Wavefront Optimized Retreatment after Prior Wavefront

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Quality Control in Refractive Surgery

Advertisements

Evaluation of Enhancement Rates following Hyperopic LASIK with Femtosecond versus Microkeratome Assisted Flap Creation Raj Rajpara, BS * Richard M. Awdeh,

Laser Vision Correction for Myopia, Myopic Astigmatism, Hyperopia and Hyperopic Astigmatism with CustomVis Solid State Laser (213nm) THE ROYAL AUSTRALIAN.

PRK Enhancement with Mitomycin - C after LASIK - a case series

Repeatability of Anterior and Posterior Corneal Higher- Order Aberrations in 4 mm, 6 mm and 8 mm diameters measured by Pentacam System Jadwiga Wojtowicz.

G. Jacob 1,2, C. Bouchard 2, S. Kancherla 1. Edward Hines, Jr. VA Hospital, Hines, IL, Department of Ophthalmology 1. Loyola University Medical Center,

Evaluation of Corneal Parameters and Spherical Aberration After DSAEK Measured with Pentacam System Orkun Muftuoglu, Pawan Prasher, R. Wayne Bowman, Steven.

Effects of IOP Lowering Agents on Myopic Regression after Refractive Surgery Lim, Taehyung M.D., Hong, So Jin M.D., Cho, Beom Jin M.D., Ph.D. Chung Kyu-Hyung.

Femto-Lasik after corneal transplantation

Phacoemulsification in eyes with previous anterior chamber phakic IOL surgery Walton Nosé, MD, PhD 1,2 Adriana dos Santos Forseto, MD 1 Mariana Ávila,

Biometric Accuracy in High Hypermetropes and Myopes

Comparison of Wavefront and Corneal Aberration Changes after Advanced Corneal Surface Ablation and Femtosecond Thin Flap LASIK Tahra AlMahmoud, MBBS 1,

Evaluation of Zonal Equivalent Keratometry Readings After LASIK Timmy Kovoor, MD Orkun Muftuoglu, MD V.Vinod Mootha, MD Steven Verity, MD R. Wayne Bowman,

ASCRS 08 Changes Of Higher Order Aberrations After Excimer Laser Treatment For Moderate Myopia by Means of Preoperative Wavefront Aberration Levels using.

March 2011 Bascom Palmer Eye Institute University of Miami Elaine Wu, M.D. Ana Paula Canto, M.D. William Culbertson, M.D. Sonia Yoo, M.D. Financial disclosure:

P91: Clinical Performance of Phakic Angle-Supported Investigational IOL in Prospective Global Trials, ASCRS 2010, Boston P91: Clinical performance of phakic.

Young Joo Shin, 1 Sang Mok Lee, 2 Jin Choi, 3 Eun Ryung Han, 4 Dong Hae Kim 4 1 H ally m University Gangnam Sacred Heart Hospital 2 3The Armed Forces Medical.

LADARVision4000 Vs VISX CustomVue LADARVision4000 Vs VISX CustomVue CustomCornea CustomCornea A Comparison of Wavefront Guided Refractive Surgery outcomes.

Ruth Lapid-Gortzak MD, Jan Willem van der Linden, BOpt,

M. Vokrojova MD, M. Vokrojova MD, D. Sivekova MD, L. Wagnerova MD D. Sivekova MD, L. Wagnerova MD Prof. P. Kuchynka MD, PhD Prof. P. Kuchynka MD, PhD The.

Refractive Accuracy of LASIK Using the IntraLase and Zyoptix BACKGROUND Wavefront guided customized lasik procedures are designed to correct both lower.

Myoung Joon Kim, MD / Sara Yoon, MD Tracy Purcell, PhD / David J Schanzlin, MD L aser In Situ Keratomileusis versus Photorefractive Keratectomy for the.

Representative Cases : Topography-guided Photorefractive Keratectomy for Irregular Astigmatism following Penetrating Keratoplasty Purpose: Evaluation of.

Laser subepithelial keratomileusis (LASEK) retreatment surgery Colm McAlinden, 1,2 Jonathan Moore, 2,3 1 School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Ulster,

Comparison of LASIK and Mitomycin-C Assisted LASEK for Correction of Refractive Errors After Cataract Surgery Dr. Nitin Balakrishnan, Crystal Vision Laser.

LONG TERM OUTCOMES OF RESTOR IOL IMPLANTATION Lori Dao, Orkun Muftuoglu, V. Vinod Mootha, Steven M. Verity, R. Wayne Bowman, H. Dwight Cavanagh, James.

