvement of Artifacts Version 2 S31E023 1200x1200 arc-second filled 01234567890123456789012 1000 2000 Elevation (m) Stacking Number

Improvement of Artifacts Ver.2 Ver.1 Ver.1 Ver.2

Improvement of Water Body Version 1 Version 2 Lake Nicaragua Lake Nicaragua N11W086 1200x1200 arc-second 800 Elevation (m)

Improvement of Water Body Ver.2 Lake Nicaragua Ver.1 Lake Nicaragua Ver.1 Ver.2

Improvements of Version 2 #Stack increase to three or more in most of the lack area. Voids in northern area Decrease Artifacts (step, Pit-in-bump, Mole-run, etc.) Almost disappear New water body detection algorithm Lakes are perfectly flat. Step Artifacts Pit-in-bump Mole-run

Summary Main characteristics of ASTER GDEM version 2 Resolution improves to 70m from 110m (version 1). Offset reduces to -0.7m from -6m (version 1). Voids in northern area decrease. Artifacts mostly disappear. Lakes are perfectly flat.