Disclosure Consultations and Honoraria Grant Support

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Foos et al, EASD, Lisbon, 13 September 2011 Comparison of ACCORD trial outcomes with outcomes estimated from modelled and meta- analysis studies Volker.
Advertisements

ACCORD - Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes ADVANCE - Action in Diabetes to Prevent Vascular Disease VADT - Veterans Administration Diabetes.
Clinical Outcomes with Newer Antihyperglycemic Agents
Session II: Glycemic control, when the lower is not the better Strict glycemic control and cardiovascular diseases Stefano Genovese Diabetologia e Malattie.
Introduction Bernard Zinman CM, MD, FRCP, FACP Director, Leadership Sinai Centre for Diabetes Professor of Medicine, University of Toronto 1.
Glycemic Control: When the Lower is Not the “Better”?
Study Design Scirica BM, Bhatt DL Braunwald et al, Sexagliptin and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med
Lancet 373: , 2009 Baseline Characteristics of Participants and Study Design of Clinical Trials to Compare Intensive glucose- lowering versus.
Background There are 12 different types of medications to lower blood sugar levels in patients with type 2 diabetes. It is widely agreed upon that metformin.
Diabetes Mellitus 101 for Cardiologists (and Alike): 2015
Clinical Outcomes with Newer Antihyperglycemic Agents FDA-Mandated CV Safety Trials 1.
Long-term Cardiovascular Effects of 4.9 Years of Intensive Blood Pressure Control in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: The Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk.
Prevalence (%) estimates of diabetes (20-79 years) 2010.
Enrollment and Outcomes Duckworth W, et al. N Engl J Med 2009;360:
Clinical Outcomes with Newer Antihyperglycemic Agents
Clinical Outcomes with Newer Antihyperglycemic Agents
Mikhail Kosiborod, MD Professor of Medicine (Cardiology)
The Evolution of Cardiovascular Outcomes Trials in T2DM Over the Years
Reducing Adverse Outcomes after ACS in Patients with Diabetes Goals
Natural History of ALL DM
Cardiovascular Outcomes Trials with Antihyperglycemic Agents
LEADER trial: Primary Outcome
Recent Breakthroughs in Cardiovascular Outcomes Trials in T2DM
Pravastatin in Elderly Individuals at Risk of Vascular Disease
Cardiovascular Outcomes Trials with Antihyperglycemic Agents
United States Preventive Services Task Force: Recommendations for ABPM
New Insights from EXSCEL
Diabetes and Risk of CV Outcomes
Diabetes Therapies and Cardiovascular Outcomes
Natural History of ALL DM
with type 2 diabetes without heart failure?
Updates on CVOT Data and Clinical Comparisons That Matter
Cardiovascular outcomes
Global Projections for Diabetes:
Expert Panelists. Emerging CV Outcomes Trial Results: What Do They Mean for T2D Management?
Updates on Outcomes for Novel T2D Therapies
366 میلیون نفر در جهان مبتلا به دیابت هستند.
Latest Cardiovascular Outcomes Trials: A Closer Look at the LEADER Results.
Clinical Application of New CV Outcomes Data
T2DM and CV Outcomes Trials: A Deep Dive!
A Deep Dive Into CVOTs.
Should SGLT2 Inhibitors Be the Primary Agents for CV Risk Reduction in T2DM?
SGLT2 inhibitors, Now Part of the Cardiology Toolkit for Comprehensive CV Risk Management.
Growing Diabetes Pandemic Worldwide
Tackling CV Risk in T2DM.
EXAMINE Study: Cardiovascular Outcomes Study of Alogliptin in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes and Acute Coronary Syndrome.
Panelists. Secondary Prevention in Patients With ACS and Diabetes: How Can We Optimize Therapy?
T2DM, CV Safety, and Efficacy: DPP-4 Inhibitors in focus
LEADER One Year On.
Learning Objectives Metabolic Abnormalities Associated With T2D.
Antihyperglycemic Therapy
Heart failure.
Dr K Vithian Consultant in Diabetes & Endocrinology NEEDS & ESNEFT
Glycemic control for macrovascular disease in type II diabetes: Evidence and insights from recent trials  Sanjay Rajagopalan  Journal of Indian College.
T2DM, CV Risk, and Modulating Risk With Glucose-Lowering Strategies
P2Y12 blockade versus placebo; risk ratio with 95% CIs for the primary composite end point of cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction and.
Pharmacotherapy for Diabetic Coronary Disease:
(p for noninferiority < 0.001)
2015 EASD In Review: CV Risk management in t2dm
New frontiers in Diabetes management
An ACCORD BP sub-analysis HR: 1.06; 95%CI: ; P=0.61
Should SGLT2 Inhibitors Be the Primary Agents for CV Risk Reduction in T2DM?
CANVAS programe subanalyses HR (95%CI): 0.65 ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
EMPA-REG OUTCOME: Cumulative incidence of the primary outcome
An ACCORD BP sub-analysis HR: 1.06; 95%CI: ; P=0.61
John J.V. McMurray et al. JCHF 2018;6:8-17
Evolution of prospectively planned primary end points in completed CVOTs of antihyperglycemic treatments for type 2 diabetes, listed in order of year of.
Prasugrel versus clopidogrel; risk ratio with 95% CIs for the primary composite end point of cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction and.
BRIDGING CVD AND T2DM: LESSONS LEARNED FROM OUTCOME TRIALS
Prasugrel and ticagrelor versus clopidogrel; risk ratio with 95% CIs for the primary composite end point of cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial.
Presentation transcript:

