Assessment of Student Performance for 2011 – 2012

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
* Princeton Public Schools State School Performance Report Interpretive Guide *Based upon data.
Advertisements

NJ ASSESSMENTS CYCLE II REPORT GRADES 3 through 8 and 11 September 6, 2007 For Haddonfield Public Schools.
BETHLEHEM TOWNSHIP NJASK 3-8 RESULTS How are we doing compared to the standard? % Partially Proficient % Proficient % Advanced Proficient.
Pennsylvania’s Continuous Improvement Process. Understanding AYP How much do you know about AYP?
Jefferson Township Public Schools Spring 2007 Testing Analysis Presented to: Jefferson Township Board of Education Presented by: Mary K. Thornton, Ph.D.
Review of NCLB Testing For Fair Lawn Board of Education and Public---October 2013 N.J.A.C. 6A:8-4.3(a) Accountability “Chief school administrators shall.
Netcong School Student Driven Curriculum & Professional Development Action Plan
ANNUAL 2012 REPORT OF STUDENT ASSESSMENT DATA 1 HAMILTON TOWNSHIP SCHOOL DISTRICT.
Washington Township 2007 Test Scores Washington Township Administrative Team October 23, 2007.
Tewksbury Township Schools “ Measuring Our 2012 Results ” District Testing Report NJ PASS Grades 1 and 2 NJ ASK Grades 3-8 Prepared for the Tewksbury.
Warren Hills Regional School District State Assessment Results October 2013 Presenters Jaclyn Russo Director of Guidance Kimberly Unangst Director of Special.
State Assessment Results October 2014 Presenters Jaclyn Russo Director of Guidance Dawn Moore Director of Curriculum and Instruction The Warren Hills Regional.
PRESENTED BY THE DEMAREST ADMINISTRATIVE TEAM Annual State of the Schools Assessment Report.
School District of University City Jackson Park Elementary School SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN Joylynn Wilson, Superintendent Monica Hudson, Principal.
MATHEMATICS Support for Single Plan for Student Achievement.
Delaware’s Accountability Plan for Schools, Districts and the State Delaware Department of Education 6/23/04.
Madison Public Schools Testing Reports Results Presenter Lee S Nittel Presenter: Lee S Nittel Director of Curriculum and Instruction.
Common Questions What tests are students asked to take? What are students learning? How’s my school doing? Who makes decisions about Wyoming Education?
School Progress Index 2012 Results Mary Gable- Assistant State Superintendent Division of Academic Policy Carolyn Wood - Assistant State Superintendent.
Analysis of Student Performance on Assessments
MELROSE PUBLIC SCHOOLS MELROSE VETERANS MEMORIAL MIDDLE SCHOOL OCTOBER 2013 MCAS Spring 2013 Results.
1 State Testing March 2006 Grades 3-8 (NJASK and GEPA)
Connecticut Mastery Test (CMT) and the Connecticut Academic Achievement Test (CAPT) Spring 2011 Presented to the Guilford Board of Education September.
NJASKNJASK Cluster Means Orange Board of Education October
RESULTS FOR ELEMENTARY AND MIDDLE SCHOOLS 2013 Statewide Test Data.
CINNAMINSON TOWNSHIP PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2011 TEST SCORE PRESENTATION.
Title: Glassboro Test Score Analysis Date: October 27, 2010 Glassboro Public Schools.
1 Community Accountability Summit April History of Accountability Changes.
District Assessment Report Rory McCourt – District Testing Coordinator Westwood Regional School District December 16, 2010.
1 Watertown Public Schools Assessment Reports 2010 Ann Koufman-Frederick and Administrative Council School Committee Meetings Oct, Nov, Dec, 2010 Part.
APS Algebra Summit1 Algebra in APS Christina Fritz Franny Dever Mitchell Ross January 31,2008.
District Assessment Report Westwood Regional School District February 18, 2010.
NJ ASSESSMENTS CYCLE II REPORT GRADES 3-8 and 11 October 30, 2008 Haddonfield Public Schools.
Adequate Yearly Progress The federal law requires all states to establish standards for accountability for all schools and districts in their states. The.
R IDGEFIELD P UBLIC S CHOOLS DATA PRESENTATION P ART I October 2015.
ACT College-Readiness Measures: Explore, Plan and the ACT Hal L. Sanderson, Ph.D. Director of Institutional Research & Assessment Evidence-Based Learning.
Changes in Professional licensure Teacher evaluation system Training at Coastal Carolina University.
Measuring College and Career Readiness PARCC RESULTS: YEAR ONE HARDING TOWNSHIP SCHOOL DECEMBER 21, 2015.
Assessment: Results & Implications for Instruction Parent meeting – October 13, 2011.
Measuring College and Career Readiness PARCC RESULTS: YEAR ONE HACKETTSTOWN PUBLIC SCHOOLS JANUARY 20, 2016.
Measuring College and Career Readiness PARCC RESULTS: YEAR ONE JEFFERSON TOWNSHIP PUBLIC SCHOOLS DECEMBER 16, 2015.
2012 NJASK Results- Garwood Public Schools. NJASK- New Jersey Assessment of Skills and Knowledge  Administered in grades 3-8  Language Arts, Mathematics,
Measuring College and Career Readiness PARCC RESULTS: YEAR ONE Somerset Hills School District ____________.
NJASK 3-5 Report Sean Siet Director of Curriculum and Instruction October 20, 2011.
Loretta L. Radulic, Assistant Superintendent Roxbury Township Public Schools October State Assessment Results and Analysis.
Huntsville City Schools School Year School Instructional Targets October 3,
Granby Public Schools Annual Continuous Progress Review Presented by Diane Dugas Director of Curriculum September CMT Review.
Policy Recommendation Best Practices in Reading Achievement to Address Reading Failure Roxanne Boyd Walden University.
Milestones Results August 2016 Bibb County School District P-1.
Measuring College and Career Readiness
Measuring College and Career Readiness
Conversation about State Report Card November 28, 2016
Paulsboro School District
Measuring College and Career Readiness
Augusta School Department School Board Presentation
Ridgefield Public Schools data presentation Part I
Ridgefield Public Schools data presentation Part II
Bridgewater-Raritan Regional School District
Worlds Best Workforce Annual Report
CHESTER SCHOOL DISTRICT
SECAUCUS SCHOOL DISTRICT
2015 PARCC Results for R.I: Work to do, focus on teaching and learning
Washington Township Public Schools
Measuring College and Career Readiness
Title I Annual Parent Meeting
PARCC RESULTS: PRESENTATION FAIRVIEW SCHOOL DISTRICT OCTOBER 2, 2018
English Learning Meeting June 12th, :00 – 2:15 pm
Assessment Report Board of Education 2014
Paulsboro School District
District Assessment Report
Presentation transcript:

