Deltares, Delft, Netherland

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ecosystem Processes ECOSYSTEM DEFINITION
Advertisements

The state of the Gulf of Finland- gaps in our present knowledge
EU Marine Strategy Framework Directive Descriptor 11: Underwater Noise
Gianna Casazza European Commission DG Environment, Marine Unit La Direttiva Quadro sulla Strategia per l’Ambiente Marino (Direttiva 2008/56/CE) Marine.
Click to edit Master title style 1 marinescotland science Marine Strategy Framework Directive Programme of Measures Consultation Descriptor 7: Hydrographical.
Marine Strategy Framework Directive: Goals and Challenges
Marine Pilot How the Marine Pilot is organized and current status
1 Fisheries sustainability – CFP directions, MSFD descriptors and CSI Poul Degnbol Head of ICES advisory programme / ETC/W Marine and Coastal EEA/EIONET.
Descriptor 3 for determining Good Environmental Status (GES) under the MSFD was defined as “Populations of all commercially exploited fish and shellfish.
The Marine Strategy Framework Directive 17th March 2010, Newcastle North Sea Stakeholders Conference Leo de Vrees European Commission (DG Environment,
Anna Donald Marine Planning and Strategy Marine Scotland
MEDITERRE 2012 – Bari, 1 st February - SHAPE Project International Conference Roberto Bertaggia - Direzione Progetto Venezia - Regione del Veneto Approaching.
Marine assessment workshop th April 2015 EEA, Copenhagen Indicators – state of the art Natural Systems & Vulnerability, NSV4, EEA.
INSPIRE Developing the “Marine Pilot” project: Directorate-General Environment Governance, Information & Reporting Unit EC/EEA.
21 November 2014 EU Service contract: Development of a shared data and information system between the EU and the Regional Sea Conventions (phase 1) Meeting.
Comparison between ECAP indicators and what EMODnet can offer in the Mediterranean Sea Intro Oostende, Belgium, 21st September 2015 Giordano Giorgi*, in.
Rodney Forster Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science (Cefas) Lowestoft, UK Products from the EMECO North Sea Observatory: an EU policy.
North Sea Observatory Tony Walne, Abigail McQuatters-Gollop SAHFOS, Plymouth SAHFOS currently: tows CPRs about 2000 miles/month in North Sea analyses about.
Counselor dr. Otilia Mihail Ministry of Environment, Water and Forest Constanta 17 June
WP6 trends in biodiversity - Review impacts - Explore trends in catch data - Explore trends in survey data - Options for assessing trends in invertebrates.
ML management within the MSFD framework: current status and recommendations Ognjen Škunca Conference on regional cooperation in Marine Litter.
COCONET SUMMER COURSE “GES & MPAs” Good Environmental Status and Marine Protected Areas in the Mediterranean and Black Sea Rabat, 8-13 september
EMODnet Chemistry 3 Kick-off Meeting May 2017
Pascal Lorance & Verena Trenkel, Ifremer, France
Indicators and underlying data-flows to be used in 2017 Quality Status Report - Data & information system Virginie Hart, Programme Officer, Monitoring.
EMODnet Chemistry initiative
A Sea for Life The Marine Strategy Framework Directive
MSFD integrated reporting
Andrej Abramic, Alejandro Garcia, Yaiza Fernandez, Ricardo Haroun
Using EcAp/IMAP indicators for MSP: Experience from Montenegro
GENERAL FISHERIES COMMISSION COMMISSION GÉNÉRALE DES PÊCHES
Introduction of energy, including underwater noise, is at levels that do not adversely affect the marine environment Mark Tasker for TG11.
Marine Strategy Framework Directive: an introduction
D10 REVIEW PROCESS April-June 2014: February 2015:
Regional and EU level data streams for D5 and D8
Biodiversity monitoring for the MSFD: Requirements and Options
Monitoring and assessments of biodiversity in the Baltic Sea
Marine Strategy Framework Directive & Aquaculture
In-Depth Assessment (IDA) of MS submissions for MSFD article 8, 9 & 10 compiled and presented by Nikolaos Zampoukas based on material provided by V.
Annex III Annex I Qualitative descriptors Characteristics
HELCOM MORE 8 meeting outcome
Methodological standards for assessment, monitoring and environmental targets Methodological standards = all methods developed and agreed in the framework.
Taking forward the common understanding of Art. 8, 9 and 10 MSFD
TG Data - Inspire Usage Options
Reporting Synergies: MSFD & BHD Miraine Rizzo, Matthew Grima Connell & Luke Tabone Biodiversity & Water Unit Environment & Resources Authority - Malta.
MSFD cross-cutting workshop for GES Decision review
European Commission DG Environment
CGBN Co-ordination Group for Biodiversity and Nature
Technical Subgroup on Marine Litter
Revision of MSFD Decision 2010/477/EU - overview
MSFD 2018 reporting outputs
Marine Strategy Framework Directive 2008/56/EC
Marine Environment and Water Industry
A Sea for Life The Marine Strategy Framework Directive
GES under MSFD and WFD: similarities and differences
Michael Lutz, Paul Smits (JRC.B6/I.2), Lydia Martin-Roumegas (ENV.C.2)
1.
MSFD GES Task Group 10 Definition:
European Commission, DG Environment, Marine Unit
* 100% = 15 Member States.
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
Availability of Methodological Standards for GES Assessment
Use of WFD methods in MSFD initial assessment, GES definition and target setting Preliminary results of in-depth analysis focusing on eutrophication.
Marine Strategy Framework Directive Descriptor 3+
WG GES Drafting Group June 2013 Berlin
MSFD – WFD assessment European Commission DG Environment
Marine Strategy Coordination Group 14 November 2011, Brussels
Article 8 Guidance – Integration levels and methods
Interpretation of Descriptor 8
Uli Claussen Co-lead ECOSTAT
Presentation transcript:

Deltares, Delft, Netherland Work package 2 D2.0 Mapped MSFD spatial data requirements to INSPIRE data model Andrej Abramić, Paul Smits, Carmelo Attardo Marine pilot project 31/08 -01/09 2015 Deltares, Delft, Netherland

Good Environmental Status (GEnS) Commission Decision on criteria and methodological standards on Good Environmental Status 2010/477/EU It applies on: monitoring programmes regional sea assessment reporting process REPORTING MONITORING GES means that uses of the marine resources are conducted at a sustainable level: Ecosystems, including their hydro-morphological, physical and chemical conditions are fully functioning and in balance Maintained biodiversity Human activities are having sustainable effect on marine environment ASSESSMENT

Annex I, 11 qualitative descriptors detailed described in CD 2010/477/EU Descriptor 1. Biodiversity is maintained Descriptor 2. Non-indigenous species do not adversely alter the ecosystem Descriptor 3. The population of commercial fish species is healthy Descriptor 4. Elements of food webs ensure long-term abundance and reproduction Descriptor 5. Eutrophication is minimised Descriptor 6. The sea floor integrity ensures functioning of the ecosystem Descriptor 7. Permanent alteration of hydrographical conditions does not adversely affect the ecosystem Descriptor 8. Concentrations of contaminants give no effects Descriptor 9. Contaminants in seafood are below safe levels Descriptor 10. Marine litter does not cause harm Descriptor 11. Introduction of energy (including underwater noise) does not adversely affect the ecosystem Quality descriptors/Criteria/Indicators

INSPIRE data model VS GES Time series (e.g. concentrations of Chl a, nutrients, priority substances …) Bio-data (e.g. invasive species distribution, affected habitats maps….) Sea areas with common characteristics (e.g. seabed areas significantly affected maps, area impacted by the noise…)

Time series - observation data QD5 Human induced eutrophication: 5.1.1 Nutrients concentration 5.1.2 Nutrient ratios 5.2.1 Chlorophyll concentration 5.2.2 Water transparency 5.3.2 Dissolved oxygen QD8 Concentrations of contaminants are at levels not giving rise to pollution effects 8.1.1 Concentration of the contaminants 8.2.1 Levels of pollution effects on the ecosystem components concerned, having regard to the selected biological processes and taxonomic groups QD9 Contaminants in fish and other seafood for human consumption do not exceed levels established by Community legislation or other relevant standards. 9.1.1 Actual levels of contaminants

EF & OF application schema

Bio-data SD Population demographic characteristics (e.g. body size or age class structure, sex ratio, fecundity rates, survival/mortality rates) (1.3.1; Population condition) Population genetic structure, where appropriate (1.3.2; Population condition) Spawning Stock Biomass (3.2.1; Reproductive capacity of the stock) - primary indicator Biomass indices (3.2.2; Reproductive capacity of the stock) secondary indicator Proportion of fish larger than the mean size of first sexual maturation (3.3.1; Population age and size distribution) Mean maximum length across all species found in research vessel surveys (3.3.2; Population age and size distribution) 95 % percentile of the fish length distribution observed in research vessel surveys (3.3.3; Population age and size distribution) Size at first sexual maturation, which may reflect the extent of undesirable genetic effects of exploitation (3.3.4; Population age and size distribution) secondary indicator Large fish (by weight) (4.2.1; Productivity (production per unit biomass) of key species or trophic groups). Performance of key predator species using the production per unit biomass (productivity) (4.1.1) Multi-metric indexes assessing benthic community condition and functionality, such as species diversity and richness, proportion of opportunistic to sensitive species (6.2.2; Condition of benthic community) Parameters describing the characteristics (shape, slope and intercept) of the size spectrum of the benthic community (6.2.4; Condition of benthic community).

