Hussein H. Karim1, Imzahim A. Alwan2, and Fatima Assad Tayeb3

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Kyle Withers University of Arizona Acknowledgements: James Callegary USGS Space Grant Symposium April 18, 2009 Using Geophysical and GIS Methods to Develop.
Advertisements

GEO-ELECTRIC INVESTIGATION OF UNDERGROUND LEACHATE DISTRIBUTION AT A CLOSED LANDFILL IN SOUTHWESTERN ONTARIO, CANADA Joshi, Siddharth 1, Yang, Jianwen.
An EM Perspective of Selected Topographic Highs in Transdanubia Ahmed Al-Yaqoobi 2, Judit Petrovszki 1, Joseph Michael Court 2 1 Eötvös Loránd University.
Environmental and Exploration Geophysics I tom.h.wilson Department of Geology and Geography West Virginia University Morgantown,
Well logging course for fourth year
Nancy Helen Natek The University of New Mexico SAGE 2001
RESISTIVITY STUDY SPRING 2010 FIELD EXERCISE APPLIED GEOPHYSICS 492/692 Amie Lamb, Katie Ryan, Justin Skord and Nicole Shivers.
Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration Techniques  The specification sates that you should be able to:  Describe the geophysical exploration techniques.
SEMBODAI RUKMANI VARATHARAJAN ENGINEERING COLLEGE DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING FOUNDATION ENGINEERING BY KARTHIVELU.
Basic Geologic and Hydrogeologic Investigations
Remote Sensing and geophysical Methods for Evaluation of Subsurface Conditions Matt Houston.
Problem 7 Time section does not perfectly image depth section Dipping reflectors are incorrectly located Moho displays “velocity pull-down” beneath the.
GEOPHYSICAL FIELD SCHOOL Lake Balaton, Hungary August 31 to September 14, 2007 MOHAMED AL RAJHI, MARTIN VEASEY, EVA PUDLEINER, PETER TAKA’CS.
Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Environmental and Exploration Geophysics I tom.h.wilson Department of Geology and.
Eagle Mountain – Woodfibre Gas Pipeline Project Geotechnical and geophysical tests James Lota, FortisBC September 25, 2014.
IEEE Wind Farm Collector System Grounding for Personal Safety Summary of Topics.
Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography High resistivity stream channel gravels are delineated by the 250 ohm-meter contour Data acquired with.
Environmental and Exploration Geophysics I tom.h.wilson Department of Geology and Geography West Virginia University Morgantown, WV.
Conclusions Geophysical Methods for Road Construction and Maintenance Hedi Rasul 1&2, Caroline Karlsson 1, Imran A. Jamali 1, Robert Earon 1, Bo Olofsson.
Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Environmental and Exploration Geophysics I tom.h.wilson Department of Geology and.
SOES6002: Modelling in Environmental and Earth System Science CSEM Lecture 1 Martin Sinha School of Ocean & Earth Science University of Southampton.
Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration Techniques  The specification sates that you should be able to:  Describe the geophysical exploration techniques.
Resistivity Method One of the main distinctions between the terrain conductivity and resistivity methods is that the resistivity method employs direct.
RESISTIVITY SOUNDING West Tahoe Fault & UNR North Parking Lot MiniRes L&R Instrument.
 The site is located in Tulkarem city.  The building consists of seven stories, and the area of each stories is about 700 m 2, the aim of this research.
Introducing the Stratagem EH4. Stratagem EH4 Hybrid-Source Magnetotellurics Frequency range of 10 Hz to 90k Hz Approx. depth of investigation from 5m.
GG 450 Feb 27, 2008 Resistivity 2. Resistivity: Quantitative Interpretation - Flat interface Recall the angles that the current will take as it hits an.
Midterm results Average mark 73.7% (29.5 / 40) Median mark 30 / 40.
ELECTRICAL RESISTIVITY SOUNDING TO STUDY WATER CONTENT DISTRIBUTION IN HETEROGENEOUS SOILS 1 University of Maryland, College Park MD; 2 BA/ANRI/EMSL, USDA-ARS,
NS/V noise NS/H noise NS/H earthquakes The use of a very dense seismic array to characterize the Cavola, Northern Italy, active landslide body. By P. Bordoni.
Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics 11 Apr 2014 © A.R. Lowry 2014 For Mon 14 Apr: Burger (§ ) Last Time: DC Electrical Resistivity Modeling.
Environmental and Exploration Geophysics I tom.h.wilson Department of Geology and Geography West Virginia University Morgantown, WV.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES NSLS – II CFAC Review Conventional Facilities Geotechnical Conditions Tom Joos Civil/Structural Engineer BNL Plant Engineering.
Basic resistivity models 2 Layer 4 Layer 3 Layer Characteristic Curves.
Environmental and Exploration Geophysics I tom.h.wilson Department of Geology and Geography West Virginia University Morgantown, WV.
Types of resistivity surveys There are several variations on resistivity surveys: 1.A “lateral profile” aims to locate anomalies, along a line or on a.
Environmental and Exploration Geophysics I tom.h.wilson Department of Geology and Geography West Virginia University Morgantown,
Environmental and Exploration Geophysics I tom.h.wilson Department of Geology and Geography West Virginia University Morgantown, WV.
Characteristic curves and their responses. The method of Characteristic Curves (Two layer case) Summary of steps Set  1 =  a1 Construct the ratios 
National Geophysical Research Institute (NGRI), a constituent Laboratory of CSIR, was established in 1961 with the mission to carry out research in multidisciplinary.
Environmental and Exploration Geophysics I tom.h.wilson Department of Geology and Geography West Virginia University Morgantown,
Last Time: DC Electrical Resistivity In a layered medium, current penetration into a second layer depends on depth of layer interface, resistivities as:
 All civil engineering projects like dams, reservoirs etc. constructed on earth crust and constructed by material obtained from the crust.  So it is.
SITE INVESTIGATION ARUN MUCHHALA ENGINEERING COLLEGE-DHARI
İs tanbul University Faculty of Engineering Hacer DÜZEN a, Halil Murat ÖZLER b a,b İstanbul University, Faculty of Engineering, Department of Geological.
EBS101 ENGINEERING GEOLOGY DR HAREYANI ZABIDI
Introduction Do air-filled caves cause high-resistivity anomalies? A six-case study from the Edwards Aquifer Recharge Area, San Antonio, TX Mustafa Saribudak.
Electrode Spread (Array type)
1 Dam Geophysics- An Indispensable Tool for Dam Health Check & Dam Monitoring Presented by: Dr. Sanjay Rana, Director, PARSAN.
Vertical electrical sounding (VES), also known as‘electrical drilling’ or ‘expanding probe’, is used mainly in the study of horizontal or near-horizontal.
Results and Discussion
Increasing the Success Rate of Groundwater Exploration in Developing Nation Using Geophysical Methods: Case of a Small Community in Nigeria. K. S. Isiorho,
Andrzej Kotyrba Central Mining Institute Katowice, Poland
Environmental and Exploration Geophysics I
ERT247 GEOMATICS ENGINEERING
Results and Discussion
10th Inkaba yeAfrica Workshop Mabunda Vincent & Dr C.J.S. Fourie
The use of 2D Resistivity Imaging Technique to investigate subsurface contamination at Sungai Besar landfill site, Selangor ,Malaysia Tan Chin Lee, Abdul.
Qing Zhu1, Henry Lin1, Xiaobo Zhou1, J.A. Doolittle2 and Jun Zhang1
Presentation for ISZA, Békéscsaba, Hungary 5-6. April 2013
Electrical Resistivity Survey of Yosemite Valley, CA
WE PUT YOU ON SOLID GROUND
GEOPHYSICAL AND GEOTECHNICAL SITE CHARACTERIZATION AT LAGOS CENTRAL AREA OF LAGOS STATE, NIGERIA Oyedele, K.F., Adegbola R.B., Abidoye O.E., Titiloye-Ajose.
