Opportunities to Study Valve Iterations and Modifications in the US

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
STS 2015 John V. Conte, MD Professor of Surgery Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine On Behalf of the CoreValve US Investigators Transcatheter Aortic.
Advertisements

ACC 2015 Jae K. Oh, MD On Behalf of the US CoreValve Investigators Remodeling of Self-Expanding Transcatheter Aortic Valve Is Responsible for Regression.
ACC 2015 Michael J Reardon, MD, FACC On Behalf of the CoreValve US Investigators A Randomized Comparison of Self-expanding Transcatheter and Surgical Aortic.
Long-Term Outcomes Using a Self- Expanding Bioprosthesis in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis Deemed Extreme Risk for Surgery: Two-Year Results From.
One Year Outcomes in Real World Patients Treated with Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation The ADVANCE Study Axel Linke University of Leipzig Heart.
INTERNATIONAL. CAUTION: For distribution only in markets where CoreValve® is approved. Not for distribution in U.S., Canada or Japan. Medtronic, Inc
TAVR Pearls Addressing the Shortcomings of the Current TAVR Generation
Trans-catheter Aortic Valve Replacement: a UK update. Dr Martyn Thomas Guys and St Thomas’ Hospital.
A shifting paradigm of care: Advances in transcatheter heart valve procedures Sandra Lauck MSN, RN, CCN(C) Clinical Nurse Specialist, Arrhythmia Management.
PARTNER Objective To compare surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR) with transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in high-risk patients with severe.
The Risk and Extent of Neurological Events Are Equivalent for High-Risk Patients Treated With Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement Thomas.
Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch in High Risk Patients with Severe Aortic Stenosis in a Randomized Trial of a Self-Expanding Prosthesis George L. Zorn, III.
Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Replacement with a Self-Expanding Prosthesis David H. Adams et al (U.S. CoreValve Clinical Investigators) Journal Club November.
Axel Linke University of Leipzig Heart Center, Leipzig, Germany Sabine Bleiziffer German Heart Center, Munich, Germany Johan Bosmans University Hospital.
TCT 2015 | San Francisco | October 15, 2015 Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement for Failed Surgical Bioprostheses Danny Dvir, MD John G. Webb, MD and.
UC c EN. Through Medtronic sponsored research, the Transcatheter Aortic Valves clinical portfolio is studying over 11,000 subjects at over 125.
INTERNATIONAL. CAUTION: For distribution only in markets where CoreValve® is approved. Not for distribution in U.S., Canada or Japan. Medtronic, Inc
INTERNATIONAL. CAUTION: For distribution only in markets where CoreValve® is approved. Not for distribution in U.S., Canada or Japan. Medtronic, Inc
EXPANDING INDICATIONS OF TRANSCATHETER HEART VALVE INTERVENTIONS. JACC CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTION. DR.RAJAT GANDHI.
1 Jeffrey J. Popma, MD Professor of Medicine Harvard Medical School Director, Interventional Cardiology Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Boston, MA.
Longest Follow-up After Implantation of a Self-Expanding Repositionable Transcatheter Aortic Valve: Final Follow-up of the Evolut R CE Study Stephen Brecker,
G. Michael Deeb, MD On Behalf of the CoreValve US Investigators
Outcomes in the CoreValve US High-Risk Pivotal Trial in Patients with a Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality Less than or Equal to.
Issues and Current Situations in the Development of Endovascular Treatment Devices for Pediatric Cardiology in the US – US Industry Dan Gutfinger, MD,
Extending the Boundaries of TAVR: Future Directions
On behalf of the FORWARD Study Investigators
Late breaking news in heart valve disease
Highlights From the SAPIEN 3 Experience in Intermediate-Risk Patients Vinod H. Thourani, MD on behalf of the PARTNER Trial Investigators Professor.
The Medtronic Ventor EngagerTM TAVI System
Division of Cardiovascular Devices
Expanding Indications for TAVR – What Should Be Next?
The Lotus Device Design & FIM Experiences with a Repositionable Self Expanding Percutaneous Aortic Valve Ian T. Meredith MBBS, BSc(Hons), Ph.D, FRACP,
Direct Flow Medical Experience with a Conformable, Repositionable, Retrievable, Percutaneous Aortic Valve Reginald Low MD University of California,Davis.
Are we ready to perform TAVI in Intermediate Risk Patients?
Carolyn D. Vaughan FDA Lead Reviewer / Mechanical Engineer
Updates From NOTION: The First All-Comer TAVR Trial
J. Matthew Brennan, MD, MPH Duke University School of Medicine
Mitralign Program Update
EVOLUT R, Next Generation, and Future
TAVR: How We continue to Refine the Technology and Improve the Results
Adherence to the Labeling
Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Intermediate Risk Patients with Aortic Stenosis Description: The goal of the trial was to assess.
Review of the Latest OUS Data from the Self-Expanding Valve Studies
Heart Valve Thrombosis & Neuro-Outcomes
30-Day Safety and Echocardiographic Outcomes Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement with the Self-Expanding Repositionable Evolut PRO System.
Early Outcomes with the Evolut R Repositionable Self-Expanding Transcatheter Aortic Valve in the United States Mathew Williams, MD, For the Evolut R US.
Direct Flow Medical Experience with a Conformable, Repositionable Retrievable Percutaneous Aortic Valve Reginald Low MD University of California, Davis.
Keith Dawkins MD FRCP FACC FSCAI Global Chief Medical Officer
First-in-Man, First In The USA: What’s The Difference?
Transcatheter Heart Valves
Updates From SURTAVI in Intermediate Risk Patients
Longevity of transcatheter and surgical bioprosthetic aortic valves in patients with severe aortic stenosis and lower surgical risk Lars Sondergaard,
Latest Data from Balloon Expendable Trials
Insights from the NCDR® STS/ACC TVT Registry.
Niv Ad, MD Chief, Cardiac Surgery Professor of Surgery, VCU
CoreValve Continued Access Study Shows Continued Improvement in 1-Year Outcomes With Self-Expanding Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Steven J. Yakubov,
Technology Update and Status of Current Clinical Trials
Axel Linke University of Leipzig Heart Center, Leipzig, Germany
Ganesh Manoharan Consultant Cardiologist
Improved Technology: Evaluating Device Modifications
CRT 2010 Washington DC, January 21, 2010
One Year Outcomes in Real World Patients Treated with Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation The ADVANCE Study Axel Linke University of Leipzig Heart.
Second Generation Valves: What Will Be Different?
Regulatory Considerations for Coronary Drug Coated Balloons – FDA View
The Ever-Expanding Patient Pool for TAVR:
Cardiovacular Research Technologies
CoreValve US Pivotal Trial High-Risk Arm Device and Access Routes.
How to Optimize TAVR Outcomes
Nat. Rev. Cardiol. doi: /nrcardio
Five-Year Outcomes after Randomization to Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: Final Results of The PARTNER 1 Trial Michael J. Mack, MD.
Presentation transcript:

Opportunities to Study Valve Iterations and Modifications in the US Rhonda J. Robb Medtronic

Rhonda Robb, MBA Employee: Medtronic

The Challenge: TAVR is Novel ….

The Opportunity Developing, and innovating a platform that is well characterized technically and advances clinical outcomes

Transcatheter Valve Requirements US FDA Requirement ISO Requirement

Computational Modeling CoreValve Testing Computational Modeling Bench Testing Material Properties Hydrodynamic assessment Structural Performance Delivery System Requirements Simulated Use Usability/Human Factors Pre-Clinical In-Vivo Assessments Clinical Assessments Bench Testing Animal Studies

> 5,000 Patients in CoreValve® US Pivotal Medtronic CoreValve US Pivotal Trial Up to 687 790 Extreme Risk Screened High Risk Screened N=737 N=995 No Yes Up to 200 487 395a 395 CoreValve Transfemoral CoreValve Non-Ilieofemoral CoreValve SAVR Pivotal N=470 N=150 N=390 N=357 Alternative Access Continued Access CoreValve ER CAS CoreValve HR CAS N=1623 N=1034 Primary Endpoint: All-cause mortality or major stroke @ 12 months (compare to perf goal) Primary Endpoint: All-cause mortality @ 12 months

CoreValve Clinical Results Extreme Risk Study support the safety and efficacy of this therapy who are deemed unsuitable for surgical aortic valve replacement Survival at 1 year was superior in patients that underwent transcatheter replacement with CoreValve at high risk for surgery 2 year results at ACC LBCT

Significant Global TAVR Evidence Base More than 70,000 Patients Enrolled Globally in Pivotal Trials, National and Industry Registries Int’l

Delivery Systems Portfolio Next Generation Valve Systems Building on Proven Foundation w/>75,000 implants Self-Expanding Nitinol Porcine Pericardium Delivery Systems Portfolio

Evolut R Building on Proven Foundation Reduced Outflow Height Fit in angulated anatomy Supra-annular Valve Porcine Pericardial Tissue Conformable Seal Optimized oversizing /radial force, extended skirt Recapturable Delivery System Ergonomic handle, 1:1 response, self-centering, with 14Fr Inline Sheath

Evolut R IDE Now Enrolling in the US PURPOSE Assess safety and efficacy of CoreValve Evolut R system in patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis who are considered high through extreme risk for SAVR DESIGN Single arm, non-randomized, multi-center up to 25 sites with follow-up through five year DEVICES Evolut R TAV (sizes 23, 26 & 29mm), EnVeo R delivery catheter system with InLine sheath SCOPE Minimum of 150 implanted subjects, up to 250 implanted subjects ENDPOINTS Safety: 30-day all-cause mortality, disabling stroke Efficacy: Device success rate (VARC II), percentage subjects ≤ mild AR @ early echo Feb 2015: FDA approval received for the addition of Evolut R Into the SURTAVI Trial

Dramatic Difference on Time to Approval CoreValve Extreme Risk FDA Approval Jan 2014 CoreValve CE Apr 2007 CoreValve High Risk FDA Approval July 2014 2007 2014 2015 2016 ~ 7 Years CoreValve Evolut R CE Jan 2015 Est FDA Approval < 1 Year 2015 2016 Evolut R

Future Considerations Early feasibility path offers a very innovative mechanism for study of new concepts (e.g. pulmonic, mitral) Need to assess future pathways for studying future patient populations given increased challenges to randomize (e.g., lower risk, bicuspid, pure AI)

Summary CoreValve self-expanding platform has established a solid foundation of safety and effectiveness data System design modifications can be evaluated: Using refined bench test and pre-clinical models to be more predictive of human outcomes Through clinical studies with lower patient numbers, shorter term data (e.g. Evolut R) and novel clinical trial constructs By incorporating into ongoing longer term studies (e.g. addition of Evolut R to Surtavi)

Thank You