Very preliminary study of the random background for the BiPo detector (PhoSwich configuration) Work done by Jonathan Ferracci.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Dante Nakazawa with Prof. Juan Collar
Advertisements

Advanced GAmma Tracking Array
Plastic Scintillator Option for DB a simulation study by Maxim Gonchar, Yury Gornushkin and Dmitry Naumov JINR, Dubna, Russia Collaboration Meeting January.
M. Carson, University of Sheffield, UKDMC ILIAS-Valencia-April Gamma backgrounds, shielding and veto performance for dark matter detectors M. Carson,
Activity for the Gerda-specific part Description of the Gerda setup including shielding (water tank, Cu tank, liquid Nitrogen), crystals array and kapton.
M. Carson, University of Sheffield IDM 2004, University of Edinburgh Veto performance for a large xenon detector.
The maximum likelihood method used to analyse NEMO-3 results interest of the method technical explanation of the method very preliminary results obtained.
Results from M. Di Marco, P. Peiffer, S. Schönert Thanks to Davide Franco and Marik Barnabe Heider Gerda collaboration meeting, Tübingen 9th-11th.
Liquid Xenon Gamma Screening Luiz de Viveiros Brown University.
Nustar/crystal simulations B. Genolini Crystal: CsI(Tl) (Saint Gobain), wrapped with reflector (VM2000, Tyveck?) Geometry:
Neutron background measurement at LNGS: present status Measurement carried out in collaboration between LNGS ILIAS-JRA1 and ICARUS groups.
Lecture 2-Building a Detector George K. Parks Space Sciences Laboratory UC Berkeley, Berkeley, CA.
AGATA Demonstrator Test With a 252 Cf Source: Neutron-Gamma Discrimination Menekşe ŞENYİĞİT.
Gamma Spectroscopy HPT TVAN Technical Training
Radiation Safety Rules of Thumb. TR-2 Alpha Particle An alpha energy of at least 7.5 MeV is required to penetrate the protective layer of the skin (0.07mm).
1 Alpha Emissions (How a Smoke Alarm Works). 2 Radioactive Emissions (Radiation) Penetrating Power SymbolEquivalentDescriptionType He Stopped by thick.
CUORICINO and CUORE Chiara Brofferio Università di Milano – Bicocca and INFN, Sez. di Milano NOW 2004 – Otranto 12 – 17 September 2004 On behalf of the.
EXL/crystal simulations B. Genolini Simulation of NUSTAR crystals with Litrani Presentation of Litrani: simulation of.
The PEPPo e - & e + polarization measurements E. Fanchini On behalf of the PEPPo collaboration POSIPOL 2012 Zeuthen 4-6 September E. Fanchini -Posipol.
FIRST RESULTS OF THE NEMO 3 EXPERIMENT Laurent SIMARD LAL Orsay (France) HEP-EPS 2003 conference CENBG, IN2P3-CNRS et Université de Bordeaux, France CFR,
CRESST Cryogenic Rare Event Search with Superconducting Thermometers Max-Planck-Institut für Physik University of Oxford Technische Universität München.
A screening facility for next generation low-background experiments Tom Shutt Laura Cadonati Princeton University.
2004/Dec/12 Low Radioactivity in CANDLES T. Kishimoto Osaka Univ.
Measurement of Gas Bremsstrahlung at the Pohang Light Source Hyosang Lee Seoul National University, Q2C Pusan National University, HANUL HNP2011.
Neutron Monitoring Detector in KIMS Jungwon Kwak Seoul National University 2003 October 25 th KPS meeting.
5th July 00PSI SEU Studies1 Preliminary PSI SEU Studies Study SEU effects by measuring the BER of the link in  /p beams at PSI. Measure the SEU rate as.
(Santiago de Compostela-Spain)
Stellenbosch University
M. Wójcik for the GERDA Collaboration Institute of Physics, Jagellonian University Epiphany 2006, Kraków, Poland, 6-7 January 2006.
BES-III Workshop Oct.2001,Beijing The BESIII Luminosity Monitor High Energy Physics Group Dept. of Modern Physics,USTC P.O.Box 4 Hefei,
