Progress on the MICE RF Systems

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Andrew Moss ASTeC MICE RF workshop 16t h February 2012 Daresbury Laboratory Response to RF review for the MICE RF system.
Advertisements

RF Specification discussion MICE RF workshop 16 th April 2012.
MICE RF Cavities and RFCC Module Update Derun Li Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory MICE RF Workshop Daresbury Laboratory, UK April 17, 2012 April 17,
MICE RF and Coupling Coil Module Outstanding Issues Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory MICE Collaboration Meeting October 26, 2004.
Status of the MICE RF System K Ronald, University of Strathclyde For the MICE RF team MICE Project Board & RLSR, 24th November
Andrew Moss ASTeC MICE Project Board 28 th June 2011 MICE RF System.
Progress of the sub-harmonic bunching system (i.e. upgrading progress of BEPCII present bunching system) Pei Shilun for the SHBS team Accelerator center,
MICE Refurbishment of CERN RF equipment for MICE M. Vretenar, CERN AB/RF.
Collaboration meeting, RAL, 4 th – 7th November 2009 Andrew Moss ASTeC Collaboration meeting, RAL, 10 th – 13 th november 2009 MICE RF Amplifier Status.
RF systems for MICE Andrew Moss The MICE RF Group and the TIARA WP7 Team Contributions include Daresbury, RAL, CERN, LBNL, LANL, FNAL, Strathclyde & Sheffield.
Andrew Moss Daresbury Laboratory Collaboration Meeting th 19 th October 2012 RAL MICE RF System review.
Andrew Moss Daresbury Laboratory August 2013 Latest results of MICE amplifier testing.
Status of the MICE RF System K Ronald, University of Strathclyde For the MICE RF team 1MICE Project Board, 17th April 2015.
THE MICE RF SYSTEM J.F.Orrett* A.J.Moss, ASTeC, Daresbury Laboratory, WA4 4AD, UK Accelerator Science and Technology Centre
Progress on the MICE 201 MHz Cavity Design Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab RF Working Group Fermilab August 22, 2007  automatic.
Paul Drumm 30 March 2004 MICE at RF Power System: power source, distribution Paul Drumm RAL Ambitious title!
RF Synchronisation Issues
Alessandro Cappelletti for CTF3 collaboration 5 th May 2010 RESULTS OF BEAM BASED RF POWER PRODUCTION IN CTF3.
Status of the MICE RF System K Ronald, University of Strathclyde For the MICE RF team 1MICE Project Board, 17th April 2015.
Status of the MICE RF System K Ronald, University of Strathclyde For the MICE RF team 1MICE Project Board, 17th April 2015.
RF Cavity / Coupling Coil Module
Single-Cavity Module Installation at MuCool Test Area Yağmur Torun MICE Collaboration Meeting February 15, 2013.
SLHC-PP – WP7 Critical Components for Injector Upgrade Plasma Generator – CERN, DESY, STFC-RAL Linac4 2MHz RF source Thermal Modeling Gas Measurement and.
Andrew Moss ASTeC 7 th December 2011 MICE RF System.
Andrew Moss Daresbury Laboratory Collaboration Meeting th -16 th February 2013 Coseners House MICE RF HP System rprogress.
Collaboration meeting, DL, 19 h – 23 h October 2008 Andrew Moss ASTeC Collaboration meeting, DL, 19 th – 23 th October 2008 MICE RF distribution system.
ATF2 Q-BPM System 19 Dec Fifth ATF2 Project Meeting J. May, D. McCormick, T. Smith (SLAC) S. Boogert (RH) B. Meller (Cornell) Y. Honda (KEK)
MICE RFCC Module Update Allan DeMello Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory MAP Winter Collaboration Meeting at JLab, Virginia February 28, 2011.
Progress on the MICE RF Systems K Ronald, University of Strathclyde For the MICE RF team 1MICE Project Board 14th November 2013.
Status of RFCC-Module Development Derun Li Center for Beam Physics Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory MICE Collaboration Meeting at INFN-LNF, Frascati,
201 MHz NC RF Cavity R&D for Muon Cooling Channels
RFCC Module Design Update  automatic tuners  cavity suspension  cavity installation Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab MICE Collaboration.
