Good practice in entry requirements

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Supporting Professionalism in Admissions and Feedback UCET Management Forum - 26 June2008 Janet Graham, Director of SPA.
Advertisements

University admissions practices: What is right? What is wrong? How should they change? Steven Schwartz.
HEPI Conference – 7 October 2008 Developments in Higher Education Applications and Admissions: Implications for Universities, Schools and Colleges Anthony.
THE ADMISSIONS POLICY. WHY AN ADMISSIONS POLICY ? To ensure that the University is compliant with the QAA Code of practice: Admissions to Higher Education.
SPA, admissions issues and feedback
Quality and Standards Framework – Collaborative Provision December 2008 Janet Pearce, University Quality Officer.
Admissions Update for Partner Institutions. Programme Working with International Students James Richardson, Director of International Office Admissions.
What do enquirers and applicants need to know? PSRB Forum on Public Information 16 December 2011 Leslie Currie, Senior Project Officer.
Outcomes from the SPA Fair Admissions Task and Finish Group What does it mean for your institution? SPA event 19 June 2012 Professor Mary Stuart, Vice-Chancellor,
Missenden Abbey Conference Centre, 2 March 2010 Mary Curnock Cook Chief Executive Professionalising Admission to Higher Education in Further Education.
The revised Access to HE Diploma specification CAVA Conference November 2013 Julie Farmer Assistant Director (Access to HE) QAA.
The 2013 Access to HE Diploma and admissions to higher education.
B2 RAG analysis comparisons. Participants a three separate events completed RAG analyses of their concerns for evidencing B2 indicators: 1) 22 July 2014.
Access to HE Diploma key developments Kath Dentith Head of Access, QAA.
Reviewing 2014; Planning 2015 SPA Conference, Leicester 5 November 2014.
Managing Numbers in Northern Ireland SPA Seminar - 12 April 2011 Janet Graham, Annie Doyle and Leslie Currie.
A Snapshot of TEQSA Dr Carol Nicoll Chief Commissioner Festival of Learning and Teaching University of Adelaide Tuesday 6 November 2012.
SPA’s Good Practice for Admissions Policies Admissions Policy and the QAA Quality Code – Are you ready? Peter Chetwynd, Admissions Support and Development.
MOOCs and the Quality Code Ian G. Giles PFHEA Medical Education
LINKING LONDON ACCESS TO HE PRACTITIONER FORUM MARCH 2015 Supporting the learner journey.
Access to HE Diploma New Specification - Implications for Pre Entry IAG and HE Progression.
Choosing What and Where to Study. Choosing a course A big decision - Over 50,000 Higher Education courses in the UK 340 places to study Research according.
UK Quality Framework OU and ARCs
The new competitive environment: How can the use of contextual data aid fair admissions SPA event 19 June 2012 Janet Graham, Director of SPA.
Introduction to the Applicant Experience The Applicant Experience in Wales, 4 June 2014 Peter Chetwynd, Admissions Support and Development Manager.
Prof. György BAZSA, former president Hungarian Accreditation Committee (HAC) CUBRIK Workshop IV Beograd, 13 March, 2012 European Standards and Guidelines.
The UK Quality Code and Higher Education Reviews Admissions Policy and the QAA Quality Code – Are you ready? Catherine Kerfoot, Development Officer, QAA.
SPA Seminar Managing Numbers for 2010 Entry Welcome and context 2 June 2010 Janet Graham, Director of SPA.
University of Glamorgan Faculty of Business & Society FGM Development Day Wednesday 18 th July 2012 The UK Quality Code for Higher Education A Brief Guide.
