Educational Benefit Review

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CYCLICAL MONITORING FOR CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT (CMCI)
Advertisements

Module 1: IEP Overview – A Plan for Guiding Instruction and Service Provision.
1 Transition FUTURE. 2 WHY FOCUS ON TRANSITION? One of the primary purposes of Public Law , the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA),
Connecticut State Department of Education
The IEP Individualized Educational Program. The IEP is the process and document that outlines what a free appropriate public education (FAPE) is for an.
1 Massachusetts DOE IEP Transition Process FUTURE.
1 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt Transition.
IDEA AND ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS WITH DISABILITIES Office of General Counsel Division of Educational Equity August 15, 2012.
Standards-Based IEPs Writing Goals and Objectives
The Role of the Educator in the IEP Process. A Little History… The 70’s 1. Public Law : Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973.
Teaching and Learning Special Education Secondary Programs Transition Services.
IEP Definition The Individualized Education Program (IEP) is developed for a student with an identified disability by an IEP team that includes the.
1 Common IEP Errors and Legal Requirements. 2 Today’s Agenda Parent Survey Results Procedural Compliance Self Assessment Results.
Designing and Implementing An Effective Schoolwide Program
Preparing Students with Special Needs for College and Career March 26 Educator’s Institute 2012 Lovegren-O’Brien Bass 3/26/12.
Special Education Adrienne Lacey-Bushell, Ed.D. Director Special Education.
Preparing for Success: The Individualized Education Program August 2015 New Teacher Institute 1.
Examining the Relationship of Quality IEPs to Student Progress A Reflective Process to Promote Reasonable Calculations for Educational Benefit 25 Industrial.
 Special Education is mandated by federal law and we have to do what they say.
Special Education Briefing April 10, 2015 HAWAII STATE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION HawaiiPublicSchools.org.
Transition Planning Parent Information Meeting Brooke Gassman, Keystone AEA Parent - Educator Coordinator Lori Anderson, DCSD Transition Facilitator Stephanie.
Pre-referral Process Student support team Student support team –General education teacher identifies a student –Meets with the SST to discuss strategies.
Disability Support Setting Goals and Making Plans According to Your IEP.
IEP Training for Kansas Schools 2013 – 2014 Kansas State Department of Education Technical Assistance System Network (TASN) Overview and Preparation for.
A Reflective Process Designed by the California Department of Education 25 Industrial Park Road, Middletown, CT · (860) Revised 03/08.
1 The Special Education Assessment and IEP Process EDPOWER Teacher Institute 2013.
Pennsylvania Training and Technical Assistance Network Overview Effective Practices for Secondary Transition (EPST) Cohort # 1 PAIU Special Education Directors.
Nash-Rocky Mount Public Schools Programs for Exceptional Children State Performance Plan/ Annual Performance Report/Continuous Improvement Performance.
Instructional Accommodations/ Modifications in Cypress-Fairbanks ISD Teacher Implementation Guide.
Office of Child Development & Early Learning Project MAX: Maximizing Access and Learning Project MAX Maximizing Access and Learning Managing and Sustaining.
The IEP: Drafting the IEP (Steps 1, 2, 3, and 4) Southwest Ohio Special Education Regional Resource Center Tuesday, November 7, 2006.
Educational Benefit Review (EBR) October Training Goals ► To define “Educational Benefit” ► To learn a process for reviewing your district’s IEPs.
State and Local Processes for Monitoring Educational Benefit
Educational Benefit Review (EBR)
Educational Benefit Review (ED Benefit). Educational Benefit Purpose To determine if the student’s Individualized Education Program (IEP) was reasonably.
Claremont Graduate University Teacher Education Special Education Seminars Dr. Phyllis B. Harris, Executive Director Oakland Unified School District Programs.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Bilingual Coordinators Network September 17, 2010 Margaret.
The Educational Benefit Review Process A Reflective Process Designed by the California Department of Education 25 Industrial Park Road, Middletown, CT.
Post Secondary Transition CANAR, NOVEMBER 12, 2015.
Assessing the Educational Benefit for Students with IEPs A Sharing of a New Professional Opportunity 25 Industrial Park Road, Middletown, CT
National Secondary Transition Technical Assistance Center Connecting TA for Part B Indicators 1, 2, 13, & 14: Working Together to Support States OSEP Project.
In accordance with the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act and Chapters 14 and 15 of the State Board Regulations, PDE provides general supervision.
ALIGNING TRANSITION REQUIREMENTS IN THE IEP PAM HUMPHREY, TRANSITION CONSULTANT.
IEP Training for Kansas Schools Kansas State Department of Education Technical Assistance System Network Measurable Annual Goals 1.
TRANSITION PLANNING FOR ELEMENTARY TEACHERS Planning for your students’ future.
Assessing the Educational Benefit for Students with IEPs A Sharing of a New Professional Opportunity 25 Industrial Park Road, Middletown, CT
“ IT IS PROOF NOT TRUTH” THE IEP IS THE PROOF Dr. Jodi Roseman Director of Special Education School District of Springfield Township.
Educational Benefit Review (EBR) October Educational Benefit Review (EBR) Purpose Determine if the student’s IEP is reasonably calculated for the.
Teacher Roles and Responsibilities in the IEP Process Amanda Strong Hilsmier EDUC 559.
“All kids get to go to school and get a fair chance to learn. That’s the idea behind IDEA. Getting a fair chance to learn, for kids with disabilities,
The Educational Benefit Review Process A Reflective Process Designed by the California Department of Education 25 Industrial Park Road, Middletown, CT.
Mississippi Department of Education Office of Special Education
Navigating the ARD/IEP Process
Review, Revise and Amend from Procedures for State Board Policy 74
American Institutes for Research
Phyllis Lynch, PhD Director, Instruction, Assessment and Curriculum
Refining & Aligning: Recommendations for preparation policy to support rti2 and Special Education in Tennessee Kim Paulsen, vanderbilt university Blake.
The Michigan Merit Curriculum (MMC), Personal Curriculums (PC) and Certificates of Completion (COC): Addressing the Needs of Students with ASD.
Transition: Preparing for Life after High School
Is Your Child’s IEP Individualized?
Mission Possible: Planning a Successful Life for Students with Intellectual Disabilities TAC it up! VCU T/TAC May 2010.
Implementation Guide for Linking Adults to Opportunity
North Carolina Positive Behavior Support Initiative
Assessing Academic Programs at IPFW
IEP and the IPS Crosswalk
Grading Students with Disabilities
IEP REPORT OF PROGRESS AND ACHIEVEMENT K-12
Standards-based Individualized Education Program (IEP) Module Two: Developing the Present Level of Academic Achievement and Functional Performance (PLOP)
Standards-based Individualized Education Program (IEP) Module One: Introduction SBIEP Module one: Introduction - The standards-based reform movement has.
New Special Education Teacher Webinar Series
Presentation transcript:

Educational Benefit Review PA Special Education Monitoring System School District/Charter School Training August 2017 Patty Todd, Division Chief www.education.pa.gov

Educational Benefit Review Purpose of Educational Benefit Review To determine whether current design of IEP is reasonably calculated for student to receive educational benefit www.education.pa.gov

Board of Education v. Rowley Legal Basis Board of Education v. Rowley Defined educational benefit “if the student derives more than minimal or trivial progress…” 34 CFR Sec. 300.324 “Each public agency must ensure that the IEP Team (i) Reviews the IEP periodically, but not less than annually, to determine whether the annual goals for the child are being achieved; and (ii) Revises the IEP, as appropriate, to address any lack of expected progress toward the annual goals, and in the general education curriculum, if appropriate.” www.education.pa.gov

Educational Benefit Review Review Process A systematic approach to review students’ IEPs and to determine if the design of IEP was reasonably calculated to provide educational benefit across three years of consecutive IEPs. Benefit is determined by comparing the current IEP with the prior two IEPs. www.education.pa.gov

Educational Benefit Review Student Sample Parameters 10 - 12 student IEPs over 3 years All primary disability categories, if available are selected Elem / Middle / High School Students Review Team Members Special Education Teacher General Education Teacher Individuals knowledgeable about the special education programs www.education.pa.gov

Educational Benefit Review How is Educational Benefit measured: Record information from the IEPs for three consecutive years Analyze relationships among specific components of IEPs and across the three years Compare progress across three consecutive IEPs 4. Look for patterns and determine if IEP was reasonably calculated to result in educational benefit www.education.pa.gov

Educational Benefit Review Chart IEP Information: Collect and record the following information from three years of IEPs for each student: 1. Present levels of performance 2. Needs/concerns 3. Annual goals & Program modifications 4. Services/Placement 5. Progress 6. Was the IEP adjusted? www.education.pa.gov

