FCC hh dump kicker - switch topologies and impact on beam

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Collimation with retracted TCSGs R. Bruce, R. Kwee, S. Redaelli.
Advertisements

LHC 18 & 19 April 2015 At 450 GeV with bumps, no increased MUFO activity. Beam screen 15R8 warming up to 80 K, ongoing for the day 09:00: Orbit studies.
Concept & architecture of the machine protection systems for FCC
FCC-hh Injection and Extraction
LHC Beam Dumping system
Beam Dumping System – Failure Scenarios Brennan Goddard, CERN AB/BT How the dump system can fail Catalogue of primary failures Failure classes and protection.
B.Goddard 08/11/04 HHH 2004 Workshop, CERN Beam Dump Brennan GODDARD CERN AB/BT The existing LHC beam dump is described, together with the relevant design.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study (a sub-system of HL-LHC) is co-funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme 7 Capacities Specific Programme,
The HiLumi LHC Design Study (a sub-system of HL-LHC) is co-funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme 7 Capacities Specific Programme,
Semiconductor Switch Designs M.J. Barnes Acknowledgements W. Bartmann, L. Ducimetière, B. Goddard, J. Holma, A. Lechner, T. Fowler, T. Kramer, M. Meddahi,
3 GeV,1.2 MW, Booster for Proton Driver G H Rees, RAL.
Drive beam magnets powering strategy Serge Pittet, Daniel Siemaszko CERN, Electronic Power Converter Group (TE-EPC) OUTLINE : Suggestion of.
LER Workshop, CERN, October 11-12, 2006Detector Safety with LER - Henryk Piekarz1 LHC Accelerator Research Program bnl-fnal-lbnl-slac Accelerator & Detector.
CERN Rüdiger Schmidt FCC week 2015 Long Magnet Stringpage 1 Incident September 19 th Architecture of powering and protection systems for high field.
REQUIREMENTS FOR FCC DILUTION KICKERS AND BEAM DUMP LINE GEOMETRY F. Burkart, W. Bartmann, M. Fraser, B. Goddard, T. Kramer FCC dump meeting 18 th June.
Wolfgang Hofle AB/RF LHC MAC - June 15, Abort gap cleaning with damper 1/23 Acknowledgements: T. Kramer (AB/BT), E. Shaposhnikova (AB/RF) Wolfgang.
1 CC & MP - CC10 - CERN Crab LHC J. Wenninger CERN Beams Department for the LHC Machine Protection Panel.
Updates on FLUKA simulations of TCDQ halo loads at IR6 FLUKA team & B. Goddard LHC Collimation Working Group March 5 th, 2007.
Simulations of TCT beam impacts for different scenarios R. Bruce, E. Quaranta, S. RedaelliAcknowledgement: L. Lari, C. Bracco, B. Goddard.
Sketching Basic Kicker System Parameters W. Bartmann, T. Fowler, B. Goddard, T. Kramer.
Beam loads & dump concepts T. Kramer, B. Goddard, M. Benedikt, Hel. Vincke.
Injection Energy Review D. Schulte. Introduction Will review the injection energy So could answer the following questions: Which injection energy can.
Overview WP14 Developments Hardware  Interferometry on the spare TDIs, planned to be installed Christmas stop 2015/2016. Final acceptance tests ongoing.
Aperture in case of an asynchronous beam dump with ATS optics R. Bruce, E. Quaranta, S. Redaelli With valueable input from: A. Bertarelli, C. Bracco, F.
SBDS – MKDV/H: The new MKDV Generator and additional Magnet for BA5 installation V. Senaj, L. Ducimetière November 20 th 2015.
FCC-hh: First simulations of electron cloud build-up L. Mether, G. Iadarola, G. Rumolo FCC Design meeting.
FCC DUMP SYSTEM W. Bartmann, B. Goddard, R. Ostojic FCC Dump Meeting, 14 th Jan
TPSG4 validation at HighRadMat #6 Cedric Baud, B. Balhan, Jan Borburgh, Brennan Goddard, Wim Weterings.
LER Workshop, Oct 11, 2006Intensity Increase in the LER – T. Sen1 LHC Accelerator Research Program bnl-fnal-lbnl-slac  Motivation  Slip stacking in the.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study (a sub-system of HL-LHC) is co-funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme 7 Capacities Specific Programme,
Beam absorbers for Machine Protection at LHC and SPS
HL-LHC WP14 2 nd meeting: Intercepting devices and failure cases to be studied Anton Lechner, Jan Uythoven.
Benchmarking Headtail with e-cloud observations with LHC 25ns beam H. Bartosik, W. Höfle, G. Iadarola, Y. Papaphilippou, G. Rumolo.
T. Kramer, CERN TE/ABT FCC-week 2016, Rome, Italy Acknowledgements
HP-PS beam acceleration and machine circumference A.LachaizeLAGUNA-LBNO General meeting Paris 18/09/13 On behalf of HP-PS design team.
MKDV upgrade LIU-SPS ABT meeting V. Senaj, L. Ducimetiere, P. Faure November 4 th 2014.
C. Bracco, R. Bruce, B. Goddard, C. Wiesner, A. Lechner, M. Frankl
Operating IP8 at high luminosity in the HL-LHC era
Tracking simulations of protons quench test
LINAC4 ADVISORY COMMITTEE
Emergency dumping of proton and ion beams in SIS100 F
Surviving an Asynchronous Beam Dump?
The LHC Beam Dumping System
Introduction: FCC beam dumping system
Controls architecture challenges for beam dump kickers
Proposition of MKD & MKBH modification with the goal to reduce maximum voltage (and risk of erratic) Viliam Senaj, 05/05/2017.
Status of RB circuit modeling PSpice models Simulation results: nQPS & oQPS Comparison with QPS data Ongoing activities Emmanuele Ravaioli TE-MPE-TM
Beam switching yard interfaces
LHC beam dump 7.56 TeV operation
Injection system design for high-energy circular collider FCC-hh
D. Woog M.J. Barnes, J. Holma, T. Kramer
Setup beam intensities for FCC-hh
Perspective on future challenges for very high energy hadron colliders
Potential failure scenarios that can lead to very fast orbit changes and machine protection requirements for HL-LHC operation Daniel Wollmann with input.
Septa requirements and suitable septa topologies for FCC
Powering the LHC Magnets
Saturday 21st April 00:33 Interlock during ramp on BLM HV
Update on circuit protection simulations of the HL-LHC Inner Triplet circuit Matthias Mentink, Circuit specifics + STEAM simulations: Samer Yammine, LEDET.
Fast losses at collimators during 16L2 dumps
MD2490: Measurement of the TMCI Threshold at Flat-Top
FCC Kicker Systems M.J. Barnes, T. Kramer CERN TE-ABT
FCC-hh injection group 7
Summary of Week 13 G. Arduini, B. Holzer
2017 CAS Erice case study: Design of a beam dumping system for FCC
Protection against accidental beam loss at the LHC
Chamonix Workshop XIV CERN - 17th-21st January 2005
Commissioning of the Beam Conditions Monitor of the LHCb Experiment at CERN Ch. Ilgner, October 23, 2008 on behalf of the LHCb BCM group at TU Dortmund:
The LHC Beam Interlock System
Interlocking strategy
What systems request a beam dump? And when do we need them?
Presentation transcript:

FCC hh dump kicker - switch topologies and impact on beam Pieter Van Trappen, Elisabeth Renner Acknowledgments: Mike Barnes, Wolfgang Bartmann, Florian Burkart, Brennan Goddard, Thomas Kramer Elisabeth Renner, Pieter Van Trappen FCC hh dump kicker - switch topologies and impact on beam FCC dump meeting June 28th , 2017

Outline Alternative topologies motivation Electrical simulations Impact on beam: comparison series connected switch to conventional switch design. Open questions - Discussion Elisabeth Renner, Pieter Van Trappen FCC hh dump kicker - switch topologies and impact on beam FCC dump meeting June 28th , 2017

Alternative topologies motivation Assuming that the switch (can be a stack of multiple devices) will self-trigger (a.k.a. erratic) because of R2E SEE or electrostatic discharges What can be done to reduce the effect (i.e. magnet current) by using alternative topologies?  Switch series connection vs. crowbar connection Elisabeth Renner, Pieter Van Trappen FCC hh dump kicker - switch topologies and impact on beam FCC dump meeting June 28th , 2017

Electrical simulations New dump layout yield the below ‘relaxed’ requirements. Lumped inductance magnet with a small HV capacitor for fast magnet current rise-time and bigger (slower) capacitor discharge for flat-top. Focus on most constraining part: fast rising-edge (1 us) capacitor discharge Cable and stray inductances ignored COTS Mitsubishi CM1000HA-24H has a complete PSpice model with parasitic components; max IC=2kA; max VCES=1.2kV Parameters (per module) Value Number of modules 300 B.dl [T.m] 0.025 k [µrad] 0.150 Length [mm] Inductance [µH] 0.38 Current [kA] 2.1 Magnet current rise-time 1 µs Elisabeth Renner, Pieter Van Trappen FCC hh dump kicker - switch topologies and impact on beam FCC dump meeting June 28th , 2017

Electrical simulations cont’d Series connection 2500A 250A Nominal kick (0-100% 1.1us, 2.1kA, Vcapa=1400V) bottom-side IGBT blocking full capacitor voltage; Vpfn vs. magnet leakage current High dV/dt at bottom IGBT can trigger bottom- side IGBT (capacitive divider over Miller capacitance and CGE) Elisabeth Renner, FCC Machine Protection: Injection and Extraction ABTEF meeting May 9th, 2017

