Sub-nanometer displacement measurements in seismic sensors.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Signaux, Bruits, Problèmes Inverses – INRA - Nice, The VIRGO Environmental Monitoring System R. De Rosa University of Napoli - Federico II and.
Advertisements

DEVELOPMENT OF SENSORS, SYSTEMS AND TECHNIQUES FOR LOW-FREQUENCY SEISMIC AND NEWTONIAN NOISE MONITORING AND FOR REDUCTION OF CONTROL NOISE IN UNDERGROUND.
MAX-PLANCK-INSTITUT FÜR GRAVITATIONSPHYSIK ALBERT-EINSTEIN-INSTITUT Karsten Kötter1 DC Data Analysis SEI/SUS (Suspensions & Seismic Isolation)
Silvia Zorzetti. PACMAN CLICScientific ProjectThe Team PACMAN (Particle Accelerator Components Metrology and Alignment to the Nanometer Scale) Ph.D. training.
1 LAViSta Laboratories in Annecy working on Vibration and Stabilisation Impact of random and determinist acoustic noise on vibrations at high frequencies.
Takanori Sekiguchi Italy-Japan Workshop (19 April, 2013) Inverted Pendulum Control for KAGRA Seismic Attenuation System 1 D2, Institute for Cosmic Ray.
SUPERSITES COORDINATION WORKSHOP Monday 10 June 2013
Seismic sensors in PACMAN
Lecture #19- Seismometers
LIGO-G W Commissioning Data on Vibration Isolation & Suspensions Fred Raab 24 October 02.
Ksjp, 7/01 MEMS Design & Fab Sensors Resistive, Capacitive Strain gauges, piezoresistivity Simple XL, pressure sensor ADXL50 Noise.
LumiCal Alignment System Status report Leszek Zawiejski, Tomasz Wojtoń, Arkadiusz Moszczyński Institute of Nuclear Physics PAN, Cracow 25th FCAL Collaboration.
1 Advanced Sensors Lecture 6 Sensors Technology AUE 2008 Bo Rohde Pedersen.
Midterm Review 28-29/05/2015 Peter NOVOTNY Early Stage Researcher 3.2, Work Package 3.
Acceleration-velocity-position
Benoit BOLZON Nanobeam 2005 – Kyoto Active mechanical stabilisation LAViSta Laboratories in Annecy working on Vibration Stabilisation Catherine ADLOFF.
CERN VIBRATION SENSOR PROPOSAL The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Commission under the FP7 Research Infrastructures.
Effects of the cryogenics operational conditions on the mechanical stability of the FLASH linac modules Ramila Amirikas, Alessandro Bertolini, Jürgen Eschke,
Introduction to seismic sensors (subject 3.2) Peter Novotny PACMAN meeting, CERN, 7 October 2014.
Trends in seismic instrumentation Based on the book Instrumentation in Earthquake Seismology Jens Havskov, Institute of Solid Earth Physics University.
Smart Materials in System Sensing and Control Dr. M. Sunar Mechanical Engineering Department King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals.
1 LAViSta Laboratories in Annecy working on Vibration and Stabilisation Catherine ADLOFF Andrea JEREMIE Jacques LOTTIN Benoît BOLZON Yannis KARYOTAKIS.
30 July 2014 Gwo-Sheng Peng (on behalf of Mr. Jiun-Kai Chen) Center for Measurement Standards/ Industrial Technology Research Institute Tel:
April 8/9, 2003 Green Bank GBT PTCS Conceptual Design Review Instrumentation K. Constantikes.
Basics of Measurement and Instrumentation
An Affordable Broadband Seismometer : The Capacitive Geophone
Concepts for Combining Different Sensors for CLIC Final Focus Stabilisation David Urner Armin Reichold.
Techniques to approach the requirements of CLIC stability K. Artoos, O. Capatina (speaker), M. Guinchard, C. Hauviller, F. Lackner, H. Schmickler, D. Schulte.
3D MEMS Accelerometers for Building Applications
Point capteur de rotation R1. 2 DUT 2X EENTEC R1 derived from automotive industrie Specifications Our goal : add new studies to our mid-band sensor i.e.
Slide # 1 Velocity sensor Specifications for electromagnetic velocity sensor Velocity sensors can utilize the same principles of displacement sensor, and.
Fiber-Optic Accelerometer Using Wavefront-Splitting Interferometry Hsien-Chi Yeh & Shulian Zhang July 14, 2006.
