Strengthening of Internationalisation in B&H Higher Education

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EAC HIGHER EDUCATION POLICY
Advertisements

Example of Strategy 20 April 2012, Vänersborg Session 3: International relations strategies Region Västra Götaland Annual strategy 2012 (subject to approval.
INCOME PROJECT TEMPUS SCM MEDA INTERNATIONALISATION OF HE MICRO LEVEL ANALYSIS.
Mark Anderson Director of The Europe Office LAUNCH OF THE EUROPE OFFICE.
Date: in 12 pts Education and Culture Erasmus+ Capacity Building in Higher Education Information Day on the external dimension of Erasmus+ Brussels, 4.
Where would higher education be without Erasmus? AEF Europe- Focus sur les IP 14 mai 2009 Patricia De Smet Unit Higher Education; « Erasmus » European.
Adult learning universities in the Nordic countries Workshop on Opening Higher Education for Adults It is always a good time to learn, Budapest 7-9 March.
EUA Convention of European Higher Education Institutions Graz, May 2003 Theme II Revisiting the Links between Teaching and Research.
Education and Culture LESSONS LEARNED FROM THE FORMER GENERATION OF HIGHER EDUCATION PROGRAMMES IN RUSSIAN FEDERATION José Gutierrez Erasmus+ : Higher.
Institutional Internationalisation Strategies and their (possible) impact on the quality of educational programs Arthur Mettinger Austrian Bologna Expert,
Information Day on Irish International Education Strategy
Erasmus Mundus Action 2. Missions of the EACEA  Implementing Community programmes  Managing projects life cycle  Information and communication  Results.
UNESCO/OECD Guidelines on transborder higher education Brussels October Counsellor Jan S. Levy.
Internationalisation and joint programmes / degrees David Crosier Eurydice World Bank Seminar 31 March 2009, Skopje.
Strategic Framework for European cooperation in education and training
Rektoru Padomes sēde, Norwegian Financial Mechanism – cooperation possibilities Latvian Rector’s Council,
Internationalizing the Undergraduate Psychology Curriculum Anna Laura Comunian University of Padua, Italy.
Speaker:Joachim Fronia, Executive Agency EM Programme ‘Keeping attractiveness and excellence and developing a common identity’
EUROPEAN REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT FUND RECOMMEND Final Event, 11 September 2014, Varna EU Interregional Cooperation State of play and perspectives Jason Martinez.
The Governance and Management of European Universities – Future Trends Thomas Estermann Senior Programme Manager European University Association Targu.
European Higher Education in Flux – challenges for the next decade - Lesley Wilson Secretary General, EUA EAIR, Vilnius, 24 August 2009.
1 Joint EAIE/NAFSA Symposium Amsterdam, March 2007 John E Reilly, Director UK Socrates-Erasmus Council.
University of Rijeka QUASYS, Dubrovnik – October 11-12, 2003 Petar Bezinović Quality Promotion Office QUALITY PROMOTION AT RIJEKA UNIVERSITY.
Fachhochschule Technikum Wien University of Applied Sciences Technikum Wien.
Action for – Enhancing Attractiveness Co-ordinators Meeting February WELCOME!
Implementing the LLL Charter Michael H örig EUA Programme Manager Nicosia, Cyprus 22 November 2010.
Empirical evidence of Internationalization of HE in Europe. EU Mobility Strategy Dejan Bokonjić, Stevan Trbojevic, Nenad Markovic Analysis of current situation.
Double degrees and joint degrees: international inter-university cooperation Lewis Purser, Director Academic Affairs.
Analysis of Current State in Internationalisation Strengthening of Internationalisation in B&H Higher Education Zlatan Buljko Zlatan Buljko Federal Ministry.
Strengthening of Internationalisation in B&H Higher Education Analysis of current state in internationalization from the accreditation aspect of HEIs Maja.
Strengthening of Internationalisation in B&H Higher Education University of Tuzla Internationalization Policy Alma Tanović, MPhil Office of Research University.
European Higher Education in a Global Perspective Lesley Wilson Secretary General European University Association Oslo, 11 March 2008.
UNIVERSITY OF NIŠ Perceptions on the current state of internationalization at institutional level Prof. dr Zoran S. Nikolić, Vice-Rector KICK-OFF MEETING.
4th ETUI seminar on ‘Psychosocial risks at work’
Alliance 4 Universities
Strengthening of Internationalisation in B&H Higher Education
Aligning higher education in the EU and Russia
LESSONS LEARNED FROM THE PRESENT GENERATION OF HIGHER EDUCATION PROGRAMMES IN EASTERN PARTNERSHIP COUNTRIES Klaus Haupt, Head of Tempus Unit Education,
WP7 Exploitation Prof. Dr Slaviša Trajković University of Niš
Legal Aspects Related to Brownfield Regeneration
Strengthening Internationalization of HE in Armenia:
Strengthening of Internationalisation in B&H Higher Education
Activity of the High-Level Group for Partnership, Coordination and Capacity Building for Statistics for Agenda 2030 on Sustainable Development (HLG) Gulmira.
Project number: EPP RS-EPPKA2-CBHE-JP
EU instruments to support the Bologna Process
Erasmus+ ( ) New opportunities for cooperation with universities from Eastern Partnership region Kaunas, 25 October
African Union Perspectives
Part 2: How to ensure good project management?
WP1. Methodology and structure of questionnaires
EuropeAid Co-operation Office
Erasmus+ ( ): 3 Key Actions
Doctoral programmes in Europe
Internationalisation in Europe
Zlatan Buljko Federal Ministry of Education and Science
Strengthening of Internationalisation in B&H Higher Education
Senior project leader at CIEP Former President of ENQA
Strengthening of Internationalisation in B&H Higher Education
Strengthening of Internationalisation in B&H Higher Education
Strengthening of Internationalisation in B&H Higher Education
Theme: Blurring the boundaries between universities and schools
Strengthening of Internationalisation in B&H Higher Education
Dzemal Bijedic University of Mostar
Strengthening of Internationalisation in B&H Higher Education
Strengthening of Internationalisation in B&H Higher Education
Rankings from the perspective of European universities
Strategy of the Internationalisation of Slovenian Higher Education
Strengthening of Internationalisation in B&H Higher Education
Being a Local University: Towards New Assessment Tools and Indicators Dr John H Smith Senior Adviser, European University Association (EUA) Brussels Member,
Training on joint doctoral studies
Doctoral Education in Europe: An Introduction
Presentation transcript:

Strengthening of Internationalisation in B&H Higher Education International Strategic Partnerships Mónica Vieira Instituto Politécnico do Porto Banja Luka |B&H 7th – 10th March 2016 Project number: 561874-EPP-1-2015-1-BE-EPPKA2-CBHE-SP   "This project has been funded with support from the European Commission. This publication reflects the views only of the author, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein"

Strengthening of Internationalisation in B&H Higher Education Vladimir Kush, Atlas of Wonder Mónica Vieira Banja Luka | 07th – 10th March 2016

Internationalisation Strengthening of Internationalisation in B&H Higher Education Internationalisation Concept of comprehensive internationalisation (Hudzik, 2011) to infuse international and comparative perspectives throughout teaching a commitment confirmed through action research HEI Mission services Mónica Vieira Banja Luka | 07th – 10th March 2016

Internationalisation Strengthening of Internationalisation in B&H Higher Education Internationalisation a commitment – highest level HEI, from leadership, governance, staff, students through action – strategy, networking, partnerships, funding, recognition mechanisms …. to infuse international and comparative perspectives – includes credit and degree mobility for students, academic exchange and the search for global talent, curriculum development and learning outcomes, franchise operations and branch campuses Mónica Vieira Banja Luka | 07th – 10th March 2016

Strengthening of Internationalisation in B&H Higher Education International Strategic Partnerships (EAIE Barometer. 2016) Sandstrom and Weimer (2016) says in a study of the EAIE Barometer: International Strategic Partnership that to succeed in internationalisation field HEIs need to partner with others and formalise cooperation. Partner what for? Partner with whom? Mónica Vieira Banja Luka | 07th – 10th March 2016

International Strategic Partnerships (EAIE Barometer. 2016) Strengthening of Internationalisation in B&H Higher Education International Strategic Partnerships (EAIE Barometer. 2016) International Strategic Partnership as those that encourage durable collaboration between institutions and organisations by building sustainable academic networks, strengthening exchanges among students and staff, and enhancing exchanges of knowledges and practices. (Sandstrom and Weimer, 2016) Mónica Vieira Banja Luka | 07th – 10th March 2016

International Strategic Partnerships (EAIE Barometer. 2016) Strengthening of Internationalisation in B&H Higher Education International Strategic Partnerships (EAIE Barometer. 2016) Methodology Online Survey (Spring 2014): net response 2411 from 33 countries of the EHEA 2093 respondents worked at HEIs and represent approximately 1500 European institutions Mónica Vieira Banja Luka | 07th – 10th March 2016

International Strategic Partnerships (EAIE Barometer. 2016) Strengthening of Internationalisation in B&H Higher Education International Strategic Partnerships (EAIE Barometer. 2016) Study Quantity of partnerships Activeness of partnerships Targeted geographical regions Content of partnerships Institutional factors Conclusion Mónica Vieira Banja Luka | 07th – 10th March 2016

