Tracking(1) Kp2 decay-in-flight BG simulation

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CBM Calorimeter System CBM collaboration meeting, October 2008 I.Korolko(ITEP, Moscow)
Advertisements

Ozgur Ates Hampton University TREK Experiment “Tracking and Baseline Design” And OLYMPUS Experiment “Study of Systematics” 1.
Ozgur Ates Hampton University HUGS 2009-JLAB TREK Experiment “Tracking and Baseline Design”
Simulation Studies of a (DEPFET) Vertex Detector for SuperBelle Ariane Frey, Max-Planck-Institut für Physik München Contents: Software framework Simulation.
03 Aug NP041 KOPIO Experiment Measurement of K L    Hideki Morii (Kyoto Univ.) for the KOPIO collaborations Contents Physics Motivation.
Pair Spectrometer Design Optimization Pair Spectrometer Design Optimization A. Somov, Jefferson Lab GlueX Collaboration Meeting September
Pion yield studies for proton drive beams of 2-8 GeV kinetic energy for stopped muon and low-energy muon decay experiments Sergei Striganov Fermilab Workshop.
1 G4MICE studies of PID transverse acceptance MICE video conference Rikard Sandström.
MC Study of B°  S Jianchun Wang Syracuse University BTeV meeting 06/27/01.
Dec 2005Jean-Sébastien GraulichSlide 1 Improving MuCal Design o Why we need an improved design o Improvement Principle o Quick Simulation, Analysis & Results.
The PEPPo e - & e + polarization measurements E. Fanchini On behalf of the PEPPo collaboration POSIPOL 2012 Zeuthen 4-6 September E. Fanchini -Posipol.
HLab meeting 10/14/08 K. Shirotori. Contents SksMinus status –SKS magnet trouble –Magnetic field study.
Medium heavy Λ hyper nuclear spectroscopic experiment by the (e,e’K + ) reaction Graduate school of science, Tohoku University Toshiyuki Gogami for HES-HKS.
ハイパー核ガンマ線分光用 磁気スペクトロメータ -SksMinus- 東北大学 大学院理学研究科 白鳥昂太郎 ATAMI.
Status of the Beamline Simulation A.Somov Jefferson Lab Collaboration Meeting, May 11, 2010.
GlueX Particle Identification Ryan Mitchell Indiana University Detector Review, October 2004.
Original plan for secondary line installation. Hadron hall beamlines in Phase1 Hadron hall secondary beamlines ① ② ③ ④.
Analysis of PSI beam test R.Sawada 09/Feb/2004 MEG collaboration R.Sawada 09/Feb/2004 MEG collaboration
Analysis strategy of high multiplicity data Toshiyuki Gogami 24/Feb/2011.
Large Magnetic Calorimeters Anselmo Cervera Villanueva University of Geneva (Switzerland) in a Nufact Nufact04 (Osaka, 1/8/2004)
Setup for hypernuclear gamma-ray spectroscopy at J-PARC K.Shirotori Tohoku Univ. Japan for the Hyperball-J collaboration J-PARC E13 hypernuclear  -ray.
Update of the DeeMe spectrometer design and its performance Nguyen Duy Thong, Masaharu Aoki, Doug Bryman C, Satoshi Mihara A, Yohei Nakatsugawa A, Hiroaki.
M. Aoki Translation of slides in 2010 JPS meeting (Okayama) By K. Shimomura and M. Aoki M. Aoki A , T. Ebihara A , N. Kawamura , Y. Kuno A , P. Strasser.
Yosuke Watanabe….. University of Tokyo, RIKEN A, KEK C, Development of a GEM tracker for E16 J-PARC 1 Thanks to ???????????
Start Counter Collaboration Meeting September 2004 W. Boeglin FIU.
Mitglied der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Calibration of the COSY-TOF STT & pp Elastic Analysis Sedigheh Jowzaee IKP Group Talk 11 July 2013.
Apollo Go, NCU Taiwan BES III Luminosity Monitor Apollo Go National Central University, Taiwan September 16, 2002.
PID simulations Rikard Sandström University of Geneva MICE collaboration meeting RAL.