Assessment of Student Performance for 2011 – 2012 Califon Public School Assessment of Student Performance for 2011 – 2012

Assessments Elementary Grades Middle Grades NJASK 3 NJASK 6 NJASK 4

Assessment Analysis By School By Sub-group By District Factor Group (DFG) By State

What is a District Factor Group? (DFG) Percent of adults without a high school diploma Percent of adults with some college education Occupational status Unemployment rate Percent of individuals in poverty Median family income

Other ( I ) District Factor Groups Bethlehem Township Franklin Township Clinton Town Lebanon Boro Clinton Township Lebanon Township East Amwell Readington Township

NJASK Score Reporting Performance Levels Scale Score from 100-300 Advanced Proficient: 250-300 Proficient: 200-249 Partially Proficient: 100-199

NJ State Benchmarks for AYP Content Area Grade Span Starting Point 2003 2005 – 2007 2008 – 2010 2011 – 2013 2014 Language Arts Literacy Elementary (Grades 3-5) 68 75 59 79 100 Middle School (Grades 6-8) 58 66 72 86 High School (Grade 11) 73 85 92 Mathematics 53 62 83 39 49 61 80 55 64 74 Benchmark values indicate % of Total Student Proficiency.

NJASK 3 LAL% MATH% PP P AP TOTAL P Califon– 11-12 19.0 81.0 0.0 9.5 47.6 42.9 90.5 Califon– 10-11 29.4 70.6 17.6 35.3 47.1 82.4 Califon– 09-10 64.7 23.5 52.9 76.4 DFG – 11-12 17.8 75.0 7.2 82.2 8.9 37.3 53.8 91.1 DFG – 10-11 21.1 66.1 12.8 78.9 9.1 36.7 54.2 90.9 DFG – 09-10 24.1 65.2 10.7 75.9 10.0 38.2 51.8 90.0 STATE – 11-12 33.2 63.1 3.6 66.7 21.6 41.3 37.1 78.4 STATE – 10-11 37.0 55.8 63.0 4.5 38.4 STATE – 09-10 40.3 54.1 5.6 59.7 21.9 41.0 78.1 Partially Proficient Proficient Advanced Proficient

