CLIC Damping ring beam transfer systems

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Page 1 Collider Review Retreat February 24, 2010 Mike Spata February 24, 2010 Collider Review Retreat International Linear Collider.
Advertisements

Compact Linear Collider. Overview The aim of the CLIC study is to investigate the feasibility of a high luminosity linear e-/e+ collider with a centre.
Damping ring K. Ohmi LC Layout Single tunnel Circumference 6.7 km Energy 5 GeV 2 km 35 km.
SuperB Damping Rings M. Biagini, LNF-INFN P. Raimondi, SLAC/INFN A. Wolski, Cockroft Institute, UK SuperB III Workshop, SLAC, June 2006.
SuperB and the ILC Damping Rings Andy Wolski University of Liverpool/Cockcroft Institute 27 April, 2006.
Low Emittance Generation and Preservation: Damping Rings October 23 rd, 2012 Y. Papaphilippou (CERN) and J. Urakawa (KEK)
Conceptual Design of the CLIC Damping Rings October 20 th, 2010 Yannis PAPAPHILIPPOU CERN International Workshop on Linear Colliders 2010.
Damping Rings Y. Papaphilippou, CERN, D. Rubin, Cornell.
CLIC Pre-damping rings overview F. Antoniou, Y. Papaphilippou CLIC Workshop 2009.
ALCW at SLAC, January 7, 2004J. Rogers, A Damping Ring Primer1 A Damping Ring Primer J. Rogers Cornell University Linear collider emittance requirements.
Frank Zimmermann, CLIC “Away Day” 28 March 2006  x * Limitations and Improvements Paths Damping Rings Maxim Korostelev, Frank Zimmermann.
Comparison between NLC, ILC and CLIC Damping Ring parameters May 8 th, 2007 CLIC Parameter working group Y. Papaphilippou.
Update of 3.2 km ILC DR design (DMC3) Dou Wang, Jie Gao, Gang Xu, Yiwei Wang (IHEP) IWLC2010 Monday 18 October - Friday 22 October 2010 Geneva, Switzerland.
Beam dynamics on damping rings and beam-beam interaction Dec 포항 가속기 연구소 김 은 산.
Analytical considerations for Theoretical Minimum Emittance Cell Optics 17 April 2008 F. Antoniou, E. Gazis (NTUA, CERN) and Y. Papaphilippou (CERN)
CASA Collider Design Review Retreat HERA The Only Lepton-Hadron Collider Ever Been Built Worldwide Yuhong Zhang February 24, 2010.
Lattice design for IBS dominated beams August th, 2007 Yannis PAPAPHILIPPOU IBS ’07 – Intra Beam Scattering mini workshop, The Cockcroft Institute,
1 Simulations of fast-ion instability in ILC damping ring 12 April ECLOUD 07 workshop Eun-San Kim (KNU) Kazuhito Ohmi (KEK)
1 Proposal for a CESR Damping Ring Test Facility M. Palmer & D.Rubin November 8, 2005.
Damping Ring S. Guiducci AAP Review Tsukuba 20 April 2009.
Damping Ring Parameters and Interface to Sources S. Guiducci BTR, LNF 7 July 2011.
ILC Damping Ring Alternative Lattice Design ( Modified FODO ) ** Yi-Peng Sun *,1,2, Jie Gao 1, Zhi-Yu Guo 2 Wei-Shi Wan 3 1 Institute of High Energy Physics,
The SPS as a Damping Ring Test Facility for CLIC March 6 th, 2013 Yannis PAPAPHILIPPOU CERN CLIC Collaboration Working meeting.
Yannis PAPAPHILIPPOU CERN
The Introduction to CSNS Accelerators Oct. 5, 2010 Sheng Wang AP group, Accelerator Centre,IHEP, CAS.
Evaluation of 1GHz vs 2GHz RF frequency in the damping rings Yannis PAPAPHILIPPOU and Alexej Grudiev.
