Supplementary figures

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
RNA-seq library prep introduction
Advertisements

V Improvements to 3kb Long Insert Size Paired-End Library Preparation Naomi Park, Lesley Shirley, Michael Quail, Harold Swerdlow Wellcome Trust Sanger.
Supplementary Figure 1. Evaluating the Intermolecular ligation efficiency. (A) Ligation product formed between a RNA and a 3’-adaptor at 25 °C for 2 hrs.
11 © 2009 PerkinElmer © 2010 PerkinElmer November 20, 2012 DNA Services Overview.
Genomic walking (1) To start, you need: -the DNA sequence of a small region of the chromosome -An adaptor: a small piece of DNA, nucleotides long.
DNA Methylation mapping
Genomics – Next-Gen sequencing and Microarrays
Chapter 08 Author: Kelly Elkins © 2013 Elsevier, Inc. All rights reserved.
Comparison between old generation and new generation of sequencing machines.
PUC 19 5’ 3’ 5’ 3’ 5’ 3’ 5’ 3’ PCR -I pUC 19 specific primers Amplicon purification PCR -II 5’ 3’ 5’ 3’ 5’ 3’ 5’ 3’ 5’ 3’ 5’ 3’ Composite pUC 19 primers.
Primers to map bsd deletion points on genomic DNA NameForwardReverse Amplicon size (base pairs) A15’-CCACGGATGGAGTGAGTTCT-3’5’-GCCCCCAAGATGAGGATTAT-3’931.
Library QA & QC Day 1, Video 3
HRM Assay and Optimization 1. DNA Quality 2. Amplicon LengthAmplicon  lengths of 100–300 bp 3. Primer Selection 4. Dye Selection 5. MgCl2 Concentration.
Conclusions Smart-Seq2 is a single-cell RNA- seq method that generates cDNA libraries with longer average size and higher yield compared to SMARTer™. Smart-seq2.
An Overview of Applications for the MiSeq and HiSeq 2500 April 4, 2016 Kevin Shianna, Ph.D. Sequencing Specialist - Illumina, Inc. MGC USERS GROUP.
Quality Control Metrics for DNA Sequencing
Detection of FLT3 Internal Tandem Duplication in Targeted, Short-Read-Length, Next- Generation Sequencing Data  David H. Spencer, Haley J. Abel, Christina.
Micelle PCR reduces artifact formation in 16S microbiota profiling
Figure 1. Library preparation methods for highly degraded DNA
Multiplexed Elimination of Wild-Type DNA and High-Resolution Melting Prior to Targeted Resequencing of Liquid Biopsies I. Ladas, M. Fitarelli-Kiehl, C.
Supplementary Figure 1 A B wild type ΔacsS
Implementation of a Reliable Next-Generation Sequencing Strategy for Molecular Diagnosis of Dystrophinopathies  Melissa Alame, Delphine Lacourt, Reda.
© 2013 Elsevier, Inc. All rights reserved.
Assessing Copy Number Alterations in Targeted, Amplicon-Based Next-Generation Sequencing Data  Catherine Grasso, Timothy Butler, Katherine Rhodes, Michael.
Small RNA Sample Preparation
Locked Nucleic Acids Can Enhance the Analytical Performance of Quantitative Methylation-Specific Polymerase Chain Reaction  Karen S. Gustafson  The Journal.
Detection of FLT3 Internal Tandem Duplication in Targeted, Short-Read-Length, Next- Generation Sequencing Data  David H. Spencer, Haley J. Abel, Christina.
Rosie Coates-Brown Final year Bioinformatics trainee
mRNA Sequencing Sample Preparation
Haplotype Counting for Sensitive Chimerism Testing
Robustness of Amplicon Deep Sequencing Underlines Its Utility in Clinical Applications  Vera Grossmann, Andreas Roller, Hans-Ulrich Klein, Sandra Weissmann,
Next-Generation Sequencing-Assisted DNA-Based Digital PCR for a Personalized Approach to the Detection and Quantification of Residual Disease in Chronic.
Performance Characteristics and Validation of Next-Generation Sequencing for Human Leucocyte Antigen Typing  Eric T. Weimer, Maureen Montgomery, Rosanne.
Hybrid Capture and Next-Generation Sequencing Identify Viral Integration Sites from Formalin-Fixed, Paraffin-Embedded Tissue  Eric J. Duncavage, Vincent.
Clinical Application of Picodroplet Digital PCR Technology for Rapid Detection of EGFR T790M in Next-Generation Sequencing Libraries and DNA from Limited.
Merlind Muecke, Martin Samuels, Megan Davey, David Jeruzalmi  Structure 
Jianbin Wang, H. Christina Fan, Barry Behr, Stephen R. Quake  Cell 
ChIP DNA Sample Preparation
Clinical Relevance of Sensitive and Quantitative STAT3 Mutation Analysis Using Next- Generation Sequencing in T-Cell Large Granular Lymphocytic Leukemia 
Molecular Diagnosis of Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease Using Next- Generation Sequencing  Adrian Y. Tan, Alber Michaeel, Genyan Liu, Olivier.
Accurate Sample Assignment in a Multiplexed, Ultrasensitive, High-Throughput Sequencing Assay for Minimal Residual Disease  Jack Bartram, Edward Mountjoy,
Eric Samorodnitsky, Jharna Datta, Benjamin M
Christine L. Baker, Cecily P. Vaughn, Wade S. Samowitz 
Keeping Up With the Next Generation
SeqSharp The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics
Digital Gene Expression – Tag Profiling Sample Preparation
Merlind Muecke, Martin Samuels, Megan Davey, David Jeruzalmi  Structure 
Jesse L. Montgomery, Nick Rejali, Carl T. Wittwer 
Gerald B. W. Wertheim, Catherine Smith, Maria E
By Keisha Persaud.
Marija Debeljak, Donald N. Freed, Jane A
Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages (August 2017)
Single-Molecule Sequencing: Towards Clinical Applications
S. Riman, H. Iyer, L. Borsuk, K. Gettings, P. Vallone 
Next-Generation Sequencing for Infectious Disease Diagnosis and Management  Martina I. Lefterova, Carlos J. Suarez, Niaz Banaei, Benjamin A. Pinsky  The.
Figure 6. The DNA lyase activity of hNTHL1 contributes to the processing of lesions in nucleosomes, even in the ... Figure 6. The DNA lyase activity of.
Marie Frank-Vaillant, Stéphane Marcand  Molecular Cell 
Tn-Seq Analysis of Vibrio cholerae Intestinal Colonization Reveals a Role for T6SS- Mediated Antibacterial Activity in the Host  Yang Fu, Matthew K. Waldor,
(Top) Construction of synthetic long read clouds with 10× Genomics technology. (Top) Construction of synthetic long read clouds with 10× Genomics technology.
Genomic DNA Sample Preparation
Importance of a Single Base Pair for Discrimination between Intron-Containing and Intronless Alleles by Endonuclease I-BmoI  David R. Edgell, Matthew.
The MLPA assay and application to diagnosis of DGS
Volume 6, Pages 1-12 (August 2018)
Multilaboratory Assessment of a New Reference Material for Quality Assurance of Cell- Free Tumor DNA Measurements  Hua-Jun He, Erica V. Stein, Yves Konigshofer,
Alteration calling accuracy and concordance with reference platforms.
Yufang Wang, Ling Guo, Ido Golding, Edward C. Cox, N.P. Ong 
Genomic & RNA Profiling Core Facility
Rapid pathogen-specific phenotypic antibiotic susceptibility testing using digital LAMP quantification in clinical samples by Nathan G. Schoepp, Travis.
Development of a Novel Next-Generation Sequencing Assay for Carrier Screening in Old Order Amish and Mennonite Populations of Pennsylvania  Erin L. Crowgey,
Quantification of bcl-2/JH Fusion Sequences and a Control Gene by Multiplex Real- Time PCR Coupled with Automated Amplicon Sizing by Capillary Electrophoresis 
Presentation transcript:

Supplementary figures Quantitation of Next Generation Sequencing Library Preparation Protocol Efficiencies Using Droplet Digital PCR Assays - a systematic comparison of DNA library preparation kits for Illumina sequencing Louise Aigrain, Yong Gu, Michael A. Quail

Figure S1 Figure S1: Comparison of the overall yields for libraries prepared with the Truseq Nano kit with either the Sanger adaptors (original Illumina adaptors, in pink) and the modern Illumina adaptors (in blue).

Figure S2 Primer pair Protocol step * NM Figure S2: Bar charts showing the stepwise DNA library preparation yields of the different kits tested. Initial DNA input: 500 ng. Except where mentioned otherwise all libraries were prepared using the original Illumina Paired end adaptor (Sanger adaptors) [6, 22]. The most critical steps correspond to the adaptor ligation for which the yield varies from 3.50% to 100% depending on the kit tested.

Figure S3 * NM Figure S3: Bar charts showing the comparison of the overall DNA library preparation yields of the different kits tested depending on the initial DNA input. Although higher DNA inputs lead to slightly higher adaptor ligation yields, the final PCR yield appears much greater when the initial DNA input is low.

Figure S4 ~343 bp ~536 bp ~713 bp lower standard 35 bp upper standard 10380 bp Figure S4: Bioanalyzer traces of 3 libraries prepared with the PhiX amplicons of 3 different sizes. The initial input sample contained a equimolar ratio of the 3 amplicons whereas this ratio varies in the final libraries presented here depending on the kit used (Truseq Nano in red, SureSelect in blue and KAPA hyper in green).

Figure S5 B H. sapiens B. pertussis A S. aureus Fragmentase incubation time on E. coli 20 min 10 min 5 min S. aureus Different GC content (15 min fragmentase) P. falciparum 3D7 (19.4% GC) B. pertussis (67.7% GC) H. sapiens (40.9 % GC) S. Aureus (32.8% GC) Figure S5: Enzymatic shearing using the fragmentase provided with the KAPA HyperPlus kit. A) Tunability and robustness of the fragmentase treatments depending on the GC content of the DNA sample, DNA input and the incubation time. B) KAPA HyperPlus libraries GC contents and their correlation with the theoretical values. Different DNA input (S. aureus, 15 min fragmentase) 10 ng 30 ng 50 ng 100 ng 400 ng