NJASK 3 Total Mean Scores LAL MATH CALIFON 213.4 240.8 DFG 215.4 247.9 STATE 205.7 230.0 Area of Strength Area of Concern

NJASK 3 LAL Cluster Mean Scores Writing Expository Task Speculative Task Reading Working with Text Analyzing Text CALIFON 10.5 5.4 5.1 17.2 5.7 11.5 DFG 11.0 5.6 STATE 10.0 5.0 15.2 10.2 JPM* 9.4 4.7 13.6 4.5 8.2 TPP** 20 10 30 8 22 Area of Strength Area of Concern *Just Proficient Mean **Total Possible Points

NJASK 3 Math Cluster Mean Scores Number & Numerical Operations Geometry & Measurement Patterns & Algebra Data Analysis, Probability & Discrete Math Problem Solving CALIFON 13.6 7.4 7.9 5.7 12.0 DFG 14.3 7.7 8.1 5.8 12.7 STATE 12.4 6.9 7.1 5.1 11.0 JPM* 8.7 5.4 5.3 3.6 8.0 TPP** 20 11 8 18 Area of Strength Area of Concern *Just Proficient Mean **Total Possible Points

NJASK 4 LAL% MATH % PP P AP TOTAL P CALIFON– 11-12 61.1 38.9 0.0 27.8 44.4 72.2 CALIFON– 10-11 47.1 52.9 23.5 64.7 11.8 76.5 CALIFON– 09-10 18.8 68.8 12.5 81.3 50.0 100 DFG – 11-12 23.8 67.9 8.3 76.2 9.7 40.5 49.8 90.3 DFG – 10-11 20.0 66.4 13.6 80.0 9.3 44.3 46.4 90.7 DFG – 09-10 22.9 60.3 16.8 77.1 11.1 39.1 88.9 STATE – 11-12 41.5 54.5 4.0 58.5 22.6 33.1 77.4 STATE – 10-11 37.3 55.5 7.2 62.7 20.7 47.2 32.1 79.3 STATE – 09-10 40.4 50.3 59.6 23.0 42.2 34.8 77.0 Partially Proficient Proficient Advanced Proficient

NJASK 4 SCIENCE % PP P AP TOTAL P CALIFON– 11-12 0.0 44.4 55.6 100 52.9 47.1 CALIFON– 09-10 25.0 75.0 DFG – 11-12 2.6 34.9 62.5 97.4 DFG – 10-11 3.1 32.0 64.9 96.9 DFG – 09-10 1.7 37.4 60.9 98.3 STATE – 11-12 8.7 46.7 44.6 91.3 STATE – 10-11 10.0 42.3 47.7 90.0 STATE – 09-10 6.6 49.2 44.2 93.4 Partially Proficient Proficient Advanced Proficient

NJASK 4 Total Mean Scores LAL MATH SCIENCE Grade 4 192.9 225.6 245 DFG 213.6 245.9 255.7 STATE 202.7 228.6 241.4 Area of Strength Area of Concern

NJASK 4 LAL Cluster Mean Scores Writing Expository Task Speculative Task Reading Working with Text Analyzing Text CALIFON 10.3 5.0 5.3 17.3 7.4 9.9 DFG 12.5 6.5 6.0 21.3 8.5 12.8 STATE 11.6 5.6 19.0 11.5 JPM* 11.3 5.8 5.5 18.7 7.2 11.4 TPP** 20 10 36 13 23 Area of Strength Area of Concern *Just Proficient Mean **Total Possible Points

NJASK 4 Math Cluster Mean Scores Number & Numerical Operations Geometry & Measurement Patterns & Algebra Data Analysis, Probability & Discrete Math Problem Solving CALIFON 12.1 7.8 6.8 3.9 12.9 DFG 14.9 7.9 5.1 14.3 STATE 13.0 7.0 4.4 12.6 JPM* 9.9 5.4 4.9 2.8 9.1 TPP** 20 11 8 Area of Strength Area of Concern *Just Proficient Mean **Total Possible Points

NJASK 4 Science Cluster Mean Scores Life Science Physical Science Earth Science Knowledge Application CALIFON 11.3 8.7 7.7 3.0 24.7 DFG 12.0 8.9 8.5 3.3 26.1 STATE 11.0 8.0 7.6 3.1 23.6 JPM* 7.1 5.3 4.7 2.1 14.9 TPP** 16 12 11 4 35 Area of Strength Area of Concern *Just Proficient Mean **Total Possible Points

