Risk Assessment Framework for Geologic Carbon Sequestration Sites

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Solution of Benchmark Problems for CO 2 Storage Min Jin, Gillian Pickup and Eric Mackay Heriot-Watt University Institute of Petroleum Engineering.
Advertisements

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION Figure 1: High-level workflow for the assessment of potential interaction of CO 2 geological storage with other basin resources,
Introduction to Geologic Sequestration of CO 2 Susan D. Hovorka Gulf Coast Carbon Center, Bureau of Economic Geology Jackson School of Geosciences, The.
Sandia National Laboratories is a multi-program laboratory managed and operated by Sandia Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of Lockheed Martin Corporation,
Geologic Storage of CO 2 : Leakage Pathways and Environmental Risks Michael A. Celia, Catherine A. Peters, and Stefan Bachu Princeton University and Alberta.
TTI Regulatory and Permitting Issues For Geologic Sequestration of CO2 Presentation to the West Coast Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnership September.
CO 2 Sequestration Catherine Peters Princeton University Deep Carbon Cycle Workshop May 15-17, 2008 Carnegie Institution Geophysical Laboratory.
Earth Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
TTI CO2 Sequestration in Geologic Formations Terralog Technologies USA, Inc. BP Hydrogen Energy CO2 Project.
Bill Leith Senior Science Advisor for Earthquake and Geologic Hazards U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey.
Technical options for placement of CO 2 in the maritime area  by Paul Freund
Induced Seismicity Houston Bar Association Environmental Law Section Houston, Texas January 21, 2015 Mark K. Boling Executive Vice President and President,
Dealing with Global Warming SNC2D. The IPCC The IPCC is the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, a group of the world’s leading climate scientists.
POTENTIAL NEW USES FOR OLD GAS FIELDS: SEQUESTRATION OF CARBON DIOXIDE Paul R. Knox Susan D. Hovorka Bureau of Economic Geology Jackson School of Geosciences.
CO 2 Sequestration Options for California Larry Myer WESTCARB Technical Director California Energy Commission (916) ; ETAAC.
Geothermal Energy is the Ethical Energy Source for the Future Will Gosnold Dept. of Geology and Geological Engineering Donald Poochigian Dept. of Philosophy.
Increasing atmospheric concentrations of greenhouse gases are known to be causing a gradual warming of the Earth's surface and potentially disastrous changes.
Carbon, Capture And Storage. Capture and Storage  Not quite this simple:
Carbon, Capture And Storage. Capture and Storage  Not quite this simple:
Alexander Voice 24 November  Motivation for the development of CCS technology  Climate change  Energy profile and outlook  Public perception.
Challenges to the Development and Commercialization of CCS Cheyenne A. Alabanzas 2009 ASME Intern University of Alaska – Anchorage.
National Geophysical Research Institute, Hyderabad.
Martin J Blunt Department of Earth Science and Engineering, Imperial College London Two hundred barrels left: an analysis of population growth, oil reserves.
Greenhouse Gas Mitigation & CO 2 Storage Prof. Jenn-Tai Liang Chemical & Petroleum Engineering Department The University of Kansas.
EPA's Regulatory Approach : Climate Mitigation via Sequestration of CO2: by Rob Ferri (EPA - Underground Injection Control) This presentation has not been.
Permanent CO 2 storage in depleted gas fields combined with CO 2 enhanced gas recovery (EGR) Idar Akervoll, SINTEF Petroleum, Trondheim Contribution to.
HSE Screening Risk Assessment (SRA) for Geologic CO 2 Sequestration Curtis M. Oldenburg Earth Sciences Division WESTCARB Meeting Portland, OR October 27-28,
Professor Peter Styles Keele University United Kingdom.
ENGINE LAUCHING CONFERENCE ORLEANS Geothermal energy and strategies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions C. Fouillac Research Direction.
INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE (IPCC) The IPCC on Carbon dioxide Capture and Storage Heleen de Coninck (IPCC WG III on Mitigation) DEFRA/IRADe.
A combustion system capable of self-sustaining, unpiloted coal burning at thermal outputs as low as 500 W and as high as 50 kW has been designed and constructed.
Risk Assessment for Geologic Sequestration of CO 2 Presented to: West Coast Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnership Sacramento, California September.
Ch WAC Geologic Sequestration of Carbon dioxide John Stormon Hydrogeologist Washington Department of Ecology Seattle, WA October.
Ran Qi, Valcir T Beraldo, Tara C LaForce, Martin J Blunt Design of CO 2 storage in aquifers 17 th Jan Imperial College Consortium on Pore-Scale Modelling.
Computational Modeling of Carbon Dioxide in Saline Reservoirs Caitlin M. Augustin Peter K. Swart Timothy H. Dixon Augustin et al., 2010.
Can Carbon Capture and Storage Clean up Fossil Fuels Geoffrey Thyne Enhanced Oil Recovery Institute University of Wyoming.