A search for strange tribaryonic states in the reaction Heejoong Yim Seoul National University For KEK-PS E549 collaboration.
Analysis strategy of high multiplicity data Toshiyuki Gogami 24/Feb/2011.
HLAB meeting paper 2011/1/18 T.Gogami CLAS ( CEBAF Large Acceptance Spectrometer ) Clam shell is open.
JPS 2003 in Sendai Measurement of spectral function in the decay 1. Motivation ~ Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment ~ 2. Event selection 3. mass.
Active polarimeter simulation Suguru Shimizu Osaka University Sep. 1, 2007 JPARC TREK Collaboration meeting at Saskatchewan.
CERF simulation Mitsu 14th Feb Simulation components Production Transportation Detector response
Neutron measurement with nuclear emulsion Mitsu KIMURA 27th Feb 2013.
J-PARC でのハイパー核ガンマ線分光実験用 散乱粒子磁気スペクトロメータ検出器の準備 状況 東北大理, 岐阜大教 A, KEK B 白鳥昂太郎, 田村裕和, 鵜養美冬 A, 石元茂 B, 大谷友和, 小池武志, 佐藤美沙子, 千賀信幸, 細見健二, 馬越, 三輪浩司, 山本剛史, 他 Hyperball-J.
Master thesis 2006 Shirotori1 Hypernuclear gamma-ray spectroscopy at J-PARC K1.8 beam line 東北大学大学院理学研究科 原子核物理 白鳥昂太郎.
D 0 reconstruction: 15 AGeV – 25 AGeV – 35 AGeV M.Deveaux, C.Dritsa, F.Rami IPHC Strasbourg / GSI Darmstadt Outline Motivation Simulation Tools Results.
A High Statistics Study of the Decay M. Fujikawa for the Belle Collaboration Outline 1.Introduction 2.Experiment Belle detector 3.Analysis Event selection.
3 May 2003, LHC2003 Symposium, FermiLab Tracking Performance in LHCb, Jeroen van Tilburg 1 Tracking performance in LHCb Tracking Performance Jeroen van.
HKS collaboration 2008/5/16 Wedding Party 2008/5/10.
M. Ellis - MICE Collaboration Meeting - Wednesday 27th October Sci-Fi Tracker Performance Software Status –RF background simulation –Beam simulation.
Track finding with g-2 silicon tracker 2 nd Workshop on Muon g-2 and EDM in the LHC Era May 5, 2012 Kazuki Ueno (RIKEN)
SIMULATION OF BACKGROUND REDUCTION TECHNIQUES FOR Ge DBD DETECTORS Héctor Gómez Maluenda. University of Zaragoza. GERDA/Majorana MC Meeting.
FP-CCD GLD VERTEX GROUP Presenting by Tadashi Nagamine Tohoku University ILC VTX Ringberg Castle, May 2006.
Λハイパー核の弱崩壊実験 S. Ajimura (RCNP) Nonmesonic weak decay of hypernuclei
Feasibility of neutron asymmetry measurements with NICA MPD K
Seoul National University On behalf of J-PARC E18 Collaboration
The MiniBooNE Little Muon Counter Detector
Study of Hypernuclei with Heavy Ion Beams (HypHI) at GSI Shizu Minami GSI, Germany on behalf of HypHI collaboration Introduction Phase 0 experiment R.
Preliminary T2K beam simulation using the G4 2km detector
Newt Ganugapati and Teresa Montaruli
Muon stopping target optimization
L/E analysis of the atmospheric neutrino data from Super-Kamiokande
IHEP group Shashlyk activity towards TDR
Status of the OPERA experiment
MICE Collaboration Meeting
Track Finding.
MAGIX Detectors Overview
KLOE Drift Chamber Review L.N.F. – March 9, 2001
Pure  exposure for e/ separation
Osaka University RCNP Toshinao Tsunemi
The First
Higgs Factory Backgrounds
GEANT Simulations and Track Reconstruction
Antoine Cazes Université Claude Bernard Lyon-I December 16th, 2008
E19 result Ryuta Kiuchi (SNU)
Understanding of the E391a Detector using KL decay
Background Simulations at Fermilab
Presentation transcript:

Tracking(1) Kp2 decay-in-flight BG simulation Sep. 1, 2007 JPARC TREK Collaboration meeting at Saskatchewan Tracking(1) Kp2 decay-in-flight BG simulation K. Horie Osaka University

