Hallett, et al., - Supplementary Figure 1

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Analysis of Microarray Genomic Data of Breast Cancer Patients Hui Liu, MS candidate Department of statistics Prof. Eric Suess, faculty mentor Department.
Advertisements

Gene expression patterns of breast cancer phenotype revealed by molecular profiling Gabriela Alexe, IBM Research DIMACS Workshop on Detecting and Processing.
DNA Microarrays Examining Gene Expression. Prof. GrossBiology 4 DNA MicroArrays DNA MicroArrays use hybridization technology to examine gene expression.
Metastatic Breast Cancer: One Size Does Not Fit All Clifford Hudis, M.D. Chief, Breast Cancer Medicine Service MSKCC.
Health and CS Philip Chan. DNA, Genes, Proteins What is the relationship among DNA Genes Proteins ?
Chapter 7 Essential Concepts in Molecular Pathology Companion site for Molecular Pathology Author: William B. Coleman and Gregory J. Tsongalis.
Enabling biomarker validation in breast cancer molecular subtypes: sensitivity and specificity of array-based subtype classification in 983 patients Balázs.
Diagnosis of multiple cancer types by shrunken centroids of gene expression Course: Topics in Bioinformatics Presenter: Ting Yang Teacher: Professor.
Lecture 8. Functional Genomics: Gene Expression Profiling using DNA microarrays. Part II Clark EA, Golub TR, Lander ES, Hynes RO.(2000) Genomic analysis.
Rate of breast cancer-specific survival Months Low gene expression (N=252) High gene expression (N=37) P < (Log-rank) a Months Low gene expression.
Jin MENG Shen FU (DPD 08) Biology 2 - Head/Neck and CNS Tumors
Pan-cancer analysis of prognostic genes Jordan Anaya Omnes Res, In this study I have used publicly available clinical and.
Supplementary Figure 2: Representative Kaplan-Meier plots of overall survival considering alterations erbB signaling pathway genes and p53 in lung cancer.
Multiplatform Analysis of 12 Cancer Types Reveals Molecular Classification within and across Tissues of Origin Hoadley, KA et al. Cell 158(4):
Eigengenes as biological signatures Dr. Habil Zare, PhD PI of Oncinfo Lab Assistant Professor, Department of Computer Science Texas State University 5.
P
A B C Supplementary Figure S1. Time-dependent assessment of grade, GGI and PAM50 in untreated patients Landmark analyses of the Kaplan-Meier estimates.
Estrogen-Regulated Genes Predict Survival in Hormone Receptor–Positive Breast Cancers J Clin Oncol 24: Daniel S. Oh, Melissa A. Troester,
Table S1: The results of ER, PgR, and HER2 status in IHC testing and mRNA expression in the full Consortium population (N=389) HER2 statusER status PgR.
Figure 1 The heterogenous landscape of triple-negative breast cancer
A B C ErbB3 protein levels ERBB3 mRNA levels P = P = 0.716
Figure 2. DNA methylation mediated MORT gene silencing is linked to luminal, receptor positive breast cancers. (A) MORT expression level plotted versus.
Volume 12, Issue 5, Pages (November 2007)
Transcriptional heterogeneity of breast cancer subtypes,
Luminal A normal-like Figure S12: KNN graph analysis showed that the cancer data consists of a series of connected, bifurcating clusters. luminal B normal.
Multimodal Assessment of Estrogen Receptor mRNA Profiles to Quantify Estrogen Pathway Activity in Breast Tumors  Anita Muthukaruppan, Annette Lasham,
Figure S1. DCYTB expression is higher in ER+ than ER- patients
Genes with Bimodal Expression Are Robust Diagnostic Targets that Define Distinct Subtypes of Epithelial Ovarian Cancer with Different Overall Survival 
High-level TNFSF13 predict a good response to post-operative chemotherapy in patients with basal-like breast cancer: A systematic review 林惠鈺1,2 歸家豪1,3.
Volume 12, Issue 5, Pages (November 2007)
Nat. Rev. Urol. doi: /nrurol
A B C Supplementary figure S7
A Long Noncoding RNA Signature That Predicts Pathological Complete Remission Rate Sensitively in Neoadjuvant Treatment of Breast Cancer  Gen Wang, Xiaosong.
Figure 1 Hierarchical clustering (HCL) outcome of all tested samples with the expression profile of the case report set as unknown Hierarchical clustering.
Consensus of Melanoma Gene Expression Subtypes Converges on Biological Entities  Martin Lauss, Jeremie Nsengimana, Johan Staaf, Julia Newton-Bishop, Göran.
Tumor intrinsic subtype is reflected in cancer-adjacent tissue.
Class Prediction Based on Gene Expression Data Issues in the Design and Analysis of Microarray Experiments Michael D. Radmacher, Ph.D. Biometric Research.
(A) Hierarchical clustering was performed to identify groups of patients with similar RNASeq expression of 20 genes associated with reduced survivability.
Volume 4, Issue 3, Pages (August 2013)
Distribution of intrinsic subtypes among TNBC and distribution of TNBC among basal-like breast cancer. Distribution of intrinsic subtypes among TNBC and.
Volume 17, Issue 8, Pages (November 2016)
The Prognostic Ease and Difficulty of Invasive Breast Carcinoma
Quality Assurance of RNA Expression Profiling in Clinical Laboratories
Volume 10, Issue 6, Pages (December 2006)
Down-regulation of LATS1 promotes the formation of tumors enriched in basal-like features. Down-regulation of LATS1 promotes the formation of tumors enriched.
Derivation and application of cancer‐specific epithelial‐mesenchymal transition (EMT) signature A six‐step scheme illustrating the generation of a cancer‐specific.
János Fekete, Balázs Győrffy
ADAM8 is overexpressed in human breast cancer AADAM8 mRNA expression in samples from breast tumor and normal breast tissue was analyzed using the Oncomine.
Correlation of DNMT3A expression and its variants with clinical parameters. Correlation of DNMT3A expression and its variants with clinical parameters.
LATS2-associated gene expression pattern is down-regulated specifically in lumB breast tumors. LATS2-associated gene expression pattern is down-regulated.
Breast Cancer Subtype Identification Using RNA-Seq Data
(A) Distribution of LATS2 mRNA expression levels in different breast cancer subtypes (PAM50, METABTIC dataset); ***P-value < 0.001, t test comparing lumB.
Correlation between Pten/p53 status and AKT pathway activity in BC and effect on clinical outcome Box plot for p53‐pathway activity in p53 wild‐type and.
Figure 1. Identification of three tumour molecular subtypes in CIT and TCGA cohorts. We used CIT multi-omics data ( Figure 1. Identification of.
Reduced BAI1 expression is associated with breast cancer patient survival. Reduced BAI1 expression is associated with breast cancer patient survival. A,
Differential methylation between AA and EA cases among breast cancer subtypes. Differential methylation between AA and EA cases among breast cancer subtypes.
M-Wnt and E-Wnt cells cluster tightly with claudin-low and basal-like breast tumors, respectively, by microarray analysis. M-Wnt and E-Wnt cells cluster.
EN1 expression in breast cancer and clinical outcome.
Clustering analysis of DTC-associated genes.
MYC–HOXB7–HER2 predicts clinical outcome in breast cancer patients treated with tamoxifen. MYC–HOXB7–HER2 predicts clinical outcome in breast cancer patients.
High-risk neuroblastoma molecular subtypes classification and inference of master regulators. High-risk neuroblastoma molecular subtypes classification.
Influence of ASGR2 expression on survival.
Identification of putative TET1 targets in TNBC
Volume 28, Issue 3, Pages e7 (July 2019)
MYC and LYN are coexpressed and have interdependent clinical outcomes.
Subtype classification of breast functional screening results.
Volume 28, Issue 4, Pages e6 (July 2019)
Construction of TME signatures and functional annotation.
Kaplan-Meier (K-M) curves of progression-free survival (PFS) of the entire cohort of patients with metastatic gastric cancer treated with RAD001. Kaplan-Meier.
Kaplan-Meier (K-M) curves of progression-free survival (PFS) in 54 patients with metastatic gastric cancer treated with RAD001. Kaplan-Meier (K-M) curves.
Presentation transcript:

Hallett, et al., - Supplementary Figure 1 K=6 Supplementary figure 1. NMF of 298 ER+ breast cancer patients reveals robust statistical support for the existence of 6 subgroups

Hallett, et al., - Supplementary Figure 2 B Ki67 Luminal A Luminal B ERBB2 Basal Normal C D 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 Lum A Lum B Normal Basal ERBB2 All 31 24 16 14 15 ER+ 37 29 8 10 ER- 22 40 34 % Memebership Supplementary figure 2. PAM50 sub-typing of training cohort. A) Hierachical clustering with Sorlie intrinsic genes and subtype assignment based on distance to PAM50 subtype centroid. B) Ki67 is highest in Basal, ERBB2 and Luminal B subtypes . C) Subtypes display expected clinical outcomes based on previous reports. D) Subtype breakdown based on ER expression in training cohort.

Hallett, et al., - Supplementary Figure 3 Supplementary figure 3. Survival characteristics are maintained between training (x-axis) and validation (y-axis) cohorts.

Hallett, et al., - Supplementary Figure 4 Supplementary figure 4. Majority of DMFS events occur after 5 years in subgroup #3 patients.

Hallett, et al., - Supplementary Figure 5 B Supplementary figure 5. Probabilities of subgroup classification for TCGA samples.

Hallett, et al., - Supplementary Figure 6 B Supplementary figure 5. Gene expression of actionable targets among the ER+ subgroups. A) RAD50 and BARD1 expression in subgrouped cell lines. B) Expression of additional actionable targets in subgrouped patient samples.