Experiment TGV II Multi-detector HPGe telescopic spectrometer for the study of double beta processes of 106 Cd and 48 Ca For TGV collaboration: JINR Dubna,
VIeme rencontres du Vietnam
Tracking (wire chamber) Shield radon, neutron,  Source foil (40 mg/cm 2 ) Scintillator + PMT 2 modules 2  3 m 2 → 12 m 2 Background < 1 event / month.
Ultra-low background gamma spectrometry 2 nd LSM-Extension Workshop, Valfréjus, 16 October 2009 Pia Loaiza Laboratoire Souterrain de Modane.
M. Wójcik Instytut Fizyki, Uniwersytet Jagielloński Instytut Fizyki Doświadczalnej, Uniwersytet Warszawski Warszawa, 10 Marca 2006.
NEMO3 analysis and SuperNEMO development Benjamin Richards D14.
Muon and Neutron Backgrounds at Yangyang underground lab Muju Workshop Kwak, Jungwon Seoul National University 1.External Backgrounds 2.Muon.
Status of neutron simulations Piotr Mijakowski (Warsaw) ArDM meeting, 2010/12/03 1.
NEMO3 experiment: results G. Broudin-Bay LAL (CNRS/ Université Paris-Sud 11) for the NEMO collaboration Moriond EW conference La Thuile, March 2008.
00 Cooler CSB Direct or Extra Photons in d+d  0 Andrew Bacher for the CSB Cooler Collaboration ECT Trento, June 2005.
Results of the NEMO-3 experiment (Summer 2009) Outline   The  decay  The NEMO-3 experiment  Measurement of the backgrounds   and  results.
Nuclear Chemistry. The Atom The atom consists of two parts: 1. The nucleus which contains: 2. Orbiting electrons. protons neutrons.
By Matthew Kauer First Year Report – 15 June 07 Measurement of 2b2ν Half-Life of Zr96 and Lightguide Studies for SuperNEMO Calorimeter Matthew Kauer UCL.
A screening facility for next generation low-background experiments Tom Shutt Case Western Reserve University.
HP SURVEY INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION AND SELECTION PRINCIPLES OF RADIATION DETECTION AND QUANTIFICATION CHAPTER 5 – REVIEW AND SUMMARY January 13 – 15, 2016.
Nasim Fatemi-Ghomi, Group Christmass Meeting December Nasim Fatemi-Ghomi Double Beta Decay Study of 150 Nd at NEMO3 (The magic isotope!!)
Sep. 22, 2011 Seoul National University Jae Keum Lee KIMS Background 1 China-Korea Workshop 2011 September 22-23, 2011.
Room-Temperature Semiconductors: From concepts to applications Zhong He Nuclear Engineering and Radiological Sciences Department The University of Michigan,
A simulation study on DBD search with pilot setup AMoRE - SNU jilee.
1 Double Beta Decay of 150 Nd in the NEMO 3 Experiment Nasim Fatemi-Ghomi (On behalf of the NEMO 3 collaboration) The University of Manchester IOP HEPP.
Search for Neutrinoless Double Beta Decay with NEMO-3 Zornitza Daraktchieva University College London On behalf of the NEMO3 collaboration PANIC08, Eilat,
SIMULATION OF BACKGROUND REDUCTION TECHNIQUES FOR Ge DBD DETECTORS Héctor Gómez Maluenda. University of Zaragoza. GERDA/Majorana MC Meeting.
Monte Carlo methods in spallation experiments Defense of the phD thesis Mitja Majerle “Phasotron” and “Energy Plus Transmutation” setups (schematic drawings)
On behalf of TEXONO collaboration
Pulse-shape discrimination with Cs2HfCl6 crystal
On measurability of mBq/kg levels of alpha activity
Measurement of surface radioactivity by Alpha/Beta detection
Simulations of UAr dark matter detectors shielded by LAr vetoes
Muon and Neutron detector of KIMS experiment
Preliminary Study of 214Bi Background in 100Mo foils
2nd International Workshop on Double Beta Decay
New concepts and instruments for 14C measurements in i-graphite
Shiva King, UCL Dubna December 2007
PARTICLE FLUX CALCULATION-III
(on behalf of the RENO collaboration)
proton mass, mp neutron mass, mn electron mass, me
• • • Ge measurements for SuperNEMO
Status of Neutron flux Analysis in KIMS experiment
GEANT Simulations and Track Reconstruction
The External Radiation Hazard
Presentation transcript:

Very preliminary study of the random background for the BiPo detector (PhoSwich configuration) Work done by Jonathan Ferracci

Principle of the study suppose that the counting rate in a scintillator (thin or thick) is due to the interaction of external photons with them (neglect the possible contribution of surface beta (210Bi) or alpha emitters) flux of external photons a priori very difficult to modelize Which isotopes? (214Pb, 214Bi, (228Ac, 212Pb, 212Bi, 208Tl (40K, (60Co (152Eu - Where? (lead shielding, iron, PMT glass, in volume, in surface)

Adopt a much simpler technique : Simulate photon with a fixed energy (100 keV, 200 keV … 2 MeV) and obtain results for this fixed Photon energy Quenching factor : use of values measured by Mathieu For all scintillators FWHM = 15% for e- at 1MeV Thin scintillator thickness = 300 microns LightGuide Thickness = 8 mm Photon emission point Thick scintillator Thickness = 3 mm Selenium source thickness = 80 microns Transversal sizes = 2 m x 3 m

For the same simulation apply 2 selections Electron selection At least 150 keV deposited in one of the thick scintillator At least 50 keV deposited in the thin scintillator close to the thick scintillator which is hit Alpha selection At least 1 MeV/quenching factor(1MeV)= deposited in one of the thin scintillator Less than 500 keV/quenching factor(500 keV) deposited in the thick scintillator close to the thin scintillator which is hit

Number of events selected (gamma emitted with a fixed energy), 500 000 events simulated Gamma energy Electron selection Alpha selection 100 keV 59 200 keV 1 447 300 keV 27 1073 400 keV 199 1353 500 keV 502 1438 600 keV 929 1390 700 keV 1493 1241 800 keV 1870 1053 900 keV 2373 981

Gamma energy Electron selection Alpha selection 1000 keV 2582 856 1100 keV 2973 816 1200 keV 3198 690 1300 keV 3406 651 1400 keV 3460 585 1500 keV 3629 535 1600 keV 3776 488 1700 keV 3642 410 1800 keV 3839 433 1900 keV 3777 366 2000 keV 3884 343

For normalisation : use the trigger rate (0.17Hz) Obtained by Mathieu at Canfranc Simulate photon with a fixed energy (100 keV, 200 keV … 2 MeV) and obtain results for this fixed photon energy Quenching factor : use of values measured by Mathieu Scintillator Thickness = 2 x 1 cm For all scintillators FWHM = 15% for e- at 1MeV LightGuide Thickness = 8 mm Photon emission point Transversal sizes = 20 cm x 20 cm

Selection applied for single rate Single rate selection At least 100 keV deposited in one of the scintillator

Number of events selected (gamma emitted with a fixed energy), 500 000 events simulated Gamma energy Single rate selection 100 keV 478 200 keV 7886 300 keV 38235 400 keV 50482 500 keV 55343 600 keV 56828 700 keV 58444 800 keV 57771 900 keV 57769

Gamma energy Single rate selection 1000 keV 57093 1100 keV 56136 1200 keV 55711 1300 keV 54700 1400 keV 54475 1500 keV 53481 1600 keV 52791 1700 keV 51482 1800 keV 51181 1900 keV 50519 2000 keV 49588

Principle of the calculation Example : if single rate is due to photons at 1000 keV 57 093 events selected by single rate selection : single rate ~ 0.17 Hz 2 582 events selected by electron selection : electron selection rate ~ 2582/57093 x 0.17 Hz x 3m x 4m/(0.2 m x 0,2 m) ~ 2.3 Hz 856 events selected by electron selection : alpha selection rate ~ 856/57093 x 0.17 Hz ~ 2.5 10-3 Hz x 3m x 4m/(0.2 m x 0,2 m) ~ 0.76 Hz 212Bi random rate ~ 2.3 Hz x 0.76 Hz x (3 x 300 10-9 s) ~ 1.6 10-6 Hz 212Bi random events expected in one month ~ 1.6 10-6 Hz x 3600 x 24 x 30 ~ 4.1 events expected in one month

214Bi random rate ~ 2.3 Hz x 0.76 Hz x (3 x 164 10-6 s) 214Bi random events expected in one month ~ 8.610-4 Hz x 3600 x 24 x 30 ~ 2 229 events expected in one month

Results obtained for 212Bi worst case : Nbackground ~ 4.7 events in a month Gamma energy (keV) Gamma energy (keV) Alimit obtained on 208Tl ~ 2.6 mBq/kg in one month

Results obtained for 214Bi worst case : Nbackground ~ 2550 events in a month Gamma energy (keV) Gamma energy (keV) Alimit obtained on 214Bi ~ 45 mBq/kg in one month

Conclusion like always, more than very preliminary suppose background is only due to interaction of external photons, and not due to surface alpha or beta emitters (the contribution of this background to single rate could be significative for thin scintillators) -> to see it : measure single rate in a scintillator as a function of thickness (linear if contribution from external photons dominate, constant if contribution from surface alpha/beta emitters dominate) very simple model of external photons (but difficult to put the correct amount of everything at the correct place) To be done : try to reproduce the single rate spectrum obtained by Mathieu in Canfranc with sum of spectrums due to external photons at fixed energies