ABE Instructional Strategies: Getting Teachers Off to the Right Start

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
Advertisements

Teacher Evaluation New Teacher Orientation August 15, 2013.
1. Learning Targets 2 Staff will understand the various Teachscape platforms offered by South Dakota Staff will be able to login to their Teachscape account.
CTE Transformation Strategy U.S. Department of Education Office of Vocational and Adult Education September 15, 2011.
North Carolina Professional Teaching Standards Lee County Schools New Hire Training
Matt Moxham EDUC 290. The Idaho Core Teacher Standards are ten standards set by the State of Idaho that teachers are expected to uphold. This is because.
Differentiated Supervision
Colleges can provide all Washingtonians access to 2-year post secondary education Measures: Enrollments in community and technical colleges Rate of participation.
Teacher Induction Program Why you are here The Allegheny Intermediate Unit offers this program for our staff and those in school districts,
FRAMEWORK FOR TEACHING (FFT) SUMMER INSTITUTE CONVERSATIONS TO ENHANCE PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE DR. MICHAEL BROOKS JUNE 18, 2012.
Understanding the NRS Rosemary Matt NYS Director of Accountability.
2014 TCTW State Leaders’ Forum Oklahoma City, Oklahoma January 29, 2014 CTE Teacher Preparation Project SREB.
The Kentucky Framework for Teaching. BIG QuestionsLearning Targets What makes a teacher highly effective? How is teacher effectiveness determined? Why.
The Danielson Framework Emmanuel Andre Owings Mills High School Fall 2013.
Lincoln Intermediate Unit 12 August 11, 2014 Differentiated Supervision: The Danielson Framework.
Teacher Effectiveness Who begins in ? Teaching Specialists Special Education Teachers English as a Second Language Teachers Gifted Teachers.
BY COURTNEY N. SPEER TECHNOLOGY AS A TOOL SPRING Professional Growth & Self- Reflection.
PGES: The Final 10% i21: Navigating the 21 st Century Highway to Top Ten.
Adult Education Assessment Policy Effective July 1 st, 2011.
Wisconsin Administrative Code PI 34 1 Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction - Elizabeth Burmaster, State Superintendent Support from a Professional.
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
The North Carolina Teacher Evaluation Process November 1, 2012
Implementing the Professional Growth Process Session 3 Observing Teaching and Professional Conversations American International School-Riyadh Saturday,
Oconee Keys Training September, Oconee Keys is designed to: Evaluate classroom teachers using qualitative rubrics to assess instructional practices.
1 WIOA Review. Try This Cross your arms 2 Now cross your arms the other way. How does it feel? 3.
In-Service September 19, 2012 Teacher Evaluation System.
APS Teacher Evaluation System Preparing for Implementation May 2012.
MSBSD Educator Evaluation
WIOA’s Goal Make Participants’ Skills Everyone’s Business
Dr. Kristen Corbell Director of Program Quality and Accountability
Brian Frazier Talent Investment Agency Office of Adult Education
DJJ Accountability Rating System
NYS Regents and CDOS Graduation Requirement Changes!
Measurable Skill Gains
Dr. Kristen Corbell Jannai Johnson
WIOA + MAERS = Performance
Professional Growth and
Framework For Teaching (FFT)
An Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
Facilitating ABE Learners’ Postsecondary Success
Adult Secondary Credentials
Educator Evaluations DARTEP 2017
Changes to the Educator Evaluation System
Teacher Evaluation “SLO 101”
NC Educator Evaluation System Overview
WIOA Accountability Ben Konruff
Personal Growth and Professional Development
Who We Are For more than 20 years, we have believed the key to preparing student for a successful future is providing rigorous and relevant instruction.
Internship Bill of Rights
Mary Weck, Ed. D Danielson Group Member
Discussion and Vote to Amend the Regulations
The CCPS Strategic Plan
Wednesday March 11, 2015 Board of Trustees Meeting
Using Data to Monitor Title I, Part D
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
T-TESS Student Growth Model PLC- April 25th & 26th
NCETA SPRING 2018 CONFERENCE
English Language Acquisition
Non-Classroom Teacher Evaluation Guidelines
Non-Classroom Teacher Evaluation Guidelines
Making Common Sense of the Common Measures
Office of Adult Education Instructional Services Team
SGM Mid-Year Conference Gina Graham
Welcome to Your New Position As An Instructor
Office of Adult Education Instructional Services Team
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA)
NRS Training: Reporting Student Performance on Table 4 - ABE Scenarios
NRS Training: Reporting Student Performance on Table 4 - ESL Scenarios
21st Century Teaching Standards and Student Assessment
Presentation transcript:

ABE Instructional Strategies: Getting Teachers Off to the Right Start Brian Frazier and Sean Lively MACAE October 17, 2016 9:00am -10:15am

AGENDA Warm Up Andragogy vs Pedagogy Classroom observation, Charlotte Danielson framework Professional Goals and Growth Plan Improve Educational gains and teaching strategies Questions

GROUP DISCUSSION What is your programs process for teacher evaluation?

Andragogy vs Pedagogy Immediacy of Application Experiential Techniques Mutuality Collaboration Increasing Self-Directedness Problem Centered

Teacher Evaluation Classroom observation, Charlotte Danielson framework Preparation Planning Classroom Environment Instruction Professional Responsibilities Assessment Pre/Post Observation meetings Informal Walk-Thru Constant feedback

PGP and PG Professional Growth Plan Mission Statement Professional Goals Personal Goals Learning Opportunities Two Goals Professional Goal Personal Goal Use Domains 1-5 on Teacher Evaluation Form

Improve Educational Gains Measurable Skills Gains Diploma/Equivalent Pre-Post Test High School Credits Program Exit and Entry into Post Secondary 44th in the State in ABE/ASE

MSG

Educational Functioning Level Gain Documented achievement of at least once educational functioning level of a participant who is receiving instruction below the postsecondary education level. Programs may measure educational functioning level gain in one of three ways: The approved pre- and post-tests must be based on the list of tests the Secretary of Education determines to be suitable for use in the National Reporting System for Adult Education. The list of approved assessments is published annually in the Federal Register. (1) Comparing the participant’s initial educational functioning level, as measured by a pre-test, with the participant’s educational functioning level, as measured by a post-test. (2) States that offer adult high school programs that lead to a secondary school diploma or its recognized equivalent may measure and report educational gain through the awarding of credits or Carnegie units. (3) States may report an educational functioning level gain for participants who exit the program and enroll in postsecondary education and training during the program year. Three ways one can measure EFL’s. Pre-test post test. High School or equivalent credits. Exit the program and enroll in postsecondary ed or training during the program year.

Section 107 Performance Measures Achievement of an educational gain as determined by the National Reporting System levels (Refer to the Office of Adult Education’s Assessment Policy) Achievement of basic English proficiency (Attainment of highest scale scores in ALL modules) Attainment of the official GED or passage of one or more individual actual GED test Attainment of a high school diploma or passage of a course required to attain a high school diploma (earn credit towards diploma)   Enrollment in a postsecondary institution Enter or Retain employment

Teachscape Administrative Certification Build a common language for teaching effectiveness Assess teaching practice accurately and holistically Analyze evaluation data Evaluate to learn Use the right tools to build evaluations ww.teachscape.com Build a common language for teaching effectiveness  Teachscape Focus training to observers so they can accurately evaluate teaching practice and provide meaningful feedback Assess teaching practice accurately and holistically Reflect, a complete observation and evaluation management system, streamlining the evaluation process while maintaining the integrity of evidence-based evaluations. Analyze evaluation data Teachscaepe uses reporting tools to inform conversations with practitioners, facilitate progress monitoring, and help determine where to focus professional development. Evaluate to learn Approaching evaluations with a growth mindset to influences how observers and teachers reflect on and discuss observations Use the right tools to build evaluations Building evaluations that feed into cycle of continuous improvement and result in better learning experiences for all students.

Thank you Frazierb3@michigan.org Livelys@michigan.org Questions? Thank you Frazierb3@michigan.org Livelys@michigan.org