LM-01L Carbon Capture and Geologic Storage Larry R. Myer Earth Sciences Division Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Physics of Sustainable Energy March.
Energy and the Environment: Tapping the Potential for Large Volume Storage of Carbon in the Gulf Coast Susan Hovorka Bureau of Economic Geology Jackson.
Numerical simulation of industrial scale CO 2 -H 2 S injection into basalts at Hellisheidi, SW-Iceland David Stevens 1,2*, Edda S.P. Aradóttir 1 Introduction.
Role of Geochemical Interactions in Assuring Permanence of Storage of CO 2 in Geologic Environments Susan D. Hovorka Gulf Coast Carbon Center, Bureau of.
M idcontinent I nteractive D igital C arbon A tlas and R elational Data B ase James A. Drahovzal, Lawrence H. Wickstrom, Timothy R.Carr, John A. Rupp,
Recent progress and big ideas on geologic sequestration US/international perspective Susan D. Hovorka Gulf Coast Carbon Center Jackson School of Geosciences.
Recent progress and big ideas on CCS US/international perspective.
Carbon Capture and Storage Potentials and Barriers to Deployment.
Carbon Dioxide Fluxes in a Forest Soil in the Citronelle Oil Field of South Alabama Latasha Lyte and E.Z. Nyakatawa Department of Natural Resources and.
Global Warming – The Broad Legal Reach of Initiatives to Reduce Carbon Emissions Worldwide Legal Issues Associated with Carbon Capture and Geologic Storage.
Carbon Capture and Storage In Texas Susan D. Hovorka Gulf Coast Carbon Center, Bureau of Economic Geology Jackson School of Geosciences, The University.
Geologic Sequestration: the Big Picture Estimation of Storage Capacity or How Big is Big Enough Susan Hovorka, Srivatsan Lakshminarasimhan, JP Nicot Gulf.
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Earth Sciences Division 1 Cyclotron Road, MS Berkeley, CA D modeling of fault reactivation.
What to do with CO 2 – the knowns and unknowns of geologic sequestration and CO 2 EOR in greenhouse gas context Susan Hovorka, Gulf Coast Carbon Center,
Copyright 2003 SIEP B.V. Shell Exploration & Production Risk Assessment for Geological CO 2 Storage Wolf Heidug.
Pulsed emission of methane (CH 4 ) from a small eutrophic lake Arianto Santoso David Hamilton photo credit: Joint Conference.
Environmental Impact Assessment Speaker : Yong Hoon Kim, Ph.D.
Idar Akervoll, SINTEF Petroleum, Trondheim
- Environmental Impact Assessment and Leakage detection -
GROUND WATER Introduction Sources and Discharge of Ground Water
Challenges in Global CCS Projects
TOUGHREACT: A Reactive Transport Simulator
A New Coal-Permeability Model:
John P. Holdren Director, The Woods Hole Research Center
A High-Temperature CO2–Brine Phase-Partitioning Model for
West Coast Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnership (WESTCARB)
Recent Advances in Well-Based Monitoring of CO2 Sequestration
Impact of Flowing Formation Water on Residual CO2 Saturations
CO2 Capture and Storage Potential for Reducing CO2 Emissions
Energy and Environment ENVE 411
GeoERA - GROUNDWATER VoGERA - rationale Increased pressure on deep sub-surface in Europe for energy related activities e.g. oil and gas, geothermal, energy.
D – H are Negative Emission Technologies
How does the CO2 quality impact on geological storage of CO2?
POTENTIAL NEW USES FOR OLD GAS FIELDS: SEQUESTRATION OF CARBON DIOXIDE Paul R. Knox Susan D. Hovorka Bureau of Economic Geology Jackson School of Geosciences.
