Investigating Shipping Pollution Violations

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
on Transfer of Sentenced Persons
Advertisements

Prosecuting a suspected case of illegal traffic Workshop for Central and Eastern Europe countries on the prosecution of illegal traffic of hazardous and.
International Cooperation in Law enforcement: Mutual Legal Assistance TAIEX Training Workshop Ankara, May, 2012 Jaganathan SARAVANASAMY Assistant.
Double jeopardy and Mutual Legal Assistance
1. Asset Recovery Rules in Jordan 5 th Pan-European High Level Conference on asset Recovery Offices Cyprus Oct Prof. Fayyad Alqudah (LL.B,
Texas Code of Criminal Procedure. Terminal Objective Upon completion of this module, the participant will be knowledgeable about the sections of the Code.
Bali Process Technical Expert Workshop on Mutual Legal Assistance and Law Enforcement Bangkok, Thailand, June 2011 Celia Maunder International Crime Cooperation.
The Adjudication Process Virginia Department of Health Professions New Board Member Training October 2008.
Border crossing and IMO antiterrorist measures Legal aspects.
Legal & Political Issues in International Computer Crime Investigation & Prosecution Jennifer S. Granick m.
Jurisdictional issues and international co-operation in combating cybercrime Anne Flanagan Institute for Computer and Communications Law Centre for Commercial.
INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION Daniel H. Claman Senior Trial Attorney U.S. Department of Justice.
Remarks of Kristen Pinhey Competition Law Officer Competition Bureau Canada Unannounced Inspections in Canada International Competition Network, 2013 Cartel.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2011 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 17 Administrativ e Law.
Regulatory Body MODIFIED Day 8 – Lecture 3.
Course: European Criminal Law SS 2009 Hubert Hinterhofer.
Federal Bureau of Investigation
NATIONAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION REGULATORY PRACTICES WORKSHOP MODULE: 4 INVESTIGATION.
Regional Conference Intellectual Property Crime Bahrain April 2008.
United Nations Convention against Corruption United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime Regional Office – South Asia Nimesh Jani.
Tax Information Exchange Agreements Formal Ratification 2011.
Division for Treaty Affairs Aims and Structure of Convention Preventive Measures International Cooperation Asset Recovery Technical Assistance Information.
26/29 June - Dipartimento di Scienze Giuridiche Unisalento Room R 27 International legal framework for environmental maritime crime: UNCLOS, IMO and MARPOL.
Moving Forward With the African Dialogue Cross-Border Principles By Mary Gurure Manager, Legal Services and Compliance COMESA Competition Commission Lilongwe,
MODULE II: THE INSTRUMENTS OF JUDICIAL COOPERATION IN CRIMINAL MATTERS IN THE CONTEXT OF THE COUNCIL OF EUROPE.- TOPIC 4 THE 1959 CONVENTION ON MUTUAL.
Chapter 22: Organization and Coordination of Counterterrorism Investigations.
International Cooperation in Criminal Matters and Cooperation between CBI and State Governments Rakesh Aggarwal DIG, CBI New Delhi.
Chapter IV. International Cooperation. 2 2 International Cooperation Mandatory Offences Optional Offences Narrow Dual Criminality Requirements In MLAs.
Executing Environmental Judgments in Criminal Proceedings.
A PRESENTATION TO THE SELECT COMMITTEE OF PUBLIC SERVICES 13 FEBRUARY 2008 BY NOSIPO SOBEKWA CHIEF DIRECTOR: MARITIME TRANSPORT REGULATION DEPARTMENT OF.
Organization and Implementation of a National Regulatory Program for the Control of Radiation Sources Regulatory Authority.
LISTINGS BY TALIBAN AND AL-QAIDA SANCTIONS COMMITTEE Briefing to the Select Committee on Security and Justice 12 Augustus
1 The Challenges of Globalization of Criminal Investigations Countries need to: Enact sufficient laws to criminalize computer abuses; Commit adequate personnel.
Objectives SWBAT Identify the various procedures in the enactment, implementation, and enforcement of law SWBAT compare responsibilities, jurisdictions,
Mediation with the Information Commissioner’s Office Cory Martinson Appeals and Policy Analyst 25 November 2009.
Navigating the Justice System. 4-1  Describe the seven phases of the criminal justice process.  Identify at least two key victims’ rights in each phase.
INVESTIGATION KAROLINA KREMENS, LL.M. (Ottawa), Ph.D. International Criminal Procedure.
Investigating Shipping Pollution Violations Pacific Module 3: Domestic Enforcement.
Investigating Shipping Pollution Violations Pacific Module 6: Port State Control.
International Cartels Cooperation Among International Antitrust Agencies.
Workshop on strengthening international legal cooperation among OSCE Member States to combat transnational organized crime (Vienna, 7-9 April 2008) Extradition.
Dr. Heike Neuhaus. Federal Prosecutor General Head of Department Central Tasks; Espionage Staff Espionage 1 Espionage 2 Administration EU IT Espionage.
ASSET RECOVERY AND INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION IN INDONESIA ASSET RECOVERY AND INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION IN INDONESIA THE 6 TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE OF IAACA.
Warrant Task Force Assessment 12/1/2009. WARRANT TASK FORCE ASSESSMENT: Please describe your agency. Please describe your agency. court47 (4 %) law enforcement1029.
Surveillance around the world
ASEAN v Transnational Crime and Terrorism…..an Introduction
Building a Narcotics Case
Learning Objectives Describe the seven phases of the criminal justice process. Identify at least two key victims’ rights in each phase of the criminal.
U.S. – MEXICO EXTRADITION & LEGAL ASSISTANCE
International cooperation in criminal matters legal framework and examples from practice - Macedonian experiences Ohrid
Courts of Law Amendment Bill
International Law.
Dr. Željko Karas Police College, Zagreb (Croatia)
MALAYSIAN WITNESS PROTECTION PROGRAM
RATIFICATION OF NAIROBI INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION ON REMOVAL OF WRECKS ,2007 PRESENTATION TO PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE OF TRANSPORT 23 SEPTEMBER 2014.
MALAYSIAN WITNESS PROTECTION PROGRAM
Data protection issues in regulatory investigations
„Administrative cooperation within the ECN“
Introduction to the Criminal Justice System Unit 1 – Part 3
U.S. Department of Justice
Treaty making practice in South Africa PRESENTATION TO THE PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS AND COOPERATION ON 9 MAY 2012 BY DIRCO,
INTERNATIONAL LEGAL COOPERATION
Patrick Sefton | Principal, Brightline Lawyers
Electronic Surveillance, Post 9/11
Navigating the Justice System
Functional immunity (only for official acts)
GENERAL DIRECTORATE OF IMMIGRATION CONTROL AND VERIFICATION
Eurojust: The EU Judicial Cooperation Unit
Nebraska Supreme Court rules on interpreters Additions & Amendments
A PRESENTATION TO THE PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORT
Presentation transcript:

Investigating Shipping Pollution Violations Pacific Module 16: Other Enforcement Options

Aim Assistance in collection of evidence Other enforcement actions ● Identify other options where domestic enforcement is not viable Assistance in collection of evidence Other enforcement actions

MARPOL Article 6 MARPOL text Article 6.1 Article 6.3 Parties cooperate in detection of violations and enforcement of the provisions of MARPOL ..detection and monitoring …reporting and accumulation of evidence Article 6.3 Any Party shall furnish to an Administration evidence of a violation (6.3)

MARPOL Article 6 MARPOL text Article 6.4 Article 6.5 The Administration informed shall investigate the matter and, if satisfied there is sufficient evidence available, cause legal proceedings taken in accordance with its laws as soon as possible Article 6.5 A Party may request an Administration to undertake an investigation on its behalf and the report shall be sent to the requesting Party so that appropriate action can be undertaken

Practical Use of MARPOL Article 6 Evidence collection Cooperation with other Parties to MARPOL Notify other jurisdiction if violation has been detected Request another Administration to collect evidence on your behalf (be specific - take samples, copy documentation (or other) from vessel for the purpose of an investigation of a violation committed in another jurisdiction (ie consider using this option if vessel has left your jurisdiction or has polluted while transiting your EEZ) Need to have secure arrangement for the integrity and transport of the evidence Requesting Party retains evidence and any legal proceedings are undertaken within jurisdiction of that Party

Practical use of MARPOL Article 6 Investigation assistance Request the Administration in the next port of call to undertake an investigation on your country’s behalf Provide specific instructions of what is required Possibly joint investigation with officers from the polluted jurisdiction joining those at the next port of call Check domestic laws in order to verify admissibility of any evidence collected (eg. authorised officers used under the laws of that jurisdiction) Requesting Party retains evidence and legal proceedings undertaken within jurisdiction of that Party

Referral to Flag State Flag State Administration is requested to investigate All evidence sent to the Flag State provide justification of clear grounds that a violation has occurred (useful to prepare a report similar to a Brief of Evidence) Flag State obligated to investigate the matter if sufficient evidence take appropriate action under its laws as soon as possible Inform the requesting Party of the outcome of the investigation MARPOL Party reports to IMO GISIS and lists referrals to Flag State (includes whether there has been a response)

Referral to Flag State: Risks Flag State Administration may not be responsive to the investigative referral Flag State laws may have lower sanctions (i.e. does not provide adequate deterrence) Requesting Party does not have control of the investigation

Port State Control Inspections Report pollution incident to PSC MOU Coastal or Port State may undertake a PSC Inspection Inspection effective only if deficiencies are detected that relate to the pollution incident and detention action is warranted Detention may have a more significant financial impact than a fine imposed through legal proceedings

Information or Evidence from a Foreign Country Where an investigation requires information or evidence from a foreign country, it may be obtained: Formally - Mutual Legal Assistance treaties (MLAT via your country’s Attorney General Department, Department of Justice, or other) Informally – Police to police or investigative agency to investigative agency

Mutual Assistance from a Foreign Country Mutual Assistance is the process used to provide and obtain formal government to government assistance in order to facilitate criminal investigations and prosecutions Country may require a formal mutual assistance request. Examples of use: Coercive powers such as a search warrant (obtain evidence such as financial records) Taking evidence from a witness for a foreign court proceedings (voluntary or cautioned statements)

Letters Rogatory Letters rogatory are a customary method of obtaining judicial assistance from abroad in the absence of a treaty or executive agreement Execution of letters rogatory may take a year or more worldwide transmitted via diplomatic channels requests from courts in one country to the judiciary of a foreign country requesting the performance of an act which, if done without the sanction of the foreign court, could constitute a violation of that country's sovereignty may be used in countries where multi-lateral or bilateral treaties on judicial assistance are not in force to effect service of process or to obtain evidence if permitted by the laws of the foreign country.

INTERPOL Assistance INTERPOL may be available to facilitate a request for referral through National Central Bureau (Police) network INTERPOL may be able to assist in collection of evidence, taking of statements, provision of information, locating persons etc INTERPOL Notices

INTERPOL Sharing of Information and Intelligence Environmental Crimes Committee Project Clean Seas Worst Offenders database Ship Pollution Prosecutions database Sharing information may assist another jurisdiction in an active investigation

Questions?