NJASK 5 LAL % MATH % PP P AP TOTAL P CALIFON– 11-12 35.7 64.3 0.0 7.1 78.6 14.3 92.9 CALIFON– 10-11 85.7 92.8 57.1 42.9 100 CALIFON– 09-10 21.7 69.6 8.7 78.3 17.4 30.4 52.2 82.6 DFG – 11-12 19.7 67.8 12.6 80.4 6.8 38.3 54.9 93.2 DFG – 10-11 19.8 67.9 12.3 80.2 8.1 35.1 56.8 91.9 DFG – 09-10 20.0 64.2 15.8 80.0 8.9 37.5 53.6 91.1 STATE – 11-12 37.9 55.5 6.6 62.1 16.8 45.9 37.4 83.3 STATE – 10-11 39.1 54.8 6.1 60.9 19.4 41.1 39.5 80.6 STATE – 09-10 36.9 54.3 63.0 21.3 42.0 36.8 78.8 Partially Proficient Proficient Advanced Proficient

NJASK 5 Total Mean Scores LAL MATH Grade 5 203.4 223.9 DFG 217.6 251.3 STATE 204.8 234.7 Area of Strength Area of Concern

NJASK 5 LAL Cluster Mean Scores Writing Speculative Task Expository Reading Working with Text Analyzing Text CALIFON 11.2 5.4 5.9 21.4 7.9 13.5 DFG 12.4 6.2 24.7 9.5 15.1 STATE 11.3 5.6 5.7 21.6 8.3 13.3 JPM* 11.1 5.5 19.9 7.5 TPP** 20 10 42 14 28 Area of Strength Area of Concern *Just Proficient Mean **Total Possible Points

NJASK 5 Math Cluster Mean Scores Number & Numerical Operations Geometry & Measurement Patterns & Algebra Data Analysis, Probability & Discrete Math Problem Solving CALIFON 11.1 9.4 6.0 3.5 8.9 DFG 13.3 11.9 6.6 5.1 12.5 STATE 11.6 10.7 5.9 4.4 JPM* 7.6 7.4 4.3 2.7 6.5 TPP** 18 16 8 19 Area of Strength Area of Concern *Just Proficient Mean **Total Possible Points

NJASK 6 LAL % MATH % PP P AP TOTAL P CALIFON– 11-12 21.4 78.6 0.0 7.1 64.3 28.6 92.9 CALIFON– 10-11 89.5 10.5 100 68.4 31.6 CALIFON– 09-10 18.2 72.7 9.1 81.8 36.4 45.5 63.7 DFG – 11-12 17.3 70.4 12.3 82.7 9.0 40.9 50.0 90.9 DFG – 10-11 17.5 69.2 13.4 82.6 10.2 47.9 41.9 89.8 DFG – 09-10 68.2 14.3 82.5 13.9 49.0 37.1 86.1 STATE – 11-12 35.5 58.4 6.1 64.5 21.2 46.6 32.2 78.8 STATE – 10-11 33.3 59.4 7.3 66.7 22.7 49.8 27.6 77.4 STATE – 09-10 34.7 57.7 7.6 65.3 28.2 48.3 23.5 71.8 Partially Proficient Proficient Advanced Proficient

NJASK 6 Total Mean Scores LAL MATH Grade 6 216.1 231.7 DFG 221.0 246.2 STATE 208.7 228.4 Area of Strength Area of Concern

NJASK 6 LAL Cluster Mean Scores Writing Persuasive Task Explanatory Reading Working with Text Analyzing Text CALIFON 9.9 6.4 3.5 32.9 17.0 15.9 DFG 11.0 7.3 3.7 33.2 16.5 16.7 STATE 10.1 6.7 3.4 29.4 14.6 14.8 JPM* 9.8 6.5 3.3 26.7 13.2 13.5 TPP** 18 12 6 52 23 29 Area of Strength Area of Concern *Just Proficient Mean **Total Possible Points