Extension of Species distribution model

Species distribution as O&M

Areas with common characteristics QD2: Non-indigenous species introduced by human activities are at levels that do not adversely alter the ecosystem. Impacts of non-indigenous invasive species at the level of species, habitats and ecosystem, where feasible (2.2.2). QD6: Sea-floor integrity is at a level that ensures that the structure and functions of the ecosystems are safeguarded and benthic ecosystems, in particular, are not adversely affected. Extent of the seabed significantly affected by human activities for the different substrate types (6.1.2). QD7: Permanent alteration of hydrographical conditions does not adversely affect marine ecosystems. Extent of area affected by permanent alterations (7.1.1) QD8: Concentrations of contaminants are at levels not giving rise to pollution effects. Occurrence, origin (where possible), extent of significant acute pollution events (e.g. slicks from oil and oil products) and their impact on biota physically affected by this pollution (8.2.2). QD10: Properties and quantities of marine litter do not cause harm to the coastal and marine environment. Trends in the amount of litter washed ashore and/or deposited on coastlines, including analysis of its composition, spatial distribution and, where possible, source (10.1.1) Trends in the amount of litter in the water column (including floating at the surface) and deposited on the sea-floor, including analysis of its composition, spatial distribution and, where possible, source (10.1.2) Trends in the amount, distribution and, where possible, composition of micro-particles (in particular micro-plastics) (10.1.3) Trends in the amount and composition of litter ingested by marine animals (e.g. stomach analysis) (10.2.1). QD11: Introduction of energy, including underwater noise, is at levels that do not adversely affect the marine environment. Proportion of days and their distribution within a calendar year over areas of a determined surface, as well as their spatial distribution, in which anthropogenic sound sources exceed levels that are likely to entail significant impact on marine animals measured (11.1.1). Trends in the ambient noise level within the 1/3 octave bands 63 and 125 Hz (centre frequency) (re 1μΡa RMS; average noise level in these octave bands over a year) measured by observation stations and/or with the use of models if appropriate (11.2.1).

Sea regions data model and related code list EcosystemStructure (1.7) EnvironmentalImpactOfInvasiveNon- indigenousSpecies (2.2) LevelOfPressureOfFishingActivity (3.1) PhysicalDamageHavingRegardToSubst rateCharacteristics (6.1) SpatialCharacterisationOfPermanentAl terations (7.1) EffectsOfContaminants (8.2) CharacteristicsOfLitterInMarineAndCo astalEnvironment (10.1)    ImpactsOfLitterOnMarineLife (10.2) DistributionInTimeAndPlaceOfLoudLo wAndMidFrequencyImpulsiveSounds (11.1)    ContinuousLowFrequencySound (11.2) Already existing code list as BODC, ICES ….

Areas with common characteristics QD2: Non-indigenous species introduced by human activities are at levels that do not adversely alter the ecosystem. Impacts of non-indigenous invasive species at the level of species, habitats and ecosystem, where feasible (2.2.2). QD6: Sea-floor integrity is at a level that ensures that the structure and functions of the ecosystems are safeguarded and benthic ecosystems, in particular, are not adversely affected. Extent of the seabed significantly affected by human activities for the different substrate types (6.1.2). QD7: Permanent alteration of hydrographical conditions does not adversely affect marine ecosystems. Extent of area affected by permanent alterations (7.1.1) QD8: Concentrations of contaminants are at levels not giving rise to pollution effects. Occurrence, origin (where possible), extent of significant acute pollution events (e.g. slicks from oil and oil products) and their impact on biota physically affected by this pollution (8.2.2). QD10: Properties and quantities of marine litter do not cause harm to the coastal and marine environment. Trends in the amount of litter washed ashore and/or deposited on coastlines, including analysis of its composition, spatial distribution and, where possible, source (10.1.1) Trends in the amount of litter in the water column (including floating at the surface) and deposited on the sea-floor, including analysis of its composition, spatial distribution and, where possible, source (10.1.2) Trends in the amount, distribution and, where possible, composition of micro-particles (in particular micro-plastics) (10.1.3) Trends in the amount and composition of litter ingested by marine animals (e.g. stomach analysis) (10.2.1). QD11: Introduction of energy, including underwater noise, is at levels that do not adversely affect the marine environment. Proportion of days and their distribution within a calendar year over areas of a determined surface, as well as their spatial distribution, in which anthropogenic sound sources exceed levels that are likely to entail significant impact on marine animals measured (11.1.1). Trends in the ambient noise level within the 1/3 octave bands 63 and 125 Hz (centre frequency) (re 1μΡa RMS; average noise level in these octave bands over a year) measured by observation stations and/or with the use of models if appropriate (11.2.1).

MSFD monitoring data model Cover all QD/Criteria/Indicators 2 from 5 identified data models need extension (placeholders) code list extension (SR & OF) to cover need of GES monitoring (sub)programmes Consider O&M data model for bio data (instead extending the SD and HB, model this data with O&M – needed extension?)