Ecloud in quadrupole & Sextupole

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
BUILD-UP SIMULATIONS FOR DAFNE WIGGLER W/ ELECTRODES Theo Demma.
Advertisements

Electron-cloud instability in the CLIC damping ring for positrons H. Bartosik, G. Iadarola, Y. Papaphilippou, G. Rumolo TWIICE workshop, TWIICE.
Review of Electron Cloud R&D at KEKB 1.Diagnostics 1.Beam Size Blow-up 2.Beam Instabilities 3.Electron Density 4.SEY (Secondary Electron Yield) 2.Mitigation.
Damping ring K. Ohmi LC Layout Single tunnel Circumference 6.7 km Energy 5 GeV 2 km 35 km.
Latest ILC DR wiggler simulations M. Pivi, T. Raubenheimer, L. Wang (SLAC) July, 2005.
RedOffice.com Presentation templates Slide No. 1 RFA Detector Data of Electron Cloud Build-up and Simulations Eric Wilkinson Mentor: Jim Crittenden Cornell.
Using Tune Shifts to Evaluate Electron Cloud Effects on Beam Dynamics at CesrTA Jennifer Chu Mentors: Dr. David Kreinick and Dr. Gerry Dugan 8/11/2011REU.
ECLOUD Calculations of Field Gradients During Bunch Passage Jim Crittenden Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences and Education Electron Cloud.
LEPP, the Cornell University Laboratory for Elementary-Particle Physics, has joined with CHESS to become the Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-based Sciences.
Electron Cloud Modeling for CesrTA Daniel Carmody Mentors: Levi Schächter, David Rubin August 8th, 2007.
R. Cimino COULOMB’05, Senigallia, Sept 15, Surface related properties as an essential ingredient to e-cloud simulations. The problem of input parameters:
LEPP, the Cornell University Laboratory for Elementary-Particle Physics, has joined with CHESS to become the Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-based Sciences.
Electron Cloud in ilcDR: Update T. Demma, INFN-LNF.
ECLOUD Calculations of Coherent Tune Shifts for the April 2007 Measurements - This presentation limited to resolving drift/dipole weighting question -
Space Charge Electric-Field Calculations for Coherent Tune Shift Estimations using the Electron-cloud Modelling Algorithm ECLOUD Jim Crittenden Cornell.
ECLOUD Calculations of Coherent Tune Shifts for the April 2007 Measurements - Thanks to Marco for clarifying the drift/dipole weighting - - Thanks to Gerry.
ECLOUD Simulations for CESR Witness Bunch Tune Shift Measurements Jim Crittenden Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences and Education.
25-26 June, 2009 CesrTA Workshop CTA09 Electron Cloud Single-Bunch Instability Modeling using CMAD M. Pivi CesrTA CTA09 Workshop June 2009.
Webex Electron Cloud Evaluations for ILC DR Mauro Pivi on behalf of the ILC Electron Cloud Working Group - by Webex - KILC12 – Daegu Korea April 25, 2012.
ILC damping ring Workshop, Dec 19, 2007, KEK, L. WANG Ecloud simulation 2007 ILC Damping Rings Mini-Workshop December, 2007 Lanfa Wang, SLAC.
Preliminary Simulation on Electron Cloud Build-up in SppC Liu Yu Dong.
Electron cloud simulations for SuperKEKB Y.Susaki,KEK-ACCL 9 Feb, 2010 KEK seminar.
March 23, 2010 CMAD a tracking and e-cloud beam instability parallel code (M.Pivi SLAC) Taking MAD(X) optics file at input, thus tracking the beam in a.
1 CERN 1 Mar E-CLOUD Build-up in Grooved Chambers Marco Venturini Center for Beam Physics, LBNL ECL2 -- CERN, 1-2 March 2007.
Electron cloud in the wigglers of ILC Damping Rings L. Wang SLAC ILC Damping Rings R&D Workshop - ILCDR06 September 26-28, 2006 Cornell University.
October 13,2010 WG Meeting Cornell U. Recommendation for Electron Cloud Mitigations in the ILC Damping Ring ILC DR Working Group October 13, 2010 Cornell.
E-cloud studies at LNF T. Demma INFN-LNF. Plan of talk Introduction New feedback system to suppress horizontal coupled-bunch instability. Preliminary.