NJASK 7 LAL % MATH % PP P AP TOTAL P CALIFON– 11-12 19.0 66.7 14.3 81.0 28.6 61.9 9.5 71.4 CALIFON– 10-11 25.0 62.5 12.5 75.0 50.0 CALIFON– 09-10 56.3 31.3 87.6 37.5 6.3 62.6 DFG – 11-12 19.5 60.7 19.7 80.4 19.2 43.1 37.8 80.9 DFG – 10-11 17.7 59.6 22.7 82.3 17.4 43.7 38.9 82.6 DFG – 09-10 13.8 55.1 31.0 86.1 18.1 42.4 39.5 81.9 STATE – 11-12 39.0 50.5 10.5 61.0 36.8 40.3 22.9 63.2 STATE – 10-11 36.7 51.0 12.3 63.3 34.3 41.4 24.3 65.7 STATE – 09-10 30.8 51.7 17.5 69.2 35.7 39.9 24.4 64.3 Partially Proficient Proficient Advanced Proficient

NJASK 7 Total Mean Scores LAL MATH Grade 7 220.4 213.6 DFG 223.8 233.8 STATE 207.9 215.3 Area of Strength Area of Concern

NJASK 7 Math Cluster Mean Scores Number & Numerical Operations Geometry & Measurement Patterns & Algebra Data Analysis, Probability & Discrete Math Problem Solving CALIFON 6.8 8.0 8.2 4.4 13.4 DFG 8.1 9.5 9.8 5.1 16.6 STATE 6.5 8.6 4.3 13.5 JPM* 5.0 7.7 3.6 10.6 TPP** 13 14 8 27 Area of Strength Area of Concern *Just Proficient Mean **Total Possible Points

NJASK 8 SCIENCE % PP P AP TOTAL P 17.0 51.5 31.4 82.9 CALIFON– 11-12 12.5 37.5 50.0 87.5 CALIFON– 10-11 13.3 40.0 46.7 86.7 CALIFON– 09-10 0.0 7.7 92.3 100 DFG – 11-12 5.6 43.4 51.0 94.4 DFG – 10-11 6.6 46.6 46.8 93.4 DFG – 09-10 5.9 44.8 49.4 94.2 STATE – 11-12 18.1 49.5 32.4 81.9 STATE – 10-11 18.8 51.9 29.3 81.2 STATE – 09-10 17.0 51.5 31.4 82.9 Partially Proficient Proficient Advanced Proficient

NJASK 8 Math Cluster Mean Scores Number & Numerical Operations Geometry & Measurement Patterns & Algebra Data Analysis, Probability & Discrete Math Problem Solving CALIFON 10.3 11.1 9.1 6.5 23.8 DFG 9.3 5.6 21.3 STATE 7.8 9.0 7.7 4.8 18.1 JPM* 5.8 7.5 6.0 3.7 13.9 TPP** 13 14 8 32 Area of Strength Area of Concern *Just Proficient Mean **Total Possible Points

NJASK 8 Science Cluster Mean Scores Life Science Physical Science Earth Science Knowledge Application CALIFON 15.1 12.9 11.9 5.0 34.9 DFG 13.0 11.5 4.9 34.7 STATE 13.4 11.15 10.1 4.4 30.5 JPM* 10.0 8.6 7.5 3.7 22.3 TPP** 21 17 16 6 48 Area of Strength Area of Concern *Just Proficient Mean **Total Possible Points

Action Plan for 2012-2013 (K-8) Writing Program: Units of Study based on Lucy Caulkin’s Writer’s Workshop Framework; monitor implementation of program and provide additional professional development on teaching writing Project READERS: Response to Effective Assessment-Driven Early Reading Support Use data to guide instruction and intervention decisions for students with reading difficulties Plan for and implement evidence-based instructional strategies and interventions that are response to students’ needs (Partnership with Lehigh University) LinkIt!: Linking state, district and classroom assessments Progress monitoring Benchmarking Instructional Grouping & Differential Instruction Test Creation

ESEA Waiver Annual Progress Targets As approved in New Jersey’s Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) Flexibility Waiver Application, the New Jersey Department of Education (NJDOE) is transitioning to a new accountability system that provides a more accurate analysis of student achievement. One component of this system is the calculation of Annual Progress Targets, which are indicators to measure schools’ progress toward meeting the State proficiency benchmark of 90%.

ESEA Waiver Preliminary School Profiles 2012 Participation and performance determinations for Califon School under New Jersey’s Elementary and Secondary Act Waiver Met Goal = Met Performance Goal of 90% Yes = Met Progress Target or Participation Rate Yes* = Met Progress Target (Confidence Interval Applied) No = Missed Progress Target or Participation Rate