Faik Orucov*, MD, Sinan Goker*,MD, Abraham Solomon**, MD, Joseph Frucht-Pery**, MD *Refractive Surgery Department, ISTANBUL SURGERY HOSPITAL Istanbul,

10 year follow up of LASIK surgery for low to high levels of myopia Qasim Qasem FRCS, Caitriona Kirwan MRCOpth, Michael O’Keefe FRCS. Institutional Affiliations:

Sherman W. Reeves, MD, MPH 1,3,4 ; Jacob A. Kozisek, OD 1,2 ; Noumia Cloutier-Gill, OD 1,2 ; David R. Hardten, MD 1,2,3,4 Accuracy of Scheimpflug Imaging.

Visual and IOP Outcomes after PRK in Pigment Dispersion Syndrome [Poster Number: P190] Kraig S. Bower, Denise A. Sediq, Charles D. Coe, Keith Wroblewski,

Wavefront-guided Ablation Retreatment in Myopic Eyes Engy M Mohamed MD, Orkun Muftuoglu MD, R.Wayne Bowman MD, V. Vinod Mootha MD, H. Dwight Cavanagh MD,PhD,

Faik Orucov*, MD, Joseph Frucht-Pery, MD, David Landau, MD, Eyal Strassman, MD, Abraham Solomon, MD Clinical outcome of thin corneas after laser in situ.

Comparison of visual function following piggyback implantation of Acrysof ReSTOR intraocular lenses with Tecnis multifocal ZM900 intraocular lenses. Rodrigo.

Refractive Outcomes with Advanced Wavefront-Guided LASIK William Trattler, MD Charles Reilly, MD Consultant to the USAF SG for Refractive Surgery Lackland.

Custom Topographic Neutralizing Technique (TNT) with Topographically-Guided (TG) laser to correct complications David T.C Lin Simon Holland ASCRS 2010.

Presbyopia CT Zyoptix Hyperopia Advanced (Rochester) Nomogram Scott MacRae MD Professor of Ophthalmology Professor of Visual Science University of Rochester.

Poster produced by Faculty & Curriculum Support (FACS), Georgetown University School of Medicine LASIK Combined with Corneal Cross-linking in Eyes with.

THE EBK PROCEDURE FOR CORRECTION OF REFRACTIVE ERRORS

Comparison of Varying the Ablation Diameter in LASIK and LASEK:The Effects on Anterior Chamber Depth (ACD) and Regression at 3 months Minoru Tomita, MD,

Corneal CXL in Pediatric Patients with Progressive Keratoconus Stephanie Wise, Christian Diaz, Karolien Termote, Paul J. Dubord, Martin McCarthy, Sonia.

Postoperative Uncorrected Visual Acuity (UCVA) versus Preoperative Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) with the WaveLight Refractive Suite (Excimer EX500.

Changes of Axial Length After LASIK Surgery: A 3-Year Follow-Up Study

Eun Chul Kim, M.D. , Man Soo Kim,M.D.

William W. Culbertson, MD Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Miami, FL

CustomVue vs Conventional LASIK: one year study

Corneal High-Order Aberrations in Keratoconus

A Comparison of Visual Acuity, Refractive Outcomes, and Satisfaction Between LASIK Performed with a Microkeratome and a Femto Laser Nauman hashmani (MBBS),

L. Espandar, MD ; M. D. Mifflin, MD; M. Moshirfar MD, FACS

ASCRS 2016 New Orleans, Louisiana

Topographically-guided photo-refractive keratectomy (TG-PRK) for complications of refractive surgery David TC Lin, MD, FRCSC Simon Holland, MD, FRCSC,

Early Experience with Descemet’s Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty Combined with Phacoemulsification: Clinical and Refractive Outcome University.

Ashkan M. Abbey, BA, Takeshi Ide, MD, PhD, George D

Clinical outcome of thin corneas after laser in situ keratomileusis

LASIK Application in High Myopic Eyes; 10 Years Survey

No financial interest for all authors

A presentation to: Meeting name Date

Comparison of topography-guided (TGL) to standard LASIK (SL) for hyperopia. How important is adjustment for angle kappa? ASCRS 08 A. John Kanellopoulos,

Preoperative Distribution of Higher Order Aberrations in Patients Undergoing LASIK Perry S. Binder, MS MD.

The authors have no financial interest to disclosure

V isual Outcomes and Complications of Mini-Enhancements after Refractive Surgery Lichtinger A, MD; Purcell TL, Ph.D; Bernabe-Ko J, MD; Schanzlin DJ, MD.

Dr Haralabos Eleftheriadis, M.D Ultralase Clinic Bristol UK

Mohamed Abdelrahman Awadalla,FRCS Magrabi Eye Hospital Cairo - Egypt

The authors have no financial interest

Kh.P.Takhchidi, O.A. Kostin1, A.A. Stepanov1 , A.I. Ovchinnikov1.

