Say, “S” (as) = semantics – and mean it

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
OMV Ontology Metadata Vocabulary April 10, 2008 Peter Haase.
Advertisements

Dr. Leo Obrst MITRE Information Semantics Information Discovery & Understanding Command & Control Center February 6, 2014February 6, 2014February 6, 2014.
Metadata vocabularies and ontologies Dr. Manjula Patel Technical Research and Development
The JISC IE Metadata Schema Registry Pete Johnston UKOLN, University of Bath JISC Joint Programmes Meeting Brighton, 6-7 July 2004
1 Introduction to XML. XML eXtensible implies that users define tag content Markup implies it is a coded document Language implies it is a metalanguage.
July 11 th, 2005 Software Engineering with Reusable Components RiSE’s Seminars Sametinger’s book :: Chapters 16, 17 and 18 Fred Durão.
Domain Modelling the upper levels of the eframework Yvonne Howard Hilary Dexter David Millard Learning Societies LabDistributed Learning, University of.
MDC Open Information Model West Virginia University CS486 Presentation Feb 18, 2000 Lijian Liu (OIM:
©Ian Sommerville 2004Software Engineering, 7th edition. Chapter 18 Slide 1 Software Reuse.
1/ 27 The Agriculture Ontology Service Initiative APAN Conference 20 July 2006 Singapore.
Chapter 6 System Engineering - Computer-based system - System engineering process - “Business process” engineering - Product engineering (Source: Pressman,
The role of metadata schema registries XML and Educational Metadata, SBU, London, 10 July 2001 Pete Johnston UKOLN, University of Bath Bath, BA2 7AY UKOLN.
Profiling Metadata Specifications David Massart, EUN Budapest, Hungary – Nov. 2, 2009.
Save time. Reduce costs. Find and reuse interoperability solutions on Joinup for developing European public services Nikolaos Loutas
Serving society Stimulating innovation Supporting legislation Workshop on the INSPIRE registry and registers Martin Tuchyňa, Tomáš.
The JISC IE Metadata Schema Registry and IEEE LOM Application Profiles Pete Johnston UKOLN, University of Bath CETIS Metadata & Digital Repositories SIG,
9 th Open Forum on Metadata Registries Harmonization of Terminology, Ontology and Metadata 20th – 22nd March, 2006, Kobe Japan. Presentation Title: Day:
1 Metadata –Information about information – Different objects, different forms – e.g. Library catalogue record Property:Value: Author Ian Beardwell Publisher.
W HAT IS I NTEROPERABILITY ? ( AND HOW DO WE MEASURE IT ?) INSPIRE Conference 2011 Edinburgh, UK.
Promoting excellence in social security Building on sector wide commonalities to enhance the benefits of Information.
Overview of SC 32/WG 2 Standards Projects Supporting Semantics Management Open Forum 2005 on Metadata Registries 14:45 to 15:30 13 April 2005 Larry Fitzwater.
Tutorial on XML Tag and Schema Registration in an ISO/IEC Metadata Registry Open Forum 2003 on Metadata Registries Tuesday, January 21, 2003; 4:45-5:30.
Metadata and Meta tag. What is metadata? What does metadata do? Metadata schemes What is meta tag? Meta tag example Table of Content.
1 Open Ontology Repository initiative - Planning Meeting - Thu Co-conveners: PeterYim, LeoObrst & MikeDean ref.:
The Semantic Web. What is the Semantic Web? The Semantic Web is an extension of the current Web in which information is given well-defined meaning, enabling.
Ontologies for the Semantic Web Prepared By: Tseliso Molukanele Rapelang Rabana Supervisor: Associate Professor Sonia Burman 20 July 2005.
Metadata Schema Registries: background and context MEG Registry Workshop, Bath, 21 January 2003 Rachel Heery UKOLN, University of Bath Bath, BA2 7AY UKOLN.
OMG Architecture Ecosystem SIG Enterprise Data World 2011.
Geospatial metadata Prof. Wenwen Li School of Geographical Sciences and Urban Planning 5644 Coor Hall
IPDA Registry Definitions Project Dan Crichton Pedro Osuna Alain Sarkissian.
eHealth Standards and Profiles in Action for Europe and Beyond
IDEAS Model for Coalition Architecture Interoperability
The Semantic Web By: Maulik Parikh.
Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
Conceptualizing the research world
Building the Semantic Web
Introduction to MODEM Building a Semantic Foundation for EA: Reengineering the MODAF™ Meta-Model Based on the IDEAS Foundation Model Lt Col Mikael Hagenbo,
Donatella Castelli CNR-ISTI
Active Data Management in Space 20m DG
The evolution of the SDMX infrastructure and services
The Re3gistry software and the INSPIRE Registry
Chapter 2 Database Environment.
EOSCpilot Skills Landscape & Framework
ESS roadmap on Linked Open Data State of play
The JISC IE Metadata Schema Registry
2. An overview of SDMX (What is SDMX? Part I)
The National Interoperability Platform – Coming soon!
2. An overview of SDMX (What is SDMX? Part I)
The Generic Statistical Information Model
HingX Project Overview
Metadata in Digital Preservation: Setting the Scene
Semantic Information Modeling for Federation
Open Science: the crucial importance of metadata
LOD reference architecture
Malte Dreyer – Matthias Razum
Statistical Information Technology
Module P4 Identify Data Products and Views So Their Requirements and Attributes Can Be Controlled Learning Objectives: Understand the value of data. Understand.
BUILDING A DIGITAL REPOSITORY FOR LEARNING RESOURCES
RDA in a non-MARC environment
NIEM Tool Strategy Next Steps for Movement
Brokering as a Core Element of EarthCube’s Cyberinfrastructure
A Research Data Catalogue supporting Blue Growth: the BlueBRIDGE case
The single digital gateway
Norway - Approaches and challenges related to “Registry of Registries”
QoS Metadata Status 106th OGC Technical Committee Orléans, France
Australian and New Zealand Metadata Working Group
SDMX IT Tools SDMX Registry
Palestinian Central Bureau of Statistics
Cultivating Semantics for Data in Agriculture and Nutrition
Presentation transcript:

Say, “S” (as) = semantics – and mean it Say, “S” (as) = semantics – and mean it! Path to semantically interoperable digital research services Suvi Remes, Miika Alonen, Patrik Maltusch, Mikael af Hällström, Stina Westman 13th International Conference on Current Research Information Systems, CRIS2016, Scotland, UK, 9.6.2016

”Once upon a time…” It is not that we would not have data spesifications – it is that we have so many, maintained on various tools, in various formats, built for various purposes… The work presented is about approach to achieve semantic interoperability shared terminology - less confusion same concepts & terms for many communications needs modular and reusable metadata definitions improved readability and understandability of data models interoperability with international standards – promoting standard reuse description of a new tool for metadata publishing avoid redefinition of data models – lowering costs achieving semantic interoperability on the national level Challanges – ”the usual story” - organisation specific documentation - no change management over organisation borders - missing formal and actual semantic mappings All kind of costs – integration costs, human labour costs needed in (re)defining data models and terminologies - on the national level – work covers not only research but also study and public administration, which are all interconnected

Development of Information Architecture on a National Level in Finland International exchange (ERASMUS+ / EMREX) 2015-20?? New services and more application interfaces É Å KAPA National service bus for organisational and personal data Rest APIs University a-x University z SOAP APIs OILI XDW ESB Rest APIs KSHJ Opintopolku VIRTA Research data Publications Etsin National research data catalog Juuli National catalog for publications ? New services Catalog y research data catalog Catalog a-x research data catalog e.g. research data catalogs focused on specific research fields and/or based on state agency assignment Incorporated University Coalitions = Universities building new informations systems together

Elements of the semantically interoperable information management infrastructure Terminology Core vocabularies Application Profiles Concepts Definitions Classifications Classes Attributes Associations Context Constraints Extensions Terminological theory mutual understanding of conceps consistant use of terms logical data structures Semantic Interoperability Model systematic method to apply descriptions Well defined management responsibilities enable efficient use of different resources – commitment needed for this long-term work Terminological theory, terminological concept modelling originally used on cross-human communication not only in human-readable, but also in machine-readable format Semantic Interoperability Model >> named to show its intermediary role, naming needed in communication purposes for non-IT-persons

Need for common framework Shared concepts with the business and IT: Well defined concepts Unique identifiers Machine readable format Service innovation and data modeling based on business needs: Reuse terms and definitions Create reusable components Focus on the interfaces and integration Framework for semantic interoperability: How to publish core vocabularies and application profiles? How to reuse standards? How to reuse core vocabularies in the implementations? How to document the metadata reuse? How to document application interfaces?

- Open Science Cloud – FAIR?

Domain specific vocabularies are administered by different agencies, and published in the standard SKOS model (in the Finnish Thesaurus and Ontology Service).

Core vocabularies are published as Linked Data that defines re-usable classes and properties based on shared concepts and links to standards and best practices.

Domain specific data models and interfaces are documented as Application profiles that re-use the classes and properties from the Core Vocabularies.

Data models are implemented with languages that best suit the given architecture by implementing the Application Profile.

New tool(s) to support collaborate data modelling and reuse of resources Terminology Concepts Definitions Classifications Core vocabularies Classes Attributes Associations Application Profiles Context Constraints Extensions In Finland we are currently building the core resource needed to ensure semantic interoperability. This work is essential also for international cooperation as stated in the morning’s key note speak. It is however more efficient to use the resourses if there proper tools for that. So we have created one. Barckets there in the title are to indicate that the tool developed is a modular IT-solution, open software it is also, which is linked to the mentioned ontology service and supports therefore terminology process. It is also linked to code service. Together these parts will form a centralised national metadata service.

Interoperability workbench Collaborative online tool for creating and documenting Core Vocabularies and Application Profiles: iow.csc.fi Anyone can access the service at the address mentioned on the slide, data description can be browsed freely Some core functions require user account, like creating models or modifying them 12

Interoperability workbench Tool for defining resolvable and machine readable data models Document the use of data models, standards and best practices Most users are after the application profiles for their own use cases Open science and research initiative’s metadata working group is currently defining a general metadatamodel for research data, here in the screen shot is showed part of the draft model >> if case you wish to have a closer look, please navigate to the address iow.csc.fi and select the model ”Reserach Data Catalog Vocubulary”. This model is quite interesting as it based on the European Comissions’s DCAT-AP and is further adapted to suit the field of research and science – it is thus led directly from an international metadatamodel and play a good example of linked data

Interoperability workbench Functionalities – e.g. Integration to controlled vocabularies Include and search metadata from imported standards link controlled vocabularies to created model Create new domain models as highly reusable metadata create classes and properties based on existing concepts – ”terminological concepts” Version history and track changes Map new classes and class usage to relevant standards Integration to classification schemes link to existing reference data from code service restrict allowed values by using existing reference data Import existing models from local models and external namespaces

Interoperability workbench Export schemas in multiple formats Enforces Naming practices RDF XML Schema tbd … JSON Schema 15

The closer the used terminology in IT systems supporting researchers is to common research parlance, the greater is the possibility that the services are both semantically interoperable and, even more important, understandable to their users. How this all benefits the researchers then? We are able to build better services for them, we argue.

Citizens… Students… The closer the used terminology in IT systems supporting (researchers) is to common (research) parlance, the greater is the possibility that the services are both semantically interoperable and, even more important, understandable to their users. Study administration and research administration are in many ways interconnected in this matter. And not only that, in Finland we are building a National Service Architechture, boosted by the Ministry of Finance. The new digital services the National Service Architehture brings, aimed at just ordinary citizens need semantics, mutual understanding of data and information their handle, to perform properly. Sematic Interoperability framework and IOW-tool are planned to be part of digitalisation of public services.

Questions – Feedback? Thank you! Suvi Remes1, Miika Alonen1, Patrik Maltusch2, Mikael af Hällström3, Stina Westman1 1 firstname.lastname@csc.fi, 2 firstname.lastname@aalto.fi, 3 firstname.lastname@vero.fi 13th International Conference on Current Research Information Systems, CRIS2016, Scotland, UK, 9.6.2016