MICE RF – TIARA and General Progress Tim Stanley RAL 5 June 2013.
Andrew Moss ASTeC Collaboration meeting CM29 15 th - 18 th February 2011 MICE RF System.
Muon- RF Phase Determination K Ronald, Strathclyde Contributions from many MICE: Tim Stanley, Chris Rogers, Rutherford Lab, Yordan Karadzhov, Geneva, Paul.
Andrew Moss ASTeC CM32 9t h February 2012 RAL MICE RF System.
MICE RF System Power Supplies, Control and Monitoring Status report February 2012 Chris White, STFC Daresbury Laboratory MICE Collaboration Meeting CM32,
MICE RFCC Module Update Allan DeMello Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory MICE CM29 at RAL, UK February 17, 2011.
Ding Sun and David Wildman Fermilab Accelerator Advisory Committee
Renovation of the 200 MHz RF system LLRF issues. Cavities redistribution 26 October th LIU-SPS Coordination Meeting 2  2011 : 4 cavities 2 x 4.
Progress on the MICE RF High Power Drive Systems K Ronald, University of Strathclyde For the MICE RF team 1MICE CM38 RF Parallel Session.
1 Collaboration Meeting 33 - Glasgow 26 th June 2012 Design Layout Andrew Moss for Alan Grant, STFC.
Andrew Moss ASTeC TIARA Mid term meeting 12 th 14 th June 2012 CIEMAT ICTF Progress on the MICE RF System.
MICE RF System Overview Derun Li Center for Beam Physics Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Andrew Moss STFC Daresbury Laboratory MICE UK.
Status of the MICE RF System K Ronald, University of Strathclyde For the MICE RF team 1MICE Project Board, 30 th April 2014.
RF Review CM37 Andrew Moss. Amplifier results at Daresbury 2MW at 35kV, good efficiency and gain.
The MICE RF System K Ronald, University of Strathclyde For the MICE RF team 1MICE RF Review, 9th September 2015.
Status of the MICE RF System K Ronald, University of Strathclyde For the MICE RF team 1MICE Project Board, 6th April 2016.
MICE RF – Installation at RAL Tim Stanley RAL 7 November 2013.
RF Module Update MICE Collaboration Meeting 44 Andrew Lambert Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory March 30 th, 2016.
201 MHz Cavity Plans Derun Li Center for Beam Physics Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory February 11, 2011 MAP Friday Video Conference Meeting.
Status of Vertical Test Stand at RRCAT P Shrivastava, P Mohania,D.Baxy, Vikas Rajput S C Joshi, S Raghavendra,S K Suhane RRCAT, Indore November 26, 2012.
MICE Demonstration of Ionisation Cooling Colin Whyte University of Strathclyde On behalf of the MICE collaboration 1RF Review 9th-10th Sept. 2015, Abingdon.
Standalone Commissioning Plan in MICE Hall K Ronald, University of Strathclyde For the MICE RF team 1MICE RF Review 9th Sept 2016.
RF Module Integration Colin Whyte University of Strathclyde on behalf of the MICE collaboration 1RF Review 9th & 10th Sept '15 Abingdon.
Linac RF System Design Options Y. Kang RAD/SNS/NScD/ORNL Project – X Collaboration Meeting April , 2011.
RF System to RF Module Interface C Whyte, University of Strathclyde For the MICE RF team 1 MICE RF Module Engineering Review LBNL Center for Beam Physics.
The RF Phase Determination for MICE Alexander Dick For the MICE RF Team.
Muon-transit RF Phase Determination K Ronald, University of Strathclyde For the MICE RF group 1MICE Optics Review, 15th January 2016.
Andrew Moss ASTeC, Daresbury Laboratory October 2010 MICE RF Amplifier Status.
Status of the MICE RF System
Completion of the MICE-US construction project
MICE RF System Power Supplies, Control and Monitoring Status report
Overview of the RFCC Module and 201-MHz Cavity Design
TTC Topical Workshop - CW SRF, Cornell 12th – 14th June 2013
An X-band system for phase space linearisation on CLARA
BE/RF-IS Contribution to LIU C. Rossi and M. Paoluzzi
12 GHz High Power RF components requirements for CEA activities
UK RFD Pre-Series cryomodule
CEPC RF Power Sources System
Presentation transcript:

Progress on the MICE RF Systems K Ronald, University of Strathclyde For the MICE RF team MICE RLSR 13th November 2013

Specifications for the MICE RF system To demonstrate sustained cooling (MICE Step VI) requires 8 cavities at 8MV/m Two sets of four cavities bracketed by the absorber chambers Each cavity is 430mm long with a Q of 44,000 and is resonant at 201.25MHz The cavities must operate in a strong magnetic field environment Driver system must provide 1MW to each cavity (500kW on each coupler) Provide required energy with four 2MW amplifier chains Distribution network must not impede service access to cooling channel LLRF phase control of 0.5o and 1% in amplitude regulation Require a system to determine the RF phase in each cavity during the transit of each individual Muon Required to allow the experiment to compare the impact of the cooling channel on each particle Comparison of tracker measurements of phase space with predictions will test our understanding of the cooling process MICE RLSR 13th November 2013

Contents To meet the above requirements, there have been four main activities in the MICE RF project in the last six months Each will be presented here High power RF driver system tests to demonstrate require 2MW power Demonstration of installation and operation in Hall constraints i.e. behind the shield wall TIARA deliverable Preparations to test the first MICE cavity at the MTA (FNAL) Outline design of a system to determine the RF phase at muon entry to channel MICE RLSR 13th November 2013

High Power Driver System The RF cavities are to be driven in adjacent, coupled pairs with a fixed phase angle between coupled pairs Each coupled pair to be driven by a 2MW, 201.25MHz amplifier chain Arbitrary phase control between separate coupled pairs of cavities SSPA (~4kW) driving Tetrode (~250kW max) driving Triode (2MW max) Since last report all issues with the Power Supply and valve seating have been successfully resolved Key difficulty was a faulty thyratron valve in the crowbar (protection) circuit Temporary solutions with lower specification switch Required reduced operating specification to protect TH116 e2v Technologies offered outstanding support Three prototype thyratron valves made available to project Stable operation at required bias voltage possible Allowed correct tuning of amplifier to be realised MICE RLSR 13th November 2013

Demonstration of required RF signal Once tuned the amplifier chain operated at the desired pulsed output level, 1Hz, 1ms, 2MW, 201.25MHz HT feedline, Output 9 inch coaxial line, Input 3 inch line Team developed for RF tests and installation at MICE A. Moss and C. White (Daresbury) have worked with T. Stanley (RAL), K. Ronald, C. Whyte and A. Dick (Strathclyde) and S. Alsari (Imperial) This provides the team required to operate the system at MICE MICE RLSR 13th November 2013

High Power Driver System Triode DC bias and drive brought up together Maintaining ~10dB gain Performance achieved: 2.06MW output RF 34kV bias voltage 129A forward average current h=46% (electronic) Gain 10.8dB Input port return loss -12.5dB VSWR 1.6 Drive from Tetrode 170kW output RF 18kV bias voltage 15.5A forward average current h=61% (electronic) Gain 19dB Drive from SSPA 2.27kW Drive from synthesised oscillator 3.7dBm MICE RLSR 13th November 2013

Distribution network and procurement Unchanged since last meeting Vast majority of distribution network procured through Univ. of Mississippi Encompasses Loads, Hybrid Couplers, Reducers, Gas Barriers, Directional Couplers, elbows, line trimmers, etc In addition Mississippi have procured key components to build further amplifiers chains and components for the RF cavities, including Capacitors and Chargers Tetrode valves and tetrode valve amplifier enclosures LLRF boards Tuner components for cavities Some $1M (US) delivered to RAL under MoU between STFC and Univ. of Mississippi Total consignment > 6 tonnes MICE RLSR 13th November 2013

Distribution network Amplifiers behind Shield Wall Amplifiers installed behind shield wall Triodes on main floor, Tetrodes on Mezzanine Impact of B-fields negated by yoke Line installation planed before yoke support risers High power dynamic phase shifters removed 4 off 6 inch coax lines over wall Pressurised to increase power handling Hybrid splitters moved - more accessible Minimises clutter and increases service access to the amplifier stations Line lengths matched using 3D CAD Manually adjustable line trimmers installed at cavity to take up assembly errors in coax length Easier to assemble – introduced flexible coax Allows for small misalignments 2 Hybrids split output from the Berkeley Amplifiers on amplifier side of wall CERN amplifiers have two outputs 4 hybrids on MICE side of shield wall Split power for the opposed couplers of each cavity Lines will be pressurised with 2Bar Nitrogen Distribution Network to MICE MICE RLSR 13th November 2013

TIARA test preparations Tiara final requirement is to demonstrate one of the amplifiers operating in the confines of the MICE Amplifier space Amplifier No.1 dismantled at DL and Transported to RAL Installation proceeding rapidly Expect demonstration of entire chain at 500kW in MICE hall by 20th December 2013 4616 tetrode system awaiting electrical connect 116 triode fitted to endstage amplifier Water and air distribution systems installed MICE RLSR 13th November 2013