Disclosure Consultations and Honoraria Grant Support AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Merck, Novo Nordisk, Sanofi, Takeda Grant Support Boehringer Ingelheim, Novo Nordisk, Merck

Type 2 diabetes is increasingly prevalent Globally, 387 million people are living with diabetes1 At least 68% of people >65 years with diabetes die of heart disease2 Mortality risk associated with diabetes (n=820,900)3 This will rise to 592 million by 20351 1. IDF Diabetes Atlas 6th Edition 2014 http://www.idf.org/diabetesatlas; 2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2011; 3. Seshasai et al. N Engl J Med 2011;364:829-41

Diabetes is associated with significant loss of life years Men Women 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 40 50 60 70 80 90 Age (years) Years of life lost 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 40 50 60 70 80 90 Age (years) Non-vascular deaths Vascular deaths On average, a 50-year-old individual with diabetes and no history of vascular disease will die 6 years earlier compared to someone without diabetes . Seshasai et al. N Engl J Med 2011;364:829-41

Meta-analysis of intensive glucose control in T2DM: major CV events including heart failure Number of events More intensive Less intensive Difference in HbA1c (%) HR (95% CI) Stroke 378 370 -0.88 0.96 (0.83, 1.10) Myocardial infarction 730 745 0.85 (0.76, 0.94) Hospitalisation for or death from heart failure 459 446 1.00 (0.86, 1.16) Favours more intensive Favours less intensive Meta-analysis of 27,049 participants and 2370 major vascular events from: ADVANCE UKPDS ACCORD VADT HR, hazard ratio; CV, cardiovascular Turnbull FM et al. Diabetologia 2009;52:2288–2298

Meta-analysis of intensive glucose control in T2DM: mortality Number of events More intensive Less intensive Difference in HbA1c (%) HR (95% CI) All-cause mortality 980 884 -0.88 1.04 (0.90,1.20) CV death 497 441 1.10 (0.84,1.42) Non-CV death 476 432 1.02 (0.89,1.18) Favours more intensive Favours less intensive Meta-analysis of 27,049 participants and 2370 major vascular events from ADVANCE UKPDS ACCORD VADT HR, hazard ratio; CV, cardiovascular Turnbull FM et al. Diabetologia 2009;52:2288–2298

Recent trials of newer glucose-lowering agents have been neutral on the primary CV outcome HR: 1.0 (95% CI: 0.89, 1.12) SAVOR-TIMI 53 HR: 0.98 (95% CI: 0.88, 1.09) TECOS HR: 0.96 (95% CI: UL ≤1.16) EXAMINE 2013 2014 2015 HR: 1.02 (95% CI: 0.89, 1.17) ELIXA DPP-4 inhibitors* EMPA-REG OUTCOME® Lixisenatide Empagliflozin CV, cardiovascular; HR, hazard ratio; DPP-4, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 *Saxagliptin, alogliptin, sitagliptin Adapted from Johansen OE. World J Diabetes 2015;6:1092-96