Service Routes and Community Transit Hubs: Right Sizing Transit

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
West Michigan Transit Linkages Study Wednesday, June 4 th, :00 a.m. Grand Valley State University Kirkhof Center Conference Room 2266.
Advertisements

Transit Capacity & Quality of Service Manual, 3rd Edition Fixed Route Quality of Service.
1 Americans with Disabilities Act Civil Rights Protection for over 50 million Americans.
Mobility Management Increasing Independence for Community Members.
Community Transit Solutions for the Suburbs APTA Annual Meeting September 30, 2013.
Comprehensive Operations Analysis. Background ■On March 6, 2014, Escambia County Board of County Commissioners approved an agreement between Escambia.
GETTING THERE The Vehicle To Participation!!!!
Short Range Transit Improvement Plan CITY OF HIGHPOINT Sounding Board Meeting Service Recommendations September 9, 2014.
White House Conference on Aging Transportation Policy Committee Testimony January 8, 2005 Looking Forward… Growing Older Public Transportation: Providing.
Transportation & Aging Senior and Disabled Riders Transportation Summit December 6, 2013.
SKAGIT-ISLAND HSTP Skagit-Island HSTP Committee Meeting #4 October 1, 2014.
One Call Transportation Services One Call Transportation Services Building on a Network.
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Service Planning & Standards Unit 4: Service Planning & Network Design.
Enhanced Mobility of Seniors and Individuals with Disabilities Texas Transportation Works Summit Presenter: Maurice Pearl, Citibus, General Manager.
Transit Connections 2013 The Value of Transit Emerging Trends: The Demographics and Needs of Seniors Richard Weiner Nelson/Nygaard Grady Tarbutton Washoe.
PPA 419 – Aging Services Administration Lecture 10c – Public Transportation and Aging.
Cost-Effective Accessible Transportation Alternatives in Rural Areas: Examples from the US Transed 2012 Delhi, India September 17-21, 2012.
JOSHUA CRAIN CE 458: PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS JUNE 4, 2009 Costs in Small Public Transit Systems in Oregon.
Weighing the Scenarios: The Costs and Benefits of Future Transit Service Produced for MTDB by The Mission Group © 2000 by The Mission Group. 1 Dave Schumacher.
Route and Network Planning
Community Partnership Program Don Okazaki, Planner Accessible Services King County Metro.
Placer County Rural Transit Study Expanding Public Transit Service for Rural Placer County.
Go wherever life takes you – on Public Transit! Seniors On the Move.
TRANSIT FEASIBILITY STUDY RECOMMENDATIONS AND SERVICE OPTIONS JUNE 14, 2016.
Transportation & Older Adults
MOVING CITIES FORWARD Uber Transportation Partnerships
IS NOW. . . The Center for Mobility Equity.
RideWise Travel Training
Presented by: RLS & Associates, Inc.
Gunnison Valley Transportation Authority (RTA) 2016 Transit Planning Process Funded through a Section 5304 Planning Grant 5/23/2018.
Strategies to integrate third-party service providers
Flagler County Fixed Route Transit Operation Plan
CET Service Proposal.
Network Characteristics
Our Suite of Services.
and Transportation Impacts
Transit for Tomorrow strategic plan
Experience The Availing Advantages Of Private Transportation Services.
Dial-A-Ride Service Report to the Community
Developing Service: Measuring Quality of Service
Strategies to integrate third-party service providers
NCARPO Quarterly Meeting July 27, 2018
Orange County Transportation Authority Micro-Transit Pilot Program
IS NOW. . . The Center for Mobility Equity.
Staten Island Bus Study Public Workshop
Comprehensive Operational Analysis (COA)
Network Characteristics
Additional Trip Planning Prospects for GTFS Flex
Kurt Scheible Public Transportation Director
Promoting Shared Rides: Where do Transit Agencies Fit?
Microtransit Pilot In Sacramento
Transit Competitiveness and Market Potential
Lorain County Transit Needs Assessment
Bus Rapid Transit Study
PARTNERSHIPS An experiment! Public Private Partnership
LRT, GRT, PRT Comparison Peter Muller, PE Ingmar Andreasson, Ph. D.
Technology In Action Session: An On-Demand Sunday Transit Application
Introduction to Micro-Transit / Demand Responsive Transit
Mass Transit Usage According to IBISWorld, the public transportation industry increased 14.3%, from $63 billion during 2013 to $72 billion for 2017,
INNOVATIVE SENIOR TRANSPORTATION PROGRAMS AND SERVICES
Local transport update to ranch
NYMTC Coordinated Plan Workshop
Red Line/HealthLine Extension Major
Re-Thinking Transportation for Individuals with Disabilities
1. Where should buses run and with what frequency?
Mobility Management in Sacramento:
Access Services CTSA for Los Angeles County.
Reimagine RTS Public Hearing
NYMTC Coordinated Plan Workshop
FREEdom and Volunteer Incentive Program (VIP)
Presentation transcript:

Service Routes and Community Transit Hubs: Right Sizing Transit Mobility Solutions Summit, Ithaca, NY June 24, 2016

Competing with the Auto It is tough to match the convenience and comfort of the auto Low density transit services need to be direct, frequent and running throughout the day and weekends Need to provide convenient connections to regional transit Community transit, human service transportation and traditional bus transit need to work together

Drawbacks of Other Traditional Services Traditional Fixed Route Bus Service (Limited geographic coverage outside urban areas) Advance reservation transportation (limited times and flexibility) Taxi Service (Expensive for frequent trips) Specialized human service agency transportation (Limited Eligibility)

The Challenges Geographic Coverage: Expanding the availability of service Accessibility: Offering the door to door aspects of taxi service Choice: Providing the flexibility of a scheduled service headway Convenience: Able to accommodate spontaneous trips without advance reservation Integrated: Services provided to general public and provide connections to traditional transit

The Case for Service Route or Route Deviation Services Can work in rural, small urban and urban settings Uses smaller buses that can directly serve congregate housing, medical and shopping centers Schedules that can be designed on clock headways to facilitate timed transfers Design to provide connections to human service transportation and regional transit options Can also be a way to right size traditional transit for lower density corridors

Service Route Characteristics No Registration, No Reservations The Curb-to-Curb Advantages of Advance Reservation/Demand Response The Fixed Schedule Advantages of Traditional Bus Schedule with Built in Extra Recovery Time for Slower Moving Passengers Ideally employs low floor ramp buses

Advantages for Community Transit Operators Increased Trip Productivity Per Hour Reduced Costs From Fewer Will-Call Return Trips for Medical Trips Advantages of Fixed Route While Employing Same Drivers, Vehicles Used for Existing Advance Reservation

Customer Advantages Schedule Design Incorporates Clock Headway to Allow Regional Transit Connections with Minimum Wait Time Provide Customer Choice of Ride Times Not Locked Into a Set Depart/Return Times Ideally, Employs Low Floor Buses to Speed Passenger Boarding and Disembarking

Impact on Non-ADA: Middlesex County (NJ) Year Service Type Passenger Trips Revenue Hours Trips per Hour 2005 Demand 257,474 78,291 3.3 2012 158,794 60,918 2.6 Service Route 25,244 5236 4.8 402,587 39,111 10.3

Impact on ADA Paratransit: San Joaquin (CA) RTD Year Service Type Passenger Trips Revenue Hours Trips per Hour 2010 Demand 37,643 14,495 2.6 2013 36,534 10,524 3.5 Service Route 46,013 14,075 3.3 138,142 21,106 6.5

Creating Hubs for Community Transit Enabling community transit buses to have access to traditional transit stations Using regional malls as point of interface between community and traditional transit bus lines Create transfers at regional transit park-rides Designing hubs between human service transportation and community transportation

Rail Station Access Access: Provides community transit riders with direct access to rail service Shared Use: Enable community transit to extend its reach to commuters and local rail users Promote transit: Introduce traditional community transit customers to rail transit

Regional Shopping Malls Access: Provide access for workers and shoppers of all ages Connections: Provide connections to other destinations and access to regional traditional transit Flexibility: Provide specialized transportation populations the options for trip chaining by offering shopping and recreational destinations

Local Park and Rides Local Access: Provide local community transit access for auto users Regional Access: Expand community transit market as first/last mile to regional transit

Human Service Agency Hubs Shared Use: Encourage agency use of community transit for agency customers Independence: Encourage travel training through ready access to community transit Rural Service Extension: Allow riders to make more distant trips to employment and other destinations via timed tranfer

Conclusions The demand for transit is growing Providing frequency and span of service in low density areas is tough Transit transfers can be made acceptable by creating safe waiting areas and minimizing wait time Hubs can result in more efficient use of all forms of mobility

For more information Steve Fittante, Senior Associate, RLS & Associates, Inc. 3477 Corporate Parkway, Suite 100 Center Valley, PA 18034 sfittante@rlsandassoc.com 610-295-3340