QEP topic Undergraduate Creative Inquiry. QEP topic Undergraduate Creative Inquiry.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1. Creativity and Innovation 2. Communication and Collaboration
Advertisements

Mission The mission of Kappa Omicron Nu is empowered leaders in scholarship, research, and leadership. This mission will enable the organization and chapters.
Ability-Based Education at Alverno College. Proposed Outcomes for Session 1. To introduce you to Alvernos approach to designing integrative general education.
An Overview of Service Learning: Building Bridges, Making Connections
APSU QEP. Explore practical learning experiences and opportunities to excel in life. APSU QEP.
Employer Engagement; Curriculum Refinements Carol Costley Institute for Work Based Learning.
Core Competencies Student Focus Group, Nov. 20, 2008.
CEC Advisory Council October 25, 2013 Miami 2020 Plan: Moments that Transorm.
1 GETTING STARTED WITH ASSESSMENT Barbara Pennipede Associate Director of Assessment Office of Planning, Assessment and Research Office of Planning, Assessment.
Computer Science Accreditation/Assessment Issues Bolek Mikolajczak UMass Dartmouth, CIS Department Chair IT Forum, Framingham, MA January 10, 2006.
National Science Foundation: Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (TUES)
MBA Experience. Assessment of Learning Assessment of Experience Assessment of Market Conditions and Alumni/Employer Feedback MBA Experience.
Catherine Wehlburg, Ph.D. Assistant Provost for Institutional Effectiveness Texas Christian University TAMU Assessment Conference 2011.
THE NEW TEXAS CORE CURRICULUM (OCTOBER 27, 2011).
Graduate Program Review Where We Are, Where We Are Headed and Why Duane K. Larick, Associate Graduate Dean Presentation to Directors of Graduate Programs.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Report on Ideas to Action (i2a) March 1, 2010 Patricia R. Payette, Ph.D. Executive Director, Ideas to Action Associate Director, Delphi Center for Teaching.
Overhaul of a Graduate Program in Arts Administration Master of Arts in Arts Administration – Initiated in 2003 – Low-residency—one weekend per month (over.
Conceptual Framework for the College of Education Created by: Dr. Joe P. Brasher.
Where Innovation Is Tradition Students as Scholars : QEP Update Fall 2010 Kimberly K. Eby Bethany M. Usher QEP Planning Committee.
Thomas College Name Major Expected date of graduation address
The Areas of Interaction are…
First Tuesday Series February 2, SACS -- Quality Enhancement Plan SACS requires that universities develop a comprehensive plan to enhance student.
ationmenu/nets/forteachers/2008s tandards/nets_for_teachers_2008.h tm Click on the above circles to see each standard.
Preparing for SACS: Focusing our Quality Enhancement Plan.
NSSE 2013 How to Use Results (or “Why you should care about NSSE”) 8/26/
AASCB The Assurance of Learning AASCB Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business Marta Colón de Toro, SPHR Assessment Coordinator College of.
Put Your Classroom On A 21 st Century DI-IT Create Engaging Technology Rich Differentiated Classroom Environments Create Engaging Technology Rich Differentiated.
Science Department Draft of Goals, Objectives and Concerns 2010.
Susan A. Ambrose Senior Vice Provost, Undergraduate Education & Experiential Learning Professor of Education & History NEASC Annual Meeting & Conference.
Course, Curriculum, and Laboratory Improvement (CCLI) Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics PROGRAM.
Greenbush. An informed citizen possesses the knowledge needed to understand contemporary political, economic, and social issues. A thoughtful citizen.
Relationships in the 21 st Century Parent Teachers Students Association (PTSA) Goals, Membership, Participation.
Undergraduate Experiential Inquiry and Research at Rice.
The University of Texas-Pan American Susan Griffith, Ph.D. Executive Director National Survey of Student Engagement 2003 Results & Recommendations Presented.
1 Embracing Math Standards: Our Journey and Beyond 2008.
Making an Excellent School More Excellent: Weston High School’s 21st Century Learning Expectations and Goals
President's Cabinet Responsible Area Campus Community Vice Presidents Group Strategy Study Team Vice Presidents Group w/a Strategy Specific Review Team.
Learning Gain in Active Citizenship Funded by the Higher Education Academy (HEA) Dr. Mary Deane, Senior Lecturer in Education Oxford Brookes University.
Student Research and Creative Activity at SUNY Oneonta
Learning by Doing Discover Engage Reflect Lead
TECHNOLOGY STANDARDS FOR EDUCATORS BONNIE SMITH MAY 2, 2011
MUHC Innovation Model.
Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology
Strategic Planning Council (SPC)Update
NSSE Data Conversations
UTRGV 2016 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE)
Faculty Forum on Critical Thinking
Student Research and Creative Activity at SUNY Oneonta
Enhancing Academic partnerships DSA Faculty Fellows
AACSB’s Standard 9: Curriculum content
High Impact Practices: HU-HIPs plan
ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE
General Education Assessment Subcommittee Report
Derek Herrmann & Ryan Smith University Assessment Services
Department of Computer Science The University of Texas at Dallas
Globally Engaged Institutions: Lists of Initiatives or Institutional DNA? Patti McGill Peterson Senior Fellow, Center for Internationalization and Global.
Student Learning Outcome Assessment Plan
UTRGV 2018 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE)
A new “pre-graduation expectation” for graduating seniors
Engaging Institutional Leadership
Learning Outcomes All CITE programs will include critical reflection. Use problem-solving strategies to resolve real-world issues Communicate effectively.
The Heart of Student Success
UTRGV 2017 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE)
Faculty and Staff Research Support
February 21-22, 2018.
Creating-1: Generate and conceptualize artistic ideas and work.
Student Learning Outcomes at CSUDH
Minnesota State University, Mankato
Opportunities to Enhance Quality at EKU
Presentation transcript:

QEP topic Undergraduate Creative Inquiry

What is Creative Inquiry? The process of exploring issues, objects or works through the collection and analysis of evidence including combining or synthesizing existing ideas, products, or expertise in original ways to answer an open-ended question or achieve a desired goal.

EDGE Student learning outcomes 1.      Students will effectively use digital information search tools. 2.      Students will formulate a creative inquiry question or problem. 3.      Students will explore a creative inquiry question or problem. 3.1        Choose an appropriate discovery process to address the problem. 3.2         Collect information relevant to the problem. 3.3         Assess collected information in a discipline‐appropriate manner. 4.      Students will create an original scholarly or creative project. 4.1           Applying critical thinking skills and/or 4.2           Applying creative thinking skills 5.      Students will communicate their findings/creations/art/inventions in a discipline‐ appropriate manner.

Fig. 4.1. An inquiry cycle (from Levy et al., 2010). Students/tutors establish question, problem, theme Students draw on their existing knowledge and, with support, decide on the direction and methods of their inquiry Students explore evidence, interrogate texts, conduct experiments etc., interacting with information via a range of sources Students reflect, discuss, critique, analyze, conceptualize, synthesize, create, receive feedback Students communicate and share results of their inquiry

Table 2.2. Results of Faculty, Staff, Student, Alumni, and Employers QEP Topic Survey. Rank Topic 1 Problem solving: foster student ability to design, evaluate and implement a strategy to answer an open‐ended question or achieve a desired goal 2 Critical thinking: foster student ability to assess claims, theories or hypotheses by accessing and evaluating relevant evidence, identifying biases and assumptions, and considering multiple perspectives 3 Communication skills: improve student written and oral communication skills 4 Creative thinking: foster student ability to bring together existing ideas into new configurations, develop new possibilities for something that already exists, or discover or imagine something new 5 Engaged/experiential learning: integrating formal instruction and co‐curricular activities such as undergraduate research, service‐learning, study abroad, and internships; as well as one‐time on‐campus or off‐campus events 6 Lifelong learning skills: prepare students for lifelong learning following graduation 7 Teamwork skills: foster the ability of students to collaborate effectively with others 8 Global awareness: enhance student knowledge of world events 9 Civic awareness: enhance student knowledge of national/local events 10 Intercultural competence: promote student appreciation for diversity

