QuakeCoRE Project Update

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 MAJOR FINDINGS OF THE PROJECT AND THEIR POSSIBLE INCLUSION IN EUROPEAN STANDARD -Major findings -Major findings suitable for inclusion in European Standard.
Advertisements

Soil Exploration Part II
Drained or Undrained: Is That the Question? Amin Rismanchian
Educational Resource Library
The standard penetration test (SPT) is an in-situ dynamic penetration test designed to provide information on the geotechnical.
Development of an In-Situ Test for Direct Evaluation of the Liquefaction Resistance of Soils K. H. Stokoe, II, E. M. Rathje and B.R. Cox University of.
Course : S0705 – Soil Mechanic
INTRODUCTION Session 1 – 2
Design Parameters.
Sensitivity Analysis In deterministic analysis, single fixed values (typically, mean values) of representative samples or strength parameters or slope.
Pore-Pressure Generation During CPT Probe Advancement By Michael Fitzgerald.
Impacts of Seismic Stress on Pore Water Pressure in Clayey Soil By: Qazi Umar Farooq Lecturer Civil Engineering Dept Univ of Engg & Tech Taxila.
The Liquefaction Resistance and Maximum Shear Modulus of Frozen Samples Yao-Chung Chen Department of Construction Engineering National Taiwan University.
Geotechnical Site Characterization by Cone Penetration Testing
Application of CPT data for evaluation of ground liquefaction in Chi-Chi Earthquake, Taiwan D.H. Lee 1, C.S. Ku 2, C.S. Chen 1, C.H. Juang 3 &J.H. Wu 3.
Determination of Soil Stiffness Parameters
Fawad S. Niazi Geosystems Engineering Division Civil & Environmental Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology April 27, 2010 Spatial Variability of.
Time-dependent increase in CPT tip resistance following explosive compaction. Time-dependent increase in V s following explosive compaction, as measured.
“LIQUEFACTION” Prepared By: Husni M. Awwad Talal Z. Zammar
LIQUEFACATION OF SILTS AND SILT-CLAY MIXTURES US TAIWAN WORKSHOP ON LIQUEFACTION November-2003 Vijay K. Puri Professor Southern Illinois University Carbondale,
Insitu Testing Methods Breakout Session Research Collaboration Field Testing Research Needs Ken Stokoe, Breakout Moderator.
The Use of Full Flow Penetrometers in an Intermediate Soil; Silt By: Alan Abad & Mark Jones.
Liquefaction: Behavior Evidence, Prediction, and Prevention.
Field Borings and Cone Penetration Testing
PEER Jonathan P. Stewart University of California, Los Angeles May 22, 2002 Geotechnical Uncertainties for PBEE.
Liquefaction: Behavior Evidence, Prediction, and Prevention Richard P. Ray, Ph.D, P.E.
Soils Investigation Soil Investigation
GEO-MECHANICS (CE2204) Shear Strength of Soils
Subsurface Investigation Building structure system.
1 Field Approach A Test pile of required dimensions is constructed in the field and a load test is conducted to assess the capacity of the pile. This approach.
Estimation of the Uncertainty of the Robertson and Wride Model for Reliability Analysis of Soil Liquefaction C. Hsein Juang and Susan H. Yang Clemson University.
Field Methodologies: Detailed Investigation Andrew Simon USDA-ARS National Sedimentation Laboratory, Oxford, MS
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES CFAC Review Thomas F. Joos, P.E. Civil/Structural Engineer BNL Plant Engineering Division May 8, 2007 NSLS-II Conventional.
CE 317 Geotechnical Engineering Dr. Tae-Hyuk Kwon
1 Interpretation and Visualization of Model Test Data for Slope Failure in Liquefying Soil Bruce L. Kutter Erik J. Malvick R. Kulasingam Ross Boulanger.
DEPARTMENT FOR GEOTECHNICS AND SPECIAL STRUCTURES Laboratory for dynamics of soils and foundations University Ss. Cyril and Methodius in Skopje Institute.
A Study on Liquefaction Evaluation Using Shear Wave Velocity for Gravelly Sand Deposits Ping-Sien Lin, National Chung-Hsing University Fu-Sheng Chen, China.
Amit Prashant Associate Professor Dept. of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology Gadhinagar, India 5th Tongji-UBC Symposium on Earthquake Engineering,
An Easy Method of Determining Hydraulic Conductivity of Soils using Pore Pressure Response of Piezocone Penetration Test Chung R Song, Ph.D., University.
Dynamic Behaviour of Unsaturated CH soil under Cyclic Loading in Unconsolidated Undrained Conditions 5th Tongji-UBC Symposium on Earthquake Engineering,
Steps in Foundation Engineering Understand project and site Develop design criteria Identify possible foundation alternatives Conduct soil investigation.
FIG_14.jpg.
SITE INVESTIGATION.
BASICS OF DYNAMICS AND ASEISMIC DESIGN
Correlating, V s, q c and Cyclic Resistance of a Silty Sand through Laboratory Calibration Tests An-Bin Huang, Yao-Tao Huang, and Yu-Chen Kuo Department.
SOIL MECHANICS AND FOUNDATION ENGINEERING-II (CE 311)
SOIL MECHANICS AND FOUNDATION ENGINEERING-II (CE 311)
SOIL MECHANICS AND FOUNDATION ENGINEERING-II (CE 311)
Liquefaction Mitigation using GeoComposite Vertical Drains
Lecturer: Dr. Frederick Owusu-Nimo
Ch. 12 Shear strengths of soil.
The Engineering of Foundations
G-γ stiffness degradation curves by seismic dilatometer (SDMT)
Evaluation of undisturbed sampling techniques for pumiceous soils
QuakeCoRE Flagship 2 The National Liquefaction Database
A possible mechanism of dynamic earthquake triggering
Piezocone Penetration
CFAC Review NSLS-II Conventional Facilities Update
Lecturer: Dr. Frederick Owusu-Nimo
Presented By: Sanku Konai
Methodologies for Geotechnical Characterization in Railways in Operation. An Experience. Nuno Cruz, Eduardo Fortunato, Francisco Asseiceiro, Jorge Cruz,
Objectives:   Determine areas where liquefaction has previously occurred and also areas where liquefaction has not occurred in New Zealand from observational.
Elected Member Workshop
on soft clay using finite element method Road & Highway Engineering
WHAT IS LIQUEFACTION.
Structural Design of Highway
PAT GEOTECHNIC INTRODUCTION TO GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING.
Scott McFarlane & Richard Merifield
Determination of Soil Stiffness Parameters
lectures Notes on: Soil Mechanics
Presentation transcript:

QuakeCoRE Project Update 17 January7 2017 Liquefaction characteristics of pumiceous deposits from high-quality sampling RP Orense & M Stringer

Background In two previous QuakeCoRE research projects, the focus was on sites where liquefaction had been observed following the 1987 Edgecumbe earthquake. Using field-obtained parameters (CPT, shear wave velocity, screw driving sounding data), assessment of the occurrence/non-occurrence of liquefaction at these sites following the earthquake was done using available empirical chart-based approaches. Conventional push-tube sampling and more advanced sampling techniques, such as the gel-push sampler and Dames-Moore sampler, were used to obtain samples at a site to evaluate the most appropriate sampling technique that can obtain high-quality undisturbed pumice deposits. More field tests and soil sampling, as well as laboratory testing, are required at other pumiceous sites in the North Island to supplement current findings.

Previous Research (1) Dilatometer tests Cyclic resistance ratio, CRR Dilatometer Modulus, ED (MPa) Horizontal stress index, kD (after Orense et al. 2012) 7

Previous Research (2) Cone Penetration Test Shear wave velocity Cyclic resistance ratio, CRR Cyclic resistance ratio, CRR (after Orense et al. 2012) Tip resistance, Qtn,cs Shear wave velocity, VS (m/s) Penetration-based methods do not correlate well with the laboratory-obtained CRR. Reason: The shear stresses during penetration were so severe that particle breakage formed new finer grained materials, the mechanical properties of which were very different from the original pumice sand. 8

Research objectives Characterise various pumiceous sites in the Waikato Region by performing field testing at designated sites (e.g. cone penetration tests, shear wave velocity profiling) and high-quality undisturbed soil sampling. Identify appropriate approach(es) for evaluation of liquefaction triggering in pumiceous deposits. It is envisioned that the results of this project will aid in the development of industry guidelines for evaluating liquefaction potential of pumiceous soils.

Research Methodology Identify target sites in the Waikato Region where field testing and sampling will be performed. Perform field testing at the designated sites. If possible, CPT and Vs-profiling and undisturbed sampling would be conducted as close to each other as possible (ideally <2m between investigations). Obtain undisturbed pumiceous samples from the target sites using advanced (e.g. Gel-push or Dames & Moore samplers) sampling techniques. Note: The choice of sampler for each site will be guided by the results from the 2016 QuakeCORE project. Conduct stress-controlled undrained cyclic triaxial tests on the undisturbed soil samples obtained (from previous project as well as this project) and determine the liquefaction resistance of the samples, as well as the development of strain and excess pore water pressure with the applied cycles. Compare the cyclic resistance obtained in the laboratory with the field-based cyclic resistance estimated from field-based parameters. Also, attempt to perform energy-based and/or strain-based approach to best explain the liquefaction resistance of pumiceous soils.

Expected impacts In the short-term, the research output will assist the local profession through guidelines on obtaining high-quality undisturbed soils for use in geotechnical investigation and appropriate field testing at pumiceous sites. Careful examination of the material behaviour under different loading conditions in the laboratory are expected to advance our understanding of the similarities and differences in the behaviour of natural pumiceous deposits relative to purely hard grained material. In the long-term, the research outputs will be combined with previous, on-going and planned future work to develop design guidelines in evaluating liquefaction potential of pumiceous deposits. In addition, the planned journal publications and conference presentations detailing the research outputs will inform the end-users on how to deal with these soils.