Instructions The following PowerPoint (PPT) template should be used by Academic Program Review (APR) site team reviewers to develop their exit meeting.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The work of the Visiting Committee Chair. Important Reminders for the Chair of a Visiting Committee: The Chair of a Visiting Committee plays a most important.
Advertisements

UNSW Strategic Educational Development Grants
PROJECT TITLE Project Leader: Team: Executive Project Sponsor (As Required): Date: Month/Day/Year 110/17/2014 V1.
TITLE OF PROJECT PROPOSAL NUMBER Principal Investigator PI’s Organization ESTCP Selection Meeting DATE.
OVERVIEW OF ClASS METHODS and ACTIVITIES. Session Objectives By the end of the session, participants will be able to: Describe ClASS team composition.
TITLE OF PROJECT PROPOSAL NUMBER Principal Investigator PI’s Organization ESTCP Selection Meeting DATE.
ABET PRIMER What is ABET, What Does ABET Do, How Do We Do Well With ABET.
National Commission for Academic Accreditation & Assessment Preparation for Developmental Reviews.
Mentor Overview.
Internet password: aea8success Conceptbasedinstruction.weebly.com Password: Consortium1.
How to write a Report On Assessment Source: AUN Secretariat.
Pre-Review Orientation Conference Call Bureau of Health Workforce HRSA Health Careers Opportunity Program June 29 – July 1, am Review Administrator.
Pre-Review Orientation Conference Call Maternal and Child Health Bureau Universal Newborn Hearing Screening Program HRSA National Technical Resource.
A Possible SE 685 Project Automated Reviewers’ Report For ABET (Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology)
Concept Analysis Document Executive Summary Template, (To view template instructions – Save this template to project files, reopen and then select View,
Two Questions Coaching Program [Your Name] [Your Address] [Date] [please name the file: your-name-2questions.pptx] —e.g. bill-marshall-2questions.pptx.
Reviewing the 2015 AmeriCorps Applications & Conducting the Review AmeriCorps External Review.
Continuing Accreditation The Higher Learning Commission provides institutional accreditation through the evaluation of the entire university organization.
Copyright © 2009 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. Intel, the Intel logo, Intel Education Initiative, and the Intel Teach Program are trademarks.
Tips For Writing Your Learning Experience The most common problems and some suggestions.
How to Prepare for an Ohio Technical Assistance Visit.
The Big Picture Getting Started The Process Follow-Up – 5 Year Action Plan Program Review.
ABET 2000 Preparation: the Final Stretch Carnegie Institute of Technology Department Heads Retreat July 29, 1999.
Columbia University School of Engineering and Applied Science Review and Planning Process Fall 1998.
RPED 250 Fall Semester 2014 Dr. Phillip Bogle, Ph.D. Program Coordinator.
December 8, 2010 Ensuring Educator Excellence Accreditation Handbook 2. Team Member Ethics 3. Responsibilities prior to arriving at the Site Visit.
2013 Common Block Development Evaluation and Feedback February 26, 2014.
Copyright © 2009 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. Intel, the Intel logo, Intel Education Initiative, and the Intel Teach Program are trademarks.
PSRC FOCUSED INTERVENTION T EAM P ROCESS January 17, 2013 HAPPY NEW YEAR.
Program Evaluation Workshop Overview of the Site Visit Process Rita Marie Cain Professor of Business Law, Bloch School.
Type Date Here Type Presenter Name/Contact Here Creating & Implementing Your Plan October 2012.
MODULE 7 The Visit Report 1 CAPTE: On-site Reviewer Training This module discusses the report that the team submits at the conclusion of the on-site visit.
Academic Program Review Workshop 2017
Submission Requirements & Instructions
Principal Investigator ESTCP Selection Meeting
CBU CALIFORNIA BAPTIST UNIVERSITY Assessment, Accreditation, and Curriculum Office CBU - OIRPA.
Welcome. BSI Parent Night October 13, 2016 Mrs
Welcome. BSI Parent Night September 19, 2017 Mrs
Office 365 Security Assessment Workshop
Polices, procedures & protocols
Thinking with Technology Course Module 9
Principal Investigator ESTCP Selection Meeting
University Supervisors
Overview of the FEPAC Accreditation Process
Electronic Presentation Hall (EPH)
COM 373 Teaching Effectively-- snaptutorial.com
NPQonline - Final Assessment
Middle States Accreditation Standards and Processes
Validation Team Exit Report
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Tips For Writing Your Learning Experience
Validation Team Exit Report
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Validation Team Exit Report
College and Career Ready Standards Implementation Teams November 2014
The Process for Final Approval: Remediation
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Instructions: PLEASE DELETE BEFORE PRESENTATION
Assessing Academic Programs at IPFW
Reaccreditation and Illinois
Principal Investigator ESTCP Selection Meeting
Giving Feedback and Evaluating Academic Writing
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Western Association of Schools and Colleges Presentation
Principal Investigator ESTCP Selection Meeting
Cyclical Program Review
Validation Team Exit Report
Validation Team Exit Report
Care Partners Annual Meeting September 30, 2019 Davis, CA
Instructions The following PowerPoint (PPT) template should be used by Academic Program Review (APR) site team reviewers to develop their exit meeting.
Presentation transcript:

Instructions The following PowerPoint (PPT) template should be used by Academic Program Review (APR) site team reviewers to develop their exit meeting presentation. The template aligns with the APR criteria outlined in the Review Team Worksheet (APR Manual, Appendix E). Additional slides may be added as needed for feedback and/or comments. If a criterion is met no comments/feedback are necessary. Please skip the slide or include “N/A” for not applicable. Comments/Feedback should be detailed with reference to evidence provided in the APR self-study report and/or during the site visit. They should highlight the program’s strengths and/or shortcomings. Reviewers should avoid providing remedies, recommendations, and/or solutions they believe should be applied in order for the program to correct any shortcomings. The program and its own constituents, after sufficient opportunity for discussion and thought, must determine their own path forward. Please send a copy of the presentation to the APR Coordinator (apr@unm.edu) prior to the scheduled exit meeting. Please delete this slide before sending the final version of the presentation to the APR Coordinator.

Academic Program Review (APR) Exit Meeting Presentation Exit Meeting Date: Site Team Reviewers:

Overall Program Strengths:

Criterion 1: Program Goals Overall Findings (select one): Met (M), Not Met (NM), or Met with Concerns (MC) Findings on strengths: Findings on shortcomings:

Criterion 2: Teaching and Learning Curriculum Overall Findings (select one): Met (M), Not Met (NM), or Met with Concerns (MC) Findings on strengths: Findings on shortcomings:

Criterion 3: Teaching and Learning: Continuous Improvement Overall Findings (select one): Met (M), Not Met (NM), or Met with Concerns (MC) Findings on strengths: Findings on shortcomings:

Criterion 4: Students Overall Findings (select one): Met (M), Not Met (NM), or Met with Concerns (MC) Findings on strengths: Findings on shortcomings:

Criterion 5: Faculty Overall Findings (select one): Met (M), Not Met (NM), or Met with Concerns (MC) Findings on strengths: Findings on shortcomings:

Criterion 6: Resources and Planning Overall Findings (select one): Met (M), Not Met (NM), or Met with Concerns (MC) Findings on strengths: Findings on shortcomings:

Criterion 7: Facilities Overall Findings (select one): Met (M), Not Met (NM), or Met with Concerns (MC) Findings on strengths: Criterion 7: Facilities Findings on shortcomings:

Criterion 8: Program Comparisons Overall Findings (select one): Met (M), Not Met (NM), or Met with Concerns (MC) Findings on strengths: Findings on shortcomings:

Criterion 9: Future Directions Overall Findings (select one): Met (M), Not Met (NM), or Met with Concerns (MC) Findings on strengths: Findings on shortcomings: