NSSE 2004 (National Survey of Student Engagement)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TJC, Institutional Effectiveness And You. Definition Institutional Effectiveness is an ongoing, comprehensive, and institutionally integrated system,
Advertisements

2008 National Survey of Student Engagement – SUNY Oneonta Patty Francis Steve Perry Fall 2008.
National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Comparisons of the survey results for UPRM Office of Institutional Research and Planning University of Puerto.
Using the 2005 National Survey of Student Engagement in Student Affairs Indiana State University.
You will be familiar with the five NSSE benchmarks and the survey items that make up each benchmark. You will be familiar with the comparison groups.
Student Engagement Retreat January 18, Background Why this retreat? (Context) Why this group? (Structure) What do we hope to accomplish ? (Purpose)
Framing a Quality Enhancement Plan for Lamar University.
Shimon Sarraf, Research Analyst Center for Postsecondary Research, Indiana University Bloomington Session for NSSE “Veterans” Regional NSSE User’s Workshop.
Students who are… …engaged in the classroom – pass; …engaged in their academic program - return; …engaged in deep learning – graduate. What constitutes.
National Survey of Student Engagement Department of Institutional Research and Planning December 2006.
GGC and Student Engagement.  NSSE  Overall: 32%  First Year: 30%  Seniors: 33%  GGC  Overall: 28%  First Year: 26% (381)  Seniors: 38% (120)
The College of Education We develop educational leaders who create tomorrow’s opportunities.
NSSE When?Spring, 2008 Who?Freshmen and Seniors random sample How?Electronic and Snail mail follow up Respondents?30% response rate 26% freshmen.
Benchmarking Effective Educational Practice Community Colleges of the State University of New York April, 2005.
National Survey of Student Engagement University of Minnesota, Morris NSSE 2004.
BENCHMARKING EFFECTIVE EDUCATIONAL PRACTICE IN COMMUNITY COLLEGES What We’re Learning. What Lies Ahead.
Using the National Survey of Student Engagement to Enhance Student Academic Success: Best Practices on Canadian Campuses Debra Dawson Ryerson University.
Studente Ontwikkeling en Sukses Student Development and Success UNIVERSITEIT VAN DIE VRYSTAAT UNIVERSITY OF THE FREE STATE YUNIVESITHI YA FREISTATA Tel.
St. Petersburg College CCSSE 2011 Findings Board of Trustees Meeting.
Results of AUC’s NSSE Administration in 2011 Office of Institutional Research February 9, 2012.
1 N ational S urvey & F aculty S urvey of S tudent E ngagement (NSSE) & (FSSE) 2006 Wayne State University.
1 NSSE Columbus State University Program Overview  What do you know about college student engagement?  Why is student engagement important?
An Introduction: NSSE and the Concept of Student Engagement.
Note: CCSSE survey items included in benchmarks are listed at the end of this presentation 1. Active and Collaborative Learning Students learn more when.
Student Engagement: 2008 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Office of Institutional Research and Planning Presentation to Senate November 2008.
Maryland Consortium Findings from the 2006 CCSSE Survey.
Assessing SAGES with NSSE data Office of Institutional Research September 25 th, 2007.
National Survey of Student Engagement 2009 Missouri Valley College January 6, 2010.
National Survey of Student Engagement 2007 Results for Students in Graduate and Professional Studies.
Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) Benchmarks of Effective Educational Practice Summary Report Background: The Community College Survey.
Engagement in Learning Marian A. Ford EDHE Class Agenda Engagement Theory Experimental Learning Theory Cognitive Apprenticeships/Internships Study.
SASSE South African Survey of Student Engagement Studente Ontwikkeling en Sukses Student Development and Success UNIVERSITEIT VAN DIE VRYSTAAT UNIVERSITY.
Student Engagement as Policy Direction: Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) Skagit Valley College Board of Trustees Policy GP-4 – Education.
Highlights of NSSE 2001: University of Kentucky December 10, 2001.
National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Comparison on the survey results at UPRM with peers Office of Institutional Research and Planning University.
SASSE South African Survey of Student Engagement Studente Ontwikkeling en Sukses Student Development and Success UNIVERSITEIT VAN DIE VRYSTAAT UNIVERSITY.
GGC and Student Engagement.  NSSE  Overall: 27% (down 5%)  First Year: 25% (down 5%)  Seniors: 28% (down 5%)  GGC  Overall: 35% (up 7%)  First.
 NSSE Results Austin Peay State University.
Why Are HIP Practices so Important to Students?... Where and how are we accomplishing these at CWU? HIGH IMPACT PRACTICES: Create an environment that helps.
Del Mar College Utilizing the Results of the 2007 Community College Survey of Student Engagement CCSSE Office of Institutional Research and Effectiveness.
Office of Institutional Research and Effectiveness The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2009 Presented by: March.
Office of Institutional Research and Effectiveness 1 The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006.
The University of Texas-Pan American Susan Griffith, Ph.D. Executive Director National Survey of Student Engagement 2003 Results & Recommendations Presented.
The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2013 Presented by: November 2013 Office of Institutional Research & Effectiveness.
National Survey of Student Engagement Executive Snapshot 2007.
The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2014 Presented by: October 2014 Office of Institutional Research & Effectiveness.
Experiences with Faculty
The University of Texas-Pan American
Instructional Division Meeting
First-Year Experiences & Senior Transitions
Student Engagement at Orange Coast College
NSSE Data Conversations
NSSE Results for Faculty
UTRGV 2016 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE)
National Survey of Student Engagement
The University of Texas-Pan American
Derek Herrmann & Ryan Smith University Assessment Services
Deep Dive: Writing Intensive, Service Learning, First Year Experience
Helping US Become Knowledge-Able About Student Engagement
Fall Institute for Academic Deans and Department Chairs
UTRGV 2018 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE)
WPAs Promoting Integrative Thinking Through Composition Across Campus
The University of Texas-Pan American
Jillian Kinzie, Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research
The Heart of Student Success
UTRGV 2017 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE)
GGC and Student Engagement
2013 NSSE Results.
Minnesota State University, Mankato
Jeanne Butler, Director Office of Assessment
Presentation transcript:

NSSE 2004 (National Survey of Student Engagement) Benchmarks: Computed from responses of 163,000 students from 472 colleges/universities Student cases weighted for enrollment status (FT/PT) and Gender. Smaller schools generally higher benchmark scores across the board. As is the case for STU.

Level of Academic Challenge Level of Academic Challenge Challenging intellectual and creative work is central to student learning and collegiate quality. Colleges and universities promote high levels of student achievement by emphasizing the importance of academic effort and setting high expectations for student performance. Active and Collaborative Learning Students learn more when they are intensely involved in their education and asked to think about what they are learning in different settings. Collaborating with others in solving problems or mastering difficult material prepares students for the messy, unscripted problems they will encounter daily during and after college. Supportive Campus Environment Students perform better and are more satisfied at colleges that are committed to their success and cultivate positive working and social relations among different groups on campus.

Student-Faculty Interaction Students learn firsthand how experts think about and solve practical problems by interacting with faculty members inside and outside the classroom. As a result, their teachers become role models, mentors, and guides for continuous, life-long learning. Enriching Educational Experiences Complementary learning opportunities in and out of class augment academic programs. Diversity experiences teach students valuable things about themselves and others. Technology facilitates collaboration between peers and instructors. Internships, community service, and senior capstone courses provide opportunities to integrate and apply knowledge.

Benchmark Percentiles in Terms of National Sample

Level of Academic Challenge

Trend in Level of Academic Challenge

Active and Collaborative Learning

Trend in Active and Collaborative Learning

Supportive Campus Environment

Trend in Supportive Campus Environment

Student-Faculty Interaction

Trend in Student-Faculty Interaction

Enriching Educational Experiences

Trend in Enriching Educational Experiences