Slice Parameter Measurements at the SwissFEL Injector Test Facility

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Christopher Gerth, Michael Röhrs, Holger Schlarb DESY Hamburg Optics for Diagnostic Section BC1 in the European XFEL.
Advertisements

J. Rudolph, Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin EuCARD 2nd ANNUAL MEETING Slice emittance measurements at the ELBE superconducting RF photoinjector.
1 Bates XFEL Linac and Bunch Compressor Dynamics 1. Linac Layout and General Beam Parameter 2. Bunch Compressor –System Details (RF, Magnet Chicane) –Linear.
Chris Tennant Jefferson Laboratory March 15, 2013 “Workshop to Explore Physics Opportunities with Intense, Polarized Electron Beams up to 300 MeV”
Paul Emma LCLS FAC April 16, Initial Experience with Injector Commissioning P. Emma, et al. Facilities Advisory Committee.
P. Emma, SLACLCLS FAC Meeting - April 29, 2004 Linac Physics, Diagnostics, and Commissioning Strategy P. Emma LCLS FAC Meeting April 29, 2004 LCLS.
Cecile Limborg-Deprey Injector Commissioning September Injector Commissioning Plans C.Limborg-Deprey Gun exit measurements.
Henrik Loos High Level 17 June 2008 High Level Physics Applications for LCLS Commissioning Henrik Loos.
Cecile Limborg-Deprey Injector October Injector Physics C.Limborg-Deprey Diagnostics and Commissioning GTL measurements.
David H. Dowell Injector Physics/Diagnostics/Gun&L0 RF April 29-30, 2004 Injector Physics / Diagnostics / Gun & L0 Linac.
August, 2003 W.S. Graves 1 Electron beam diagnostic methods William S. Graves MIT-Bates Laboratory Presented at 2003 ICFA S2E Workshop DESY-Zeuthen August,
Injector Setup/Mini-phase  Description of injector setup  sources of drift  Mini-phase procedure for injector  Checking the rest of the machine. Stephen.
Influence of the Third Harmonic Module on the Beam Size Maria Kuhn University of Hamburg Bachelor Thesis Presentation.
Low Emittance RF Gun Developments for PAL-XFEL
~ gun3.9 GHz cavity Bunch compressor 3 ILC cryomodules 45 deg. spectro injector main linac user area disp. area transport line Overview of.
LOLA setup simulated LOLA measurement*: no transverse beam dimensions imaging: entrance-LOLA to OTR simulated LOLA measurement*: gaussian transverse shape.
LCLS Accelerator SLAC linac tunnel research yard Linac-0 L =6 m Linac-1 L  9 m  rf   25° Linac-2 L  330 m  rf   41° Linac-3 L  550 m  rf  0°
Recent Experiments at PITZ ICFA Future Light Sources Sub-Panel Mini Workshop on Start-to-End Simulations of X-RAY FELs August 18-22, 2003 at DESY-Zeuthen,
A Transverse Profile Imager for SwissFEL Rasmus Ischebeck.
FLASH II. The results from FLASH II tests Sven Ackermann FEL seminar Hamburg, April 23 th, 2013.
Beam Dynamics and FEL Simulations for FLASH Igor Zagorodnov and Martin Dohlus Beam Dynamics Meeting, DESY.
A bunch compressor design and several X-band FELs Yipeng Sun, ARD/SLAC , LCLS-II meeting.
EMMA Extraction / Diagnostic line Bruno Muratori STFC, Daresbury Laboratory 01/09/08.
Bruno Muratori (for the EMMA team) STFC, Daresbury Laboratory EMMA commissioning 02/09/08.
Accelerator Science and Technology Centre Extended ALICE Injector J.W. McKenzie, B.D. Muratori, Y.M. Saveliev STFC Daresbury Laboratory,
T. Limberg Position of the 3rd Harmonic System. Injector (with first Bunch Compression Stage) 2 European XFEL MAC May 2010 T. Limberg.
W.S. Graves 2002 Berlin CSR workshop 1 Microbunching and CSR experiments at BNL’s Source Development Lab William S. Graves ICFA CSR Workshop Berlin, Jan.,
Awake electron beam requirements ParameterBaseline Phase 2Range to check Beam Energy16 MeV MeV Energy spread (  ) 0.5 %< 0.5 % ? Bunch Length (
Christopher Gerth & Christopher Behrens Mini-Workshop on Longitudinal Diagnostics for FELs 11/12 March 2013, PSI, Villigen TDS induced energy spread.
Construction, Commissioning, and Operation of Injector Test Facility (ITF) for the PAL-XFEL November 12, 2013 S. J. Park, J. H. Hong, C. K. Min, I. Y.
LCLS-II Injector layout design and study Feng Zhou 8/19/2015.
What did we learn from TTF1 FEL? P. Castro (DESY).
X-band Based FEL proposal
Wir schaffen Wissen – heute für morgen PSI, March 2013 Paul Scherrer Institut PSI / DESY / KIT Mini-Workshop on Longitudinal Diagnostics for FELs.
PAL-XFEL Commissioning Plan ver. 1.1, August 2015 PAL-XFEL Beam Dynamics Group.
Applications of transverse deflecting cavities in x-ray free-electron lasers Yuantao Ding SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory7/18/2012.
B. Marchetti R. Assmann, U. Dorda, J. Grebenyuk, Y. Nie, J. Zhu Acknowledgements: C. Behrens, R. Brinkmann, K. Flöttmann, M. Hüning,
+ SwissFEL Matlab Toolbox ADAQA used for Emittance Measurements Bolko Beutner, Rasmus Ischebeck PSI / DESY / KIT Mini-Workshop on Longitudinal Diagnostics.
Multi-bunch Operation for LCLS, LCLS_II, LCLS_2025
Studies at the SwissFEL Injector Test Facility
Sara Thorin, MAX IV Laboratory
6D Characterization of Witness Beam before Injection in LWFA
Thermal emittance measurement Gun Spectrometer
Revised Commissioning Strategy
Experimental Optimization and Characterization of Electron Beams for Generating IR/THz SASE FEL Radiation with PITZ. P. Boonpornprasert, G. Asova1, Y.
F. Villa Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati - LNF On behalf of Sparc_lab
What did we learn from TTF1 FEL?
Time-Resolved Images of Coherent Synchrotron Radiation Effects
Simulation Calculations
Advanced Research Electron Accelerator Laboratory
Z. Huang LCLS Lehman Review May 14, 2009
Linac/BC1 Commissioning P
VELA TDC: Bunch Length and Longitudinal Phasespace Measurements Update
LCLS Commissioning P. Emma, et al
LCLS Tracking Studies CSR micro-bunching in compressors
High Level Physics Applications for LCLS Commissioning
Laser Heater Integration into XFEL. Update.
Linac Diagnostics Patrick Krejcik, SLAC April 24, 2002
Injector Experimental Results John Schmerge, SSRL/SLAC April 24, 2002
Linac Physics, Diagnostics, and Commissioning Strategy P
Breakout Sessions SC1/SC2 – Accelerator Physics
Simulations for the LCLS Photo-Injector C
Diagnostics RF and Feedback
Linac Diagnostics Commissioning Experience
LCLS Injector Commissioning P
Injector Diagnostics Status
P. Emma, for the LCLS Commissioning Team LCLS DOE Review May 14, 2009
Electron Optics & Bunch Compression
New VUV-FEL Simulation results
Status of DESY-PSI-CERN collaboration on development of X-band TDS with variable polarisation: PolariX-TDS Alexej Grudiev on behalf of Polarix-TDS collaboration.
Presentation transcript:

Slice Parameter Measurements at the SwissFEL Injector Test Facility Eduard Prat Costa PSI/DESY/KIT Mini-Workshop on Longitudinal Diagnostics for FELs 11 March 2013 eduard.prat@psi.ch

Contents Introduction Longitudinal phase-space measurements Slice emittance measurements High-level applications Summary and next steps eduard.prat@psi.ch 2

SwissFEL Injector Test Facility (SITF) Phase 1: Electron source and diagnostics (03/2010 – 07/2010) Phase 2: Phase 1 + (some) S-band acceleration (08/2010 – summer 2011) Phase 3: The full machine Summer 2011: installation of bunch compressor. All S-band rf available from April 2012 X-band: power expected in April 2013 quadrupole BPM+screen screen Gun S-band X-band Bunch compressor FODO section Transverse deflector High-energy spectrometer E= 7 MeV E= 250 MeV Phase 4: Installation of new PSI gun + undulator experiment (08-09/2013) eduard.prat@psi.ch

Design optics for phase 3 CSR effects βx < 10m between 3rd and 4th dipole of BC Longitudinal resolution At the TD: βy = 40m Between TD and profile monitor: sin(Δy) = 1 resolution ~ 4μm for VMAX=5MV (assuming εy=0.5μm, E=250MeV) Energy spread resolution At the spectrometer: βx = 0.214m Dx = 0.267m resolution ~ 14keV (assuming εx=0.5μm, E=250MeV) Optics for symmetric single quad scan βx = βy = 15m αx = αy = 1.385 TD FINXB entrance BC eduard.prat@psi.ch 4

Transverse Deflector (TD) A Transverse Deflector (TD) is used to measure the longitudinal bunch profile and the slice parameters of the beam (energy, energy spread, transverse position, transverse size and emittance) TD gives a transverse (vertical) kick which depends on the longitudinal position of the beam. Calibration: the phase of the deflector is changed to obtain the calibration between vertical position and bunch arrival time. The centroid shift gives an idea of the equivalent time jitter of the beam. y at observation point y’ at TD position Calibration: S = 1.43mm/ps equivalent jitter = 0.11ps At the TD: βy = 40m Between TDC and monitor: sin(Δy) = 1 resolution ~ 4μm for VMAX=5MV (assuming εy=0.5μm, E=250MeV) eduard.prat@psi.ch 5

