Improving transition for Combined Honours students through a holistic engagement approach Colin Bryson, Alex Roper, Hannah Lyons, Stacey Duggan, Grace.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The nature of student engagement and why it matters so much. Colin Bryson.
Advertisements

Enhancing the Student Experience The Student Voice
Enhancing Student Engagement – what are we talking about? Graham Gibbs Research Centre for Student Engaged Educational Development.
Maximizing Your NSSE & CCSSE Results
Students as co-creators of curricula Dr Catherine Bovill, Senior Lecturer, Academic Development Unit Dublin Region Higher Education Alliance 30 th November.
Building partnership and community with students through fostering engagement Colin Bryson, Newcastle University
Student engaging. What’s that about? Colin Bryson, Daniel Ashall and Bethany Parker, Newcastle University
Student Engagement and partnership in Combined Honours Ruth Furlonger, Hannah Lincoln, Fae Rinaldo-Langridge, Jenni Cannon and Colin Bryson.
Clarifying the concept of student engagement: A fruitful approach to underpin policy and practice Colin Bryson and Christine Hardy.
Conceptualising student engagement in order to improve policy and practice Colin Bryson, Newcastle University
Engaging students through a partnership model Colin Bryson and Ruth Furlonger: Newcastle University
Promoting individualism and retaining identity in mass higher education: academic advising for the 21st Century Nicola Andrew and Ruth Whittaker.
The Class of 2012: engaged students or consumers? Christine Hardy, Nottingham Trent University.
The value of mentors and mentees in year zero, art & design Rachel Dickson: Belfast School of Art, University of
Future Directions Strategy Implementation Professor Liz Thomas Dr Helen May.
Making use of the concepts of student engagement to enhance learning and teaching Colin Bryson, Lucy Boden and Holly Maxey Newcastle University
Engaging students through partnership
COLIN BRYSON AND FAE RINALDO NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY, UK EFYE Conference 2015 Pushing boundaries: developing student engagement and ‘students as partners’
Transforming learning and student engagement through students as partners Colin Bryson and Fae Rinaldo- Langridge ALDHE Conference 2015.
Peer mentoring at Newcastle University – why it works and how to go forward Colin Bryson.
Learner Centred and Learning Centred. vision values shared beliefs personal mental models structures organization common language.
Empowering Learners. Aims To consider the case for giving learners more autonomy and ownership. To recognise different ways of empowering learners. To.
A Pedagogy for a Changing World Simon Beames and Mike Brown Routledge 2016.
Glasgow Caledonian University
Liberating the curriculum
Staff-student partnership: a catalyst for staff-student engagement
CHAPTER 7 DELIVERY OF YOUR COMPREHENSIVE SCHOOL COUNSELING PROGRAM
The efficacy of external subject-specialist mentoring in the professional identity construction of early career physics teachers Dr David Cameron, Institute.
Expanding induction and using the VLE to enhance induction to First Year Life Science Dr Chris Finlay & Dr Maureen Griffiths School of Life Sciences.
Making Practice Visible: The Impact of the FdA in Early Years
Colin Bryson, Newcastle University
Mentoring CPD Festival 2017.
Early Intervention, Transition & Engagement – Using Data to Improve the Student Journey & Learning Experience Dr. Emily McIntosh Associate Director, Student.
Collaborative Learning
Job design & job satisfaction
Addressing student expectations and building confidence through a pre-arrival activity. Amanda Zacharopoulou Ulster Law School.
The positive impact of personal advising training
L2L The Professional Development Framework through the lens of Libraries & Librarians.
Christine Hardy, Colin Bryson and Len Hand
What are the impact of changes to lesson observation and feedback processes on teachers’ attitudes and practice? Why this? The new process. What did we.
NHS Education for Scotland Always Event Project
Encouraging student engagement to increase learning gain
SOLSTICE & CLT Conference 2016
Realising the potential of student engagement
Critical pedagogy: Building strong learning communities.
Student Engagement With Learning & Teaching Development
Peer Review & Enhancement Promoting enhancement through reflective critical friendship Quick guide Version 2, LEAD, October 2017.
Strategies to increase family engagement
Development of an active learning curriculum to enhance engagement & retention on foundation year students Learning & Teaching Conference 2018 Nicky Milner.
VISIBLE LEARNING John Hattie.
Dr Camille B. Kandiko Howson Academic Head of Student Engagement
Colin Bryson, Newcastle University
Professional Learning on the Foundation Degree
Welcome to the School of Education
Linking engagement indicators to supportive interventions
Dr Camille B. Kandiko Howson Academic Head of Student Engagement
Making Tomorrow’s Doctors Today’s Teachers
Celebrating enhancements ‘Achieved in partnership’,
STUDENTS AS PEER MENTORS:
Creating a Partnership Learning Community
CPD: The Coaching & Mentoring Model
A STUDENT PEER MENTORING PROGRAM
Job design & job satisfaction
Personal Academic Tutoring
Applying for promotion on learning and teaching 1 Gathering Evidence
Designing Learning Environments that Cultivate Positive Mindsets
What aspects of a team make it a Community of Practice?
The Impact of Peer Learning on Assessment Literacy and Feedback Orientation
Partnership Principles and Mechanisms
In limbo? Practitioners who teach
Presentation transcript:

Improving transition for Combined Honours students through a holistic engagement approach Colin Bryson, Alex Roper, Hannah Lyons, Stacey Duggan, Grace Cooper and Helen Thomas Combined Honours Newcastle University

Fostering student engagement The Australian evidence (FYE, McInnis, Krause, inter alia) The US evidence (NSSE, Pascarella & Terenzini, Tinto) My own evidence (Bryson, Hand, Hardy)

Conception of SE Engagement is a concept which encompasses the perceptions, expectations and experience of being a student and the construction of being a student in HE (Bryson and Hand, 2007).

To foster SE - aims Combat the alienating forces (Mann, 2001) Academic and social integration (Tinto, 1993) Belonging (Kember et al, 2001) Community (Wenger, 1999; Tinto, 2006; McInnis, 2005; Perry, 1997)

Key influences on engagement (Bryson & Hand) Student expectations and perceptions – match to the ‘personal project’ (Dubet) Balances between challenge and appropriate workload Degrees of choice, autonomy, risk, and opportunities for growth and enjoyment Trust relationships Communication and discourse The holistic approach – transition pedagogies (Kift)

Issues in this case – less than good experiences and perceptions Lack of support from staff No sense of belonging or identity Poor academic and social integration into subjects and degree Lowest NSS score!

The nature of degree An almost unique path through modules A non-shared curriculum experience But could not be done through the curriculum or classroom….

A slightly different approach Co-determination - Not just listening to the student voice but empowering – co-ownership of the agenda and the implementation Making linked interventions Evaluation and more interventions

Empowering the student voice Indirect – lots of feedback gathering Direct – new student presentation system Student led Wider student forums

Interventions Changes to the degree – minor and major Alternatives to personal tutor support Redesign of induction Building community – reinvigorated society, common room Peer mentor system – the flagship

Peer mentor scheme Students wanted a transition mentor scheme not peer assisted learning Recruited one mentor per ten first years Trained Had pre-induction advisory and socialising role Major roles in induction week and weekly meetings thereafter

Two different systems evolved Most mentors faded into background after week 1 of term – perceived they were not needed – 85% of mentees did not participate after induction week But 6 mentors had far higher impact – had 60-90% of mentees participating in one way or other The latter group took responsibility through ownership (became self-reinforcing)

Did it all work? Gathered lots of evaluation Mentor system a success – 80% of students drew on it Other interventions well received These approaches seen as exemplars by rest of the university ….BUT

Some limits… Full buy–in – 10% of the students Those that really get involved 10% of students participate 60% make use to some extent – and appreciate it more or less (but don’t feel part of a community) 20% at best indifferent or oblivious And involvement in some aspects – giving , social events etc remains problematic

So back to engagement Some students show engagement to the programme aspects – relationships and dialogue, even discourse Others are clearly engaged enough to be doing well enough in their studies and apparently enjoying their student experience ? – no communication channel

Questions to address (and consider your own context) 1.Where should the focus be for building the sense of belonging and community: University or subject or degree or more local? 2. Consider the model of student (rep) as partner – pro’s, con’s and limits?

More… 3.Is peer mentoring and support an alternative to personal tutoring and learning support (i.e. staff)? 4. Do we need to reach all the first year students or it enough just to offer opportunities?

And more 5.Which students should we prioritise in our fostering student engagement agenda? The disengaged – very challenging! The slightly engaged – big dividends The already engaged – most gratifying…