Prototype Test of Vibration Isolation System Current Status & Schedule
Seminar ON SMART SENSOR Submitted by : SUBIR KUMAR GHOSH Roll No. IN-14/04 Electrical & Instrumentation Deptt. B.E 7th Semester JORHAT ENGINEERING COLLEGE,
QD0 stabilization L. Brunetti 1, N. Allemandou 1, J.-P. Baud 1, G. Balik 1, G. Deleglise 1, A. Jeremie 1, S. Vilalte 1 B. Caron 2, C. Hernandez 2, (LAViSta.
Position – velocity - acceleration Oscillatory motion Position Velocity Acceleration Consequence 1: low frequency -> measure position or velocity high.
CLIC MDI stabilization update A.Jeremie G.Balik, B.Bolzon, L.Brunetti, G.Deleglise A.Badel, B.Caron, R.Lebreton, J.Lottin Together with colleagues from.
LIGO- G D The LIGO Instruments Stan Whitcomb NSB Meeting LIGO Livingston Observatory 4 February 2004.
Active Vibration Stabilization for the NLC Final Focus Quads Josef Frisch, Linda Hendrickson, Thomas Himel, Andrei Seryi,
Sensors Por: Flora Gibson.
LIGO-G Z The Status of VIRGO E. Tournefier for the Virgo Collaboration GWADW 2004, Aspen From the CITF to VIRGO Commissioning of the Fabry-Perot.
Hard or Soft ? C. Collette, K. Artoos, S. Janssens, P. Fernandez-Carmona, A. Kuzmin, M. Guinchard, A. Slaathaug, C. Hauviller The research leading to these.
B. Caron, G. Balik, L. Brunetti LAViSta Team LAPP-IN2P3-CNRS, Université de Savoie, Annecy, France & SYMME-POLYTECH Annecy-Chambéry, Université de Savoie,
GWADW - La Biodola 20061/20 Underground reduction of Gravity Gradient Noise. Giancarlo Cella INFN sez. Pisa/Virgo GWADW – La Biodola 2006.
Main beam Quad Stabilisation: Status of the stabilisation test program at CERN CLIC-stabilization day S. Janssens Contribution to slides by:
Slide # 1 Date & Time: Wednesday, 4.00 – 5.15 pm One page double sided formula sheet allowed 4-5 problems; 10 T/F, Fill the gaps; 3-5 short questions Presentation.
STABILISATION AND PRECISION POINTING QUADRUPOLE MAGNETS IN THE COMPACT LINEAR COLLIDER S. Janssens, P. Fernandez Carmona, K. Artoos, C. Collette, M. Guinchard.
EE 4BD4 Lecture 14 Position Sensors 1. Types of Sensors Potentiometers and linear resistors Capacitive sensors (mm distances, e.g. capacitive microphone)
STATIC AND MODAL BEHAVIOUR OF THE CLIC MAIN BEAM BPM SUPPORT M. Esposito, EN-MME The research leading to these results has received funding from the European.
Accelerometer approaches Measure F Compression Bending Stress/force based Piezoelectric Piezoresistive Measure x Capacitive (Optical) (Magnetic) AC DC.
Test plan for CLIC MB linac quad LAPP option A.Jeremie.
QD0 stabilisation in CLIC CDR A.Jeremie with LAViSta team.
Instrumentation Symposium 10/9/2010 Nigbor 1 Instrumentation Selection Strategies Robert Nigbor
Thoughts on an SPI for AdLIGO SPI: Suspension Point Interferometer, or Seismic Platform Interferometer with Rana Adhikari and Matt Evans.
Nanometrics Broadband Seismic Sensor Workshop 24 March 2004 Neil Spriggs.
Yoichi Aso Columbia University, New York, NY, USA University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan July 14th th Edoardo Amaldi Conference on Gravitational Waves.
Nano stabilisation studies for CLIC
EuroTeV WP7 activities in DESY
3: ISI ASCR, Brno University of Technology, Brno, Czech Republic
Laboratories in Annecy working on Vibration Stabilization
Ddd 4-Slides Challenge Silvia Zorzetti.
Superattenuator for LF and HF interferometers
Background With new accelerators delivering beams always smaller and more energetic, requirements for very precise beam alignment become more and more.
Touchscreen Technology
Flat-Top Beam Profile Cavity Prototype: design and preliminary tests
Acoustic Reflection 2 (distance) = (velocity) (time) *
ECE699 – 004 Sensor Device Technology
Summary of the iKAGRA Run
Dispersive Comb-Spectrum Interferometer: Metrological Characterization
CLIO underground in mine
Presentation transcript:

