Managing Outgoing Subawards April 18, 2017

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Governors Grants Office Presents: Smart Issues for Effective Grants Management Governors Grants Office Higher Education Conference May 22, 2012 Martin.
Advertisements

© 2014 University of New Hampshire. All rights reserved. Uniform Guidance Highlights What you really need to know.
OMB Uniform Guidance 2 CFR Part 200.  The final guidance was issued on December 26, 2013 and supersedes and streamlines requirements from OMB Circulars.
Fiscal Compliance Corner Recent Happenings, etc. MRAM August 2014 Ted Mordhorst Director for Post Award Financial Compliance Research Accounting & Analysis.
New Uniform Guidance Combines the requirements of OMB Circulars A-21, A-87, A-110, A-122, A-89, A-102, A-133, and A-50 into a streamlined format. *NOTE:
What You Need to Know To Ensure Compliance October 2014.
Subcontracts Subcontractor or Vendor How do you know?
1 Subgrants vs. Subcontracts TAA-CCCT Grants November 16, 2011.
Subcontracts Procedures and Federal Regulations Susan Tompkins George Walueff.
JULY12, 2011 SESSION 7 OF AAPLS – BUDGETING FOR PROPOSALS WITH SUBCONTRACTS: ESTABLISHING RELATIONSHIPS APPLICANTS & ADMINISTRATORS PREAWARD LUNCHEON SERIES.
Subrecipient Monitoring OFFICE OF RESEARCH ADMINISTRATION 2010.
Subcontracts 101 By Mitali Ravindrakumar USC Collaboration between Parties Perform Subcontractor Analysis Sponsor - Fund Project/Subcontr act Negotiate.
CReATE Presented by: Marcy Friedle, Grants Compliance Analyst.
Subawards and Subrecipient Monitoring
Uniform Guidance: Summary of Significant Changes 2 CFR PART 200—UNIFORM ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS, COST PRINCIPLES, AND AUDIT REQUIREMENTS FOR FEDERAL.
Uniform Guidance 2 CFR 200 Nicole Pilman, Uniform Guidance Implementation Coordinator Sue Paulson, Assistant Controller Pamela A. Webb, Associate VP for.
Conducting Collaborative Projects How to request a Subaward and when is a consultant needed? OSP Awareness Feb 16, 2012 osp.syr.edu
Circular A-110 Everything You Didn’t Want to Know.
Grants & Contracts Support Group December 10, 2008 Subrecipient and Vendor Determination Checklist.
UNIFORM GUIDANCE OVERVIEW. OMB Circulars Before and After A-21 Cost principles for Educational Institutions A-21 Cost principles for Educational Institutions.
Subrecipient Monitoring. A formal binding legal agreement between your institution and another legal entity A portion of your sponsored project's.
What You Need to Know To Ensure Compliance January 2015.
Financial Assistance Workshop Contract versus Grant.
Collaborating with Others? If so, why and how? OSP AWARENESS MARCH 5, 2015 OSP.SYR.EDU
A SOUND INVESTMENT IN SUCCESSFUL VR OUTCOMES FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT.
Highlights of Post Award Sponsored Project Administration July 11, 2007 Office of Research Training & Compliance.
CONTRACTS & GRANTS PROCESS AT A RESEARCH UNIVERSITY FSU ALUMNI CENTER MAY 7, 2015 Post Award Processes Angie Rowe Associate Director – Sponsored Research.
Recipe for Success in Subcontracting Crystal Miller and Elizabeth Fowlkes.
Subawards and the Uniform Guidance Research Reps Meeting 17 March 2015.
SBIR Budgeting Leanne Robey Chief, Special Reviews Branch, NIH.
Subrecipient Monitoring NCURA Regional Conference April 25, 2007 Jeri Muñiz Director, Sponsored Projects University of California, Irvine Csilla M. Csaplár.
UNIFORM GUIDANCE OVERVIEW December 2014 Update. Important Dates Applicable to new awards and (possibly) new funding increments issued on and after December.
SUBAWARDS & SUBRECIPIENT MONITORING UNIFORM GUIDANCE AT K-STATE 2 CFR Part 200 – Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements.
“SPEAR” W ORKSHOP P RESENTED B Y : M ARCY F RIEDLE C OLLABORATIONS : S UBRECIPIENT V. C ONTRACTOR.
National Institutes of Health U.S. Department of Health and Human Services NIEHS SRP Annual Meeting November 18 – 20, 2015 George Tucker Chief, Grants.
Office of Sponsored Programs- OMB Uniform Guidance October 21, 2015.
“SPEAR” W ORKSHOP O CTOBER 19 & 30, 2015 ANGELLE GOMEZ S UBAWARD R ISK A SSESSMENT / MONITORING.
JEOPARDY FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT EDITION Documentation Procurement Mystery Cost Principles Administrative Requirements Q $100 Q $200 Q $300 Q $400 Q $500.
Agency Roundtable Discussion: Subrecipient Monitoring.
The New Super Circular Inaugural Tribal Accounting Conference November 16, 2015 Morgan Aronson National Single Audit Coordinator
Financial Management Program Top Ten Things to Know About New Federal Grant Compliance Presented by: Tracy Arner, CPA 1.
Sponsored Project Administration Fall 2012 CERTIFICATION PROGRAM Sponsored Project Lifecycle Introduction Overview Creating a Project Budget Compliance.
Section 68 – What are your Sub- Recipients up to? (Sub-Recipient Monitoring – State Perspective) Wednesday, May 23, :30-2:45 Cindy Jarvis, Assistant.
A risk assessment is the process of identifying potential hazards an organization may face and analyzing methods of response if exposure occurs.
What’s your friend up to? Subrecipient Monitoring Issues Tom Egan, MIT OSP Jeannette Gordon, Division of Grants Compliance and Oversight OPERA, OER, NIH.
F&A Rates 101 Basics of F&A rates for Proposals, Grants, & Contracts Dr. Mindy S. Connolly, CPCM Sr. Sponsored Research Officer Office of Sponsored Projects.
Juanita Syljuberget Alabama Cooperative Extension System May 23, 2012.
Sub-recipient Monitoring and Contractor Determination
Budget Development Sponsored Programs Administration
Subrecipient Monitoring
SUBRECEPIENTS POST-AWARD PROCEDURES
Subaward - 2 CFR A formal legal agreement between your institution and another legal entity An award provided by a pass-through entity (PTE) to.
The Administration of Subrecipient Agreements
Overview of Consultants in Sponsored Projects (OSR)
Other Key Uniform Administrative Grant Requirements
TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT FORUM
Outgoing Subawards Proposal Stage
Subaward Life Cycle 10/24/17.
OMB Circular A110 and Uniform Guidance
The Importance of Subrecipient Monitoring
Outgoing Subawards Proposal Stage
Outgoing Subs Understanding Subawards and Subcontracts
OSP/DFA Research Administration Certification Program
Uniform Guidance - Procurement Implementation
Subrecipient vs. Contractor Determinations
The University of Texas at Arlington
2 CFR 200 Procurement Principles
Outgoing Subawards Proposal Stage
Understanding a Subrecipient Agreement
California State University, Fresno
Presentation transcript:

Managing Outgoing Subawards April 18, 2017 Sponsored Projects Services Jennifer Brown, Manager Subawards

Learning Objectives Define a subaward Discuss how Uniform Guidance characterizes a subaward versus a contract (vendor) Review required documents Discuss resources available

What is a Subaward? A subaward or subcontract is a contract obligating an organization or person to do work for another organization as part of a larger project. The University of Arizona uses subawards when a particular capability or expertise required for the project is not available at the University. What awards does the outgoing subawards team handle?

Management & Monitoring Stages of a Subaward Proposal Issuance Management & Monitoring Closeout Proposal Issuance Management & Monitoring Closeout

Proposal Subrecipient or Contractor (vendor)? Uniform Guidance §200.330 Subrecipient and Contractor Determinations Must be done before subaward is issued Determination for each transaction required Subjective decision – substance over form Why is it a good idea to make the determination at the proposal stage?

Proposal Subrecipient? Characteristics indicative of a subrecipient include when the other organization: Has its performance measured in relation to whether objectives of a Federal program were met Has responsibility for programmatic decision making Is responsible for adherence to applicable program compliance requirements specified in the award Uses the funds to carry out a program for the pass-through entity, rather than to provide goods or services for a program of the pass-through entity

Proposal Contractor? Characteristics indicative of payment for goods and services received by a contractor include when the other organization: Provides goods and services as part of their normal business operations Provides similar goods and services to many different purchasers Operates in a competitive environment Does not participate in the intellectual direction of the project and are therefore not included as authors on publications Is not subject to compliance requirements

Proposal Case Study What is your determination? Why? Examples: university service center, ophthalmologist, true subaward

Cost Reimbursable vs Fixed Price Fixed Price Subaward The subrecipient must propose the work as fixed price and it should be clearly noted as such in the budget justification to the prime organization at the prime award proposal stage No cost sharing is required on the prime award The amount requested is below the Simplified Acquisition Threshold defined by OMB Uniform Guidance (2 CFR 200) under Section 200.332, Fixed amount subaward. Currently, the Simplified Acquisition Threshold is at $150,000 (effective 10/1/10)

Required Documents Subrecipient Subrecipient Commitment Form Copy of F&A rate agreement (if applicable) Scope of work to include deliverables Detailed budget and budget justification Period of performance dates List of key personnel After it has been determined who you will be working with, the proposed subrecipient must provide several items to be included in the proposal. The statement of work should be detailed and provide clear information regarding expected deliverables.

Required Documents Continued Principal Investigator or Business Office Subaward Sole Source vs. Competitive Bid Request Form Subaward Budget Negotiation Documentation Form

Proposal Competitive Bid vs Sole Source Competitive bid or sole source? Competitive bid – comparison of bids Sole source – evidence why this the only institution or organization that can fulfill the scope of work required as part of the award Required by the State of Arizona as well as federal guidelines. Strong detailed justification for not putting the work out to bid. The budget negotiation form also serves to identify potential conflicts of interest.

Proposal Cost/Price Analysis Uniform Guidance §200.403 Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under federal awards: (a) be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles Once we have the budget, it needs to be reviewed to ensure it is fair and reasonable in relation to the work to be performed. The analysis should be documented and the budget negotiation document should be completed.

Proposal Cost/Price Analysis Review of each cost element and supporting information Determine whether each cost is necessary and reasonable Evaluate cost trends and reasonableness of estimates Evaluate the application of negotiated rates, labor rates, etc.

Stages of a Subaward Research Gateway Proposal Issuance Management & Monitoring Closeout Proposal Issuance Management & Monitoring Closeout

Questions/Comments? Contact us! Jennifer Brown brownjj@email.arizona.edu 520-626-6676 Brandi Gaulin brandig@email.Arizona.edu 520-626-8978 Gina Schwartzberg gxs@email.arizona.edu 520-626-0603