International Strategic Partnerships (EAIE Barometer. 2016) Strengthening of Internationalisation in B&H Higher Education International Strategic Partnerships (EAIE Barometer. 2016) Key findings: 1. Quantity of partnerships 75% perceived the number of institutional strategic partnerships has been increasing in Europe over the past 3 years; Some HEIs publicly promote a high number of international partnerships, other focus on and encourage more activity with a targeted region, smaller number of partnerships; There is great differences among countries in terms of the number of institutional partnerships EHEA average is 71 partnerships per institution Very important: authors clearly perceived from the differences in the responses that there are national and institutional differences in what is considered a ‘strategic’ partnership Mónica Vieira Banja Luka | 07th – 10th March 2016

International Strategic Partnerships (EAIE Barometer. 2016) Strengthening of Internationalisation in B&H Higher Education International Strategic Partnerships (EAIE Barometer. 2016) Key findings: 2. Activeness of partnerships The number of partnerships does not correlate with the level of activeness Although institutions with a deliberate strategic commitment to international partnering thus appear to pay more attention to the outcome of theses cooperation agreements. Despite the high number of strategic partnerships reported by many of the respondents, only 19% considered that ALL of their strategic partnerships are active, …. Mónica Vieira Banja Luka | 07th – 10th March 2016

International Strategic Partnerships (EAIE Barometer. 2016) Strengthening of Internationalisation in B&H Higher Education International Strategic Partnerships (EAIE Barometer. 2016) Key findings: 3. Targeted geographical regions The highest priority region for respondents was the EU-28, followed by Asia, North America and other European countries. EUA Trends 2015 report (Sursock, 2015) find the same trend where the 3 top geographical areas mentioned were EU (73%), Asia (48%) and USA/Canada (35%) Mónica Vieira Banja Luka | 07th – 10th March 2016

International Strategic Partnerships (EAIE Barometer. 2016) Strengthening of Internationalisation in B&H Higher Education International Strategic Partnerships (EAIE Barometer. 2016) Key findings: 4. Content of partnerships - Student exchange and staff mobility are the most common activities included in international strategic partnerships, followed by research collaboration. - 56% of the respondents indicated that joint or double degrees were included in strategic partnerships, while just under half reported that support staff exchange, curriculum development and knowledge exchange as included activities Mónica Vieira Banja Luka | 07th – 10th March 2016

International Strategic Partnerships (EAIE Barometer. 2016) Strengthening of Internationalisation in B&H Higher Education International Strategic Partnerships (EAIE Barometer. 2016) Key findings: 4. Content of partnerships Publicly funded institutions, for instance, appear to pay more attention to the quality of research, while privately funded ones are more concerned about attracting more international students (Engel et al 2015). Thus, there is reason to believe that, when it comes to strategic partnerships, higher education funding may influence the type of partnerships developed. Mónica Vieira Banja Luka | 07th – 10th March 2016

International Strategic Partnerships (EAIE Barometer. 2016) Strengthening of Internationalisation in B&H Higher Education International Strategic Partnerships (EAIE Barometer. 2016) Key findings: 5. Institutional factors International strategic partnerships are affected not only by national policies, institutional funding and strategic priorities, but also by the internal institutional organisation. At the majority of the respondents’ institutions, central management of the institution is responsible for approving international strategic partnerships. Mónica Vieira Banja Luka | 07th – 10th March 2016

International Strategic Partnerships (EAIE Barometer. 2016) Strengthening of Internationalisation in B&H Higher Education International Strategic Partnerships (EAIE Barometer. 2016) Key findings: 5. Institutional factors Institutions where the head of the international office approves strategic partnerships more often cited student and staff mobility as part of their partnerships, while respondents from institutions where the Board holds such responsibility more frequently noted research and innovation activities. Single international offices are more common among HEIs that are beginning to develop their internationalisation efforts, while decentralised offices with coordination mechanisms are more prevalent in later stages of internationalisation. At institutions with multiple offices with a coordination mechanism, a somewhat higher proportion of strategic partnerships are reported as active (ie indicating the highest combined score of ‘most’ and ‘all’ partnerships reported as active). Mónica Vieira Banja Luka | 07th – 10th March 2016

International Strategic Partnerships (EAIE Barometer. 2016) Strengthening of Internationalisation in B&H Higher Education International Strategic Partnerships (EAIE Barometer. 2016) CONSIDERATIONS FOR INTERNATIONAL STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIPS - DEVELOPING AN INTERNATIONAL STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIP POLICY - MANAGING INTERNATIONAL STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIPS Mónica Vieira Banja Luka | 07th – 10th March 2016

Strengthening of Internationalisation in B&H Higher Education REFERENCES Sandstrom, Anna-Malin, Weimer, L. (2016). International Strategic Partnerships. Amsterdam: European Association for International Education (EAIE). Retrieved from http://www.eaie.org/eaie-resources.html Sursock, A. (2015). Trends 2015: Learning and teaching in European universities. Brussels: European University Association (EUA). Mónica Vieira Banja Luka | 07th – 10th March 2016