Longitudinal phase-space measurements Combining the TDC with an energy spectrometer the longitudinal phase-space can be measured At the SIFT these measurements are done at the spectrometer at the end of the lattice The bunch length is the beam size in the vertical plane normalized by the TD calibration Beam centroid position and beam size give information about energy and energy spread: σ2 = ε•β + D2•δ2 (δ = Δp/p) Optics resolution ~14keV (βx = 0.21m, Dx = 0.27m, εx=0.5μm, E=250MeV) Present resolution limited at around 80keV due to screen resolution More studies will be shown in Gian Luca’s talk, and more to be done soon Measurement example (230 MeV, on-crest) Slice energy spread and current profile Beam image Bunch length 2.73 ± 0.21 ps Energy spread at the core 76.4 ± 0.32 KeV eduard.prat@psi.ch 6

Slice emittance measurements Streaked beam Transverse deflection (streaking) Optics. The optics are scanned using 5 quads between transverse deflector and observation point (end of FODO section). Generate regular phase-advance in x Keep beam size under control Keep longitudinal resolution constant Transverse deflector calibration. At each optics the phase of the deflector is changed to obtain individual mm-ps calibration for each optics. Slice analysis. The beam is split into slices, using the centroid from Gauss fit as a reference. Per each slice the beam size from Gauss fit is obtained. Emittance/mismatch determination. From the beam sizes per each optics the emittance and optics are obtained per each slice. Projected parameters are also obtained Reconstructed emittance and optics eduard.prat@psi.ch 7

Optics for slice emittance 5 quads (F10D1.MQUA.60/70/80/90/100) are used to: Scan phase-advance in x Keep βx under control (35≤βx≤40) Keep βy small (βy<10) sin(μy) ~ 1 Beta functions at the screen k-values Phase-advances eduard.prat@psi.ch 8

Resolution, errors and matching Beam image close to screen resolution limit SwissFEL profile monitor (YAG + OTR) is used for emittance measurements. Beam size resolution is ~15μm, equivalent to an emittance resolution of ~ 3nm (E=250MeV, β=35m) Signal to noise ratio is good enough to measure slice emittance down to ~1pC level Errors Statistical errors from beam size variations (this is what is shown in the error bars of the measurements) Systematic errors: optics mismatch, energy error, quad field errors, screen calibration and resolution, errors associated to Gauss fit, etc. Matching Beam core is always matched to exclude errors due to optics mismatch Matching of the core works normally in 1-2 iterations Successful matching gives us confidence in the obtained emittance values eduard.prat@psi.ch 9

Optimum Emittances 200pC 10pC By doing a full optimization we have achieved the following emittances (uncompressed beam) These emittance values fulfill the SwissFEL requirements for uncompressed beams Emittance values are stable in short-term and optimum settings are reproducible 200 pC 10 pC Projected emittance ~0.30μm ~0.15μm Slice emittance ~0.20μm ~0.10μm 200pC 10pC eduard.prat@psi.ch 10

Example application: “thermal emittance” measurements Goal: compare thermal emittance for different wavelengths (267.5nm is our standard value). Method: scan the laser beam size and measure the slice emittance at low charge, keeping the charge density constant (10pC with 1.8mm aperture, bunch length of 10 ps). Measured values (~600nm/mm) are much better than simulation assumptions (910nm/mm). Degradation when going from 267.5nm to 260nm is only 5-10%. High order contributions possibly due to space charge or rf fields (not seen in simulations with ASTRA) We need further investigations (investigate space-charge effects, gun gradient contribution, etc.) λ=260.0nm λ=267.5nm Thermal emittance ~630nm/mm ~585nm/mm eduard.prat@psi.ch

High-level applications High-level applications written in Matlab (they use the generic toolbox ADAQA) One emittance tool for all type of measurements (projected and slice) Automatic analysis, data saving, plotting of results and logbook entry Routinely used in operation User needs to do some preparation and checks: Measure the beam energy Switch on TD and check the zero-crossing phase Be sure that the used screen is in and that the ROI is properly chosen For emittance measurements, check that the quads do not steer out of the ROI Plot for slice emittance measurement eduard.prat@psi.ch 12

GUI for longitudinal phase-space measurements eduard.prat@psi.ch 13

GUI for emittance measurements eduard.prat@psi.ch 14

GUI for optics matching eduard.prat@psi.ch 15

Summary and next steps Summary Methods to measure slice beam parameters well developed and tested at the SwissFEL Injector Test Facility Longitudinal phase-space Longitudinal resolution = 4μm (for VMAX = 5 MV) Energy spread resolution = 14keV (now limited to ~80keV due to screen resolution) Slice emittance Emittance resolution around 3nm Successful optics matching Great results achieved for uncompressed bunches High-level applications developed for these measurements, routinely used in operation Next steps Emittance optimization for compressed bunches with X-band cavity Long. phase-space measurements for compressed bunches with X-band cavity Improve profile monitor at energy spectrometer eduard.prat@psi.ch 16