Compare options: simulations recent history Cloud density near (r=1mm) beam (m -3 ) before bunch passage, values are taken at a cloud equilibrium density.
Compare options: simulations recent history Cloud density near (r=1mm) beam (m -3 ) before bunch passage, values are taken at a cloud equilibrium density.
ILC DR Workshop - KEK December, A new resonance in wiggler simulations: Christine Celata Use POSINST code.
Cesr-TA Simulations: Overview and Status G. Dugan, Cornell University LCWS-08.
Nov 17, 2009 Webex Assessing the 3.2 km Ring feasibility: Simulation parameters for electron cloud Build-up and Instability estimation LC DR Electron Cloud.
Electron cloud measurements and simulations at CesrTA G. Dugan, Cornell University 4/19/09 TILC09 4/18/09.
Simulation of multipacting thresholds G. Iadarola and A. Romano on behalf of the LIU-SPS e-cloud team LIU SPS scrubbing review, 8 September, 2015.
G. Rumolo, F. Zimmermann, Cornell Workshop LC e-Cloud Activities at CERN G. Rumolo, F. Zimmermann WP e-cloud task contacts: F. Zimmermann, CERN;
Electron cloud in Final Doublet IRENG07) ILC Interaction Region Engineering Design Workshop (IRENG07) September 17-21, 2007, SLAC Lanfa Wang.
Electron Cloud Studies Theo Demma INFN-LNF Frascati.
Electron cloud measurement in Cu/Al chambers with/without TiN coating at KEKB positron ring ILC DR Working Group Meeting Kyo Shibata (KEK)
Vacuum System S. Guiducci BTR, LNF 8 July RDR - electron damping ring:
Electron Cloud Issues for the 3.2km Positron Damping Ring Mark Palmer (Cornell University) GDE January 18, 2011 ILC Baseline Assessment Workshop 2 SLAC.
Electron cloud study for ILC damping ring at KEKB and CESR K. Ohmi (KEK) ILC damping ring workshop KEK, Dec , 2007.
3 February 2010 ILC Damping Ring electron cloud WG effort Mauro Pivi SLAC on behalf of ILC DR working group on e- cloud ILC DR Webex Meeting Jan 3, 2010.
Measurement of the Electron Cloud Density in a Solenoid Field and a Quadrupole Field K. Kanazawa and H. Fukuma KEK June 2009 CTA09 1.
Electron Cloud Studies at DAFNE Theo Demma INFN-LNF Frascati.
Electron Cloud in the International Linear Collider ILC Mauro Pivi work performed while at SLAC and the ILC Damping Ring Working Group High.
Coupled bunch Instabilities at ILC Damping Rings L. Wang SLAC ILC Damping Rings R&D Workshop - ILCDR06 September 26-28, 2006 Cornell University Refer to.
LEPP, the Cornell University Laboratory for Elementary-Particle Physics, has joined with CHESS to become the Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-based Sciences.
Status of ECLOUD Simulations for the Shielded Button Measurements
Electron Cloud & IBS Update
Update to ECLOUD Calculations for the
Groove Mitigation and Plans
Electron Cloud Effects in SuperB
Observations and Predictions for DAFNE and SuperB
Impedance & SEY of grooved surface
Impedance & SEY of grooved Surface Ecloud in Quadpole
Electron cloud and collective effects in the FCC-ee Interaction Region
J.A.Crittenden, Y.Li, X.Liu, M.A.Palmer, J.P.Sikora (Cornell)
Electron Cloud in ilcDR: Update
SuperB General Meeting June , Perugia (Italy)
ILC DR instability simulations
ILC 3.2 km DR design based on FODO lattice (DMC3)
Status of Ecloud Build-Up Simulations for the ILC DR’s
ILC DR instability simulations
ILC DR Working Group on Collective Effect: Electron Cloud
ILC 3.2 km DR design based on FODO lattice (DMC3)
ILC Damping Ring electron cloud WG effort
Electron Cloud in ilcDR: Update
Electron Cloud Build-up in ilcDR
ILC DR instability simulations
R&D GOALS AND MILESTONES TOWARDS A TECHNICAL DESIGN REPORT TDR (2008)
Presentation transcript:

Ecloud in quadrupole & Sextupole Lanfa

parameters 3.2km DR 6.4km DR Field: 7.5T/m Length:0.3m Pipe radius: 25mm SEY: 0.9~1.4 Beam Size: (270,5) m Field: 12T/m Length:0.3m Pipe radius: 25mm SEY: 0.9~1.4 Beam Size: (360,6) m

Photon parameters Average number of photons emitted per unit length per beam particle in the ARCS are: 0.33 photons/meter/e+ in the ARCS of 6.4 km ring 0.47 photons/meter/e+ in the ARCS of 3.2 km ring (Considering an average of 0.204 photons/meter/e+ around each ring and a fractional arc/circumference=4000m/6476m and 1400m/3238m) Photoelectric yield: 0.1 Need an improved estimation of the photon distribution in the ring (Cornell code)

Build Up Input Parameters for CLOUDLAND ilc-DR 6.4 Km, 6 ns bunch spacing*. Bunch population Nb 2.1x1010 Number of bunches 23 x 6 trains Bunch gap Ngap 30 Bunch spacing Lsep[m] 1.8 Bunch length σz [mm] 6 Bunch horizontal size σx [mm] 0.26 Bunch vertical size σy [mm] 0.006 Photoelectron Yield Y 0.1 Photon rate (e-/e+/m) dn /ds 0. 33 Antechamber protection  0% Photon Reflectivity R 50% Max. Secondary Emission Yeld δmax 1.2 Energy at Max. SEY Εm [eV] 300 SEY model Cimino-Collins ((0)=0.5) *https://wiki.lepp.cornell.edu/ilc/pub/Public/DampingRings/WebHome/DampingRingsFillPatterns.xls

Photon Reflectivity =50% Antechamber protection =0 Data: ilc_6km_quadsp & ilc_3km_quadsp

Build Up Input Parameters for CLOUDLAND ilc-DR 6.4 Km, 6 ns bunch spacing*. Bunch population Nb 2.1x1010 Number of bunches 45 x 6 trains Bunch gap Ngap 15 bunches (60 buckets) Bunch spacing Lsep[m] 1.8 Bunch length σz [mm] 6 Bunch horizontal size σx [mm] 0.26 Bunch vertical size σy [mm] 0.006 Photoelectron Yield Y 0.1 Photon rate (e-/e+/m) dn /ds 0. 33 Antechamber protection  0%, 90%, 98% Photon Reflectivity R 20% Max. Secondary Emission Yeld δmax 1.2 Energy at Max. SEY Εm [eV] 300 SEY model Cimino-Collins ((0)=0.5) *https://wiki.lepp.cornell.edu/ilc/pub/Public/DampingRings/WebHome/DampingRingsFillPatterns.xls

Quadrupole: Photon Reflectivity =20% Antechamber protection =0 Average density Ecloud density near the beam Data: ilc_6km_quadspr20atn0 & ilc_3km_quadspr20atn0

SEY effect (3km Ring) Quadrupole: Photon Reflectivity =20% Antechamber protection =0 Average density build-up Central density build-up

SEY effect (3km Ring) Quadrupole: Photon Reflectivity =20% Antechamber protection =90% Average density build-up Central density build-up

SEY effect (3km Ring) Quadrupole: Photon Reflectivity =20% Antechamber protection =98% Note: ecloud is not saturated for large SEY Average density build-up Central density build-up

SEY effect (6km Ring) Quadrupole: Photon Reflectivity =20% Antechamber protection =0 Average density build-up Central density build-up

SEY effect (6km Ring) Quadrupole: Photon Reflectivity =20% Antechamber protection =90% Note: ecloud is not saturated for large SEY Average density build-up Central density build-up

SEY effect (6km Ring) Quadrupole: Photon Reflectivity =20% Antechamber protection =98% Note: ecloud is not saturated for large SEY Average density build-up Central density build-up

Quadrupole: Photon Reflectivity =20% Antechamber protection =90 Average density Ecloud density near the beam Data:ilc_6km_45b_quadr20atn90 & ilc_3km_45b_quadr20atn90

Ecloud in Sextupole

Sextupole : Photon Reflectivity =20% Antechamber protection =0 Average density Ecloud density near the beam

SEY effect (3km Ring) Sextupole: Photon Reflectivity =20% Antechamber protection =0 Average density build-up Central density build-up

SEY effect (3km Ring) Sextupole: Photon Reflectivity =20% Antechamber protection =90% Average density build-up Central density build-up

SEY effect (3km Ring) Sextupole: Photon Reflectivity =20% Antechamber protection =98% Average density build-up Central density build-up

SEY effect (6km Ring) Sextupole: Photon Reflectivity =20% Antechamber protection =0 Average density build-up Central density build-up

SEY effect (6km Ring) Sextupole: Photon Reflectivity =20% Antechamber protection =90% Average density build-up Central density build-up

SEY effect (6km Ring) Sextupole: Photon Reflectivity =20% Antechamber protection =98% Average density build-up Central density build-up

Sextupole : Photon Reflectivity =20% Antechamber protection =90 Average Ecloud density Ecloud density near the beam

Summary Estimation of impedance of grooves and SEY to define ILC DR needs Low integrated impedance for triangular grooves (in magnets). Larger impedance overall for rectangular grooves (in straights). 2mm triangular grooves SEY << 1 1mm triangular grooves work very good with r=50um 10-15% SEY of grooves with magnetic field within ILC DR dipole/wiggler field variation Trapping in quadrupole and sextupole Very long e- trapping in CesrTA >> 1 turn Estimation in ICL DR qad & sext to compare with beam instability thresholds (see Pivi presentation next) for 6 km and 3 km rings: 3km lower cloud density.