Cavity tests at the MTA The first MICE cavity will be tested at the MTA Tests will be done in a specially commissioned single cavity test stand 1st MICE cavity EP’ed at LBNL Vacuum vessel built at Keller Be windows in hand Actuators built at LBNL Tuner forks built at FNAL New coupler fabrication in progress at LBNL • Assembly/integration – Cavity and vessel at Lab-6 – Clean room prepared, assembly in progress – Tuner control bench tested – Detailed installation and logistics plan developed – Expect operation early 2014 • Ultimately will be tested with the first Coupling Coil Magnet – Requires 6-month MTA shutdown (2015) MICE RLSR 13th November 2013

Coupler fabrication at LBNL Fabrication nearing completion for the first two couplers Coupler conditioning planned to be conducted in situ on cavity MICE RLSR 13th November 2013

Demonstration of tuner operation Cavities will be tuned to and ultimately held on resonance by mechanical deformation by a set of six pneumatically driven tuner forks Fork test fit on cavity in Lab-6 Stiffener rings and forks surveyed Fork contact pads overcut for shims Gas control system has been build Controls tested by deformation of a test ring (single tuner) After initial tests the RF control will be linked to the tuner control via RS-485 and pneumatic system MICE RLSR 13th November 2013

Cleanroom assembly and test installation of cavity Test stand vacuum envelope tested to ~10-7mBar Cavity has been assembled with tuners Six tuner tests in December Trial of cavity insertion allowed testing of Simplified insertion fixture New lift attachment Cavity successfully inserted and suspended with struts Minor issue revealed with strut suspension system Cavity temporarily removed Replacement strut bodies from dissimilar material under fabrication Builds experience for assembly of first RFC Module MICE RLSR 13th November 2013

LLRF development Exploits two LLRF4 boards from LBNL – now purchased Agreements with LBNL established to develop system Basic design of hardware and software is done Daresbury have tested all major features, including the feed-forward control system on a recent 1.3GHz system (separate project) Design remains fundamentally unchanged Hardware and software can be applied to MICE 201.25MHz Requires straightforward modification of the analogue system Can be achieved in ~ 3 months Systems in use already with EPICS control Prior to cavities arriving, can build cavity simulator Allows testing of the timing diagnostic MICE RLSR 13th November 2013

Requirements for Muon-RF Phase Timing ToF detectors provide 50ps resolution time stamp for the particle Systematic delays well understood Trackers define muon orbital trajectory Predict delay to first cavity- this is the time we want to ‘perform’ our RF phase measurement It is likely that this time mark will not be available until significantly later than the transit time of the Muons In order to not compromise the current resolution Ideally want accuracy to be 50ps/3, ~17ps, ~1o. May be relaxed subject to advice from analysis group Vital to achieve stable synchronisation with ToF signals Can exploit known properties of RF signal to assist Worst case scenario- cavity linewidth is ~50kHz in 201.25MHz centre, 2.5 parts in 10000 Max phase shift in 1 cycle is ~0.1o. Can therefore project about 10 cycles from measurement point Adding only 1o to the error Requires accurate measurement as baseline for projection May be substantially eased by the LLRF feedback loop gain bandwidth MICE RLSR 13th November 2013

Phase Detection Schemes RF zero crossing easiest to define and provides best trigger edge Detector clock should be synchronised with ToF Use external clock (from LLRF or alternative source) to sync clock cycles Use LLRF Feed-Forward complete trigger to sync all timebases No interesting data till LLRF enters closed loop for phase Confirms peak gradient achieved Phase Detection: TDC Approach Could use Caen V1290A TDC’s and LeCroy 4415A Discriminators used for ToF Known hardware and programming interface Minimises electrical length uncertainty and thermal variability Limited to 25ps resolution May requires resolution enhancement e.g. Analogue interpolator (requires knowledge of amplitude) e.g. Enhanced digital Vernier demands high clock and comparator performance Requires discriminators tested in 201MHz environment: Alternate Phillips 704 rated to 300MHz Use alternative, faster TDC Agilent/Acqiris semi analogue device Is unproven, new programming and hardware interface Has different hardware limitations to understand MICE RLSR 13th November 2013

TDC Enhancement Scheme The resolution of the ToF detectors is ~50ps In order not to compromise this when quadrature combining errors, ideally our error should be <1/3 the ToF uncertainty The Caen TDC’s do not quite match this in terms of their resolution (25ps) It may be possible to enhance resolution with a form of analogue interpolation Exploits knowledge of the signal amplitude and time evolution Dependent on the performance of the discriminators and stability of the TDC Either by delay lines to offset phase OR staggered triggers in discriminators Thermal stability of LeCroy 4415A seems promising for staggered triggers May require highly stabilised power supply Tn-1 V/V0 Delay Box Tn Tn+1 Discriminators (RF) TDC’s (RF) /ps TDC ‘Clock’ RF reference MICE RLSR 13th November 2013

