Vertex Detector Mechanical R&D Design Questions and Issues

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Vertex Detector and Tracker Mechanics and Materials Bill Cooper (Fermilab) (Layer 1) VXD.
Advertisements

Vertex Detector Cooling Bill Cooper Fermilab (Layer 5) (Layer 1) VXD.
Vertex Detector Cable Considerations Bill Cooper Fermilab VXD.
Mechanical Status of ECAL Marc Anduze – 30/10/06.
Global Design Effort Detector concept # Plenary introductory talk IRENG07 Name September 17, 2007.
28 June 2002Santa Cruz LC Retreat M. Breidenbach1 SD – Silicon Detector EM Calorimetry.
The LHCb Inner Tracker LHCb: is a single-arm forward spectrometer dedicated to B-physics acceptance: (250)mrad: The Outer Tracker: covers the large.
Fiber Bragg Grating (FBG) Sensors For Micromegas
Vertex Detector Mechanics Bill Cooper Fermilab VXD.
Performance of the DZero Layer 0 Detector Marvin Johnson For the DZero Silicon Group.
Experimental Area Meeting V. Bobillier1 Good connection to earth (in many points) of every metallic parts to be installed in the cavern is very.
The BTeV Tracking Systems David Christian Fermilab f January 11, 2001.
Mechanical Work Plan Discussion Bill Cooper Fermilab.
Mechanics: Status and Plans Bill Cooper (Fermilab) (Layer 1) VXD.
D. Lissauer, BNL. 1 ATLAS ID Upgrade Scope R&D Plans for ATLAS Tracker First thoughts on Schedule and Cost.
CLIC Vertex Detector Mechanics Bill Cooper Fermilab (Layer 5) (Layer 1) VXD.
Pixel Support Tube Requirements and Interfaces M.Olcese PST CDR: CERN Oct. 17th 2001.
VELO workshop, Amsterdam, april ‘00M.Ferro-Luzzi Difficulties with current mechanical design recent FEA results: to obtain sufficient stiffness of center.
November 16, 2001 C. Newsom BTeV Pixel Modeling, Prototyping and Testing C. Newsom University of Iowa.
ILC Vertex Tracker Ladder Studies At LBNL M Battaglia, D Contarato, L Greiner, D Shuman LBNL, Berkeley.
IFE Plant Structural Concepts Including Shielding and Optical Stability Requirements Thomas Kozub, Charles Gentile, Irving Zatz - PPPL.
VXD Mechanical R&D at the University of Washington H. Lubatti, C. Daly, W. Kuykendall LCRD in conjunction with Fermilab, SLAC.
1 CLAS12/Central Tracker review. Saclay 12/09 Stéphan AUNE Central Tracker review Micromegas central & forward tracker  R&D and prototypes  CAD implantation.
Mechanical Status of EUDET Module Marc Anduze – 05/04/07.
ACFA-7; Taipei, Nov 2004 H.Weerts status Si licon D etector Status H.Weerts Fermilab/Michigan State Univ. (Progress on Si-tracker layout)
Design Discussion of Mechanical / Electrical Interfaces Bill Cooper (Fermilab) (Layer 1) VXD.
2 Silicon pixel part Done and to be written Written! Under way To be done Introduction 1.Hybrid Pixel Assembly Concept 2.Silicon sensor 1.First thinned.
FPCCD option Yasuhiro Sugimoto 2012/5/24 ILD 1.
Vessel dimensions GTK assembly carrier Electrical connections Cooling pipes integration Vessel alignment with the beam Next steps Conclusion 3/10/20102.