Electrical simulations cont’d Crowbar connection 4000A Is the U2 collector current vs. 100ns -500ns delay magnet current No nominal kick cause single IGBT cannot block 1400V Detection and triggering circuit delay! Elisabeth Renner, FCC Machine Protection: Injection and Extraction ABTEF meeting May 9th, 2017

Impact on the beam: oscillation introduced by 1 erratic MKD Oscillation amplitude*: 1 sw.: 0.9 sigma 2 sw. in series: 0.01 sigma *Values for MKD 1, as worst case scenario (MKD entrance: 𝛽 𝑥 =1498m, MKD exit: 𝛽 𝑥 =1009 ) Elisabeth Renner, Pieter Van Trappen FCC hh dump kicker - switch topologies and impact on beam FCC dump meeting June 28th , 2017

Impact on the beam: load on TCP for x erratic MKDs Assumptions beam profile: gaussian different numbers of erratic segments considered  worst case scenarios chosen for further analysis: first x MKDs erratic simultaneous erratics phase advance between MKD1 and observation point 90° (full amplitude), although in current design Δ𝜇 𝑀𝐾𝐷1, 𝑇𝐶𝑃 ~ 160° If x segments fail, how many bunches can be tolerated to make an additional turn? How many abort gaps are necessary? … Elisabeth Renner, Pieter Van Trappen FCC hh dump kicker - switch topologies and impact on beam FCC dump meeting June 28th , 2017

Estimate of load on TCP (7.6 𝜎) by x erratic MKDs Assumptions beam profile: gaussian different numbers of erratic segments considered  worst case scenarios chosen for further analysis: first x MKDs erratic simultaneous erratics phase advance between MKD1 and observation point 90° (full amplitude), although in current design Δ𝜇 𝑀𝐾𝐷1, 𝑇𝐶𝑃 ~ 160° If x segments fail, how many bunches can be tolerated to make an additional turn? How many abort gaps are necessary? … Elisabeth Renner, Pieter Van Trappen FCC hh dump kicker - switch topologies and impact on beam FCC dump meeting June 28th , 2017

Estimate of load on TCP (7.6 𝜎) by x erratic MKDs Energy/power thresholds for load comparison: ~ 500 kW: LHC: TCP load limit to avoid quenches of DS magnets [1] ~ 17 kJ/g: melting heat of graphite [3,4] with a max. energy deposition of 270 𝐺𝑒𝑉/(𝑐 𝑚 3 𝑝) and 𝜌=2.28 𝑔/𝑐 𝑚 3 But: Very rough estimate! (TCP not graphite etc.) Only for order of magnitude [2] [1] S. Radaelli et al, Quench tests at the large hardron collider with collimation losses at 3.5 Z TeV, Proceedings of HB2012 [2] Y. Nie, R. Schmidt, Interaction of 50 MeV - 50 TeV protons with solid copper and graphite targets in hadron accelerator complex at CERN, 2017 [3] A. Lechner, Design studies for the FCC-hh beam dump. FCC Week 2017; based on [4] [4] Jan M. Zazula, LHC Project Note 78 / 97, 19 Elisabeth Renner, Pieter Van Trappen FCC hh dump kicker - switch topologies and impact on beam FCC dump meeting June 28th , 2017

Acceptable number of bunches to stay below chosen load at 7 Acceptable number of bunches to stay below chosen load at 7.6 sigma for x erratic segments Elisabeth Renner, Pieter Van Trappen FCC hh dump kicker - switch topologies and impact on beam FCC dump meeting June 28th , 2017

Acceptable number of bunches to stay below chosen load at 7 Acceptable number of bunches to stay below chosen load at 7.6 sigma for x erratic segments Elisabeth Renner, Pieter Van Trappen FCC hh dump kicker - switch topologies and impact on beam FCC dump meeting June 28th , 2017

Beam impact: Conclusion and open questions series switch architecture is favorable for ‘1 sigma oscillation’, as load on is TCP negligible potential to reduce number of segments should be considered Elisabeth Renner, Pieter Van Trappen FCC hh dump kicker - switch topologies and impact on beam FCC dump meeting June 28th , 2017

Beam impact: Conclusion and open questions series switch architecture is favorable for ‘1 sigma oscillation’, as load on is TCP negligible potential to reduce number of segments should be considered But, careful: 600 instead of 300 switches  higher failure rate series connected switches: erratic elements are missing for extraction after 1 turn. how many erratic MKDs can be tolerated to still extract the beam/partial beam safely after 1 turn (all previous erratic MKDs now missing)? Studies ongoing, discussion appreciated Elisabeth Renner, Pieter Van Trappen FCC hh dump kicker - switch topologies and impact on beam FCC dump meeting June 28th , 2017