Global Design Effort ILC Damping Rings: R&D Plan and Organisation in the Technical Design Phase Andy Wolski University of Liverpool and the Cockcroft Institute,
Emittance reduction by a SC wiggler in the ATF-DR September 16 th, 2009 Yannis PAPAPHILIPPOU and Rogelio TOMAS ATF2 weekly meeting.
ILC Damping Rings: Configuration Status and R&D Plans Andy Wolski Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory January 19, 2006.
Parameter scan for the CLIC damping rings July 23rd, 2008 Y. Papaphilippou Thanks to H. Braun, M. Korostelev and D. Schulte.
V.Shiltsev 1 Comments on What Kind of Test Facility(ies) the ILC Needs Vladimir Shiltsev/ Fermilab.
Evaluation of 1GHz vs 2GHz RF frequency in the damping rings April 16 th, 2010 Yannis PAPAPHILIPPOU and Alexej Grudiev.
ALCW at SLAC, January 7, 2004J. Rogers, Novel Schemes for Damping Rings1 Novel Schemes for Damping Rings J. Rogers Cornell University Improving dynamic.
FCC-ee injector complex including Booster Yannis Papaphilippou, CERN Thanks to: M.Aiba (PSI), Ö.Etisken (Ankara Un.), K.Oide (KEK), L.Rinolfi (ESI-JUAS),
Frank Stulle, ILC LET Beam Dynamics Meeting CLIC Main Beam RTML - Overview - Comparison to ILC RTML - Status / Outlook.
Large Booster and Collider Ring
Non linear optimization of the CLIC pre-damping rings
sx* Limitations and Improvements Paths
CLIC damping rings overview
Update of Damping Ring parameters
CASA Collider Design Review Retreat Other Electron-Ion Colliders: eRHIC, ENC & LHeC Yuhong Zhang February 24, 2010.
Yannis PAPAPHILIPPOU CERN
10th International Accelerator School for Linear Colliders
Follow-up on Damping Ring design
ANKA Seminar Ultra-low emittance for the CLIC damping rings using super-conducting wigglers Yannis PAPAPHILIPPOU October 8th, 2007.
CEPC Injector Damping Ring
LHC (SSC) Byung Yunn CASA.
CLIC damping rings overview and open issues
ILC 3.2 km DR design based on FODO lattice (DMC3)
CLIC damping rings overview and open issues
ILC 3.2 km DR design based on FODO lattice (DMC3)
CLIC damping rings working plan towards the CDR
Damping Ring parameters for the new accelerating structure
Status of CTC activities for the Damping rings
Negative Momentum Compaction lattice options for PS2
F. Antoniou, E. Gazis (NTUA, CERN) and Y. Papaphilippou (CERN)
Non linear optimization of the CLIC pre-damping rings
Evaluation of 1GHz vs 2GHz RF frequency in the damping rings
Proposal for a CESR Damping Ring Test Facility
Damping Ring parameters for the new accelerating structure
Kicker and RF systems for Damping Rings
ANKA Seminar Ultra-low emittance for the CLIC damping rings using super-conducting wigglers Yannis PAPAPHILIPPOU October 8th, 2007.
Kicker specifications for Damping Rings
Kicker and RF systems for Damping Rings
Negative Momentum Compaction lattice options for PS2
Damping Ring parameters with reduced bunch charge
Fanglei Lin, Yuhong Zhang JLEIC R&D Meeting, March 10, 2016
Evaluation of 1GHz vs 2GHz RF frequency in the damping rings
Fanglei Lin JLEIC R&D Meeting, August 4, 2016
3.2 km FODO lattice for 10 Hz operation (DMC4)
Presentation transcript:

CLIC Damping ring beam transfer systems CLIC Work-packages for ABT CLIC Damping ring beam transfer systems Yannis PAPAPHILIPPOU March 11th, 2010

DR design goals PARAMETER NLC CLIC bunch population (109) 7.5 4.1 bunch spacing [ns] 1.4 0.5 number of bunches/train 192 312 number of trains 3 1 Repetition rate [Hz] 120 50 Extracted hor. normalized emittance [nm] 2370 <500 Extracted ver. normalized emittance [nm] <30 <5 Extracted long. normalized emittance [keV.m] 10.9 Injected hor. normalized emittance [μm] 150 63 Injected ver. normalized emittance [μm] 1.5 Injected long. normalized emittance [keV.m] 13.18 1240 Damping ring necessary to “cool” the beam to an extremely low emittance in all three dimensions Design parameters dictated by target performance of the collider (e.g. luminosity), injected beam characteristics or compatibility with the downstream system parameters Most parameters are driven by the main linac RF optimization (efficiency)

DR challenges Output emittance stability High-bunch density Emittance dominated by Intrabeam Scattering, driving energy, lattice, wiggler technology choice and alignment tolerances Electron cloud in e+ ring imposes chamber coatings and efficient photon absorption Fast Ion Instability in the e- ring necessitates low vacuum pressure Space charge sets energy, circumference limits Repetition rate and bunch structure Fast damping achieved with wigglers RF frequency reduction considered due to many challenges @ 2GHz (power source, high peak and average current) Output emittance stability Tight jitter tolerance driving kicker technology Positron beam dimensions from source Pre-damping ring challenges (energy acceptance, dynamic aperture) solved with lattice design Design Parameters CLIC Energy [GeV] 2.86 Circumference [m] 493.2 Energy loss/turn [Me] 5.8 RF voltage [MV] 7.4 Compaction factor 6e-5 Damping time x / s [ms] 1.6 / 0.8 Number of arc cells / wigglers 100/76 Dipole/ wiggler field [T] 1.4/2.5

Schematic layout e- Damping Ring e+ Damping Ring e- Pre-damping Ring e- DR to Booster linac transfer line e- Damping Ring e- PDR to DR transfer line e+ linac to PDR transfer line e- Pre-damping Ring e+ Pre-damping Ring e- linac to PDR transfer line e+ PDR to DR transfer line e+ Damping Ring e+ DR to Booster linac transfer line

PDR design F. Antoniou, CLIC09 Injected Parameters e- e+ Bunch population [109] 4.4 6.4 Bunch length [mm] 1 10 Energy Spread [%] 0.1 8 Hor.,Ver Norm. emittance [nm] 100 x 103 7 x 106 Main challenge: Large input emittances especially for positrons to be damped by several orders of magnitude Design optimization following analytical parameterization of TME cells Detuning factor (achieved emittance/TME)> 2 needed for minimum chromaticity Target emittance reached with the help of conventional high-field wigglers (PETRA3) Non linear optimization based on phase advance scan (minimization of resonance driving terms and tune-shift with amplitude)

DR layout Racetrack shape with S. Sinyatkin, et al., LER 2010 Racetrack shape with 96 TME arc cells (4 half cells for dispersion suppression) 38 Damping wiggler FODO cells in the long straight sections (LSS) Space reserved upstream the LSS for injection/extraction elements and RF cavities Y.P., 11/03/2010 TE/ABT meeting

Kicker stability Kicker jitter is translated in a beam jitter in the IP. Typically a tolerance of σjit ≤0.1σx is needed Translated in a relative deflection stability requirement as For higher positions at the septum (larger injected emittances or lower beta functions) the stability tolerance becomes tighter The tolerance remains typically to the order of 10-4 Available drift space has been increased to reduce kicker voltage spec.

Kicker design M. Barnes CLIC09 Double kicker system relaxes requirement, i.e. ~3.3 reduction achieved @ATF Striplines required for achieving low longitudinal coupling impedance Significant R&D needed for PFL (or alternative), switch, transmission cable, feedthroughs, stripline, terminator (PhD thesis student at CERN) Should profit from collaborator with ILC and light source community Y.P., 10/03/2010 TE/BT meeting

Beam transfer items Damping ring kickers with very low stability tolerance Challenging technology Double kicker system studies Injection/extraction BT elements specification refinement for PDR and DR Transfer line design, i.e. optics and layout Injector linac to PDR transfer line (spin rotator for electrons) PDR to DR transfer lines DR to BC1 transfer lines (double kicker system) Depending on the final RF frequency choice a delay loop may be needed for train recombination (RF deflector with tight stability tolerances) PDR may need different injection kicker and septum design and transfer lines due to different beam characteristics for electron and positrons Injection and extraction beam dumps for DR and PDR Y.P., 11/03/2010 TE/ABT meeting