Problem: A kicker failure can deposit 9 x 1011 protons on any metallic

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Preliminary studies for T2 primary target for the NA61 fragmentation beam run 11 th October 2010 – NA61 Collaboration Meeting M. Calviani on behalf of.
Advertisements

FLUKA studies: channeled ions on LHC IP7 L. Lari (CERN & IFIC (CSIC-UV)) D. Mirarchi (CERN & ICL) A. Lechner (CERN) ColUSM#32 December the 6 th,
Wire scanners MDW chicane energy collimator 3 MPS collimators in this region end of linac Damage Simulation in MPS Collimators L. Keller Apr. 9, 2006.
Coll Eng E Doyle 1/18 LARP Phase II Secondary Collimator RC1 Prototype Engineering Status 6/21/06 Jaw-hub-shaft concept - continued Permanent.
PROBLEM: Radiation Dose Rate in IR2 When IR1 is Operating (and Vice Versa) Muon Dose Rate > 1 mRem/hr for 0.1% Collimated Halo.
BLM thresholds for MQW magnets V. Raginel, B. Auchmann, D. Wollmann BLM Threshold Working Group meeting, 24/02/2015.
GRD - Collimation Simulation with SIXTRACK - MIB WG - October 2005 LHC COLLIMATION SYSTEM STUDIES USING SIXTRACK Ralph Assmann, Stefano Redaelli, Guillaume.
Loss maps of RHIC Guillaume Robert-Demolaize, BNL CERN-GSI Meeting on Collective Effects, 2-3 October 2007 Beam losses, halo generation, and Collimation.
Beam LARP Rotatable Collimator Mechanical Engineering Discussion 03 October 2008 Phase II CERN ME Video Mtg. Tom Markiewicz/SLAC BNL - FNAL- LBNL - SLAC.
H- beam collimation in the transfer line from 8 GeV linac to the Main Injector A. Drozhdin The beam transfer line from 8 GeV Linac to the Main Injector.
LHC Phase II Collimator Compact jaw simulations New FLUKA => ANSYS mapping scheme New 136mm x 950mm jaw –60cm primary collimator –Helical cooling channel.
Status of Phase II Energy Loss Studies 1. FLUKA with “simple” CERN-provided input file modeling ~40m around primary collimators used for all SLAC studies.
Estimation of temperature increase in the dump through Monte – Carlo simulations and rough calculations N. Charitonidis (EN/MEF)
The SLAC Phase II Collimator Program 15 June 2005 CERN Team Visit Tom Markiewicz SLAC BNL - FNAL- LBNL - SLAC US LHC Accelerator Research Program.
LER Workshop, CERN, October 11-12, 2006Detector Safety with LER - Henryk Piekarz1 LHC Accelerator Research Program bnl-fnal-lbnl-slac Accelerator & Detector.
Status of FLUKA Simulations for Collimation BLM Thresholds 6 th BLM Threshold Working Group 10/02/2015 E.Skordis On behalf of the FLUKA team Sixtrack input.
DS Heat Load Scenarios in Collision Points and Cleaning Insertions. Prepared by F. Cerutti, A.Lechner and G. Steele on behalf of the FLUKA team (EN-STI)
Updates on FLUKA simulations of TCDQ halo loads at IR6 FLUKA team & B. Goddard LHC Collimation Working Group March 5 th, 2007.
Simulations of TCT beam impacts for different scenarios R. Bruce, E. Quaranta, S. RedaelliAcknowledgement: L. Lari, C. Bracco, B. Goddard.
Collimator and beamline heating External Review of the LHC Collimation Project CERN Wed 30/6/2004.
Design Review of the 1 st Rotatable Collimator (RC1) Prototype Project Overview 15 December 2005 Tom Markiewicz/SLAC BNL - FNAL- LBNL - SLAC US LHC Accelerator.
1 LARP Collimator Engineering E. Doyle 2/3/05. 2 Review: SS Thermal Simulation 150mm OD 25mm wall Simply supported Heat: 1hr beam life, FLUKA results,
IDS120j WITHOUT RESISTIVE MAGNETS ( 20 cm GAPS AND 15.8 g/cc W BEADS ) AZIMUTHAL DPD DISTRIBUTION STUDIES FOR: BP#1, SH#1, SHVS#1/LFL, SC#1+SC#2, BeWind.
Simulation comparisons to BLM data E.Skordis On behalf of the FLUKA team Tracking for Collimation Workshop 30/10/2015 E. Skordis1.
Heat Deposition Pre-Evaluation In the context of the new cryo-collimator and 11-T dipole projects we present a review of the power deposition studies on.
Case study: Energy deposition in superconducting magnets in IR7 AMT Workshop A.Ferrari, M.Magistris, M.Santana, V.Vlachoudis CERN Fri 4/3/2005.
LARP Coll. Video-conf. May 12, '05Phase II Collimator Engineering - E. Doyle1/20 Adapting the NLC Consumable Collimator to LHC Phase II Secondary Collimation.
Schematics for simplified energy deposition study in IR7 R. Assmann.
Beam collimation in the transfer line from 8 GeV linac to the Main Injector A. Drozhdin The beam transfer line from 8 GeV Linac to the Main Injector is.
Phase II Collimators for LHC Upgrade at SLAC - Material Issues E. Doyle 03 Sept /25 Workshop on Materials for Collimators CERN 2007/09/03 Phase.
NM4SixTrack Implementation of new composite materials for HL-LHC collimator upgrades in SixTrack “Tracking for SixTrack” workshop – CERN, R.
Simulation of heat load at JHF decay pipe and beam dump KEK Yoshinari Hayato.
Beam absorbers for Machine Protection at LHC and SPS
The LARP Collimation Program 1 June 2005 LARP DOE Review-Fermilab Tom Markiewicz SLAC BNL - FNAL- LBNL - SLAC US LHC Accelerator Research Program.
DRAFT Simulation of Errant Beams in the BDS How many bunches will damage beamline components or quench SC coils? Analysis Steps 1.Use TRANSPORT with BDS.
Recent Energy Deposition Simulations TCSM-A6L7 L. Keller LARP Video Mtg. 02 Oct
H. Matis, S. Hedges, M. Placidi, A. Ratti, W. Turner [+several students] (LBNL) R. Miyamoto (now at ESSS) H. Matis - LARP CM18 - May 8, Fluka Modeling.
accident deformation – doyle 1/12 Phase II Collimator - Accident Deformation Simulation December 11, 2006.
Halo Collimation of Protons and Heavy Ions in SIS-100.
ENERGY DEPOSITION AND TAS DIAMETER
R.W. Assmann, V. Boccone, F. Cerutti, M. Huhtinen, A. Mereghetti
LARP Collimation – Engineering & Analysis
BEAM LOSS MONITORING SYSTEM
Simulations of collimation losses at RHIC
Thermo-mechanical simulations jaws + tank
Progress in Collimation study
Energy deposition studies in IR7 for HL-LHC
BEAM LOSS MONITORING SYSTEM
Beam collimation for SPPC
Status of energy deposition studies in IR3
Recommendations of 12/16/05 review committee & SLAC response
LARP Collimation – Engineering & Analysis
Beam-Induced Energy Deposition Studies in IR Magnets
Russian Research Center “ Kurchatov Institute”
accident deformation – doyle (rev1) 1/8
LHC Collimation Requirements
Optic design and performance evaluation for SPPC collimation systems
Beam Loss Simulations LHC
Status of energy deposition studies IR7
Discussion of High Energy Proton Losses in Arc 7
Efficiency of Two-Stage Collimation System
US LHC Accelerator Research Program
Micro Status Report of SLAC Phase II Plan Tom Markiewicz SLAC
RC1 Prototype Conceptual Design Review 15 December, 2005
Engineering Update E. Doyle 5/16/06
FLUKA Energy deposition simulations for quench tests
Collimator Efficiency Study
US LHC Accelerator Research Program
accident deformation – doyle 1/8
LHC Physics Debris Simulation Update
Presentation transcript:

Problem: A kicker failure can deposit 9 x 1011 protons on any metallic secondary collimator - causing it to melt within a substantial volume. Missteered beam (9E11 protons) 120 cm long copper secondary collimator jaw Copper fractures @ ≈200 ˚C

LHC Renewable Collimator Concept (E. Doyle - SLAC) Beam 2 side-by-side rotating metal cylinders form the gap Beam 1

Recent Energy Deposition Simulations L. Keller LARP, Apr. 2005 Recent Energy Deposition Simulations 1. Look at accident effects on various secondary collimators. 2. Run the FLUKA model with the LHC V6_5_lowb lattice, collimator data, and ray files of inelastic interactions in the primary collimators.

IR-7 Beam 2 Beam 1 dipoles First group of Primary secondary collimators Primary collimators 40 m

Missteered beam (9E11 protons) on secondary Jaw What is the damage area in a missteering accident? Copper Jaw Cross section at shower max. Copper 2.5 cm Fracture temp. of copper is about 200 deg C

Accident Case – jaw adjacent to the one being directly hit, ≈ 4 mm gap. This jaw may be damaged too. Copper Copper Fracture at 200deg C 840 deg C

Accidental direct hit Aluminum What about damage to ALUMINUM secondaries ? Aluminum Fracture 150 deg C

Another accident Case – Beam hits the horizontal primary collimator The first jaw in the downbeam secondary collimator (40m away) may be damaged. Copper Copper 250 ˚C

See no proton spike 1 cm from edge of jaw CERN Collimation Group Picture of Energy Deposition in the First Secondary Collimator (note hot spot near middle of left jaw) The SLAC model shows the maximum energy deposition on the inner edge of the jaw – why different? – what is the physics? See no proton spike 1 cm from edge of jaw

Axial Distribution of Halo Interactions in the Second Primary Collimator (TCPH) Carbon

Axial Position of Halo Interaction Point vs Axial Position of Halo Interaction Point vs. Distance from Primary Collimator Edge Why a sharp peak ≈ 1µ from the edge? Beam Jaw edge

Power Deposition on First Secondary Collimator in 12 Min. Lifetime (kW per jaw) Primary Collimator (source) TCSM.B6.L7 Jaws at 7 sigma Jaws at 10 sigma Copper Al_2219 TCP.D6.L7 (TCPV) 73 26 51 19 TCP.C6.L7 (TCPH) 61 22 49 TCP.B6.L7 (TCPS) 92 28 56 20 120 cm long collimator Notes: 1. Collimator data, ray files, and loss maps from LHC Collimator web page, Feb. 2005. 2. Must add contribution from direct hits on secondary jaws.

Power Deposition on First Secondary Collimator vs. Length for Three Primary Collimator Sources Notes: 12 minute beam lifetime Primary jaws at 6 sigma, secondary jaws at 7 sigma

What can be done to reduce the power deposited in the For Discussion: What can be done to reduce the power deposited in the first two secondary collimators? 1. Add a >10 sig absorber in front of dipoles MDW 2. Withdraw the jaws to somewhere between 7 and 10 sigma to spread the load to downstream collimators 3. ------ 4. ------