Linac possibilities for a Super-B

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Page 1 Collider Review Retreat February 24, 2010 Mike Spata February 24, 2010 Collider Review Retreat International Linear Collider.
Advertisements

Proton / Muon Bunch Numbers, Repetition Rate, RF and Kicker Systems and Inductive Wall Fields for the Rings of a Neutrino Factory G H Rees, RAL.
S. N. “ Cavities for Super B-Factory” 1 of 38 Sasha Novokhatski SLAC, Stanford University Accelerator Session April 20, 2005 Low R/Q Cavities for Super.
CARE07, 29 Oct Alexej Grudiev, New CLIC parameters. The new CLIC parameters Alexej Grudiev.
SuperB and the ILC Damping Rings Andy Wolski University of Liverpool/Cockcroft Institute 27 April, 2006.
Linear Super-B Factory Progress John T. Seeman FPCP Workshop Vancouver BC April 9, 2006.
Exotic approach to a Super B-FACTORY P. Raimondi.
Thomas Roser Snowmass 2001 June 30 - July 21, MW AGS proton driver (M.J. Brennan, I. Marneris, T. Roser, A.G. Ruggiero, D. Trbojevic, N. Tsoupas,
Issues for Optimization of a Super-B Factory John T. Seeman SBF Workshop SLAC June 14, 2006.
Future Very High Luminosity Options for PEP-II John T. Seeman For the PEP-II Team e+e- Factories Workshop October 13-16, 2003.
Thomas Roser RHIC Open Planning Meeting December 3-4, 2003 RHIC II machine plans Electron cooling at RHIC Luminosity upgrade parameters.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Department of Energy Issues.
EDM2001 Workshop May 14-15, 2001 AGS Intensity Upgrade (J.M. Brennan, I. Marneris, T. Roser, A.G. Ruggiero, D. Trbojevic, N. Tsoupas, S.Y. Zhang) Proton.
Beam dynamics on damping rings and beam-beam interaction Dec 포항 가속기 연구소 김 은 산.
After Posipol In my opinion we are still too much dispersed. We have to re compact our community if we want to succeed in presenting a Compton version.
Electron Source Configuration Axel Brachmann - SLAC - Jan , KEK GDE meeting International Linear Collider at Stanford Linear Accelerator Center.
Cold versus Warm, parameters impacting LC reliability and efficiency contribution to the discussion on risk factors Giorgio Bellettini, Seul ITRP meeting,
WG2 (Proton FFAG) Summary G.H. Rees. Proton Driver Working Group  Participants: M. Yashimoto, S. Ohnuma, C.R. Prior, G.H. Rees, A.G. Ruggiero  Topics:
The SPS as a Damping Ring Test Facility for CLIC March 6 th, 2013 Yannis PAPAPHILIPPOU CERN CLIC Collaboration Working meeting.
Main Technical Issues of theSuper B Injector Main Technical Issues of the Super B Injector SuperB Meeting, Isola d’Elba, May 31st – June 3rd, 2008 D. Alesini,
GDE FRANCE Why High brillance gun is good for the ERL scheme? And SC GUN? Alessandro Variola For the L.A.L. Orsay group.
Injection System Update S. Guiducci (LNF) XVII SuperB Workshop La Biodola, Isola d'Elba, May 29 th 5/29/111.
CEPC APDR Study Zhenchao LIU
ILC - Upgrades Nick Walker – 100th meeting
Design and Parameters for a linearly colliding Super B-FACTORY
Plans of XFELO in Future ERL Facilities
Status and prospects of VEPP-5 Injection Complex
Status of the CLIC main beam injectors
Beam-beam effects in eRHIC and MeRHIC
CLIC Damping ring beam transfer systems
SuperB Injection, RF stations, Vibration and Operations
Large Booster and Collider Ring
Measurements, ideas, curiosities
Top-Up Injection for PEP-II and Applications to a Higgs Factory
Beam-beam R&D for eRHIC Linac-Ring Option
Injection facility for Novosibirsk Super Charm Tau Factory
SuperB project. Injection scheme design status
Pol. positron generation scheme for ILC
CEPC-SppC Accelerator CDR Copmpletion at the end of 2017
CLIC source update CLIC main beam injectors reminder
CASA Collider Design Review Retreat Other Electron-Ion Colliders: eRHIC, ENC & LHeC Yuhong Zhang February 24, 2010.
Electron Source Configuration
Beam beam simulations with disruption (work in progress...)
CEPC Injector Damping Ring
LHC (SSC) Byung Yunn CASA.
Damping Ring parameters for the new accelerating structure
AC Power for a Super-B Factory
Parameter Optimization in Higgs Factories Beam intensity, beam-beam parameters, by*, bunch length, number of bunches, bunch charge and emittance.
CEPC APDR SRF considerations(4) -LEP Cavity Voltage &BBU
Super-B Factory in a “4400m” Tunnel
Cost Algorithm for a Super-B Factory
Low Energy Electron-Ion Collision
Polarized Positrons in JLEIC
J. Seeman Perugia Super-B Meeting June 2009
Damping Ring parameters for the new accelerating structure
Kicker and RF systems for Damping Rings
CEPC SRF Parameters (100 km Main Ring)
JLEIC Reaching 140 GeV CM Energy: Concept and Luminosity Estimate
Damping Ring parameters with reduced bunch charge
Parameters Changed in New MEIC Design
MEIC New Baseline: Luminosity Performance and Upgrade Path
CDR2 – Injection System Injection system overview (Seeman) (2 pages)
Main Design Parameters RHIC Magnets for MEIC Ion Collider Ring
RF Parameters for New 2.2 km MEIC Design
JLEIC Main Parameters with Strong Electron Cooling
MEIC New Baseline: Part 7
MEIC New Baseline: Performance and Accelerator R&D
Beam-beam simulations
HE-JLEIC: Do We Have a Baseline?
MEIC Alternative Design Part III
Presentation transcript:

Linac possibilities for a Super-B Sasha Novokhatski SLAC, Stanford University WG2 - Linac/RF, Positron Source, Injection/Extraction March 17, 2006

Long history of electron-positron colliders Go to “Google” and find hundreds of projects A.M.Budker, International High Energy Physics Conference, Kiev, Russia, 1970 Ugo Amaldi,1978

Linearly colliding Super-B Factory layout Why linear collider scheme? We believe that luminosity in single collisions can be higher and we can cool the beams to smaller emittance in the damping ring

Possible limitation for damping ring energy “Space charge problem in the TESLA Damping Ring” W.Decking, R.Brinkmann, EPAC’2000 At lower energies (< 3 GeV) the space-charge can lead to emittance growth, and potentially to particle loss. The space charge tune shift may be noticeable. Estimation for round beams Maximum gradient of the force Flat beams

Space charge tune shift Incoherent tune shift Better to go to higher energy in damping ring

Linear Super B (may be the cheapest option) IP 4 GeV e- SC linac Bunch compressor e- Gun Positron target Decompressor monochromator 1GeV e+ linac 1GeV e+DR 6 GeV e+ SC linac without klystrons e- Dump 7GeV e+ DR

Damping Ring Energy 7GeV Beam current 1.6E-8 / 2.1E-9=7.6A Circumference 10000*0.63m=6.3km Damping time 8.3msec Injection/ejection by mini trains of 1000 bunches with frequency of 1.2 kHz RF power 2.2MeV*7.6=16.7 MW +HOMs(10%)+Resistive wall Collision time structure 8.3 msec 2.1nsec*1000=2.1 msec

Accelerator Physics Issues Electron gun Beam transfer lines Buncher (compressor) Debuncher-Monochromator HOM loads Beam Loss Single-bunch instability Adiabatic anti-damping Multi-bunch Instabilities Two beams of different energies must remain confined in the same focusing channel (not so difficult in linacs)

Linac 4 GeV is a TESLA-type linac, with higher repetition rate TESLA Linear Collider

Wake fields in Tesla cavities 0.2 mm bunch Wake potential in the last cell

Accelerating gradient and HOM power loss

Preliminary Super-B Factory parameters Collision parameters Linacs parameters Parameter LEB HEB Beam Energy (GeV) 4 7 Number of bunches 10000 Collision freq/bunch (Hz) 120 IP energy spread (MeV) 5 Particles /bunch x 1010 10 Time between collisions (msec) 8.3 by* (mm) 0.5 bx* (mm) 22 Emittance (x/y) (nm) 0.7/0.0016 sz (mm) 0.35 Lumi enchancement Hd 1.07 Crossing angle(mrad) IP Horiz. size (mm) IP Vert. size (mm) 0.028 Horizontal disruption 1.7 0.9 Vertical disruption 244 127 Luminosity (x1034/cm2/s) 100 Parameter LEB HEB Linac Energy [GeV] 4 6+1 Number of bunches per cycle 10*1000 10*10 Repetition rate [Hz] 1200 Final energy spread [MeV] 5 7 Particles /bunch x 1010 10 1 Bunch spacing [nsec] 2.1 RF Frequency [MHz] 1428 Norm. Emittance (x/y) [mm*mrad] 5.48/0.0125 9.59/0.022 Bunch length at injection [mm] 3 Final bunch length sz [mm] 0.35 Accelerating gradient [MV/m] 20 Accelerator length [m] 200 300 Energy spread after collision [MeV] 15 Average current [mA] 19.2 0.19 Energy recovery efficiency [%] n/a 95 RF power (40% efficiency) [MW] 192 ~0 Relative particle loss [1/sec] 0.001