University of California, San Diego Shiley Eye Center

Majid Moshirfar, MD, FACS

BOGOTA LASER REFRACTIVE INSTITUTE

Refractive Surgery Outcomes: Corneas Thinner than 500 microns Vs

Stephen G Slade, MD The Laser Center of Houston Houston, Texas

Presentation transcript:

Wavefront Optimized Retreatment after Prior Wavefront Customized LASIK for Myopia Juan C. Arciniega, MD; Engy Mohamed, MD; James P. McCulley, MD, FRCOphth (UK); Wayne Bowman, MD. Department of Ophthalmology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, Texas. USA. Financial Disclosure: JCA and EM have no financial interest to disclose. JPM and WB are consultants of Alcon Inc. This study was supported in part by grants NIH EY12430, EY016664 and an unrestricted grant from the Research to Prevent Blindness, New York, New York.

Background Laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) is a popular technique for correcting myopia, myopic astigmatism, and mild to moderate hypermetropia. Although the predictability is high, undercorrection and/or regression is inevitable in some eyes.1,2 Re-treatments may be necessary and useful to refine the results obtained after the first surgery. 2 Perez-Santonja JJ, Bellot J, Claramonte P, Ismail MM, Alio JL. Laser in situ keratomileusis to correct high myopia. J Cataract Refract Surg 1997;23:372-85. O’Doherty M. O’Keeffe M, Kelleher C. Five year follow-up of laser in situ keratomileusis for all levels of myopia. Br J Ophthalmol 2006;90:20-3.

Purpose To assess the visual outcomes, refractive error, and safety of Wavefront-Optimized (WFO) LASIK retreatment after previous Wavefront- Customized (WFC) LASIK in myopic patients.

Methods A retrospective chart review of 18 eyes from 13 patients whom underwent WFO LASIK retreatment after previous WFC LASIK was performed. All primary LASIK procedures were done using the Visx CustomVueTM laser platform (Abbott Medical Optics, Illinois, USA). All eyes underwent LASIK retreatments using the Wavelight AllegrettoTM Eye-Q 400 excimer laser platform (Alcon Inc., Hünenberg, Switzerland). Ophthalmic examinations, including uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best-spectacle corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), refractive error (RE), and complications were performed preoperatively and postoperatively at 1, 3, and 6 months. Pre-retreatment total root mean square (RMS) from third to sixth order- Zernike polynomials was calculated.

Results Pre-retreatment total high order aberrations (HOA).

Pre-operative and post-operative values of RE Results Table 1. Pre-operative and post-operative values of RE Pre-operative POM 1 POM 3 POM 6 Spherea -0.56±1.4 -0.31±0.5 -0.24±0.36 -0.39±0.35 Range -3.0 to 1.5 -1.25 to 0.5 -1.25 to 0.25 -1.5 to 0 Astigmatisma 0.7±0.5 0.14±0.29 0.17±0.24 0 to 2 0 to 0.75 POM= Post-operative month. aValues expressed as mean ± standard deviation.

Results Comparison between Pre-operative and Post-operative values of RE.

UCVA, BSCVA and SE over follow-up time Results Table 2. UCVA, BSCVA and SE over follow-up time Preoperative POM 1 POM 3 POM 6 UCVA 0.27±0.16 0.062±0.12 0.06±0.12 0.02±0.05 BSCVA 0.01±0.03 -0.01±0.03 -0.03±0.05 SE -0.211±1.4 -0.23±0.4 -0.16±0.29 -0.30±0.29 POM = postoperative month; UCVA = uncorrected visual acuity; SE = spherical equivalent BSCVA = best spectacle corrected visual acuity; UCVA & BSCVA = logMAR scale

Results Comparison between Pre-operative BSCVA and Post-operative UCVA at 6 months

Results Pre-retreatment spherical equivalent changed from -0.21 ± 1.4 D (range from 1.63 to -3.0) to -0.29 ± 0.3 D (range from 0 to -1.0) at 6 months.

Results The pre-retreatment total HOA was 0.48±0.21 (0.24 to 1.01µm) and did not show correlation with the visual outcomes postoperatively. At 6 months all eyes were within ±0.50D of target refraction. The efficacy index (UCVA post-operative/BSCVA pre-operative) was 1.0 at 6 months. The safety index (BSCVA post-operatively/BSCVA pre-operatively) was 1.08 at 6 months. No intraoperative or postoperative complications were reported.

Conclusion Our findings suggest that Wavefront-Optimized ablation retreatment after primary Wavefront-Customized LASIK is safe and predictable, with positive visual and refractive outcomes achieved at 6 months post-treatment. In addition, no correlation between the degree of pre-retreatment total RMS and visual outcomes postoperatively was detected.