1 FPCCD VTX Work Plan Y. Sugimoto 2010/1/22. 2 FPCCD: Features and R&D issues (1/2) Small pixel size (~5  m) –Sensor development Small size chip; ~6mm.
D. M. Lee, LANL 1 07/10/07 Forward Vertex Detector Overview Technical Design Overview Design status.
TC Straw man for ATLAS ID for SLHC This layout is a result of the discussions in the GENOA ID upgrade workshop. Aim is to evolve this to include list of.
SiD Vertex Detector Mechanical R&D (May Apply to Other Concepts) Bill Cooper Fermilab.
Upgrade PO M. Tyndel, MIWG Review plans p1 Nov 1 st, CERN Module integration Review – Decision process  Information will be gathered for each concept.
E. Da Riva/M. Gomez Marzoa1 WG4 Meeting - 27th June 2012 Air Cooling by means of carbon fiber structure Enrico DA RIVA (EN-CV-PJ) Manuel GOMEZ MARZOA (EN-CV-PJ)
Vessel dimensions GTK assembly carrier Electrical connections Cooling pipes integration Vessel alignment with the beam Next steps Conclusion 3/23/20102electro-mechanical.
D0 PMG, May 04, 2000 Slide 1 Schedule DØ SMT Status Report.
TRACKING AND VERTEXING SUMMARY Suyong Choi Korea University.
6/19/06 Su DongSiD Advisory: VXD DOD Summary II1 VXD DOD Summary (II) Sensors & Other system Issues.
10 September 2010 Immanuel Gfall (HEPHY Vienna) Belle II SVD Upgrade, Mechanics and Cooling OEPG/FAKT Meeting 2010.
Marc Anduze – EUDET Meeting – PARIS 08/10/07 Mechanical R&D for EUDET module.
EC: 7 DISK concept Preliminary considerations
Straw man layout for ATLAS ID for SLHC
De Remigis The test has been accomplished with an SLVS signal, since that was chosen for the serial communication between the readout and the optical converter.
EUDET HCAL prototype; mechanics Felix Sefkow Work by K.Gadow, K.Kschioneck CALIC collaboration meeting Daegu, Korea, February 20, 2009.
SiD R&D Plan and Opportunities for New Collaborators
University of Washington, Seattle
Technical Design for the Mu3e Detector
- STT LAYOUT - SECTOR F SECTOR A SECTOR B SECTOR E SECTOR D SECTOR C
Discussion items SVD mechanics session.
3D IC Reliability Xinxin Yu, Hao Wu.
Concepts and Requirements for GIMM Structures
SiD Solenoid Status and Plans
C.Clerc ILD session, ALCPG /03/2010
ALICE PD group meeting Andrea Francescon.
LumiCal mechanical design, integration with LDC and laser alignment
First of all we will remind some numbers:
WG4 – Progress report R. Santoro and A. Tauro.
SIT AND FTD DESIGN FOR ILD
Magnet Options Forward dipoles vs. forward solenoids
SiD Electronic Concepts
Flat-Top Beam Profile Cavity Prototype: design and preliminary tests
Comments to the SVD4 structure
Vertex Detector Overview Prototypes R&D Plans Summary.
Petroleum and Mining Engineering Department
SiD Tracker Concepts M. Breidenbach
VLT Meeting, Washington DC, August 25, 2005
Peter Kodyš, Zdeněk Doležal, Jan Brož,
Flat-Top Beam Profile Cavity Prototype
as a prototype for Super c-tau factory
Presentation transcript:

Vertex Detector Mechanical R&D Design Questions and Issues Bill Cooper Fermilab

Sensor Properties For each technology, what limits are there on sensor dimensions: thickness plus each transverse dimension? How do active and cut dimensions compare? Does the sensor require out-of-plane features, for example, separate readout chips? What stress and strain can a sensor tolerate without damage? Can the sensor be formed into a partial cylinder or non-flat shape? If so, what is the minimum bend radius? At what temperature is the sensor expected to operate? Humidity? How stable need the temperature be? Are temperature requirements different for various sensor regions? How uniform is the coefficient of thermal expansion through the sensor thickness and in different transverse regions? 12 June 2007 VXD Mechanics Meeting

Handling and Assembly Requirements Where / how is a sensor to be singulated from a wafer? How is it to be handled thereafter? How robust are sensor surfaces? What is known about sensor wire-bonding and bump-bonding properties? Are sensors sufficiently flat as fabricated, or do they need to be flattened by support structures? How sensitive is the sensor to static discharge? In what gas environment should the sensor be maintained? Are environmental requirements different when a sensor is not powered? 12 June 2007 VXD Mechanics Meeting

Power Consumption / Delivery What is the expected power dissipation per unit area? Is the dissipation uniform over the sensor or concentrated in specific areas? If it is concentrated, what is the dissipation within each area and on each sensor surface? If power cycling is required, is it integral with the sensor or must it be provided separately? What are the design requirements and implications of serial power? 12 June 2007 VXD Mechanics Meeting

Controls, I/O, and Cabling How many control signals are needed? When and how often are they downloaded? Are signal receivers and output drivers integral with the sensor or separate? How are connections made? How many separate power and signal connections are required? Are optical transceivers incorporated in one of the sensor layers? Are cables attached directly to sensors or via connectors? How are cables and optical fibers anchored to prevent transmission of forces and moments into a sensor? 12 June 2007 VXD Mechanics Meeting

B-field and Implications How sensitive is the sensor to magnetic field magnitude and direction? How are current-carrying elements aligned with the field direction? How are cables anchored to prevent motion due to the B-field? 12 June 2007 VXD Mechanics Meeting

Noise: Pick-up / Generation / Shielding How sensitive is the sensor to noise pick-up? Does the sensor or its readout generate noise which could adversely affect other portions of the detector, such as calorimetry? This may be less of an issue if I/O is via fiber optics. What are the requirements for support structure grounding? Is a Faraday cage needed? What about noise traveling down the beam pipe? 12 June 2007 VXD Mechanics Meeting

Geometry, Support, and Cooling Barrel and disk support Geometric acceptance “Mass” Ease and precision of fabrication and assembly Alignment provisions and requirements Vertex detector positioning relative to the beam Vertex detector positioning relative to the outer tracker and other sub-detectors (calorimeters, muon system, etc.) Simulations Design and prototyping Ladders and barrels Wedges and disks 12 June 2007 VXD Mechanics Meeting

Geometry, Support, and Cooling Assumed to be via dry gas Supply and distribution ducts and manifolding Vibrations, flow rates and regimes, temperatures, etc. 12 June 2007 VXD Mechanics Meeting

Installation, Servicing, and Beam Pipe How is the vertex detector installed and aligned? How is it serviced later? What are the detailed paths to the outside world for power, cabling, fiber optics, and cooling gas? If power conditioning is needed, where and how would that be done? How is the vertex detector integrated with the beam pipe, associated “vacuum chambers”, and other sub-detectors? Beam pipe contour Support Geometry and constraints Integration of the vertex detector with forward calorimetry, beam monitoring, and other sub-detectors 12 June 2007 VXD Mechanics Meeting

Technology Dependencies of Solutions We received a suggestion that mechanical design approaches be characterized by the extent to which they are sensor technology dependent (or independent). A reasonable suggestion, but beware the quicksand! It seems likely that some mechanical designs will be more suitable for one sensor technology than another. It seems equally likely that the some sensor technologies will require specific mechanical design features. We should be aware of those dependencies, and even tabulate them, so that they can be taken into account if resources limit our investigations. In the ideal world, optimal combinations of mechanical designs and technologies would become self-evident as R&D progresses. 12 June 2007 VXD Mechanics Meeting

Issues and People The list of issues is certainly incomplete and needs to be tuned. We invite people to suggest changes and to sign-up to investigate specific issues: Sensor properties Sensor handling Power Controls, I/O, and cabling B-field Noise, pick-up, shielding Geometry, support, and cooling Installation, servicing, and beam pipe Technology dependencies We hope some names can be associated with tasks before the next meeting. 12 June 2007 VXD Mechanics Meeting