Effective writing for bids and grants

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
How to write a winning proposal. Overview Thinking about the proposed work (the who, the what and the when) Creating the plan (identifying steps, assigning.
Advertisements

Writing an action research report
Understanding CP Writing Tasks
1 © 2006 Curriculum K-12 Directorate, NSW Department of Education and Training Implementing English K-6 Using the syllabus for consistency of teacher judgement.
Writing Essays Dr. Tamara O’Connor & Sylvia Mooney Student Learning Development Student Counselling Service
Your Project Proposal.
The Writing Process: Revising, Editing and Proofreading Student Development Services Writing Support Centre UCC 210
Writing 4* journal articles Rochelle Sibley The Writing Centre 27 th February 2015.
Jumping on the Funded Research Bandwagon Paul O’Reilly Dublin Institute of Technology Presentation to Faculty of Commerce and Centre for Innovation and.
Literature Review and Parts of Proposal
Claire Ridsdale, Teaching & Learning Adviser (Literacy
Grant Writing Strategies for Doctoral Students Scott M. Lanyon Professor and Head, Dept. of Ecology, Evolution, and Behavior College of Biological Sciences.
Educational Research: Competencies for Analysis and Application, 9 th edition. Gay, Mills, & Airasian © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
Funded by the European Commission WHAT MAKES A GOOD PROPOSAL?
Accelerating progress through guided writing
 Ensure the title is in line with the requirements of the proposed funding agency if they have any specification for the titled page (some do have.
Copyright © 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.
Are you fit for funding? Angela Richardson Cheshire Community Foundation WARRINGTON THIRD SECTOR ASSEMBLY North West Funders Forum.
What are the characteristics of “good writing”? What are the characteristics of “good writing”?
Progress Report 16th April Level 3: Completed (except the 3 units which had to be reassigned due to developer illness) Level 4: Planned, assigned.
Now what? 1.  I have short-listed projects I am interested in  I know the types of projects I would like to pursue  I have an idea of the resources.
ELACC7W1 Write arguments to support claims with clear reasons and relevant evidence.
GCSE English Language 8700 GCSE English Literature 8702 A two year course focused on the development of skills in reading, writing and speaking and listening.
COMMUNICATION EFFECTIVE WRITING. Plan Prepare Perform Present.
Abstract  An abstract is a concise summary of a larger project (a thesis, research report, performance, service project, etc.) that concisely describes.
Exploitation means to use and benefit from something. For Erasmus+ this means maximising the potential of the funded activities, so that the results are.
A project funded by the European UnionImplemented by a consortium led by Get ready for the call! Next steps for building partnerships and developing a.
Non-fiction and Media Higher Tier.
Best Practices in Implementing the 2010 ELA Standards
Academic writing.
GCSE WRITING Support presentation
Applying for funding: Tips fom the trenches
National 5 Critical Essays.
Writing your reflection in Stage 1 & 2 Indonesian (continuers)
IB Assessments CRITERION!!!.
How to Critique a Proposal
Introducing a new generation of readers for your students
“Embracing the Future”
MSc in Social Research Methods
Writing Tasks and Prompts
Critical Essays Learning Intention:
Academic writing for researchers
Academic writing for researchers
Why bother – is this not the English Department’s job?
Academic writing for researchers
Revision: Re-seeing, Re-thinking
Business Archives Council Conference Panel Session
The IBCC Reflective Project
ENGLISH LANGUAGE GCSE All students will study GCSE English Language and GCSE English Literature (four exams 2 for Lit and 2 for Lang). Both subjects are.
Editing & Polishing your Assignment
European Network of Environmental Authorities: Making Structural & Cohesion Funds Water Positive Working Group Dr Martin Griffiths Environment Agency for.
Introduction to vital statistics report writing
Effective Introductions
Enhancing Effective Assessment and Feedback
Academic writing for researchers
Do Now: List 2-3 reasons why it is important to peer and self assess a
ACADEMIC WRITING in ENGINEERING PURPOSES
Inclusive Communication Hub
The Writing Process: Revising, Editing and Proofreading
Academic writing for researchers
Chapter 11 Grammar and the Writing Process
They Say, I Say Chapter 1 and 12
AuthorAID Workshop on Research Writing
Summary of Evidence/Reason for Referral
Critiquing research reports
SAMBa Writing Sprint for ITT9 Assignment
Editing and Revising Lesson #12.
National 5 Critical Essays.
Improving academic performance Building language skills Developing critical thinking Expressing ideas and opinions Ask the audience: What are the core.
MPATE-GE 2626: Thesis in Music Technology
Presentation transcript:

Effective writing for bids and grants Rochelle Sibley Rochelle.Sibley@warwick.ac.uk Academic Writing Programme 11th June 2013

Outline of the session 9:00-10:00 Common concerns and dealing with content 10:00-10:30 Jonathan Tritter – What makes a successful bid? 10:30-10:50 Coffee break 10:50-12:30 Writing style and reviewing examples Copyright 2013 Academic Writing Programme, University of Warwick

Session aims To discuss your individual experiences with and concerns about bid and grant writing. To investigate best practice tips for ‘pitching’ your project successfully. To develop checklists of questions to ask whilst editing your draft. To define and address important stylistic issues associated with writing for bids and grants. To provide an opportunity for peer review feedback on your latest bid or grant draft. Copyright 2013 Academic Writing Programme, University of Warwick

Initial questions What have been your experiences with bid and grant writing up to now? What particular concerns do you have about the process? What do you think is the most challenging aspect of writing bids and grants? Copyright 2013 Academic Writing Programme, University of Warwick

Issues with writing bids and grants What makes a bid or grant unsuccessful? It doesn’t outline the contribution to the field clearly enough. It doesn’t give clear enough outcomes. It doesn’t include measurable progress indicators. It doesn’t follow the funding body’s guidelines. It is too vague about the costs and how the budget will be used. It doesn’t create enough impact. The project does not engage with current ‘hot topics’ in the field. What other reasons have people heard for a bid or grant being rejected? Copyright 2013 Academic Writing Programme, University of Warwick

The funding body POV What are the funding body’s main concerns? Will this project be delivered on schedule? Will the projected outcomes be realised? Will the project make an important contribution to the field? Will the project be a credit to the stakeholders? Address these issues with: A clear and realistic timetable of progress A detailed outline of impact and associated activities The use of key words that link to current ‘hot topics’ A considered explanation of how your project extends and develops existing research in your field. Copyright 2013 Academic Writing Programme, University of Warwick

Copyright 2013 Academic Writing Programme, University of Warwick BREAK

Pitching your bid or grant What questions do you need to ask to pitch the content of your project effectively? Which funding body is best for your project? What are the funding body’s current themes – how does your research fit into one of these? What are your keywords – are they emphasised enough? What is your project adding to the field? How long will it take to achieve the outcomes of the project? Who is going to benefit from your project – is there enough impact? Who do you need on board to achieve the project’s aims? Why are these the best people for the project? What other questions might be relevant? Copyright 2013 Academic Writing Programme, University of Warwick

Generating impact How can a project create impact? Academic publications Professional/practitioner publications Conferences Digital resources Popular media Engaging with the public through events Open access events to share outcomes What additional impact could your project generate? Copyright 2013 Academic Writing Programme, University of Warwick

Style checklist for bids and grants What does a well written bid or grant look like? Concise and clear use of language at all times Follows the funding body’s guidelines Aware of the range of possible readers (specialist and non-specialist) Consistent use of grammar and capitalisation Key questions: Who is your audience – what specialist terminology can you include without defining or clarifying it further? How simply can you express your project’s aims without skipping key details? Who is writing this – one person or more than one? Copyright 2013 Academic Writing Programme, University of Warwick

Editing for clarity What makes a piece of writing clear? Have you been consistent in your phrasing and use of terminology? Does every single word actively contribute something to your bid or grant? Have you been aware of sentence structure (balancing variation with simplicity of expression)? Useful strategies: Reread your work out loud Ask a critical friend outside your field to read it If this bid or grant has been written collaboratively, make sure it has been edited to standardise phrasing and grammar throughout. Copyright 2013 Academic Writing Programme, University of Warwick

Group activity Read the relevant section of funding bid and then discuss in groups: What does the content of this section contribute to the success of the bid? What does the style of this section contribute to the success of the bid? You might also want to consider what you could adapt from this model for bids in your own discipline. Copyright 2013 Academic Writing Programme, University of Warwick

Feedback and questions Copyright 2013 Academic Writing Programme, University of Warwick Feedback and questions