Creating a Conference Poster
Lecture 15 Resistivity-GPR
Environmental and Exploration Geophysics I
Learning to Use Electrical Resistivity Soundings for Interpretation of (Sediment) Stratigraphy Remke L. Van Dam - Michigan State University,
Electrical Resistivity Lab
The Crossley Heath School, Halifax
Presentation transcript:

Hussein H. Karim1, Imzahim A. Alwan2, and Fatima Assad Tayeb3 The 2nd International Conference on Buildings, Construction and Environmental Engineering- BCEE2 17-18 October 2015 Beirut, Lebanon Delineation Landfill Depth using 2D Electrical Resistivity Imaging (ERI) Technique in Kut City, Eastern Iraq Hussein H. Karim1, Imzahim A. Alwan2, and Fatima Assad Tayeb3 1-D Resistivity Survey: Schlumberger array is used for resistivity sounding survey. The VES curves can be classified into two groups; the first involves 5 VES points consists of four geoelectrical layers of QH, KQ, QQ and QH. The second group appears three ngeoelectrical layers involving 9 VES points of Q type. Fig. 1 a and b shows resistivity curves for VES 29 and VES 31 as representative curves. The apparent resistivity sections show a decrease in apparent resistivity values with depth, and they give a primary picture about the distribution of deposits. 2–D Resistivity Surveys: The results of this survey study are also used to create 2D images with RES2DINV software. From the analysis of all sections, the maximum depth of investigation was about 34 m and resistivity values are ranging from 1 to more than1000 Ω.m. Fig. 2 shows the inverse models of 2D imaging for the parallel Lines 27 to 31as representative sections. Fig. 3 shows of isoresistivity map of the landfill layer with values ranging between 30 to more than 170 Ω.m. While, Fig. 4 shows depth of the landfill layer with values ranging between 2 to 15 m. Maximum values of resistivity are concentrated in the NW and NE parts of the area, while minimum values are concentrated in SE of the area. The maximum values of landfill depth appear in NE and SW parts of the area and the minimum values are concentrated in the NW and SE parts of the study area. 1 Professor, Build. & Const. Eng. Dep., Univ. of Technology, Baghdad, Iraq. E-mail: husn_irq@yahoo.com. 2 Asst. Professor, Build. & Const.Eng. Dep., University of Technology, Baghdad, Iraq. (e-mail: mzahim74@yahoo.com). 3 M.Sc. in Geomatics Engineering. (e-mail: fm.alkobaisi@gmail.com). Background Surface geophysical methods afford quick, inexpensive and non- invasive means to help in characterization the subsurface geophysical formation. They provide information on subsurface properties, such as soil and landfill thickness, depth to bedrock, location and distribution of conductive fluids, and fracture zones and faults. However, there are numerous limitations to the information obtained by the geophysical techniques and they shall not be expected to provide reliable results under all circumstances. All geophysical information should be crossed-checked by borings and/or other direct methods of exploration. Electrical resistivity of the soil is considered as an indicator for the variation of soil properties. Electrical Resistivity Survey is carried out to determine the resistivity distribution of earth layers. Electrical current is injected to the ground and then potential difference is measured. This measured potential difference pattern provides information on the subsurface condition and electrical properties of the soil. Objectives The main objective of the present study is applying detailed 2D resistivity surveying in the site of investigation to delineate the depth of landfill by correlating resistivity data with geotechnical data taken from boring. CONCLUSIONS 1. The landfill has been identified as the upper resistive feature (layer) consists of domestic wastes and broken fragments and is characterized by its low N-values. 2. The landfill layer appears at different depths from ground surface to a depth of 8 m and it was recognized with high resistivity ranging from 30 Ω.m to more than 1000 Ω.m. 3. The inversion sections also show a layer with medium resistivity (5-30 Ω.m) represents the clay and layer overlapping with layer by very low resistivity (˂ 5 Ω.m) that represents the silty clay. 4. The outputs interpretation is in agreement geotechnical data obtained from the borehole logs available in the site of the study. 5. The resistivity and depth contour maps show that the resistivity values are ranging between 30 to more than 170 Ω.m and the depth values are ranging between 2 to 15 m. FIELD WORK The aim of this work is to identify the landfill depth in the site for engineering purposes. ABEM Terrameter SAS 4000 was used for data collection of ERI. The total area of the site under investigation is about 29000 m2. Field work consists two parts, 1-D and 2-D surveys. For 1-D survey, 14 VES points shown in Figure 4 have been investigated along spreads of 50 to 100 m long by using Schlumberger array for sounding technique. For 2D imaging survey, 36 spreads with total length of 3304 m and different electrode spacing have been surveyed using Wenner-Schlumberger array for all spreads. DATA INTERPRETATION After the field survey, this step involved converting the apparent resistivity values into true resistivity (for 1-D) and into resistivity model section (for 2-D) that can be used for interpretation