Presentation transcript:

Risk Assessment Framework for Geologic Carbon Sequestration Sites Curtis M. Oldenburg1, Steven L. Bryant2, and Jean-Philippe Nicot1 1Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory 2University of Texas, Austin 3Texas Bureau of Economic Geology ABSTRACT CF SUBMODELS Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) mitigates the risk of climate change by directly reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Mitigating climate change by CCS entails costs (e.g., monetary for implementing the capture and storage technology) and risks (e.g., possibility of local impacts such as CO2 leakage or induced seismicity due to CO2 injection). We have developed a simple and transparent Certification Framework (CF) for certifying that the local risks of a given Geologic Carbon Sequestration (GCS) site are below agreed-upon thresholds. Leakage risk in the CF is based on the concept of effective trapping of CO2, whereby both the likelihood and impact of CO2 leakage are considered. The CF calculates CO2 (and brine) leakage risk by (1) estimating the probability of intersection of conductive faults and potentially leaky wells with the expected CO2 plume, and by (2) modeling fluxes or concentrations of CO2 under potential leakage scenarios as proxies for impacts to compartments (such as potable groundwater). Reservoir Simulation Reservoir Simulation (GEM or TOUGH2) is used to calculate the CO2 plume evolution and brine pressure perturbation footprints. Saturation and/or concentrations and pressures are either read from a catalog of pre-simulated results or computed on a site-specific basis. Well and Fault Leakage The CF calculates CO2 leakage flux using either simple models for flow up conduits (Oldenburg et al., 2008) or the more complex multicomponent drift-flux model (Pan et al., 2008). Fault Intersection Probability The CF calculates plume-fault intersection probability and considers likelihood of encountering a fault with an offset, e.g., larger than the seal thickness and therefore likely to be a leaky fault (Jordan et al., 2008). CF CONCEPTUALIZATION Fault Connectivity Intersecting fault networks can give rise to connected pathways from the storage region to shallow compartments. Our project is carrying out research on the use of percolation theory and fuzzy rules to model fault networks (Zhang et al., 2008; 2009). ECA Compartment NSE Compartment Dense Gas Dispersion Impact In the unlikely event that CO2 reaches the ground surface, the CF is carrying out research to use dense-gas dispersion modeling to understand how surface leakage of CO2 will disperse under various condiions of topography and ambient wind (Chow et al., 2009). USDW Compartment Conduits (wells and faults) . CASE STUDY (SOUTHERN SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY, CA) HMR Compartment Leakage Storage Region Injection into Vedder Bakersfield, CA Probability System input description Simulation output CF Output USDW is the main compartment vulnerable to impacts. USDW is approx. 1 km vertically above storage region. 250,000 t CO2/yr for four years into 160 m thick Vedder Fm at 2300 m depth. Very low probability that CO2 plume will encounter wells. Small chance (~3%) that CO2 will encounter fault with offset equal to seal thickness. Faults not expected to be conductive by shale-gouge ratio and oil trapping experience. Leakage risk found to be de minimis (effective trapping) for this site. CONCLUSIONS We have developed a simple and transparent framework for estimating local risks of GCS, e.g, due to CO2 or brine leakage. The CF simplifies the complex geologic and environmental system into a handful of compartments and relies on specialized submodels to calculate probabilities of various intersections and the resulting fluxes or concentrations that lead to impact. Research is continuing on the development of specialized submodels and on applications of the CF to specific sites (e.g., U.S. and international pilot and industrial-scale sites). ECA = Emission Credits and Atmosphere HS = Health, Safety, and Environment NSE = Near-Surface Environment USDW = Underground Source of Drinking Water HMR = Hydrocarbon and Mineral Resources CO2 = Injected CO2 source Fluxes and concentrations (j, C) of CO2 into/in compartments are proxies for impact to vulnerable assets. CF WORKFLOW REFERENCES Oldenburg, C.M., J.-P. Nicot, and S.L. Bryant, Case studies of the application of the Certification Framework to two geologic carbon sequestration sites, Energy Procedia, GHGT9 conference, Nov. 16-20, 2008, Washington DC. LBNL-1421E. Oldenburg, C.M., S.L. Bryant, and J.-P. Nicot, Certification Framework Based on Effective Trapping for Geologic Carbon Sequestration, Int. J. of Greenhouse Gas Control 3, 444–457, 2009, LBNL-1549E. Oldenburg, C.M., S.L. Bryant, J.-P. Nicot, N. Kumar, Y. Zhang, P. Jordan, L. Pan, P. Granvold, F.K. Chow, Model Components of the Certification Framework for Geologic Carbon Sequestration Risk Assessment, in Carbon Dioxide Capture for Storage in Deep Geological Formations, Volume 3, L.I. Eide (Ed.), CPL Press and BP, 2009. LBNL-2038E. Jordan, P.D., C.M. Oldenburg, and J.-P. Nicot, Characterizing fault-plume intersection probability for geologic carbon sequestration leakage risk assessment, Energy Procedia, GHGT9 conference, Nov. 16-20, 2008, Washington DC, LBNL-1522E. Zhang, Y., C.M. Oldenburg, and S. Finsterle, Percolation-Theory and Fuzzy Rule-Based Probability Estimation of Fault Leakage at Geologic Carbon Sequestration Sites, Env. Earth Sci., LBNL-2172E, in press. Zhang, Y., C.M. Oldenburg, P.D. Jordan, S. Finsterle, and K. Zhang, Fuzzy Rule-Based Probability Estimation of Fault Leakage at Geologic Carbon Sequestration Sites, Energy Procedia, GHGT9 conference, Nov. 16-20, 2008, Washington DC. LBNL-1415E. Chow, F.K., P.W. Granvold, and C.M. Oldenburg, Modeling the effects of topography and wind on atmospheric dispersion of CO2 surface leakage at geologic carbon sequestration sites, Energy Procedia, GHGT9 conference, Nov. 16-20, 2008, Washington DC., LBNL-1420E. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This work was supported in part by the CO2 Capture Project (CCP) of the Joint Industry Program (JIP), and by Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory under Department of Energy Contract No. DE-AC02-05CH11231. cmoldenburg@lbl.gov , steven_bryant@mail.utexas.edu , jp.nicot@beg.utexas.edu