Panel III Court Performance & Evaluation SURVEY Commercial Enforcement and Insolvency Systems Panel III Court Performance & Evaluation Legal Vice Presidency The World Bank

Funding 82% 9% 9% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Generally Material Deficiency Inadequate

Court Management 56% 44% 44% 44% 44% 44% 44% 44% 33% 33% 22% 0% 0% 0% 60% 56% 50% 44% 44% 44% 44% 44% 44% 44% 40% 33% 33% 30% 22% 20% 10% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Court's Budget Court's Internal Court Personnel Court Facilities Court Technical Finances Support Systems Chief Justice / Principal Judge Judges Collectively Government Department Other

Court Management - Staff 50% 45% 40% 35% 30% 18% 25% 20% 9% 15% 10% 5% 0% Judges Support Staff

Court Management - Materials Are courts materially provided for in an adequate fashion as regards to... 45% Statistics 64% Stationary 45% Library 36% Internet 36% Computers 45% Communication Systems 55% Facilities 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70%

Expert Employees Are there expert employees of the court? Yes 36% No 64%

Use of Experts How frequently are experts used in insolvency cases? Infrequently Frequently 30% 30% Sometimes 40%

Case Management 82% 73% 73% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Court operating rules Case management Court procedures for regulations insolvency proceedings