Date of download: 11/1/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Date of download: 6/1/2016 Copyright © 2016 SPIE. All rights reserved. Comparison of two optimum results. Figure Legend: From: Eliminating lateral color.
Advertisements

Date of download: 6/3/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: 3D Reconstruction and Manufacture of Real Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: From CT Scan.
Date of download: 6/27/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: A Simplified Procedure to Determine the Optimal Rate of Freezing Biological Systems.
Date of download: 6/29/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: A Numerical Model for Oil Film Flow in an Aeroengine Bearing Chamber and Comparison.
Date of download: 7/10/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Three-Dimensional Modeling of Supine Human and Transport System Under Whole-Body.
Date of download: 9/16/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: A MR Imaging Procedure to Measure Tarsal Bone Rotations J Biomech Eng. 2007;129(6):
Date of download: 9/18/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 9/18/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Theory and Algorithms for Weighted Total Least-Squares Fitting of Lines, Planes,
Date of download: 11/12/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Comparison of Distributions of Wave Heights From Nonlinear Schröedinger Equation.
Date of download: 10/1/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/1/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/11/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/12/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/13/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/13/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/13/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/13/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/15/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/18/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/19/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/19/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/21/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/23/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/24/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/24/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/24/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/25/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/25/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/26/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/27/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/29/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/29/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/29/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/30/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Hemodynamics of the Mouse Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm
From: Additive Manufacturing of Glass
Date of download: 11/1/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Heat Exchanger Efficiency
Date of download: 11/2/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/3/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Three-Dimensional-Printing of Bio-Inspired Composites
Date of download: 11/4/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/4/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/5/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/6/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/9/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/9/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Cloud Manufacturing: Current Trends and Future Implementations
Date of download: 11/13/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/15/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 12/17/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 12/22/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 12/24/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Examining the LEED Rating System Using Inverse Optimization
Date of download: 12/26/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 12/26/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 12/28/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 12/28/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 12/29/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 12/30/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 12/31/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 12/31/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 1/1/2018 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 1/1/2018 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 1/3/2018 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 1/3/2018 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Design of a Wireless Biological Signal Conditioning System1
From: Optimal Bearing Housing Designing Using Topology Optimization
Date of download: 3/7/2018 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 3/8/2018 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Presentation transcript:

Date of download: 11/1/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: A Genetic Algorithm Based Multi-Objective Shape Optimization Scheme for Cementless Femoral Implant J Biomech Eng. 2015;137(3):034502-034502-12. doi:10.1115/1.4029061 Figure Legend: A comparison of bone resorption in the proximal femur for different implants. The plots (a), (b), (c), and (d) correspond to immediate postoperative bone density distribution for OSG-1, OSG-2, OSG-3, and initial stem, respectively. The plots (e), (f), (g), and (h) correspond to bone density distribution after bone remodeling for OSG-1, OSG-2, OSG-3, and initial stem, respectively. Negative sign indicates bone resorption and the number indicates average reduction in bone density. Gray-scale variations represent bone density ranges in g cm−3.