Note: figure mentioned by Dr. Lisc; added on Jan. 27, 2016 Undergraduate Creative Inquiry Problem Solving Critical Thinking Communication Skills Creative Thinking Engaged/ Experiential Learning Lifelong Learning Teamwork Skills Note: figure mentioned by Dr. Lisc; added on Jan. 27, 2016

Table 3.8. Responses of seniors to the NSSE 2014 question: “How much has your experience at this institution contributed to your knowledge, skills, and personal development in the following areas?” NSSE Question TTU Carnegie Difference 17a. Writing clearly and effectively. 2.83 3.09 -0.26 17b. Speaking clearly and effectively. 2.92 2.96 -0.04 17c. Thinking critically and analytically. 3.27 3.30 -0.03

Table 3.9. Historical NSSE data for Tennessee Tech Freshmen and Seniors   Freshmen Seniors NSSE survey item 2005 2014 Change 17a. How much has your experience at Tech contributed to your writing clearly and effectively 3.05 2.73 -0.32 2.91 2.83 -0.08 17b. How much has your experience at Tech contributed to your speaking clearly and effectively 2.74 2.57 -0.17 3.02 2.92 -0.10 17c. How much has your experience at Tech contributed to your thinking critically and analytically 3.10 2.97 -0.13 3.26 3.27 +0.01

Fig. 3.2. Relative frequency that IDEA objectives are selected by instructor (* denotes an objective particularly relevant to the original QEP).

Table 3.11. Hart Research Associates (2010) employer survey results. Learning Outcome % The ability to effectively communicate orally and in writing 89 Critical thinking and analytical reasoning skills 81 The ability to apply knowledge and skills to real-world settings through internships or other hands-on experiences 79 The ability to analyze and solve complex problems 75 The ability to connect choices and actions to ethical decisions Teamwork skills and the ability to collaborate with others in diverse group settings 71 The ability to innovate and be creative 70 Concepts and new developments in science and technology

EDGE program outcomes 1.      Undergraduate programs offer opportunities for creative inquiry. 2.      Faculty support undergraduate students in creative inquiry activities. 3.      Students participate in creative inquiry activities. 4.      Students have opportunities to communicate/disseminate the results of their creative inquiry activities. 5.     Students who have participated in creative inquiry activities are prepared for their career goals and advanced study.

The four goals of our QEP are to establish an undergraduate curriculum that encourages student success in creative inquiry expand student co-curricular opportunities for undergraduate creative inquiry support and acknowledge faculty and students who engage in creative inquiry develop the infrastructure to support undergraduate creative inquiry

Tier 1/ Foundational Skills 6.1 establish an undergraduate curriculum that encourages student success in creative inquiry Tier 3/ Intensive Tier 2/ Developing Skills Tier 1/ Foundational Skills

Table 6.2. Projected number of students affected by Goal 1 initiatives Pilot year 2015-2016 Year 1: 2016-2017 Year 2: 2017-2018 Year 3: 2018-2019 Year 4: 2019-2020 Year 5: 2020-2021 Tier 1 CI foundational skills initiative   # students impacted* 40 280 2,100 2,200 2,300 2,400 Tier 2 and 3 curriculum grant program # new projects** 24 26 28 30 32 34 Total number of active projects by year 50 78 108 140 174 # of students impacted by active projects in current year (assumes 40 students per project per year) 1,013 2,000 3,120 4,320 5,600 6,960 Yearly subtotals # students impacted yearly 1,056 2,280 5,220 6,520 7,900 9,360

