Journal of Vision. 2011;11(8):11. doi: / Figure Legend:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Journal of Vision. 2017;17(6):18. doi: / Figure Legend:
Advertisements

From: System gamma as a function of image- and monitor-dynamic range
From: Statistics for optimal point prediction in natural images
From: Focus information is used to interpret binocular images
Journal of Vision. 2013;13(3):24. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2016;16(10):9. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2011;11(8):11. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2008;8(7):12. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2011;11(12):7. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2008;8(3):33. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: Why the long face? The importance of vertical image structure for biological “barcodes” underlying face recognition Journal of Vision. 2014;14(8):25.
Journal of Vision. 2012;12(13):19. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2004;4(9):3. doi: /4.9.3 Figure Legend:
From: What are the units of storage in visual working memory?
Journal of Vision. 2011;11(13):27. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: Neural bandwidth of veridical perception across the visual field
From: Binocular visual acuity for the correction of spherical aberration in polychromatic and monochromatic light Journal of Vision. 2014;14(2):8. doi: /
Journal of Vision. 2017;17(6):6. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: Breaking object correspondence across saccades impairs object recognition: The role of color and luminance Journal of Vision. 2016;16(11):1. doi: /
Figure Legend: From: Fixations on low-resolution images
Journal of Vision. 2009;9(5):31. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2015;15(16):13. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2008;8(11):3. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: The attenuation surface for contrast sensitivity has the form of a witch's hat within the central visual field Journal of Vision. 2012;12(11):23.
Figure Legend: From: Key characteristics of specular stereo
From: Pattern matching is assessed in retinotopic coordinates
Figure Legend: From: Adaptation to blurred and sharpened video
From: Metacontrast masking within and between visual channels: Effects of orientation and spatial frequency contrasts Journal of Vision. 2010;10(6):12.
From: Metacontrast masking within and between visual channels: Effects of orientation and spatial frequency contrasts Journal of Vision. 2010;10(6):12.
Journal of Vision. 2012;12(6):33. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: Contextual effects on real bicolored glossy surfaces
Journal of Vision. 2008;8(3):33. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: Does spatial invariance result from insensitivity to change?
Journal of Vision. 2009;9(5):31. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: Surface color perception and equivalent illumination models
Figure Legend: From: Gating of remote effects on lightness
Figure Legend: statistical inference
From: Perceptual entrainment of individually unambiguous motions
From: Perception of light source distance from shading patterns
Journal of Vision. 2015;15(6):4. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2011;11(6):14. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: A double dissociation of the acuity and crowding limits to letter identification, and the promise of improved visual screening Journal of Vision.
Journal of Vision. 2010;10(12):1. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2014;14(14):2. doi: / Figure Legend:
Figure Legend: From: Latitude and longitude vertical disparities
From: Probing visual consciousness: Rivalry between eyes and images
Journal of Vision. 2016;16(1):17. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: Expertise with multisensory events eliminates the effect of biological motion rotation on audiovisual synchrony perception Journal of Vision. 2010;10(5):2.
From: Size-induced distortions in perceptual maps of visual space
From: The perceptual basis of common photographic practice
Journal of Vision. 2016;16(6):12. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: What's color got to do with it
Journal of Vision. 2006;6(10):3. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: Perceived surface color in binocularly viewed scenes with two light sources differing in chromaticity Journal of Vision. 2004;4(9):1. doi: /4.9.1.
From: Rethinking ADA signage standards for low-vision accessibility
From: What predicts the strength of simultaneous color contrast?
Journal of Vision. 2017;17(6):13. doi: / Figure Legend:
Figure Legend: From: Fixations on low-resolution images
Figure Legend: From: The resolution of facial expressions of emotion
Figure Legend: From: Measuring visual clutter
Journal of Vision. 2011;11(8):11. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: Four types of ensemble coding in data visualizations
Figure Legend: From: The fine structure of multifocal ERG topographies
Journal of Vision. 2008;8(11):18. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2014;14(8):6. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: Objects predict fixations better than early saliency
From: Statistics for optimal point prediction in natural images
Journal of Vision. 2010;10(4):15. doi: / Figure Legend:
Figure Legend: From: Analysis of human vergence dynamics
Figure Legend: From: The color constancy of three-dimensional objects
Presentation transcript:

From: The zone of comfort: Predicting visual discomfort with stereo displays Journal of Vision. 2011;11(8):11. doi:10.1167/11.8.11 Figure Legend: Vergence and focal distance in various viewing situations. The three columns on the left represent natural viewing (N), natural viewing with optical correction (G), and stereo 3D viewing (S). In natural viewing, the vergence stimulus and focal stimulus are always at the same distance and, therefore, are consistent with one another. In natural viewing with an optical correction for refractive error (spectacles or contact lenses), the focal distance is different from the vergence distance because of the constant decrement or increment in focal power due to the correction. Stereo viewing creates inconsistencies between vergence and focal distances because the vergence distance varies depending on the image contents while the focal distance remains constant. The right side of the figure plots focal distance in diopters as a function of vergence distance in diopters for the six viewing conditions schematized on the left side. The green line represents natural viewing, the blue line represents natural viewing with an optical correction, and the red line represents viewing a stereo display. Near and far distances are indicated on the axes. Date of download: 11/7/2017 The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology Copyright © 2017. All rights reserved.