Fair access and widening participation – the view from SPA OCNLR Access to HE Conference Thursday 24 March 2011 Annie Doyle, Senior Project Officer, SPA.
UCAS update & developments. Setting the scene ▪ Central organisation through which applications are processed for entry to full-time higher education.
Qualifications Information Review CONSULTATION | 2012 QIR Consultation.
Recognition of Prior Learning for Individuals and Organisations Andy Gibbs October 2013.
Contextual data in admissions: is it right to use it; is it wrong not to? FACE Conference 2 July 2009 Dan Shaffer, Senior Project Officer.
Competition and Markets Authority, consumer protection and HE admissions 12 October 2015 Dan Shaffer, Head of Professionalism in Admissions.
Consumer Protection Law and Admissions and Student Recruitment 6 January 2016 Janet Graham, Director of SPA.
Managing Numbers for 2010 Entry Managing Confirmation and planning Adjustment/Clearing 2 June 2010.
Managing mistakes in admissions decision-making 2a. UCAS Admissions Conference, 21 March 2016 Jeni Clack, Admissions Support and Development Advisor.
Subject Descriptors Access Tariff.  June 2013 Access Qualification Development Group agreed that QAA should take forward work on the development of subject.
Fair admissions ▪Fair admissions system should: ▫Be transparent ▫Seek to minimise barriers ▫Strive to use reliable and valid assessment methods ▪How is.
Diplomas and Higher Education Professor Stephen Scott Pro-Vice-Chancellor University of Leeds Digital 20/20 Diplomas one year on.
Managing the risk of unconscious bias in admissions 3b UCAS Admissions Conference, 21 March 2016 Dan Shaffer, Head of Professionalism in Admissions Lizzy.
S5/6 Information Evening April 1 st Points to Consider  What job, course or career am I aiming for?  What are the entry requirements?  How do.
Partnerships between institutions: competition, collaboration and issues to consider for admissions 4b. UCAS Admissions Conference, 22 March 2016 Janet.
Managing the risk of unconscious bias in admissions.
Consumer Protection Law and Admissions and Student Recruitment July 2016.
Students’ Rights: The CMA and beyond
UCAS PARENT’S INFORMATION EVENING.
Presenter: Sue Hackett
SPA Programme outline 26/04/2018
Communications and Marketing February 2017
Joining up approaches between your recruitment and admissions 1b
HE White Paper (England): SPA overview and action on unconscious bias
Estranged learners Becca Bland, Chief Executive, Stand Alone
Using admissions to bridge the gap for care leavers
Implementing and reviewing additional admissions assessments
Application Process.
B2 RAG analysis comparisons
Quality and Standards An introduction.
The UK Quality Code and Chapter B9
Partnerships between institutions: competition, collaboration and issues to consider for admissions 4b. UCAS Admissions Conference, 22 March 2016 Janet.
(c) 2011 MarylandOnline, Inc.
Class Careers is a social enterprise company that seeks to enable equal access to careers information for all schools across the country regardless of.
Communications and Marketing November 2017
The UCAS process Giving yourself the best chance David Winstanley
Vocational orientation in the Service sector
Vocational orientation in the Service sector
From the beginning: CAP Project Received full commissioning in 2007 to provide two levels of service. NHS England commissioned 13 AAC Hub Services in 2014.
Alternative Modes of Assessment
Choosing the right Degree
Presentation transcript:

Good practice in entry requirements @SPA_Admissions Good practice in entry requirements Jeni Clack, Admissions Support Manager https://www.spa.ac.uk/resources/entry-requirements-and-offer-making UCAS Annual Admissions Conference 2017

What is SPA? Set up in 2006 following the Schwartz Report Fair Admissions to Higher Education: Recommendations for Good Practice, 2004: “The Group recommends the creation of a central source of expertise and advice on admissions issues. Its purpose would be to act as a resource for institutions who wish to maintain and enhance excellence in admissions. Such a centre could lead the continuing development of fair admissions, evaluating and commissioning research, and spreading best practice.”

The SPA team Website resources

Fair admissions be transparent Admissions update 17 October 2012 Fair admissions be transparent enable institutions to select students who are able to complete the course as judged by their achievements and their potential strive to use assessment methods that are reliable and valid seek to minimise barriers to applicants be professional in every respect and underpinned by appropriate institutional structures and processes “Equal opportunity for all individuals, regardless of background, to gain admission to a course suited to their ability and aspirations.”

Fair admissions and entry requirements HE providers should have a justifiable basis for their entry requirements, minimise barriers to participation and select applicants with the skills and knowledge to enable them to successfully complete the course. Transparent, clear and accessible information on entry requirements will allow applicants and their advisers to make the most informed and suitable match in their choices.

QAA UK Quality Code for HE Chapter B2: Recruitment, selection and admission to higher education Indicator 7 “Selection processes for entry into higher education are underpinned by transparent entry requirements, both academic and non-academic, and present no unnecessary barriers to prospective students”.

CMA advice Competition and Market Authority (CMA) advice to HE providers on consumer protection law Course-related material information made available to applicants must include published “entry requirements/criteria (both academic and non-academic), and an indication of the standard/typical offer level criteria.

SPA’s good practice The distinction between entry requirements, typical/standard offers and actual offers made Considerations for reviewing entry requirements Considerations for publishing and communicating entry requirements

Entry requirements Entry requirements, or entry criteria, represent the normal requirements an applicant is expected to achieve in order to be considered for a place on the course. Likely to be far broader than what may appear in an offer Should include the full range of academic and non-academic requirements Not necessarily the exact grades that will be requested, but the prerequisites for making an offer.

Typical offers Typical offers, or standard offers, refer to the offers a course expects to normally make for applicants meeting the entry requirements. They are commonly published within the entry requirements themselves, but are subject to change closer to the start of the admissions cycle. Usually based on historical data Indicative only and do not represent a guarantee that all offers will be at that level Offers to individual applicants could vary for e.g. consideration of contextual factors; progression agreements

Actual offers Actual offers made should relate to both the published entry requirements and typical offers and should not include any extra requirements. Adding new requirements, such as subject-specific qualifications or work experience, is unfair and imposes barriers to entry. May be appropriate to vary the offers made within published requirements Terms and conditions for entry should be made absolutely clear to the applicant before they accept any offer. How are academic and non-academic requirements conveyed to applicants to ensure they are fully aware of what is expected of them?

Which do you display? Entry requirements represent the normal requirements an applicant is expected to achieve in order to be considered for a place on the course. Typical offers, or standard offers, refer to the offers a course expects to normally make for applicants meeting the entry requirements. Actual offers made should relate to the published entry requirements and typical offers and should not include any extra requirements.

Approaches to entry requirements The absolute minimum required for consideration, based on the lowest matriculation requirements identified in the course validation: E.g. “Five GCSEs including English and Mathematics plus two A levels.” Higher requirements based on agreed selective levels: E.g. “Ten GCSEs at grade A including English, Mathematics and a foreign language, plus three A levels at grades ABB.”

Continued… The absolute maximum required as a guarantee to applicants that no offer will exceed it. Differential entry requirements for applicants who fulfil certain criteria: E.g. “AAA - ABB at A level”

? What’s your approach? The absolute minimum required for consideration Higher requirements based on agreed selective levels The absolute maximum required Differential entry requirements

Reviewing Ensure staff have an informed understanding Review qualification profiles of applicants Consider qualification reform Ensure equivalency Use reliable and consistent assessment methods Mitigate the risk of unconscious bias Monitor progression of students Adhere to contractual obligations

Changing It is not good practice to change entry requirements after they’ve been published. Where changes are deemed necessary: Widely publicise both the change and reason Update online information promptly Clear internal and external comms Reflect in offer libraries or standard offer text

Publishing and communicating Should be clear for all applicants and easily navigable, allowing applicants to find requirements most relevant to them. Admissions cycle Clearing or main-scheme Different modes of study Frequently encountered, with signposting Combinations of qualification types Legacy, current and future

Language and terminology Should be precise and specific, and describe exactly what is required. Exact qualification, level, subject Same name but different ‘or equivalent’ Help text for terms Exclusions Alternative offers

Thank you Any questions? Please don’t hesitate to contact the SPA team: enquiries@spa.ac.uk All of our resources are freely available on our website: www.spa.ac.uk Follow us on twitter: @SPA_Admissions