Simple estimation of Kp2 BG fraction Fraction of Kp2 decay-in-flight in the target is BR(Kp2)/BR(Km3) * decay probability ~ * (1.- exp (target radius / bgct) ) ~1. momentum of Kp2 p+ 205MeV/c; b= 0.84 bgct ~ 100cm target radius ~ 10cm 1- exp(-10/100) ~ 0.1 The number of Kp2 decay-in-flight in the target is comparable to the number of Km3 events

Target and tracking Last meeting at KEK Source of Kp2 BG (1)scatter in the spectrometer (2)dif in the spectrometer can be rejected by installing C0. (3)dif before C0 … to be rejected by target fiber. This talk MC simulation (GEANT3) for Kp2 BG rejection (1) fiber size (2) target thickness (3) Kp2 BG fraction

Analysis of target fiber Energy deposit in each fiber (MeV) Maximum energy deposit in 1 fiber (MeV) fiber geometry square type □2mm 20 cm length target radius : 3cm K+ beam 800 MeV/c, pencil beam 2 different type of ADC or amplifier are needed. total energy deposit (MeV) number of hit fiber

Fiber size and spatial resolution of K+ stopping position K+ stopping position was determined as a function of fiber size by GEANT3. Analysis method Method 1 : K+ stopping position was determined by 1 fiber position which has the maximum energy deposit. Method 2: K+ stopping position was determined by energy weighted average of 2 fiber positions which has the maximum and 2nd maximum energy deposit. Energy deposit H L x x x Method 1 Method 2

Spatial resolution of K+ stopping position as a function of fiber size rdiff =true – measured method 1 L=1.5mm method 1 L=2mm L open : method 1 (using 1 fiber info.) closed: method 2 (using 2 fibers info.) K+ stopping position was obtained to be 0.07cm in RMS. method 1 L=2.5mm L (cm)

Kp2-dif fraction in Km3 sample Kp2 decay-in-flight fraction was obtained as a function of target radius by a GEANT3 code. C0(GEM) position was fixed and more realistic than the previous study. rGEM= 8cm, s=0.01cm tracking c2 4 point tracking (C0, C2, C3, C4) with a c2 cut m requirement by TOF P>185 MeV/c or back-to-back events are rejected. Km3 Kp2

Target diff. spectra K+ stop. pos. (hit-fit) (cm) Most of survived Kp2 events after Km3 selection is p+ decay-in-flight before C0 chamber. Resolution of K+ stopping position (s=0.07cm) is not considered. rtarg=5cm rtarg=5cm rtarg=5cm rtarg=5cm rtarg=3cm rtarg=3cm rtarg=3cm Km3 0.12 cm in RMS 0.07 cm in RMS Kp2 Kp2 BG could be rejected by target diff. cut.

Results of Kp2 BG fraction Kp2 background fraction can be obtained as BG fraction= Ω is the detector acceptance with Km3 selection conditions. Br(Kp2)* Ω(Kp2) Br(Km3)* Ω(Km3) event survive factor for target diff. cut red: 5cm radius blue: 3 cm radius

Summary Fraction of Kp2 dif BG is estimated by using a GEANT3 for target radius of 3cm and 5cm . Most of survived Kp2 events after Km3 selection is p+ decay-in-flight before C0 chamber. Arrangement of target fiber with C0 is key point to reject. Resolution of K+ stopping position is evaluated. 0.07cm in RMS Fraction of Kp2 BG is controlled to be 0.1-0.5% level.

backup

Consistency of Kpi2 BG fraction between last reported value and this talk previous reported at KEK BG fraction = 0.3 % Difference Feb. Aug. GEM s=200micron 100micron r= 5cm 8cm target r=3cm 3cm, 5cm tracking c2 cut adequate adequate target diff. cut loose adequate

Simple estimation of Kp2 BG events momentum of Kp2 p+ 205MeV/c; b= 0.84 bgct is nearly 100cm target radius is neary 10cm 1- exp(-10/100) is nearly prob= 0.1 fraction of Kp2 decay in flight in the target is BR(Kp2)/BR(Km3) * prob is neary 1. The number of Kp2 decay-in-flight in the target is comparable to the number of Kmu3 events