Sub-nanometer displacement measurements in seismic sensors. 2nd PACMAN workshop Debrecen, Hungary 13-15.9.2016 Peter Novotny This project is funded by the European commission under FP7 Project number 606839

Content What are seismic sensors. Seismic sensors in PACMAN. Limitations of state of the art sensors. Understanding the sensor resolution. Measurement of the sensor resolution. How to improve sensor resolution. Content

What are seismic sensors and their working principle. Instruments which measures ground motion. What are seismic sensors and their working principle. Not only earthquakes but also motion in nanometres.

Why do we need seismic sensors in PACMAN? To know how ground motion influences characterization of BPM. Why do we need seismic sensors in PACMAN? Seismic sensors Ground

Force Balanced optical Limitations of state of the art sensors for PACMAN. Seismometers Bandwidth Resolution PZT Accelerometers Bandwidth Resolution Geophones Bandwidth Resolution PACMAN requirements: Bandwidth = 0.1 ~ 200 Hz Resolution ≤ 0.1nm RMS@1Hz Magnetic fields resistance Force Balanced optical accelerometers Bandwidth Resolution !! Point out the resolution! MEMS accelerometers Bandwidth Resolution

How do we measure sensor’s resolution? Main problem is that perfect quiet place doesn’t exist! ADC How do we measure sensor’s resolution? Compare to a microphone acoustic noise which can be measured in soundproof chamber Resolution is given by sensor’s self noise Ground

How do we understand resolution. RMS or “average” motion in the bandwidth of interest. How do we understand resolution. RMS@1Hz = 0.14nm 𝑹𝑴𝑺= 𝒇 𝟏 𝒇 𝟐 𝑷𝑺𝑫 𝒇 ×𝒅𝒇 Bandwidth = 0.1 ~ 200 Hz Resolution ≤ 0.1nm RMS@1Hz

PSD resolution of different sensors.

How to improve sensor resolution? Implement high resolution sensor for displacement measurement Options: Resistive, Capacitive, LVDT, Optical encoders, Piezoelectric, Eddy current, Interferometers, … After applying following requirements: Contactless Sub-nanometer resolution Magnetic field resistance How to improve sensor resolution?

How to improve sensor resolution? All technologies implemented before but results are influenced by: Ambien environment (temperature, humidity, air refraction index, …) Mechanical design Data acquisition hardware Signal processing algorithm This makes comparison very difficult and unclear. How to improve sensor resolution?

Direct comparison = no data ambiguity Capacitive sensor Implementation of displacement sensors to same mechanical body Optical encoder Seismic mass Interferometer

Increasing sensitivity to improve resolution Implementation of multi-reflection Michelson interferometer Increasing sensitivity to improve resolution Displacement [nm] Corr. Dif vs mass locking M2 M3

Seismic sensors will be used to check how ground motion influences BPM characterization. Resolution is the main limit for state of the art sensors. What we understand under RMS@1HZ resolution and how do we measure it. Direct comparison of sub-nm displacement sensors to overcome data ambiguity. Increasing the resolution with multi-reflection Michelson interferometer. Conclusions

Thank you for your attention!

RMS of sensors noises

Self-noise measurement problem Mass locking vs. corrected difference?? Self-noise measurement problem