Figure 1 Flow chart of search and selection strategy for studies in a systematic review of endometrial thickness during IUI with ovarian stimulation. *

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

From: A Regularist Approach to Mechanistic Type-Level Explanation

Advertisements

From: An open day in the metric space

Figure 1 WBC count (A), platelet count (B), MPV (C), platelet activation rate (D) and TGF-β1concentration (E) in the PF of women with endometriosis and.

Fig. 1 Flow chart of the COBRA-light trial and its extension study

From: Global Banking: Recent Developments and Insights from Research*

Figure 1 Flow diagram of systematic review

Figure 2. Quality of life (QOL) scores for functional scale items

Fig. 1 Graphical representation

Figure 3. Day 2 cell symmetry

Figure 2. CONSORT flow diagram.

Table 1 Patient characteristics of attendees of the influenza vaccination, irrespective of AF status From: Yield of screening for atrial fibrillation in.

Figure 1 Cumulative chance of pregnancy according to age at initiation of pregnancy seeking. The curves were drawn based on the following assumptions:

Source:Ellerman, Convery, and de Perthuis (2010). Figure 6. 2, p

Figure 1. Shiga toxin–producing Escherichia coli (STEC) isolates by method of initial detection and STEC serotype, Connecticut, 2000–2009. From: Ten-Year.

Figure 1 Decrease in neuronal activity during n-back task in real tDCS as compared to sham stimulation. (A) Main effects of group (sham > real) based on.

Figure 1. Selection of papers.

Fig. 1 Flow chart of study selection

Figure 1. Conceptual model of well-being related to involvement in theatre. From: Theatre Involvement and Well-Being, Age Differences, and Lessons From.

Figure 1. Orthodontic set-up and location of LLLT or placebo-laser

Fig. 1 Flow of ascertainment of cases with incident childhood IgA vasculitis reported by four sources From: Incidence of IgA vasculitis in children estimated.

Figure 2. Illustration of minimum cross-sectional area (a) and measurements for oropharynx and soft palate in sagittal plane (b, c). From: Airway volume.

Fig 1 Respiratory support escalation strategies for study patients

Figure 1 Flow chart showing the selection of publications identified in the literature search. From: GnRH antagonist versus long agonist protocols in IVF:

From: Where do we go from here

From: A European Disease

Example 14. Schubert, Quartet in G Major, D

Fig. 1 Flow diagram of patient selection and study design.

Figure 1. Academic productivity and high academic income: top earners vs. the rest of academics. The average number of ‘peer-reviewed article equivalents’

Figure 1. Orthodontic set-up and location of LLLT or placebo-laser

Figure 1 Flow of data processing

From: Estimating the Location of World Wheat Price Discovery

Figure 3. Hypothalamic–Pituitary–Adrenal (HPA)-axis functioning moderates crime exposure: regions of significance on X (crime). The lines represent two.

Figure 1. Publication channels used by scholars at the faculty of Arts, 2006–2013. From: Accountability in context: effects of research evaluation systems.

Figure 1: Time points at which sperm samples were analysed for aneuploidy frequencies in controls and cancer patients From: Sperm aneuploidy frequencies.

Figure 1: Logistic regression showing association of prescribing provider and patient panel characteristics with occurrence of a hospitalization or ED.

Figure 3. Visualisation of ESMO-MCB scores for curative and non-curative setting. A & B and 5 and 4 represent the grades with substantial improvement.

Figure 1. Dosage and administration route of drugs used in the BMD study. Each cycle was proposed every 28 days (‘base’ schedule) or 35 days (‘weekly’

Figure 1 Percentage and number of arrivals with YFV check per entry location in Tanzania. Numbers in chart indicate number of arrivals per entry location.

Figure 1. Percentage of trainees is represented on the y-axis for each competency/knowledge item represented in the x-axis. Only Poor/Fair (P/F) ratings.

Figure 1 Study flow chart

Figure 1 Flowchart for the study population.

From: Consumer Bankruptcy, Bank Mergers, and Information *

Figure 2 Comparison of pregnancy outcomes between true NC-FET and modified NC-FET. Odds ratio (OR) adjusted for clinical pregnancy (OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.73–1.12)

Figure 1 PRISMA flow diagram illustrating the process of selection of studies for inclusion in the systematic review. From: How effective are weight-loss.

Figure 2 Care pathways used by women in Morogoro, Tanzania

Figure 1. Scattergram of serum CA-125 levels in 775 consecutive patients who had been diagnosed with gynecologic disease by laparotomy or laparoscopy.

Figure 6. RRs for clinical cure rates stratified by different diseases

Figure 1. Example of phase shift angles among three different terns where one of them has been taken as a reference. From: Assessment of ELF magnetic fields.

Figure 1. Progression-free survival and overall survival for FL/DLBCL patients. From: Clinicobiological features and prognostic impact of diffuse large.

Figure 1. Percentage of participants in each group (holocaust survivors, prewar immigrants, and postwar immigrants) by the main coded strategies. From:

Figure 2 Map of traveller arrivals to Tanzania and performed checks (arrivals with checks/all arrivals). Change: change of aircraft, no change: no change.

Figure 1. HR (95% CI) of death from dementia associated with weight or BMI in middle age and in old age. From: Adiposity in middle and old age and risk.

Figure 1 Flow diagram detailing the systematic review process.

Figure 1 Mechanism of mortality benefit associated with radial access

Figure 1 A dot plot illustrating the correlation between the yearly absolute risk difference for both MACE and major ... Figure 1 A dot plot illustrating.

Take home figure The protective role of CNP/NPR-B/NPRC.

Fig. 1 Flow chart of included patients for analyses

Fig. 1 Flow chart for selection of study subjects

Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.

Figure 1. Flow diagram for selection of articles for systematic review. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content.

Figure 1. Percentage of Pacific and European children completing all components of B4SC in 2013 and 2015 Figure 1. Percentage of Pacific and European.

Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.

Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.

Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.

Figure 1 Patient selection

Figure 1 Patient selection.

Figure 1 Grant agencies and charitable foundations supporting Plan S.

Figure 1: Trade shares of South Korea's major trading partners (% of South Korea's total trade in goods) Figure 1: Trade shares of South Korea's major.

Figure 1 ABCDE of primary prevention.2

Figure 1. Forest plot of lung cancer mortality in LDCT trials.

Presentation transcript:

Figure 1 Flow chart of search and selection strategy for studies in a systematic review of endometrial thickness during IUI with ovarian stimulation. * We searched for citations recently added to PubMed via electronic submission from a publisher, and are soon to proceed to the next stage by adding the tag [sb]. From: Endometrial thickness in women undergoing IUI with ovarian stimulation. How thick is too thin? A systematic review and meta-analysis Hum Reprod. 2017;32(5):1009-1018. doi:10.1093/humrep/dex035 Hum Reprod | © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com

Figure 2 Endometrial thickness in pregnant versus non-pregnant women Figure 2 Endometrial thickness in pregnant versus non-pregnant women. EMT = endometrial thickness (mm). Red dots mean high risk of bias, yellow unclear risk of bias and green low risk of bias. From: Endometrial thickness in women undergoing IUI with ovarian stimulation. How thick is too thin? A systematic review and meta-analysis Hum Reprod. 2017;32(5):1009-1018. doi:10.1093/humrep/dex035 Hum Reprod | © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com

Figure 3 EMT for clomiphene citrate versus gonadotrophins Figure 3 EMT for clomiphene citrate versus gonadotrophins. CC = clomiphene citrate. From: Endometrial thickness in women undergoing IUI with ovarian stimulation. How thick is too thin? A systematic review and meta-analysis Hum Reprod. 2017;32(5):1009-1018. doi:10.1093/humrep/dex035 Hum Reprod | © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com

Figure 4 EMT for CC versus letrozole and CC plus gonadotrophins versus letrozole. From: Endometrial thickness in women undergoing IUI with ovarian stimulation. How thick is too thin? A systematic review and meta-analysis Hum Reprod. 2017;32(5):1009-1018. doi:10.1093/humrep/dex035 Hum Reprod | © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com

Figure 5 EMT for letrozole versus gonadotrophins. From: Endometrial thickness in women undergoing IUI with ovarian stimulation. How thick is too thin? A systematic review and meta-analysis Hum Reprod. 2017;32(5):1009-1018. doi:10.1093/humrep/dex035 Hum Reprod | © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com