6.2 Expand Student Co-curricular Opportunities for Undergraduate Creative Inquiry Creative Inquiry Summer Experience (CISE) Grants The Tennessee Tech Journal of Creative Inquiry Expanding Tennessee Tech Research Day to Tennessee Tech Research and Creative Inquiry Day

6.3 support and acknowledge faculty and students who engage in creative inquiry Establish Excellence in Creative Inquiry Student Awards Establish the Tennessee Tech Creative Inquiry Faculty Fellows Program Offer Enhanced Institutional Membership to the Council of Undergraduate Research Provide Additional Opportunities and Support for Faculty Professional Development Establish Excellence in Creative Inquiry Faculty Awards

6.4 develop the infrastructure to support undergraduate creative inquiry Establish the Office of Creative Inquiry Establish a Central Website for Creative Inquiry Establish EDGE Committees Collaborate with Undergraduate Creative Inquiry Partner Programs

ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE Associate Provost Office of the Provost EDGE Steering Committee Director Office of Creative Inquiry Director Creative Inquiry Summer Experience (CISE) EDGE Faculty Fellows Curriculum Grant, Assessment and Marketing Committees CISE & JCI Committees

committees EDGE Steering Committee Curriculum Grant Committee CISE Committee Journal of Creative Inquiry Committee Assessment Committee Marketing Committee

EDGE Steering Committee The EDGE Steering Committee will provide directives for the implementation of EDGE. Responsibilities: to establish guidelines for providing professional development to support the creative inquiry enriched curriculum, and approve the allocation of funds for this goal to establish the criteria and guidelines for the Faculty Fellows Program, and to review applications. Membership of the Steering Committee is composed of faculty, staff, students, and administration. The OCI Director is the EDGE Steering Committee Chair. The Steering Committee meets monthly to review the progress of EDGE.

Curriculum Grant Committee The Curriculum Grant Committee will establish the criteria and guidelines for the Curriculum Grant Program and review submitted proposals for funding. This committee will also be responsible for establishing the criteria and guidelines for the Curriculum Sustainability Grant Program, and reviewing submitted proposals for funding administering the Award for Excellence in Creative Inquiry Instruction, including establishing the criteria for selection Membership of the Curriculum Grant Committee is composed of faculty, staff, students, and administration. The OCI Director is the Curriculum Grant Committee Chair. The Honors Program Director is also a member of this committee.

CISE Committee The CISE Committee will establish and refine the criteria and guidelines for CISE grants and review submitted proposals for funding. The CISE Committee will also be responsible for administering the Excellence in Creative Inquiry Student Awards, including establishing the criteria for selection administering the Award for Excellence in Creative Inquiry Mentoring, including establishing the criteria for selection coordinating with the Office of Research in order to grow greater participation in Tennessee Tech’s Research and Creative Inquiry Day Membership of the CISE Committee is composed of faculty, staff, students, and administration, including the OCI Director. The CISE Committee is chaired by the CISE Director.

Journal of Creative Inquiry Committee The Journal of Creative Inquiry Committee will establish the criteria and guidelines for the JCI, including layout and editing decisions, and will review manuscripts for publication. Membership of the JCI Committee is composed of faculty, staff, students, and administration. The CISE Director is the Chair of the JCI Committee.

Assessment Committee The Assessment Committee will refine the assessment plan for EDGE. Curricular and co-curricular programs will be assessed using direct and indirect measures. The committee will also analyze assessment data, produce reports, and offer recommendations for modifications to the plan. The Assessment Committee will be chaired by the Tennessee Tech Assessment Director. Members will include the OCI Director, the graduate assistant in the Office of Assessment, students and faculty.

Marketing Committee The Marketing Committee will collaborate with the Office of Creative Inquiry to promote and publicize opportunities for participation of faculty, staff, and students in all aspects of EDGE. This committee will include the OCI Director, and other faculty, staff, and students as needed.