Educational Benefit Review Record IEP Information Copy verbatim phrases from specific components of the IEPs, Abbreviations are acceptable, Do not paraphrase or summarize Capture progress from progress reports, test scores, report card grades… For organization--identify sections (academic, social, physical) or content areas (ELA, Math…) Was IEP adjusted? www.education.pa.gov

Present Levels of Performance Needs/Concerns EDUCATIONAL BENEFIT REVIEW WORKSHEET Instructions: LEAs participating in monitoring are required to use this worksheet to address the Educational Benefit Review (EBR) in FSA #3. The LEA is to form a team, and complete one worksheet for each student on the EBR/FSA #23 list provided to the LEA by the BSE. The LEA is to have the completed worksheet for each student , as well as each student’s educational record, available for review by the BSE team chairperson during the onsite review. The overall purpose of the EBR process is to determine whether the IEP was reasonably calculated to provide for educational benefit. Specific instructions about how to complete the EBR were provided by the BSE during the monitoring training. Name of Student ___________________________ LEA ___________________________ Student’s ID Number ________________________ Present Levels of Performance Needs/Concerns Annual Goals/Accommodations & Modifications Services/Placement Progress Was IEP Adjusted?

EBR Chart

Educational Benefit Review Analyze Relationships Consider and collect data from each IEP separately Determine alignment – the relationship between two or more components (column to column and year to year) Look for patterns of progress across the years Is there alignment across the columns for IEPs or are there gaps or broken chains? Was the IEP adjusted? www.education.pa.gov

Educational Benefit Review Compare Prior Years Consider why items are on year one and not on the other two years. If an item disappears from one year to the next, why did it disappear? Was the IEP adjusted? Was the annual goal achieved? www.education.pa.gov

Educational Benefit Review Answer a set of ten questions for each student 1. Are the assessments complete and do they identify all of the student's needs, including postsecondary outcomes and/or career assessment/functional vocational evaluation for secondary students? 2. In Year 3, does the IEP, through the Present Level of Academic Achievement and Functional Performance (PLAAFP) statement or other IEP information, identify all of the student's significant needs? www.education.pa.gov

Educational Benefit Review Answer a set of ten questions for each student 3. In Year 3, are all of the student's needs addressed by goals and objectives, transition services, and/or supplementary aids and services, including, for secondary students, postsecondary outcomes, preferences, and interests? 4. In Year 3, are there programs and services to support all of the student’s goals and objectives? www.education.pa.gov

Educational Benefit Review Answer a set of questions for each student 5. Do the transition services provided for the student over the three year period of review represent a coordinated set of activities related to the student’s vision for adult life? 6. In reviewing the comparison of the PLAAFP from Year 1 to Year 2 and from Year 2 to Year 3, if the student did not make progress, were the goals and objectives, transition activities, or programs and services in Year 3 changed in the IEP to facilitate the student's future progress? www.education.pa.gov

Educational Benefit Review Answer a set of questions for each student In reviewing the comparison of the PLAAFP from Year 1 to Year 2 and from Year 2 to Year 3, if the student did make progress, were the goals and objectives, transition activities, or programs and services in Year 3 changed in the IEP to facilitate the student's future progress, including participation in general education? 8. Were sufficient services provided to ensure that the student would make progress? www.education.pa.gov

Educational Benefit Review Answer a set of questions for each student 9. Is this student provided with supplementary aids and services to support participation in extracurricular and non-academic activities if determined to be needed by the IEP team? 10. Based upon the review of Worksheets Year 1, 2 and 3 and questions # 1-9 above, the LEA has determined that the student has received educational benefit? www.education.pa.gov

Enter the information for each student into the FSA #23 Educational Benefit Review Enter the information for each student into the FSA #23 www.education.pa.gov

Educational Benefit Review QUESTIONS www.education.pa.gov

Secretary of Education Pedro A. Rivera Office of Elementary and Secondary Education Matthew Stem, Deputy Secretary Bureau of Special Education Ann Hickson-Herrmann, Director The mission of the Department of Education is to ensure that every learner has access to a world-class education system that academically prepares children and adults to succeed as productive citizens. Further, the Department seeks to establish a culture that is committed to improving opportunities throughout the commonwealth by ensuring that technical support, resources, and optimal learning environments are available for all students, whether children or adults. www.education.pa.gov