Phase Detection Schemes RF zero crossing easiest to define and provides best trigger edge Detector clock should be synchronised with ToF Use external clock (from LLRF or alternative source) to sync clock cycles Use LLRF Feed-Forward complete trigger to sync all timebases No interesting data till LLRF enters closed loop for phase Confirms peak gradient achieved Phase Detection: Digitiser Approaches Could use digitisers to record waveform Would involve a lot of data if we require Nyquist on 201MHz But since narrowband- have options Sequential burst acquisitions on a regular periodicity Undersampled waveforms and DSP signal reconstruction Both techniques require proving Give amplitude data- useful for TDC analogue interpolation Suitable digitisers quoted by Agilent and Caen; Additional vendors possible MICE RLSR 13th November 2013

Digitiser Sparse Data Approach 1: Subsampling We know with quite high precision the form of the accelerating field in time 201.25MHz (50kHz width) Do not need to satisfy Nyquist on the signal, only on the bandpass signal ¦FFT¦ V DFT of 201.25MHz. 10ms pulse 1V Amplitude, 600MSa/sec DFT /ns MICE RLSR 13th November 2013 f/Hz

Digitiser Sparse Data Approach 1: Subsampling We know with quite high precision the form of the accelerating field in time 201.25MHz (50kHz width) Do not need to satisfy Nyquist on the signal, only on the bandpass signal ¦FFT¦ Mirrored alias V DFT of 201.25MHz. 10ms pulse 1V Amplitude, 60MSa/sec Note no overlap between adjacent aliases Can use DSP analysis? Map baseband up by 180MHz DFT /ns MICE RLSR 13th November 2013 f/Hz

Digitiser Sparse Data Approach 1: Sequential Sampling We know with quite high precision the form of the accelerating field in time Could sample short burst of the signal using high speed (> Nyquist on 201.25MHz) digitisers in sequential timebase mode V /ns Need to understand the accuracy of the fitting process and resulting projections As a function of the sample rate and sequence spacing, duration As a function of the noise in the system, tuning by the LLRF MICE RLSR 13th November 2013

Time delays Cable solutions If we use new electronics, we will need to assess the delays and delay stability cf. the ToF electronics Network analysers/simulations to define the systematic delays in the RF system Cable used in the ToF system RG213, 40m long Has acceptable RF bandwidth Not particularly mechanically nor thermally stable Cable solutions Could take cavity signal to ToF, or LLRF reference oscillator signal to ToF on high performance cable Use RG213 laid in parallel with ToF cable to achieve maximum equalisation of the thermal response Measure to define electrical length after installation Provide redundant spare cables to test for variation in electrical length Check cable performance as we want a stability below the ToF detectors resolution MICE RLSR 13th November 2013

Overview of Timing Critical Elements Sketch illustrates relationships of key components in STEP V configuration STEP VI similar Work in progress: Mathematical tests of digitiser interpolation Test sensitivity to vertical resolution, temporal sample rate, noise Work in progress: Understand cable stability Work to be undertaken: Test TDC/Discriminators in 201.25 MHz environment If necessary test alternative hardware Digitisers Cavities 3&4 (RG213) Cavities 1&2 (RG213) Cavities 1&2 Cavities 3&4 Discriminators (RF) ToF 1 Beamline TDC’s (RF) ToF Signals RG213 HPRF Computers HPRF MO Signal (RG213) RF Amp 2 RF Amp 1 Discriminators (ToF) RF RF Drive LLRF Feedback TDC’s (ToF) RF Drive 201.25 MHz LLRF MO LLRF Trigger Clock Datarecorders MICE RLSR 13th November 2013

Summary High Power Drivers Have achieved specification on system No.1, 2MW for 1ms at 1Hz and 201.25MHz Require commissioning of systems No.2-4 Installation of system No.1 at RAL underway Tests will be undertaken in December Major procurement effort complete Most components required for distribution network Many components required for amplifiers and LLRF work Cavity Status Cavity test assembly has been undertaken, Tuner tests underway: completion December Coupler fabrication in hand High power tests expected in January, later tests in magnetic fields System has been defined to allow RF phase to be compared to Muon event times Will exploit a combination of TDC and digitiser techniques Interpolation methods for subsampled and sequential waveforms being tested now Performance of TDC/Discriminators needs to be proven experimentally Daresbury have offerred to build a ‘Cavity Simulator’ using LLRF boards Will allow tests of the timing system components In a safe lab enviroment MICE RLSR 13th November 2013