REVEAL: Randomized placebo-controlled trial of anacetrapib in 30,449 patients with atherosclerotic vascular disease Louise Bowman on behalf of the HPS.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The results of the Study of Heart and Renal Protection (SHARP)
Advertisements

Protecting the heart and the kidney: Implications from the SHARP trial Dr. Christina Reith University of Oxford United Kingdom.
The results of the Study of Heart and Renal Protection (SHARP) Colin Baigent, Martin Landray on behalf of the SHARP Investigators Disclosure: SHARP was.
1. 2 The primary Objective of IDEAL LDL-C Simvastatin mg/d Atorvastatin 80 mg/d risk CHD In stable CHD patients IDEAL: The Incremental Decrease.
HPS2-THRIVE: Randomized placebo-controlled trial of ER niacin and laropiprant in 25,673 patients with pre-existing cardiovascular disease. Jane Armitage.
HPS2-THRIVE: Treatment of HDL to Reduce the Incidence of Vascular Events Jane Armitage on behalf of the THRIVE Collaborative Group Financial Disclosure:
The efFects of Pharmacological management of lipids in patients with CKD Andrew Monson FY1 18/9/14.
Economic evaluation of MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study Heart Protection Study Collaborative Group University of Oxford UK.
Lancet : doi: /S (08)60104-X Efficacy and safety of cholesterol-lowering treatment: prospective meta-analysis of data from.
 High density lipoproteins (HDL) protect against cardiovascular disease  A novel mechanism for raising HDL levels is to inhibit a protein known as CETP.
BEAUTI f UL: morBidity-mortality EvAlUaTion of the I f inhibitor ivabradine in patients with coronary disease and left ventricULar dysfunction Purpose.
Pravastatin in Elderly Individuals at Risk of Vascular Disease Presented at Late Breaking Clinical Trials AHA 2002 PROSPER.
BackgroundBackground HDL-C levels are inversely related to CV event rates. HDL-C levels are inversely related to CV event rates. Torcetrapib, a cholesteryl.
Management of Elevated Cholesterol in the Primary Prevention Group of Adult Japanese (MEGA) Trial MEGA Trial Presented at The American Heart Association.
ELIGIBILITY: MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study Increased risk of CHD death due to prior disease: Myocardial infarction or other coronary heart disease; Occlusive.
HPS: Heart Protection Study Purpose To determine whether simvastatin reduces mortality and vascular events in patients with and without coronary disease,
Aim To determine the effects of a Coversyl- based blood pressure lowering regimen on the risk of recurrent stroke among patients with a history of stroke.
SPARCL Stroke Prevention by Aggressive Reduction in Cholesterol Levels trial.
SPARCL – Stroke Prevention by Aggressive Reduction in Cholesterol Levels (SPARCL) Jim McMorran Coventry GP GP with Specialist Interest in Diabetes and.
Collaborative Atorvastatin Diabetes Study CARDS Dr Sachin Kadoo.
Cholesterol Treatment Trialists’ (CTT) Collaboration Slide deck
Baseline characteristics and eligibility criteria of participating trials Cholesterol Treatment Trialists’ (CTT) Collaborators Lancet 2005;366:
Baseline characteristics of HPS participants by prior cerebrovascular disease.
CETP inhibition: Where are we now? Prof. John Kastelein Academic Medical Centre Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Efficacy and safety of more intensive lowering of LDL cholesterol: a meta-analysis of data from participants in 26 randomised trials Lancet 2010;
REVEAL: Randomized placebo-controlled trial of anacetrapib in 30,449 patients with atherosclerotic vascular disease Martin Landray and Louise Bowman on.
The SPRINT Research Group
US cost-effectiveness of simvastatin in 20,536 people at different levels of vascular disease risk: randomised placebo-controlled trial UK Medical Research.
Efficacy and safety of more intensive lowering of LDL cholesterol: a meta-analysis of data from 170,000 participants in 26 randomised trials Ungroup once.
Title slide.
Cholesterol Treatment Trialists’ (CTT) Collaboration Slide deck
Reducing Adverse Outcomes after ACS in Patients with Diabetes Goals
Baseline characteristics and effectiveness results
Diabetes mellitus, fasting blood glucose concentration, and risk of vascular disease: a collaborative meta-analysis of 102 prospective studies  The Emerging.
Update on Clinical Trials with Novel CETP Inhibitors to Raise HDL: Where are We Today? H. Bryan Brewer, Jr. Washington Cardiovascular Associates Washington.
Cholesterol Treatment Trialists’ (CTT) Collaboration Slide deck
Pravastatin in Elderly Individuals at Risk of Vascular Disease
Effects of Anacetrapib on the Incidence of New-Onset Diabetes Mellitus and on Vascular Events in People With Diabetes Louise Bowman & Martin Landray on.
The Anglo Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial
ELIGIBILITY: MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study
PS Sever, PM Rothwell, SC Howard, JE Dobson, B Dahlöf,
AIM HIGH Niacin plus Statin to prevent vascular events
HDL cholesterol and cardiovascular risk Epidemiological evidence
Senior Medical Director, Cardiovascular
CANTOS: The Canakinumab Anti-Inflammatory Thrombosis Outcomes Study
First time a CETP inhibitor shows reduction of serious CV events
SPIRE Program: Studies of PCSK9 Inhibition and the Reduction of Vascular Events Unanticipated attenuation of LDL-c lowering response to humanized PCSK9.
HDL cholesterol and cardiovascular risk
Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S)
ASCEND Randomized placebo-controlled trial of aspirin 100 mg daily in 15,480 patients with diabetes and no baseline cardiovascular disease Jane Armitage.
Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT)
Cholesteryl Ester Transfer Protein Inhibitors
Dabigatran in myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery
The following slides highlight a report on a presentation at the Late-breaking Trials Session and a Satellite Symposium of the American Heart Association.
Jane Armitage on behalf of the HPS2-THRIVE Collaborative Group
Baseline characteristics of HPS participants by prior diabetes
The Hypertension in the Very Elderly Trial (HYVET)
The results of the SHARP trial
Diabetes mellitus, fasting blood glucose concentration, and risk of vascular disease: a collaborative meta-analysis of 102 prospective studies  The Emerging.
Insights from the Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial (ASCOT)
Screening, Lipid Stabilization, and Placebo Run-in
ELIGIBILITY: MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study
Lipid-Lowering Arm (ASCOT-LLA): Results in the Subgroup of Patients with Diabetes Peter S. Sever, Bjorn Dahlöf, Neil Poulter, Hans Wedel, for the.
These slides highlight a presentation from a Special Session of the Late-Breaking Clinical Trials sessions during the American College of Cardiology 2005.
Cause of death Treatment-arm events, % (n=45 054)
Diabetes mellitus, fasting blood glucose concentration, and risk of vascular disease: a collaborative meta-analysis of 102 prospective studies  The Emerging.
The Heart Rhythm Society Meeting Presented by Dr. Johan De Sutter
The results of the SHARP trial
Simvastatin in Patients With Prior Cerebrovascular Disease: HPS
SPIRE Program: Studies of PCSK9 Inhibition and the Reduction of Vascular Events Unanticipated attenuation of LDL-c lowering response to humanized PCSK9.
Presentation transcript:

