Teaching Evaluations at TTU Using the IDEA Instrument

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
 Goals: 1. To help faculty respond critically to student generated course evaluation; 2. To help faculty improve student learning.  Outcomes: Faculty.
Advertisements

Campus-wide Presentation May 14, PACE Results.
Teaching Methods Related to Student Progress in Lower-level STEM Courses Steve Benton, Ph.D. Senior Research Officer IDEA Emeritus Professor, Kansas State.
Using the IDEA Student Ratings System: An Introduction University of Saint Thomas Fall
Understanding and Using Your IDEA Evaluation Results Nina Campanicki & Ernie Linsay Faculty Development Day March 20, 2010.
IDEA Student Ratings of Instruction: Adjunct Workshop Dr. Kristi Roberson-Scott Fall 2009 Semester.
IDEA Student Ratings of Instruction Update Carrie Ahern and Lynette Molstad Selected slides reproduced with permission of Dr. Amy Gross from The IDEA Center.
IDEA What it is and How to Implement the System Texas A & M, February 2013 Shelley A. Chapman, PhD Senior Educational Consultant.
Personal Assessment of the College Environment (PACE)
IDEA Student Ratings of Instruction Insight Improvement Impact ® Loyola University of Chicago April 10-11, 2013 Steve Benton, PhD Senior Research Officer.
TTU Teaching Evaluations at TTU Using the IDEA Instrument.
IN SUPPORT OF STUDENT INVOLVEMENT IN THE COURSE TRANSFORMATION PROGRAM Senate Resolution 1012.
Analyzing and Improving College Teaching: Here’s an IDEA Alan C. Lacy, Associate Dean College of Applied Science and Technology Illinois State University.
Assessment Overview Drake CPHS. Overview Overview of IDEA Data Assessing college-wide teaching goal Advising Results Q&A.
Using IDEA for Assessment, Program Review, and SACS University of Alabama Birmingham September 11, 2012 Shelley A. Chapman, PhD.
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT and PROCESS
Office of Institutional Research, Planning and Assessment January 24, 2011 UNDERSTANDING THE DIAGNOSTIC GUIDE.
IDEA Making an Old Enemy Your Friend. MYTH or REALITY?  IDEA is a for-profit corporation.
The Common Core State Standards Initiative Alisa Chapman, University of North Carolina October 24, 2013.
IDEA Student Ratings of Instruction Shelley A. Chapman, PhD Insight Improvement Impact ® University of Alabama Birmingham September 11, 2012.
Assessment Practices That Lead to Student Learning Core Academy, Summer 2012.
IOWA CORE CURRICULUM LEADERSHIP TRAINING Day Two.
Data-Guided Faculty Development Planning University of Alabama Birmingham September 11, 2012 Shelley A. Chapman, PhD.
Data-Informed Faculty Development Planning Howard Community College August 17, 2012 Shelley A. Chapman, PhD.
University Teaching Symposium January 9,  Individual Development and Educational Assessment  Kansas State University  A diagnostic to.
IDEA Student Ratings System Loyola University September 9 & 10, 2015 Jake Glover, PhD Senior Education Officer.
 Shelley A. Chapman, PhD Texas A & M University February 2013.
IDEA TRAINING Objective and Course Coding - Spring
Instructional Strategies Teacher Knowledge, Understanding, and Abilities The online teacher knows and understands the techniques and applications of online.
IDEA STUDENT EVALUATION REPORTS Insight Improvement Impact ® Using IDEA as a Tool for Reflection about Your Teaching Raritan Valley Community College January.
Creative Classroom Collaboratives (C 3 ): Research Update December 1, 2011 Sponsored B y: Eastern Suffolk BOCES Presented By: Susanne Hartnett.
Summary of CPHS Course Evaluations: AY and Chuck Phillips August 2009.
Diana Dinzey Educational Placement. General Education Paraprofessional Residential Treatment Center Alternative H.S Self Contained Resource Room I nclusion.
Using IDEA for Assessment, Program Review, and Accreditation Texas A & M University November 8, 2012 Shelley A. Chapman, PhD.
DEVELOPED BY MARY BETH FURST ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR, BUCO DIVISION AMY CHASE MARTIN DIRECTOR OF FACULTY DEVELOPMENT AND INSTRUCTIONAL MEDIA UNDERSTANDING.
USING STUDENT EVALUATIONS AT STOCKTON Heather McGovern Director of the Institute for Faculty Development Associate Professor of Writing January 2012.
An Overview of Making Standards Work Developed by: Jane Cook EASTCONN Staff Dev/Literacy & Ed Tech Specialist Adapted from materials from The Leadership.
Problem with Multi-purpose Postsecondary Course Evaluations STANLEY VARNHAGEN JASON DANIELS BRAD ARKISON Evaluation & Research Services, Faculty of Extension.
Making an Old Enemy Your Friend
Building Your Personnel Action Dossier
Classroom Observations
Center for Assessment and Improvement of Learning
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT and PROCESS
Teaching Evaluations at TTU Using the IDEA Instrument
The Writing and Research Workshop Series: An Overview
Assessment & Evaluation Committee
The Continuum of Interventions in a 3 Tier Model
Developing a Student Learning Outcomes Assessment Plan and Report
Kevin Oliver, Assistant Professor of Instructional Technology
Your Career at Queen’s: Merit Review and Renewal, Tenure, & Promotion New Faculty Orientation August 24, 2017 Teri Shearer Deputy Provost (Academic.
Smarter Balanced Assessment Results
2017 Workshop Tenure and Promotion Policy and Procedures Overview
Assessment in cliL Petra Vallin.
Assist. Prof.Dr. Seden Eraldemir Tuyan
Andrew Caudill Western Kentucky University
How to Approach & Talk with Instructors
Fashion & Textile Technology
ENGLISH LANGUAGE GCSE All students will study GCSE English Language and GCSE English Literature (four exams 2 for Lit and 2 for Lang). Both subjects are.
2016 Tenure and Promotion Workshop Policy and Procedures Overview
Student Course Evaluation Revision Task Force
Classroom Observations
WHAT IS LIFE LONG LEARNING IMPORTANCE OF LIFE LONG LEARNING
Getting Started with Personal Statements
Assessment & Evaluation Committee
Student Evaluations of Teaching (SETs)
IDEA Student Ratings of Instruction
DVD Back to School Night 2014
Intensive Intervention – Tier 3
Personal Assessment of the College Environment (PACE)
Presentation transcript:

Teaching Evaluations at TTU Using the IDEA Instrument

Are Student Evaluations of Teaching Valid? Yes, but realize - Student evaluations can be influenced by communication skills and teaching style Students do not evaluate the accuracy of information presented TTU

Teaching Evaluation Policy at TTU TENURE-TRACK, full-time temporary, and part-time faculty, as well as teaching assistants with grading responsibility for courses, will have all their courses evaluated every semester (summer courses excluded). The results of these evaluations will be reviewed by the chairperson and dean or director in connection with personnel actions.   TENURED FACULTY must submit at least two IDEA evaluations a year (one from an introductory course and one from an upper-division course, when possible) to their dept. chairperson or director. Faculty who teach fewer than four courses per year need submit only one evaluation. Faculty may choose which one(s) to submit and may submit more than minimum requirement.) Tenured faculty seeking promotion must evaluate all classes for at least one semester each year for each of the previous four years or from initial appointment, whichever is the shorter period. TTU

Key Features of IDEA System Instructor selects teaching goals Controls for extraneous variables (e.g., motivation and class size) National database for comparisons Adaptable to web-based instruction TTU

Students rate their progress in each course compared to other courses on goals such as Gaining Factual Knowledge Learning to apply course material to solve problems Acquiring skills in working with others as a team Learning to analyze and critically evaluate ideas Developing creative capacities TTU

Effective Use of IDEA Depends on Selecting the appropriate form Selecting appropriate course goals Interpreting the results correctly TTU

Choosing the Long or Short Form   TTU

Long Versus Short Form Long Short 18 core questions 29 additional methods/diagnostic questions 10 additional questions possible Space for student comments 18 core questions 10 additional questions possible Space for student comments TTU

Differences in controlled variables Long form Class size Desire to take course regardless of who taught it Student effort not attributable to instructor Course difficulty not attributable to Instructor Short form Class size Desire to take course regardless of who taught it Student effort not attributable to instructor Calculus versus Hist English Writing versus Sociology TTU

Selecting Objectives on the Faculty Information Form TTU

When to mark an objective as important or essential You may also want to review the IDEA Center Advice on selecting objectives. http://www.theideacenter.org/category/helpful-resources/support-student-ratings-instruction/faculty-information-form TTU

Interpreting IDEA Results Overall Progress on Relevant Objectives most important Use Adjusted score since this score compensates for class size and student motivation Score (national mean = 50) represents student's perceptions of progress on the weighted average of objectives that the instructor has identified as essential and important It is the single best measure of teaching effectiveness.  Keep in Mind: Not appropriate to use these scores to make fine discriminations Most useful for identifying the extremes in teaching effectiveness Best to look at averages or trends in evaluation performance across classes and across time TTU

Report Form TTU

Relationship Between Progress on Relevant Objectives and Excellence of Teacher When student feel like they are making progress, they rate the instructor as excellent more frequently TTU

Report Form TTU

Improving Teaching and Learning Diagnostic (Long) Form TTU

Suggestions to Help Improve Teaching Evaluations Select appropriate goals for the course. Is this a significant part of the course? Do I do something specific to help the students accomplish this objective? Does the student’s progress on this objective affect his or her grade? Clearly explain goals at the beginning of course and frequently remind students of those goals. Include goals on syllabus. Map goals to activities or assignments that relate to progress. Monitor student’s progress on those goals and provide alternative opportunities for improvement on the goals. Don’t have evaluations completed immediately after giving a test. Use active learning techniques. Engagement promotes learning. TTU

Thank You Dr. Theresa Ennis University Assessment Director tennis@tntech.edu 372-6124; Office DBRY 326 Amy McCoy Administrative Support Specialist 3 abmccoy@tntech.edu 372-6146; Office DRBY 326 TTU