Arguments for The Existence of God

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Ontological Argument
Advertisements

The ontological argument is based entirely upon logic and reason and doesn’t really try to give a posteriori evidence to back it up. Anselm would claim.
Arguments for The Existence of God Ontological Cosmological Teleological Ontological Cosmological Teleological.
The Ontological Argument. Anselm’s Argument So the fool has to agree that the concept of something than which nothing greater can be thought exists in.
Ontological Argument for God Introduction to Philosophy Jason M. Chang.
The Ontological Argument
The Ontological Argument
Phil 1000 Bradley Monton Class 2 The Cosmological Argument.
Is Religion Reasonable? Faith Seeking Understanding The ontological argument The cosmological argument The teleological argument (from design)
Ontological arguments Concept of God: perfect being –God is supposed to be a perfect being. –That’s just true by definition. –Even an atheist can agree.
Is Belief in God Reasonable? Faith Seeking Understanding A posteriori arguments (based on experience): The teleological argument (from design) The cosmological.
 Born to a noble family in Italy  As a young man, joins the Benedictine Order in Normandy, France, residing in the monastery there for 30 years – 15.
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 5 The Ontological Argument By David Kelsey.
Pages 420 to 433 IDEAS ON THE EXISTENCE OF GOD. PHILOSOPHIC REASONING ABOUT GOD There is value in discussing God’s existence Three basic positions: Teleological.
Ontological Argument. Teleological argument depends upon evidence about the nature of the world and the organisms and objects in it. Cosmological argument.
Arguments for God’s existence.  What are we arguing for?
Introduction to Humanities Lecture 11 Anselm & Aquinas By David Kelsey.
PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION  Preliminary Issues:  Agreement vs. Tolerance  Different Religions ARE Incompatible  Religious Claims Aren’t True FOR Individuals.
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 5 The Ontological Argument By David Kelsey.
A Mickey Mouse Guide to the Ontological Argument
Arguments for The Existence of God Ontological Cosmological Telelogical Ontological Cosmological Telelogical.
Anselm’s “1st” ontological argument Something than which nothing greater can be thought of cannot exist only as an idea in the mind because, in addition.
The Ontological Argument
Anselm’s Ontological Argument STARTER TASK: ‘Fools say in their hearts, “There is no God”’ Psalm 14:1 Copy this statement down. What do you think it is.
Anselm & Aquinas. Anselm of Canterbury ( AD) The Ontological Argument for the Existence of God (Text, pp )
Chapter 1: Religion Proving God: The Ontological Argument Introducing Philosophy, 10th edition Robert C. Solomon, Kathleen Higgins, and Clancy Martin.
WEEK 3: Metaphysics Natural Theology – Anselm’s Ontological Argument.
The Ontological Argument
The Ontological argument 2 This time it’s critical!
Ontological Argument (Ontological is from the Greek word for being, named by Kant) Learning Objectives To know the specification content To know the meaning.
Introduction to Humanities Lecture 11 Anselm & Aquinas By David Kelsey.
Philosophy of Religion Ontological Argument
The Mickey Mouse Guide to the Ontological Argument
THE ONTOLOGICAL ARGUMENT 1
Gaunilo’s response the stage one of Anselm’s argument
OA: Faith and Reason What difference does the argument make
The Ontological Argument
Kant recap Kant’s 1st point Kant’s 3rd point
The ontological argument
Other versions of the ontological argument
Philosophy MAP 2 and new topic The Idea of God
Unit 2: Arguments relating to the existence of God.
A Mickey Mouse Guide to the Ontological Argument
Kant’s criticisms of the Ontological Argument
Criticisms of the Ontological Argument
The ontological argument: an a-priori argument (ie, deductive rather than inductive) Anselm ‘God’ is that being than which nothing greater can be conceived’;
The Ontological Argument
O.A. so far.. Anselm – from faith, the fool, 2 part argument
Other versions of the ontological argument
Ontological arguments for God’s existence:
Norman Malcolm American philosopher. 11 June 1911 – 4 August 1990.
Lecture 18: God and Reason
The Ontological Argument: An Introduction
The Ontological Argument Ontological
The Ontological argument 2
The Ontological Argument: St. Anselm’s First Argument
Kant’s objection to ontological arguments
In pairs, write a list of all the reasons people believe in God.
THE ONTOLOGICAL ARGUMENT.
Anselm & Aquinas December 23, 2005.
The Big Picture Deductive arguments - origins of the ontological argument Deductive proofs; the concept of ‘a priori’. St Anselm - God as the greatest.
Other versions of the ontological argument
The Ontological Argument
The Ontological Argument
THE ONTOLOGICAL ARGUMENT.
Ontological Argument – challenges against
Arguments for The Existence of God
IN SUPPORT OF THE ONTOLOGICAL ARGUMENT
Explore the weaknesses of the ontological argument. (8 marks)
Clarify the key ideas Logic Definition Premises Outline opinion Flawed
Presentation transcript:

Arguments for The Existence of God Ontological Cosmological Telelogical

God’s Existence Not subjective Not unprovable in principle Natural Theology: Knowing God through reason Biblical Theology: Knowing God through revelation

The Ontological Argument A priori (vs. a posteriori) God exists by definition If you think about the concept of God hard enough, you’ll see that he must exist

Descartes’ Version God is a perfect being A perfect being must contain all perfections Existence is a perfection. God exists.

Anselm’s Version Reductio ad absurdum Indirect proof - show that atheism leads to a contradiction, so theism must be true

Anselm’s Version Assume God doesn’t exist God exists only in the mind The Greatest Conceivable Being (GCB) exists only in the mind But this can’t be true because there is a greater being, which exists not only in the mind but in reality as well

Anselm’s Version The GCB exists ONLY in the mind The GCB isn’t the GCB A is not A <-- Contradiction Atheism leads to a contradiction Atheism is false It’s not true that God doesn’t exist God exists

Anselm’s Version Assume not-G. If not-G, then GCB = not-GCB Not-not-G

Gaunillo’s Objection The Greatest Conceivable Island Objection (Perfect Island, Lost Island) Assume the GCI exists only in the mind. If the GCI exists only in the mind, then a greater island can be imagined, which exists not only in the mind but in reality The GCI isn’t really the GCI (contrad.) The GCI must exist.

Gaunillo’s Objection Anselm: My argument doesn’t work for the greatest conceivable kind of type of being, just the greatest conceivable being in general. Once the limiting, imperfect particulars of the island are eliminated, the Island starts to look like God.

Kant’s Objection Existence isn’t a property (real predicate) The concept of a real $100 is the same as an imaginary $100; it’s just that one is instantiated. Existence applies to a thing and it’s properties together; it is not itself a property.

Malcolm’s Modal Version God is a necessary being. If God’s existence is possible, then it’s actual. God’s existence is possible. God must exist. Objection: Maybe God’s existence isn’t possible

Other Objections God doesn’t’ exist in the mind. Exist “in the mind” equivocates on the term “exists.” The terms “greater” and “greatest” are vague, value-laden or assume a Platonic metaphysics with degrees of reality. Which is greater Jupiter or the DNA molecule?

The Cosmological Argument A posteriori Aquinas 5 ways Motion Change Possibility and necessity Gradation of being Governance of the word