REVEAL: Randomized placebo-controlled trial of anacetrapib in 30,449 patients with atherosclerotic vascular disease Louise Bowman on behalf of the HPS 3 / TIMI 55 - REVEAL Collaborative Group Funded by MSD, British Heart Foundation, Medical Research Council Designed, conducted and analysed independently of the funders University of Oxford is the trial sponsor

Association between non-HDL/HDL & CHD Positive association between non-HDL and risk of CHD Inverse association between HDL and risk of CHD Prospective Studies Collaboration; Lancet 2007;370:1829-39

Background Anacetrapib is a potent inhibitor of Cholesteryl Ester Transfer Protein (CETP) which doubles HDL-cholesterol and lowers LDL-cholesterol Previous trials of other CETP inhibitors have been stopped after around 2 years of follow-up due to unexpected cardiovascular hazards (torcetrapib) or apparent lack of efficacy (dalcetrapib, evacetrapib) The REVEAL trial assessed the efficacy and safety of adding anacetrapib vs. placebo to effective doses of atorvastatin among patients with established occlusive vascular disease

REVEAL trial design Eligibility: 30,000 patients aged over 50 years with occlusive vascular disease Background statin: Atorvastatin 20 or 80 mg daily (China: 10 or 20 mg) Randomized: Anacetrapib 100 mg daily vs. matching placebo Follow-up: ≥4 years and ≥1900 primary outcomes Primary outcome: Major Coronary Event (i.e. Coronary death, myocardial infarction, or coronary revascularization) REVEAL Collaborative Group. Am Heart J 2017;187:182-90

Baseline demographics Characteristic Total (30449) Age (years) Mean 67 Gender Male 25534 (84%) Female 4915 (16%) Region Europe 15738 (52%) North America 6082 (20%) China 8629 (28%)

Prior disease & blood lipids at randomization (after 8-12 weeks’ treatment with atorvastatin) Characteristic Total (30449) Prior disease Coronary heart disease 26679 (88%) Cerebrovascular disease 6781 (22%) Peripheral arterial disease 2435 (8%) Diabetes mellitus 11320 (37%) Lipids HDL cholesterol 40 mg/dL (1.0 mmol/L) LDL cholesterol 61 mg/dL (1.6 mmol/L) Non-HDL cholesterol 92 mg/dL (2.4 mmol/L)

Follow-up and adherence to treatment Median duration 4.1 years Complete 99.8% Anacetrapib Placebo Adherence at midpoint Randomized treatment* 89.9% 89.7% Study atorvastatin 90.3% Any statin 94.6% 94.7% * No difference in any reason for stopping allocated treatment

Effects of anacetrapib on lipids at trial midpoint Measurement Absolute difference Proportional difference mg/ dL SI units HDL cholesterol +43 +1.1 mmol /L 104% Apolipoprotein AI +42 +0.4 g/L 36% LDL cholesterol - D irect (Genzyme) 26 0.7 mmol /L 41% - Beta quantification* 11 0.3 mmol /L 17% Apolipoprotein B - 12 0.1 g/L 18% Non - HDL cholesterol 17 0.4 mmol /L 18% * measured in a random subset of 2000 participants

Primary outcome: Major coronary events (Coronary death, myocardial infarction, or coronary revascularization) 15 Anacetrapib Placebo 1640 (10.8%) 1803 (11.8%) Rate ratio 0.91 (0.85 to 0.97) P=0.004 Placebo 10 Participants with Event (%) Anacetrapib 5 1 2 3 4 Years of Follow-up

Components of the primary outcome Type of Event Anacetrapib Placebo Rate Ratio (95% CI) P Value (N=15225) (N=15224) no. of participants with events (%) 0.90 (0.83–0.97) 0.91 (0.85–0.97) Coronary revascularization Major coronary event (7.1) (10.8) (7.9) (11.8) 1081 1640 1201 1803 0.01 0.004 Coronary death 388 (2.5) 420 (2.8) 0.92 (0.80–1.06) 0.25 Myocardial infarction 669 (4.4) 769 (5.1) 0.87 (0.78–0.96) 0.007 Coronary death or MI 934 (6.1) 1048 (6.9) 0.89 (0.81–0.97) 0.008 0.8 1.0 1.2 Anacetrapib Better Placebo Better Major coronary event: Coronary death, MI or coronary revascularization No significant evidence of differential proportional effects among 23 pre-specified subgroup categories

Proportional reduction in Coronary death or MI vs Proportional reduction in Coronary death or MI vs. absolute reduction in non-HDL cholesterol (derived from published CTT meta-analysis) 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% Statin vs. control >50 mg/dL redn (4 trials) REVEAL Proportional risk reduction Statin vs. control <50 mg/dL redn (17 trials) More vs. less 22 mg/dL redn (5 trials) 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Absolute reduction in non-HDL cholesterol (mg/dL)

Primary & secondary outcomes Type of Event Anacetrapib Placebo Rate Ratio (95% CI) P Value (N=15225) (N=15224) no. of participants with events (%) Coronary death 388 (2.5) 420 (2.8) 0.92 (0.80–1.06) 0.25 Myocardial infarction 669 (4.4) 769 (5.1) 0.87 (0.78–0.96) 0.007 Coronary death or MI 934 (6.1) 1048 (6.9) 0.89 (0.81–0.97) 0.008 Coronary revascularization 1081 (7.1) 1201 (7.9) 0.90 (0.83–0.97) 0.01 Major coronary event 1640 (10.8) 1803 (11.8) 0.91 (0.85–0.97) 0.004 0.99 (0.87–1.12) Presumed ischaemic stroke (3.2) 485 489 0.93 (0.86–1.00) Major atherosclerotic event (9.1) (9.7) 1383 1483 0.05 0.93 (0.88–0.99) Major vascular event (13.6) (14.5) 2068 2214 0.02 0.8 1.0 1.2 Anacetrapib Better Placebo Better Major coronary event: Coronary death, MI or coronary revascularization Major atherosclerotic event: Coronary death, MI or presumed ischaemic stroke Major vascular event: Coronary death, MI, coronary revascularization or presumed ischaemic stroke

Other clinical assessments Anacetrapib Placebo Difference P New - onset diabetes mellitus 510 (5.3%) 571 (6.0%) 0.6% 0.05 Blood pressure Systolic (mmHg) 132.4 131.7 +0.7 0.002 Diastolic 77.6 77.4 +0.3 0.04 Hypertensive serious adverse events 151 (1.0%) 141 (0.9%) +0.1% 0.56 K idney disease New - onset eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73m 2 1344 (11.5%) 1236 (10.6%) +0.84% 0.04 Renal failure s erious adverse events 169 (1.1%) 146 (1.0%) +0.15% 0.20 No effect on vascular, non-vascular, or all-cause mortality - No effect on cancer, liver, muscle, cognitive function or adverse events

Effects of adding anacetrapib to intensive statin therapy Significant 9% proportional reduction in major coronary events (effect appears to be greater in later years of treatment) Small reduction in risk of new-onset diabetes mellitus No excess of symptomatic side-effects with anacetrapib (levels in adipose tissue rise with continued treatment) No excess of mortality, cancer or other serious adverse events (small increase in BP and small reduction in kidney function) Post-trial follow-up of all consenting participants (off-drug) to assess longer-term efficacy and safety of anacetrapib

Available at www.nejm.org together with supplementary methods, analyses, and detailed tabulations of adverse events